Re: Major update of python-support

2009-02-22 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO La nuit ayant déjà recouvert  d'encre ce jour du mercredi 18 février
2009, vers 23:55, Josselin Mouette  disait :

> As such, it would be very nice if people maintaining various kinds of
> Python packages could test building them with the new version and see
> whether the resulting packages actually work. This way, we could avoid
> triggering dozens of FTBFS bugs when making the change.

Do we need to  upload a new version when there is  a fix needed? In this
case, I suppose we should  use python-support in unstable instead of the
one in experimental?
-- 
panic("Lucy in the sky");
2.2.16 /usr/src/linux/arch/sparc64/kernel/starfire.c


pgpSYtV6xDFww.pgp
Description: PGP signature


new numpy tests fail

2009-02-22 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi,

so the new numpy is in Debian, finally...

But one test fails:

In [1]: import numpy

In [2]: numpy.test()
Running unit tests for numpy
/var/lib/python-support/python2.5/nose/plugins/manager.py:386:
UserWarning: Module nose was already imported from
/var/lib/python-support/python2.5/nose/__init__.py, but
/var/lib/python-support/python2.5 is being added to sys.path
  import pkg_resources
NumPy version 1.2.1
NumPy is installed in /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/numpy
Python version 2.5.4 (r254:67916, Feb 17 2009, 20:16:45) [GCC 4.3.3]
nose version 0.10.4
..FK..
==
FAIL: test_umath.TestComplexFunctions.test_against_cmath
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.5/nose/case.py", line 182, in runTest
self.test(*self.arg)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/numpy/core/tests/test_umath.py",
line 268, in test_against_cmath
assert abs(a - b) < atol, "%s %s: %s; cmath: %s"%(fname,p,a,b)
AssertionError: arcsinh -2j: (-1.31695789692-1.57079632679j); cmath:
(1.31695789692-1.57079632679j)

--
Ran 1726 tests in 9.747s

FAILED (KNOWNFAIL=1, failures=1)
Out[2]: 




If anyone (David:) has time to look into it, it'd be great.

Ondrej


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Python related changes for unstable/squeeze

2009-02-22 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:04:54PM +0100, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> ... 
> PS Ana: do you hate me already or should I continue? ;-P

Piotr, please, whatever another interpreted language you are
programming in now, stop.

Ana


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org