Re: Compressing objects.inv?

2011-01-04 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 03 janvier 2011 à 12:26 +0100, Michael Fladischer a écrit : 
> I've filed bugs with severity minor to all (30) affected packages
> (except python-sphinx, thanks for the quick fix :-) ).

You might want to close them or merge them with #608907 which contains
the correct fix.

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.
: :' : “You would need to ask a lawyer if you don't know
`. `'   that a handshake of course makes a valid contract.”
  `---  J???rg Schilling


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1294154084.933.34.ca...@meh



Re: Compressing objects.inv?

2011-01-04 Thread Jakub Wilk

* Josselin Mouette , 2011-01-04, 16:14:
I've filed bugs with severity minor to all (30) affected packages 
(except python-sphinx, thanks for the quick fix :-) ).


You might want to close them or merge them with #608907 which contains
the correct fix.


Fixing dh_compress won't magically fix existing binaries, so IMO bugs 
Michael filed are still useful.


--
Jakub Wilk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110104152737.ga3...@jwilk.net



Python license

2011-01-04 Thread Vincent Bernat
Hello and happy new year!

Do you know  any Python module that the author  states as being licensed
under "Python  license"? Since  Python license is  stated as  a contract
between  the  licensee  and  the  PSF,  I wonder  how  to  put  that  in
debian/copyright.

My problem is in python-cerealizer:

,
| # Cerealizer
| # Copyright (C) 2005-2008 Jean-Baptiste LAMY
| # Copyright (C) 2008 Peter Eckersley
| #
| # This program is free software.
| # It is available under the Python licence.
`

Upstream  licensed  its  software  using  Python license  to  allow  the
inclusion into Python.
-- 
BOFH excuse #132:
SCSI Chain overterminated


pgpJWDRMVgzzq.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Python license

2011-01-04 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
$> grep -il 'Python.*license' ~doc/*/copyright 
/usr/share/doc/calibre-bin/copyright
/usr/share/doc/calibre/copyright
/usr/share/doc/cython/copyright
/usr/share/doc/cython-dbg/copyright
/usr/share/doc/diveintopython/copyright
/usr/share/doc/ggobi/copyright
/usr/share/doc/idle/copyright
/usr/share/doc/idle-python2.6/copyright
/usr/share/doc/ipython/copyright
/usr/share/doc/jython/copyright
/usr/share/doc/liblucene2-java/copyright
/usr/share/doc/libmusicbrainz4c2a/copyright
/usr/share/doc/libmysqlclient16/copyright
/usr/share/doc/libmysqlclient-dev/copyright
/usr/share/doc/libpython2.6/copyright
/usr/share/doc/libqscintilla2-5/copyright


On Tue, 04 Jan 2011, Vincent Bernat wrote:

> Hello and happy new year!

> Do you know  any Python module that the author  states as being licensed
> under "Python  license"? Since  Python license is  stated as  a contract
> between  the  licensee  and  the  PSF,  I wonder  how  to  put  that  in
> debian/copyright.

> My problem is in python-cerealizer:

> ,
> | # Cerealizer
> | # Copyright (C) 2005-2008 Jean-Baptiste LAMY
> | # Copyright (C) 2008 Peter Eckersley

> | # This program is free software.
> | # It is available under the Python licence.
> `

> Upstream  licensed  its  software  using  Python license  to  allow  the
> inclusion into Python.
-- 
=--=
Keep in touch www.onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110104181751.gd15...@onerussian.com



Re: Python license

2011-01-04 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jan 04, 2011, at 07:13 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote:

>My problem is in python-cerealizer:
>
>,
>| # Cerealizer
>| # Copyright (C) 2005-2008 Jean-Baptiste LAMY
>| # Copyright (C) 2008 Peter Eckersley
>| #
>| # This program is free software.
>| # It is available under the Python licence.
>`
>
>Upstream  licensed  its  software  using  Python license  to  allow  the
>inclusion into Python.

I think this is essentially meaningless. ;)   The "Python license" is an
imprecise way to refer to the Python Software Foundation License that Python
itself is released under.  It is not correct to use that license unaltered in
third party libraries, even to allow its inclusion in Python.

For that, the PSF only accepts contributions licensed under the Academic Free
License v2.1, or the Apache License v2.0.  Together with a signed contributor
agreement, the code would then be relicensed under the PSF license for release
with Python.

All the gory details are in the following links:

http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/
http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/
http://wiki.python.org/moin/PythonSoftwareFoundationLicenseFaq

Cheers,
-Barry



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature