Re: RFS: nautilus-clamscan
OoO En ce début de soirée du mercredi 14 mai 2008, vers 21:27, Clement
Lorteau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> Thank you for the review. I followed your recommendations and uploaded
> the new package to debian.mentors.net. See my comments below.
You can use "test_files/*" for debian/nautilus-clamscan.examples. You
may also add a debian/watch file this is very useful.
Your GPG key is not signed by anyone. You should try to meet someone
that can sign it, preferably a DD or someone whose key is signed by a
DD. Look at this page:
https://nm.debian.org/gpg.php
If you live in Paris or near Paris, I can sign your key.
--
panic("bad_user_access_length executed (not cool, dude)");
2.0.38 /usr/src/linux/kernel/panic.c
pgpf7teLX085W.pgp
Description: PGP signature
debhelper 7 and python-central
Howdy all,
debhelper version 7 introduces a number of new features
http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/dh_implementation/> that can
greatly simplify a 'debian/rules' file.
One important feature, that can dramatically cut the number of
'dh_foo' commands specified in the 'debian/rules' file, is called
"sequences", that are automagically-determined sequences of 'dh_foo'
commands that will be run, logging the fact and not re-running a
command unnecessarily.
One can simply call 'dh install' to run all the commands that
debhelper determines need to be done for the install sequence; one can
also partially run sequences up to a certain point, or resume from a
certain point. See 'dh(1)' for more on this feature.
Early in the 7.0.x series, debhelper gained the ability to detect a
Python package and run 'dh_pysupport' in the 'install' sequence,
allowing a single-line 'dh install' to perform all the tasks needed in
an 'install' target. However, it currently seems to lack corresponding
support for 'python-central'.
I'm using 'python-central' in 'bugs-everywhere' and have partially
converted it to debhelper 7; the Bazaar repository is online
http://bzr.debian.org/bzr/collab-maint/bugs-everywhere/be.debian/>.
The 'debian/rules' file currently needs to explicitly skip the steps
that would otherwise call 'dh_pysupport', which would fail on this
'python-central'-using package.
e.g. instead of being able to say 'dh install', I need to write::
install: build
dh install --until installdirs
$(CURRENT_PYTHON_VERSION) setup.py install
${DEB_PYTHON_INSTALL_ARGS_ALL}
dh install --before pysupport
dh install --after pysupport
and instead of 'dh binary-indep', I need to write::
binary-indep: build install
dh binary-indep --before pysupport
dh_pycentral
dh binary-indep --after pysupport
Does anyone know debhelper better than me, and can suggest ways to
improve that package's current 'debian/rules' file to make better use
of debhelper 7 with 'python-central'?
--
\ "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does |
`\ knowledge." —Charles Darwin, _The Descent of Man_, 1871 |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debhelper 7 and python-central
Ben Finney wrote: > Does anyone know debhelper better than me, and can suggest ways to > improve that package's current 'debian/rules' file to make better use > of debhelper 7 with 'python-central'? python-central could include a dh sequence file, then you could use something like: dh binary-indep --with python-central I might need to add a Debian::Debhelper::Dh_Lib::remove_command to the sequence file interface, if it needs a way to actually remove the dh_pysupport call, rather than just adding a dh_pycentral call. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: debhelper 7 and python-central
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ben Finney wrote: > > Does anyone know debhelper better than me, and can suggest ways to > > improve that package's current 'debian/rules' file to make better use > > of debhelper 7 with 'python-central'? > > python-central could include a dh sequence file, then you could use > something like: > > dh binary-indep --with python-central That would be ideal, yes. > I might need to add a Debian::Debhelper::Dh_Lib::remove_command to > the sequence file interface, if it needs a way to actually remove > the dh_pysupport call, rather than just adding a dh_pycentral call. Sounds like a good feature. I'd vote for calling it 'skip_command' though, with the resulting '--skip-command foo' interface. -- \“I don't accept the currently fashionable assertion that any | `\ view is automatically as worthy of respect as any equal and | _o__) opposite view.” —Douglas Adams | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
