Source package name suggestion?
I plan to file an ITP to package the 'q' library: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/q/2.4 'q' seems like a terrible source package name, so I'll probably pick 'python-q' as the spn. Obviously we'll have python-q and python3-q[*] binary packages. I just wanted to see if anybody has strong opinions either way. -Barry [*] q 2.4 doesn't support Python 3 but there's an upstream issue/pull request that adds it and wfm. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Source package name suggestion?
On 22 August 2013 16:25, Barry Warsaw wrote: > I plan to file an ITP to package the 'q' library: > > https://pypi.python.org/pypi/q/2.4 > > 'q' seems like a terrible source package name, so I'll probably pick > 'python-q' as the spn. Obviously we'll have python-q and python3-q[*] binary > packages. I just wanted to see if anybody has strong opinions either way. > > -Barry > > [*] q 2.4 doesn't support Python 3 but there's an upstream issue/pull request > that adds it and wfm. I bet it's unrelated to QQ (largest IM network in the world, unless skype has caught up after merging MSN). Regards, Dmitrijs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/canbhluhsm81x0nge4pq4_+osqf3h4nrlnmubbu48hykrm53...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Source package name suggestion?
On Aug 22, 2013, at 05:15 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: >I bet it's unrelated to QQ (largest IM network in the world, unless >skype has caught up after merging MSN). It's just a cute little "quick" debug/logging package. Ka-ping gave a lightening talk on it at Pycon and it seemed like a brilliantly simple solution for a simple but common problem. -Barry -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130822133159.0574150e@anarchist
