Re: Please remove Pycasa from PAPT
[Charlie Smotherman, 2010-09-29] > POX would you please remove pycasa from PAPT. The upstream author has > decided to maintain the package. It has never been uploaded so it is > safe to remove it. Thanks why can't you do it yourself, using `svn rm svn://...`? -- Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer www.ozarowski.pl www.griffith.cc www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100929070927.gd22...@piotro.eu
Re: python transition incomplete
Le lundi 27 septembre 2010 à 20:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:51 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Le dimanche 26 septembre 2010 à 23:53 +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit : > > > >gnome-python-extras 2.25.3-5 > > > python-gda depends on both python2.5 and libpython2.6. > > > > Fixed in 2.25.3-6. Please unblock. > > I thought such cases were, according to Jakub's mail, harmless? Well, it leads to installing both Python versions while only one of them is needed. Certainly not RC but annoying. Cheers, -- .''`. : :' : “You would need to ask a lawyer if you don't know `. `' that a handshake of course makes a valid contract.” `--- J???rg Schilling -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1285745615.10269.5.ca...@meh
Re: Bug#598432: python-apt: upgrade fails
[CCed debian-python] On Mi, 2010-09-29 at 14:31 +0200, Stefan Fleischmann wrote: > Just to clarify, the "quick fix" I posted here was supposed to help people to > get rid of the buggy package. It doesn't fix the actual package. > > Like I said before, the problem is not only the version number handling by > pycentral but also the path of the installed files! If you have look at the > package 0.7.97.1 for amd64 or 0.7.98 for i386 you'll see that files are put > in /usr/lib/python3.1 > In this package however files are put in /usr/lib/python3 instead which causes > the problem you describe when simply changing the version number to 3.1. > > If you think pycentral should handle integer version numbers (at least it > shouldn't exit with an error I guess) please file a bug report there. > > But to summarize for this package I think the files are put in the wrong place > (compared with the package from testing and packages for i386) and the version > number in the mentioned config file is wrong. AFAIK, /usr/lib/python3 is the new location. Dear debian-python subscribers, could someone please propose a fix for python-apt? I do not intent to drop Python 3 support, but considering that there is a new RC bug each month because python3 packaging changes I start to wonder whether this is worth the effort. Python maintainers: Breaking backward compatibility in unstable is not nice, especially not every (second) month. You should have thought about it while python3 was still in experimental, not afterwards. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1285765930.341.9.ca...@jak-thinkpad
Re: Bug#598432: python-apt: upgrade fails
[Julian Andres Klode, 2010-09-29] > Dear debian-python subscribers, could someone please propose a fix for > python-apt? I do not intent to drop Python 3 support, but considering > that there is a new RC bug each month because python3 packaging changes > I start to wonder whether this is worth the effort. I'll try to send you a patch this evening > Python maintainers: Breaking backward compatibility in unstable is not > nice, especially not every (second) month. You should have thought about > it while python3 was still in experimental, not afterwards. Dear release team: please notify Debian developers and upstream authors about freeze date at least 6 months in advance so that everything can be planed in a sane way, TIA -- Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer www.ozarowski.pl www.griffith.cc www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100929133525.gi22...@piotro.eu
Re: Bug#598432: python-apt: upgrade fails
On Mi, 2010-09-29 at 15:12 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > [CCed debian-python] > > On Mi, 2010-09-29 at 14:31 +0200, Stefan Fleischmann wrote: > > Just to clarify, the "quick fix" I posted here was supposed to help people > > to > > get rid of the buggy package. It doesn't fix the actual package. > > > > Like I said before, the problem is not only the version number handling by > > pycentral but also the path of the installed files! If you have look at the > > package 0.7.97.1 for amd64 or 0.7.98 for i386 you'll see that files are put > > in /usr/lib/python3.1 > > In this package however files are put in /usr/lib/python3 instead which > > causes > > the problem you describe when simply changing the version number to 3.1. > > > > If you think pycentral should handle integer version numbers (at least it > > shouldn't exit with an error I guess) please file a bug report there. > > > > But to summarize for this package I think the files are put in the wrong > > place > > (compared with the package from testing and packages for i386) and the > > version > > number in the mentioned config file is wrong. > AFAIK, /usr/lib/python3 is the new location. > > Dear debian-python subscribers, could someone please propose a fix for > python-apt? I do not intent to drop Python 3 support, but considering > that there is a new RC bug each month because python3 packaging changes > I start to wonder whether this is worth the effort. It seems that doko already provides a patch, mvo takes a look at it now. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1285767388.341.16.ca...@jak-thinkpad
Re: python transition incomplete
On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 09:33 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le lundi 27 septembre 2010 à 20:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > > On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:51 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > Le dimanche 26 septembre 2010 à 23:53 +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit : > > > > >gnome-python-extras 2.25.3-5 > > > > python-gda depends on both python2.5 and libpython2.6. > > > > > > Fixed in 2.25.3-6. Please unblock. > > > > I thought such cases were, according to Jakub's mail, harmless? > > Well, it leads to installing both Python versions while only one of them > is needed. Certainly not RC but annoying. Unblocked. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1285793548.27100.27.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
