Bug#671272: RFS: pyswisseph/1.77.00.0+dfsg-2 [ITP]

2012-05-02 Thread Paul Elliott
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Package: sponsorship-requests
  Severity: normal 

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyswisseph"

 * Package name: pyswisseph
   Version : 1.77.00.0+dfsg-2
   Upstream Author : Stanislas Marquis 
 * URL : http://pyswisseph.chaosorigin.com/
   : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/pyswisseph
 * License : GPLV2+
   Section : python

  It builds those binary packages:

python-swisseph - Python extension to the Swiss Ephemeris
python-swisseph-docs - Python extension to the Swiss Ephemeris 
 (common documentation)
python3-swisseph - Python extension to the Swiss Ephemeris (Python 3)

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/pyswisseph

  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyswisseph/pyswisseph_1.77.00.0+dfsg-2.dsc

  More information about pyswisseph can be obtained from 
  http://pypi.python.org/pypi/pyswisseph
  http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/pyswisseph.git
  git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/pyswisseph.git

  This python extension module can be tested using openastro.org,
  a python program that is also being RFSed:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/openastro.org


  Changes since the last upload:

  * switch to dfsg package
  * change copyright to dep-5, fix copyright file
  * Remove ${python:Breaks}, nothing generates this substitution variable 
  - anymore.
  * simplify description.
  * remove --buildsystem=python_distutils from debian/rules
  - dh is able to detect the build system automatically.
  * email message id in Forwarded: line.
  * add newline to override file.
  * change name to python-swisseph
  * rebuild pydoc from source.
  * create a documentation package
  * create a python3 version of this extension
  - using recommendations in:
  - http://wiki.debian.org/Python/LibraryStyleGuide


  Regards,
   Paul Elliott


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#671277: RFS: openastro.org/1.1.25+dfsg-4 [ITP]

2012-05-02 Thread Paul Elliott
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openastro.org"

 * Package name: openastro.org
   Version : 1.1.25+dfsg-4
   Upstream Author : Pelle van der Scheer 
 * URL : http://openastro.org/
   : https://launchpad.net/~pellesimon/+archive/ppa
 * License : GPLV3+
   Section : graphics

  It builds those binary packages:

openastro.org - Fully featured Open Source Astrology software

  To access further information about this package, please visit 
  the following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/openastro.org
  http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/openastro.git
  git://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/openastro.git

  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openastro.org/openastro.org_1.1.25+dfsg-4.dsc

  More information about hello can be obtained from http://openastro.org/

  This python program depends on the python extension module pyswisseph
  which is also being RFSed:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/pyswisseph

  Changes since the last upload:

  * create dfsg package
  - delete pyswisseph/pyswisseph-1.75.01/doc
  * change bad permissions before build; use "a-" in command
  * restore source directory by deleting openastro
  * upgrade debian/copyright to dep-5
  * "debhelper (>= 7.0.50~)" instead of "debhelper (>= 7.0.50)"
  * use X-Python-Version, not XS-Python-Version
  * remove XB-Python-Version.
  * make openastromod private; move /usr/share/openastro.org


  Regards,
   Paul Elliott


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Help in packaging rubber

2012-05-02 Thread Hilmar Preusse
Dear python maintainers,

I intend/plan to adopt the rubber package[1]. I prepared a package
for testing, it is available from here[2].

When building the package two warnings occur:

- dh_pysupport: This program is deprecated, you should use dh_python2 instead. 
Migration guide: http://deb.li/dhs2p
- dpkg-deb: warning: 'debian/rubber/DEBIAN/control' contains user-defined field 
'Python-Version'

Yes, I've read http://deb.li/dhs2p, but I'm failing to understand
what I have to do in the "Before you begin" section. Unfortunately I
don't speak python myself, this might be the reason.

Please be so kind to teach me, what needs to be changed. Please keep
me in Cc, I'm not subscribed.

Regards,
  Hilmar

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/670755
[2] http://wagner.debian.org/~hilmar-guest/
-- 
http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/#206401 http://counter.li.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20120502213921.ga23...@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de



Re: Help in packaging rubber

2012-05-02 Thread olivier.sal...@codeless.fr
 I am not a python expert so consider the following as the result of
previous experiences only.

Le 5/2/12 11:39 PM, Hilmar Preusse a écrit :
> Dear python maintainers,
>
> I intend/plan to adopt the rubber package[1]. I prepared a package
> for testing, it is available from here[2].
>
> When building the package two warnings occur:
>
> - dh_pysupport: This program is deprecated, you should use dh_python2 
> instead. Migration guide: http://deb.li/dhs2p
I think you have to set ---with=python2 in your rules file after the dh $@
> - dpkg-deb: warning: 'debian/rubber/DEBIAN/control' contains user-defined 
> field 'Python-Version'
t from old memories I think it is fine.
>
> Yes, I've read http://deb.li/dhs2p, but I'm failing to understand
> what I have to do in the "Before you begin" section. Unfortunately I
> don't speak python myself, this might be the reason.
In the Before you begin, they ask you to check there is no existing
package using same namespace (like Java package).
If your package uses namespace rubber.Rubber for example, there should
be no other rubber in Debian packages to avoid conflicts.

Olivier
> Please be so kind to teach me, what needs to be changed. Please keep
> me in Cc, I'm not subscribed.
>
> Regards,
>   Hilmar
>
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/670755
> [2] http://wagner.debian.org/~hilmar-guest/
>
> -- 
> gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438  (keyring.debian.org)
> Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335  D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438