Re: new python2.3 bug surfaced in apt-listchanges
Kevin B. McCarty writes: > Thought I'd email you this directly since the BTS is pretty broken these > days. actually, this is a bug in db4.1, or at least triggered in db4.1. Run the very same python versions in testing and in unstable, or revert back libdb4.1 to the version from sarge, and the message goes away. I do see this on sid, but not sarge. Any hints welcome ... Matthias > -- > Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics Department > WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/Princeton University > GPG: public key ID 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544 > > -- Forwarded message -- > Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 22:22:01 -0500 (EST) > From: Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: python2.3: Latest python upgrade breaks apt-listchanges yet again > > Package: python2.3 > Version: 2.3.3-4 > Severity: important > > The latest update to python2.3 breaks apt-listchanges yet again: (no, this > isn't the _ascii_lower() bug) > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/apt-listchanges", line 67, in ? > seen = anydbm.open(config.save_seen, 'c') > File "/usr/lib/python2.3/anydbm.py", line 83, in open > return mod.open(file, flag, mode) > File "/usr/lib/python2.3/dbhash.py", line 16, in open > return bsddb.hashopen(file, flag, mode) > File "/usr/lib/python2.3/bsddb/__init__.py", line 192, in hashopen > d.open(file, db.DB_HASH, flags, mode) > bsddb._db.DBError: (38, 'Function not implemented -- process-private: unable > to initialize environment lock: Function not implemented') > > Presumably the item noted in the changelog for python2.3 version 2.3.3-4 > is the culprit: > > * Fix broken _bsddb module. setup.py picked up the wrong library. > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: testing/unstable > Architecture: powerpc > Kernel: Linux arcturus 2.4.20-ben10+fixed-brk #1 Mon Dec 1 17:58:21 EST 2003 > ppc > Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 > > Versions of packages python2.3 depends on: > ii libbz2-1.01.0.2-1A high-quality block-sorting > file > pi libc6 2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries > an > ii libdb4.1 4.1.25-10 Berkeley v4.1 Database Libraries > [ > ii libncurses5 5.3.20030719-4 Shared libraries for terminal > hand > ii libreadline4 4.3-9 GNU readline and history > libraries > ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7c-5 SSL shared libraries > ii python2.3.3-4An interactive high-level > object-o > ii zlib1g1:1.2.1-3 compression library - runtime > > -- no debconf information > > -- > Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics Department > WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/Princeton University > GPG: public key ID 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544 >
Some installiation bug for zope-exuserfolder and related
Hi, I dunno if this is the right place and if you already fixed this, and sorry if this is not the way to report a bug (I don't have the time to RTFM, I just want to do a quick install). Anyways, here's my two cents: I got this message when trying to install zope-exuserfolder (0.10.10-5), (and related stuff) using debian's dselect utlility on a debian 2.4.18-bf2.4 unstable: : Setting up zope-cmfplone (1.0.5.20030909-2) ... postinst cannot determine the version of python used in /usr/sbin/zope-z2 ... please file a bug report. dpkg: error processing zope-cmfplone (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of plone: plone depends on zope-cmfplone (= 1.0.5.20030909-2); however: Package zope-cmfplone is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing plone (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Setting up zope-exuserfolder (0.10.10-5) ... postinst cannot determine the version of python used in /usr/sbin/zope-z2 ... please file a bug report. dpkg: error processing zope-exuserfolder (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: zope-cmfplone plone zope-exuserfolder E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Some errors occurred while unpacking. I'm going to configure the packages that were installed. This may result in duplicate errors or errors caused by missing dependencies. This is OK, only the errors above this message are important. Please fix them and run [I]nstall again Press enter to continue. : The problem seems to come from /usr/sbin/zope-z2 in this (only) line: exec python2.2 -O /usr/lib/zope/z2.py $@ should be: exec /usr/bin/python2.2 -O /usr/lib/zope/z2.py $@ based on the regular expression from postinst located at: /var/lib/dpkg/info/zope-exuserfolder.postinst After that it works fine. Regards, Federico.
Re: [zope] Zope packaging policy
Since http://people.debian.org/~luca/zope-policy.html exists no more, I have moved the latest file I had to http://people.debian.org/~madduck/zope/zope-policy.sgml http://people.debian.org/~madduck/zope/zope-policy/ Unless there are objections, I would be happy to maintain the policy. If you have patches, please send them to me. I think we should keep this on debian-devel. I do not read debian-python. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [zope] Zope packaging policy
On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 12:57:40PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > http://people.debian.org/~luca/zope-policy.html > exists no more, I have moved the latest file I had to Luca is currently in a state of forced vacation from email reading and debian stuff. I think the right thing is doing the updating job waiting for him. cheers, c.
Re: [zope] Zope packaging policy
also sprach Cosimo Alfarano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.01.11.1715 +0100]: > Luca is currently in a state of forced vacation from email reading > and debian stuff. > > I think the right thing is doing the updating job waiting for him. I will not make any policy changes until he's back. We will only concentrate on getting that which is there finalised. Does anyone know when he's expected to be back? -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! signature.asc Description: Digital signature
