Re: dh_python2 transition

2011-05-03 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 05/02/2011 04:45 PM, Arto Jantunen wrote:
> How about concentrating on getting rid of dh_python and python-central
> for wheezy? My understanding is that consensus about those two being
> deprecated and needing to be removed should be achievable without too
> much flaming.

dh_python should be gone already, I hope.
python-support is kinda sane implemented, so I wouldn't mind to keepo it
for yet another release - but I think we should get rid of it, too.

Btw, is there any lintian check to see if the ld dh_python is being
used?


-- 
 Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer
 http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org
 GPG Fingerprints: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dbfb37b.7030...@bzed.de



Re: dh_python2 transition

2011-05-03 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 09:49, Bernd Zeimetz  wrote:
> On 05/02/2011 04:45 PM, Arto Jantunen wrote:
>> How about concentrating on getting rid of dh_python and python-central
>> for wheezy? My understanding is that consensus about those two being
>> deprecated and needing to be removed should be achievable without too
>> much flaming.
>
> dh_python should be gone already, I hope.
> python-support is kinda sane implemented, so I wouldn't mind to keepo it
> for yet another release - but I think we should get rid of it, too.

Assuming that dh_python2 is better, and why would you wanna keep
python-support? Is it too much pain to port existing packages using
it?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi=g=hYzw=hrtuzvngghdh-jj0o...@mail.gmail.com



Re: dh_python2 transition

2011-05-03 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 05/03/2011 10:36 AM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 09:49, Bernd Zeimetz  wrote:
>> On 05/02/2011 04:45 PM, Arto Jantunen wrote:
>>> How about concentrating on getting rid of dh_python and python-central
>>> for wheezy? My understanding is that consensus about those two being
>>> deprecated and needing to be removed should be achievable without too
>>> much flaming.
>>
>> dh_python should be gone already, I hope.
>> python-support is kinda sane implemented, so I wouldn't mind to keepo it
>> for yet another release - but I think we should get rid of it, too.
> 
> Assuming that dh_python2 is better, and why would you wanna keep
> python-support? Is it too much pain to port existing packages using
> it?

There might be more important tasks than to migrate away from something
that works very well.

-- 
 Bernd ZeimetzDebian GNU/Linux Developer
 http://bzed.dehttp://www.debian.org
 GPG Fingerprints: ECA1 E3F2 8E11 2432 D485 DD95 EB36 171A 6FF9 435F


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dbfc755.70...@bzed.de



Re: dh_python2 transition

2011-05-03 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:13, Bernd Zeimetz  wrote:
> On 05/03/2011 10:36 AM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 09:49, Bernd Zeimetz  wrote:
>>> On 05/02/2011 04:45 PM, Arto Jantunen wrote:
 How about concentrating on getting rid of dh_python and python-central
 for wheezy? My understanding is that consensus about those two being
 deprecated and needing to be removed should be achievable without too
 much flaming.
>>>
>>> dh_python should be gone already, I hope.
>>> python-support is kinda sane implemented, so I wouldn't mind to keepo it
>>> for yet another release - but I think we should get rid of it, too.
>>
>> Assuming that dh_python2 is better, and why would you wanna keep
>> python-support? Is it too much pain to port existing packages using
>> it?
>
> There might be more important tasks than to migrate away from something
> that works very well.

Even if the tradeoff is something that works even better, and is set
to be the standard (i.e. consistency)?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi=z2me7zuwrnvmbnafs811a7oq...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Request to Join Project Python Applications Packaging Team

2011-05-03 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Wednesday, May 04, 2011 02:23:58 AM nore...@alioth.debian.org wrote:
> Johannes Ring has requested to join your project.
> Comments by the user:
> Hi,
> 
> I am currently a member of the DPMT, but now I have started working on some
> packages that fits better under the umbrella of PAPT. Therefore, I would
> like to request to join the team.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Johannes Ring

Added you to the team.  Welcome.

Scott K


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201105040236.41772.deb...@kitterman.com