Re: ITP: Name for "real" python-pgsql module
Bernd Zeimetz pisze: Paweł Tęcza wrote: So, I'm affraid that packaging of python-pypgsql module is necessary in that situation. I'm not a Python programmer and don't want to change the sources. Well.. you could ask upstream. Actually I'd vote against adding just another PG binding as the others implement the DB api well and work well - so as long as I can't see any additional features pypgsql brings, I'm not conviced to sponsor it. Hi Bernd, Thanks for the reply! It seems that I don't need to debianize real python-pgsql module. Gordon Messmer, a creator of Courier-Pythonfilter has written a patch with psycopg2 support and we are testing it now. My best regards, Pawel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: [RFR] urlwatch
[Franck Joncourt, 2008-12-19 21:21] > >> /usr/share/urlwatch/examples/hooks.py.example > >> /usr/share/urlwatch/examples/urls.txt.example > > > > how about installing these in /usr/share/doc/urlwatch/examples ? > > You are right, that is a good idea. [...] > Upstream does that when setup.py is installed and I do not see how I > could bypass this without rewriting the setup.py file. The argument you can simply move (mv) files/directory in debian/rules -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Need help with revelation
Hello debian-python, I have been maintaining revelation in the past, a GNOME2 Password manager. I will most likely orphan this package because: - I no longer use revelation - I don't have a sponsor right now - Upstream is discontinued since, Tuesday 16. January 2007 11:44 There are a couple of bugs left, for some of them I do have an upload ready, which you can dget from: http://bc-bd.org/www/revelation/revelation_0.4.11-4.dsc Please note that the above release does not include a NMU, 0.4.11-3.1, which is currently in sid and lenny. Simply removing the package may be a bad idea, as people who are using revelation will then no longer be able to access their password lists. Additionally upstream is looking for someone to take over the stable branch development, aka. bug fixing etc. Maybe somebody on this list wants to take over maintaining revelation, or even better, maintaining upstream. Regards Stefan PS: please CC me, as I am not on this list. -- A man was reading The Canterbury Tales one Saturday morning, when his wife asked "What have you got there?" Replied he, "Just my cup and Chaucer." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Need help with revelation
On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:00:40 + b...@bc-bd.org wrote: >... >Simply removing the package may be a bad idea, as people who are using >revelation will then no longer be able to access their password lists. >... Removing the package from the archive won't remove it from installed systems. If it's dead upstreamam then I'd suggest it ought to go. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
