Re: Summary of python transition problems
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:47:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > * gimp-python: #207304 > > automake problem, which it seems I failed to fix. > > but one of it's build-dep's is listed as: > > -gimp1.2 (1.2.3-2.4 to -) > > * Maintainer: Ben Gertzfield > * Valid candidate > > so probably, it doesn't make sense to move it to testing, if gimp1.2 > is removed. No, you just need to fix that build-dependency to point at gimp. gimp1.2 is now a transitional package. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Re: Summary of python transition problems
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 02:02:38PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-29 22:47]: > > but one of it's build-dep's is listed as: > > -gimp1.2 (1.2.3-2.4 to -) > > * Maintainer: Ben Gertzfield > > * Valid candidate > > so probably, it doesn't make sense to move it to testing, if gimp1.2 > > is removed. > Actually, gimp1.2 still exists; there were two gimp1.2 packages and > one got removed. Does testing cope with this? >gimp1.2 | 1.2.3-2.4 | testing | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, > ia64, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc >gimp1.2 |1.2.5-3 | unstable | all Yes, testing copes with this just fine; since gimp1.2 now comes from the gimp source package, when gimp makes it into testing the old source/binary packages will be removed. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer pgpUj54L9qZNt.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Summary of python transition problems
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:47:09PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > Missing builds > > == > > * libapache2-mod-python: powerpc > already asked for rebuild ... no reaction. I could take a look at this in the next day or two, if no one else bites. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature
