Re: Recommending get-orig-source for packages ?

2013-12-05 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Dec 05, 2013, at 06:27 PM, Ben Finney wrote:

>We already have https://wiki.debian.org/onlyjob/get-orig-source>,
>in particular 
>https://wiki.debian.org/onlyjob/get-orig-source#Repackaging_orig.tar>.
>
>Are you expecting ‘debian/repack’ to be significantly different when
>repacking Python-language packages, as opposed to the general case of
>repacking an upstream source tarball? What differences would be great
>enough to warrant a Python-library-specific recipe?

Not particularly, and I doubt most packages will need repacking.  I was just
thinking a link might be useful for folks landing on the LibraryStyleGuide
page, but I don't feel strongly about it.

-Barry


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131205201340.425c657a@anarchist



Re: Python 3 as default

2013-12-05 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Dec 04, 2013, at 06:16 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:

>Why should it be Jessie+1 instead of Jessie?

The only reason I suggested Jessie+1 was because the official call for release
goal deadline was Sept 30, which we've obviously passed.  However, as you and
I discussed off-line, the more modest goal of having only Python 3 in the
minimal install is achievable and probably doesn't require an official release
goal.  So let's JFDI! :)

(Jessie+1 will be a good timeframe to discuss larger Python 2 minimization
goals, even if we know we can't ever completely it.)

-Barry


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature