ok to upload cython 0.10.3-1?
Hi, is it ok if I upload 0.10.3-1? E.g. will it break the sage build (or anything else)? Or should I wait after the Lenny release. Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [debian-sage] ok to upload cython 0.10.3-1?
Should be fine for sage purposes; the Sage 3.0.5 in sid is using the embedded cython 0.9.8, and the current version used by Sage is 0.10.3, so that'll be what I'll want when I upgrade to Sage 3.3.0. -Tim Abbott On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Ondrej Certik wrote: > > Hi, > > is it ok if I upload 0.10.3-1? E.g. will it break the sage build (or > anything else)? > > Or should I wait after the Lenny release. > > Ondrej > > --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "debian-sage" group. > To post to this group, send email to debian-s...@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > debian-sage+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/debian-sage?hl=en > -~--~~~~--~~--~--~--- > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Presentation and some questions/remarks about numpy/scipy packages
Hi, I am a developer of numpy and scipy, and I would be interested in helping numpy/scipy debian packages to be better on both Debian and Ubuntu. As a user of both Debian and Ubuntu, and one of the main developer working on build issues for numpy/scipy, I think I can be useful :) I looked at the recent debian packaging (current trunk), and I noticed two things which I think are mistakes, or at least seem strange: - build-depends has a depdency on libfftw3-dev. Numpy does not use FFTW at all, and never had to my knowledge, at least from numpy 0.9.8 (almost 3 years ago). - build-conflicts against atlas. I guess this is to avoid explicitely linking against ATLAS - this can be avoided easily without the build-conflicts which is a bit of a pain: ATLAS=None python setup.py build should build numpy (and scipy) without ATLAS, even if atlas is detected. cheers, David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Presentation and some questions/remarks about numpy/scipy packages
Hi David! On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 9:10 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > Hi, > > I am a developer of numpy and scipy, and I would be interested in > helping numpy/scipy debian packages to be better on both Debian and > Ubuntu. As a user of both Debian and Ubuntu, and one of the main > developer working on build issues for numpy/scipy, I think I can be > useful :) I am really glad you are interested in the packaging. Welcome! :) Do you know how to build it from our svn? If not, feel free to ask. Since python-sphinx 0.5 is in unstable now, do you think we should build with the docs as they are in the debian packaging svn? I simply used numpy svn and copied the doc directory into the tarball, see the debian/rules. > I looked at the recent debian packaging (current trunk), and I noticed > two things which I think are mistakes, or at least seem strange: > > - build-depends has a depdency on libfftw3-dev. Numpy does not use > FFTW at all, and never had to my knowledge, at least from numpy 0.9.8 > (almost 3 years ago). I think it could probably be just removed, unless someone objects. > - build-conflicts against atlas. I guess this is to avoid explicitely > linking against ATLAS - this can be avoided easily without the > build-conflicts which is a bit of a pain: > > ATLAS=None python setup.py build > > should build numpy (and scipy) without ATLAS, even if atlas is detected. Thanks for the tip --- I think there was some reason for this conflict, but I can't remember now. Let's wait a bit what other think here. Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Presentation and some questions/remarks about numpy/scipy packages
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 10:00 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: >> Hi David! >> >> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 9:10 PM, David Cournapeau wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am a developer of numpy and scipy, and I would be interested in >>> helping numpy/scipy debian packages to be better on both Debian and >>> Ubuntu. As a user of both Debian and Ubuntu, and one of the main >>> developer working on build issues for numpy/scipy, I think I can be >>> useful :) >> >> I am really glad you are interested in the packaging. Welcome! :) >> >> Do you know how to build it from our svn? If not, feel free to ask. > > Well, I know how to build a debian package from source and how to fix > some issues, but I am not familiar with a lot of tools around. Is > there a simple guideline about this ? Our page is here: http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonModulesTeam and in particular I wrote this howto: http://wiki.debian.org/PAPT_Howto E.g. the section Building the package. Btw, feel free to update the PythonModulesTeam page above with instructions how to build the package, that would be really useful. >> Since python-sphinx 0.5 is in unstable now, do you think we should >> build with the docs as they are in the debian packaging svn? I simply >> used numpy svn and copied the doc directory into the tarball, see the >> debian/rules. > > Doc is a pain to deal with with distutils, generally. I don't know > what's the doc status in 1.2 (the documentation infrastructure is one > of the big change since 1.2 for the upcoming 1.3). > > I think we can ignore doc changes for 1.2*, and focus on 1.3, since we > would need to change anyway for 1.3. Ok, so should I leave the current tarball, as you can see, I am using svn -r6221: get-orig-source: wget http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/numpy/numpy-1.2.1.tar.gz; \ tar xzf numpy-1.2.1.tar.gz; \ cd numpy-1.2.1; \ svn export -r6221 http://svn.scipy.org/svn/numpy/trunk/doc; \ cd ..; \ tar czf python-numpy_1.2.1.ds.orig.tar.gz numpy-1.2.1; \ rm -rf numpy-1.2.1 numpy-1.2.1.tar.gz > >> Thanks for the tip --- I think there was some reason for this >> conflict, but I can't remember now. Let's wait a bit what other think >> here. > > According to the debian/changelog file and the related bug on debian > bug tracker, this was to avoid depending on ATLAS at link stage. This > can be done by the command above - which is not really documented. > Generally, the numpy build system is a bit arcane and 'magic'. In the > short term, I hope to clarify most of oddities for easier packaging > (not just Debian, BTW). Thanks, that's excellent. Ondrej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
