Good day,
I just skimmed the last thread "multiple pythons and the default" and
checked http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPythonTODO
S, when does Unstable move to 2.4? I have webpy users wanting to use
2.4. I am reluctant to make 2.4 packages as they look really sucky. But
if this 2.4 transition is going to take a long time, then I guess I'll
have to.
Best wishes,
- Forwarded message from Kai Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Kai Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: feedparser
Date: Sun, 7 May 2006 23:44:54 +0900
Reply-To: Kai Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sam$ python
Python 2.3.5 (#2, Mar 6 2006, 10:12:24)
[GCC 4.0.3 20060304 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-10)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import feedparser
>>>
sam$ python2.4
Python 2.4.4c0 (#2, Apr 22 2006, 22:39:06)
[GCC 4.0.3 (Debian 4.0.3-1)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import feedparser
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in ?
ImportError: No module named feedparser
>>>
I based my webpy python package on yours.
Now some people are complaining it doesn't work with Python 2.4
http://groups.google.com/group/webpy/browse_thread/thread/b552cbf75bd60db8/1135fd9fb265b55a?lnk=arm#1135fd9fb265b55a
So I guess I need to make 2.4 packages. But, I wonder why you don't deal with
this issue with your package?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=358900
- End forwarded message -
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]