Re: Generation of "python" dependencies for public extensions versus python2.3
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > The scripts in /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/GMenuSimpleEditor call > plain "python". That's probably causing the dependency. After I've "sed 1d" the files, the Depends of python-gmenu still has: Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.6-6), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.10.0), libgnome-menu2 (>= 2.14.0), python-central (>= 0.5), python (>= 2.3), python (<< 2.4) Python-Version: 2.3 So, it won't be possible to use the package with python2.3 after the switch. To recap: - the gnome-menus source has XS-Python-Version: current - the python-gmenu binary ends up with Python-Version: 2.3 - python-gmenu ships a private module, GMenuSimpleEditor, with no python shebang, which will be byte-compiled by pycentral - python-gmenu ships a public extension, /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gmenu.so Wouldn't it be best to permit python2.3 instead of python in this case? Perhaps it's because the package is named "python-XXX", which means it should always ship its public extension for the current version of Python? I tried renaming the binary package to something else, not using python in the name, the result was still the same: Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.6-6), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.10.0), libgnome-menu2 (>= 2.14.0), python-central (>= 0.5), python (>= 2.3), python (<< 2.4) Python-Version: 2.3 I even tried using XS-Python-Version: 2.3, and it resulted in the same binary headers. Is it possible at all to achieve a python2.3 package?? I think the only solution I have is to build for all versions now. -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Generation of "python" dependencies for public extensions versus python2.3
Please could you check dh_python with the patch from #378604? Loïc Minier writes: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2006, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > > The scripts in /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/GMenuSimpleEditor call > > plain "python". That's probably causing the dependency. > > After I've "sed 1d" the files, the Depends of python-gmenu still has: > Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.6-6), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.10.0), > libgnome-menu2 (>= 2.14.0), python-central (>= 0.5), python (>= > 2.3), python (<< 2.4) > Python-Version: 2.3 > > So, it won't be possible to use the package with python2.3 after the > switch. > > To recap: > - the gnome-menus source has XS-Python-Version: current > - the python-gmenu binary ends up with Python-Version: 2.3 > - python-gmenu ships a private module, GMenuSimpleEditor, with no >python shebang, which will be byte-compiled by pycentral > - python-gmenu ships a public extension, >/usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/gmenu.so > > Wouldn't it be best to permit python2.3 instead of python in this case? > > Perhaps it's because the package is named "python-XXX", which means it > should always ship its public extension for the current version of > Python? >I tried renaming the binary package to something else, not using python > in the name, the result was still the same: > Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.6-6), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.10.0), > libgnome-menu2 (>= 2.14.0), python-central (>= 0.5), python (>= > 2.3), python (<< 2.4) > Python-Version: 2.3 > > I even tried using XS-Python-Version: 2.3, and it resulted in the same > binary headers. > > Is it possible at all to achieve a python2.3 package?? > > > I think the only solution I have is to build for all versions now. > > -- > Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
