Re: pure python and postinst

2003-04-05 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:20:22AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> G'day, 
> 
> just going through my old inbox messages that didn't seem to be replied
> to;
> 
> On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 13:11, Steve M. Robbins wrote:

Well, thanks!  I had forgotten about this.  I'm no longer sure what
prompted my question.  Perhaps it was idle curiousity ...


> > I've just finished my first attempt at packaging a python module.
> > This module (people.debian.org/~smr/pyvtk) is purely python.
> > 
> > I followed the "python policy" outlined in /usr/share/doc/python, and
> > also looked at a couple of example packages.
> > 
> > One thing I noticed in the packages (that isn't covered in the policy)

... or maybe I was wondering why this common practice isn't covered in
the python packaging document that I was using at the time.

A summary of this little thread would make a nice addition to
the policy if it is not yet in there.

-S




bug reports preventing the python transition

2003-04-05 Thread Matthias Klose
This list may be incomplete, but at least all these bugs keep the
python packages out of testing. It seems that all these bugs can be
easily fixed ...

Do you know of other python dependent packages with RC reports?

Matthias

Package: gnue-designer (debian/main)
Maintainer: Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  167973 [   ] gnue-designer_0.1.1-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing 
build-depends?
  171332 [R  ] gnue-designer: Missing dependency on wxpython

Jeff, libwxgtk2.4-python is now the current version. Please fix!

Package: python-bsddb3 (debian/main)
Maintainer: Nathan Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  185372 [   ] python-bsddb3: Must depend on particular version of python, 
as per Python Policy.

Fixable. Will do a NMU next week.

Package: python-gnome (debian/main)
Maintainer: Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  183250 [   ] python-gnome: Package un-installable

Torsten, Christian, this package is installable (again?). Tagged as
fixed.

Package: python-omniorb2 (debian/main)
Maintainer: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  187079 [   ] python-omniorb2_2.0-2(unstable/arm): missing build-depends

Bastian, seems to be fixable ...

Package: python-pyogg (debian/main)
Maintainer: Christopher L Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  182358 [   ] [T] python-pyogg: Unable to import the module

Tagged "sarge", but still in the "release critical list". Why?

Package: python2.1-oss (debian/main)
Maintainer: Tommi Virtanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  166652 [   ] python2.1-oss: module performs wrong ioctl() calls

Tommi, Radim, there is a patch in the report, but no explanation, that
Audio_speed is replaced by Audio_stereo. Tommi lowered the severity,
but didn't CC control. Done now.

Package: python2.2-twisted (debian/main)
Maintainer: Moshe Zadka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  183968 [   ] python2.2-twisted: segfault during installation

Marc, Moshe, I am unable to reproduce this. I am lowering the
severity, as this seems to be only seen in a mixed testing/unstable
environment.

Package: python2.2-ztutils (debian/main)
Maintainer: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  171122 [   ] python2.2-ztutils: missing python module ExtensionClass

Wichert, you even replied on the report ...

Package: zope-ldap (debian/main)
Maintainer: Andrea Fanfani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  185800 [   ] does not work with current zope

Andrea, Luca, please could you look into this one?

Package: zope-worldpilot (debian/main)
Maintainer: Behan Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  122653 [   ] zope-worldpilot: please rebuild with new python packages.
  67644  [   ] Dependency error in zope-worldpilot

This package looks rotten. I'll file a request to remove it from
unstable.




RC wxwindows reports preventing python 2.1 -> 2.2 transition

2003-04-05 Thread Matthias Klose
Hi,

For wxwindows2.2 and 2.4 I see two RC reports. Any chance to fix these
soon?

What about removing wxwindows2.3 from unstable. AFAICR this was a
"development" release anyway. Same for 2.2, no other packages seem to
depend on this version anymore.

Thanks, Matthias




Re: bug reports preventing the python transition

2003-04-05 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Previously Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: python2.2-ztutils (debian/main)
> Maintainer: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   171122 [   ] python2.2-ztutils: missing python module ExtensionClass
> 
> Wichert, you even replied on the report ...

I uploaded a fix which was rejected and which seems to have been lost
(it's not in queue/reject and it's not on my system). I'll see if I can
do another upload this weekend.

Wichert.

-- 
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   http://www.wiggy.net/
A random hacker




Re: bug reports preventing the python transition

2003-04-05 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi.

Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: zope-worldpilot (debian/main)
> Maintainer: Behan Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   122653 [   ] zope-worldpilot: please rebuild with new python packages.
>   67644  [   ] Dependency error in zope-worldpilot
> This package looks rotten. I'll file a request to remove it from
> unstable.
Upstream is dead since >1 year, too, and still advertises the thing as
incompatible with recent zope. IIRC, there have been 0 CVS commits on SF for a
year and 1 post on the mailing list. (Even though it's unfortunate because I
liked the idea.)

Note that Anthony Towns also mentioned it in his assignments on debian-release.

Cheers

T.




pgpWvUu8XAPEC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: RC wxwindows reports preventing python 2.1 -> 2.2 transition

2003-04-05 Thread Ron

Howdy,

On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 11:54:42AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> For wxwindows2.2 and 2.4 I see two RC reports. Any chance to fix these
> soon?

The biggest issue with them IMO is the png mess, and the right fix to
avoid thrashing on all sides is probably to transition them to gtk2
sooner now rather than later.

I'll bump it all further up my stack again though, thanks.

> What about removing wxwindows2.3 from unstable. AFAICR this was a
> "development" release anyway. Same for 2.2, no other packages seem to
> depend on this version anymore.

Yes, they are certainly candidates for removal asap.  When I looked
yesterday poedit still showed up in the 2.3 deps, but I don't see that
now.  (apt-cache showpkg reports some terribly weird things for me from
time to time...)

If they really have no further deps I'd be glad to see 2.2 and 2.3 gone.

I'll file a request at ftp-admin if no-one listening pings me that they've
already removed them :-)

cheers,
Ron





Re: RC wxwindows reports preventing python 2.1 -> 2.2 transition

2003-04-05 Thread Matthias Klose
Ron writes:
> > What about removing wxwindows2.3 from unstable. AFAICR this was a
> > "development" release anyway. Same for 2.2, no other packages seem to
> > depend on this version anymore.
> 
> Yes, they are certainly candidates for removal asap.  When I looked
> yesterday poedit still showed up in the 2.3 deps, but I don't see that
> now.  (apt-cache showpkg reports some terribly weird things for me from
> time to time...)

poedit was NMUed and maybe gets a new maintainer soon.

> If they really have no further deps I'd be glad to see 2.2 and 2.3 gone.
> 
> I'll file a request at ftp-admin if no-one listening pings me that they've
> already removed them :-)

thanks.

Matthias




Re: bug reports preventing the python transition

2003-04-05 Thread Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 01:54:00PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Upstream is dead since >1 year, too, and still advertises the thing as
> incompatible with recent zope. IIRC, there have been 0 CVS commits on SF for a
> year and 1 post on the mailing list. (Even though it's unfortunate because I
> liked the idea.)

I've sent a mail to both the maintainer and the developer list: let's wait
one or two weeks.

BTW 67644 seen to aply no more: file syntax is correct, and compiling those
files with python 2.1 work. Many (not all!) of the lines of the files
mentioned in the report end with ^M, so i suppose that this bug raise only
with the old (1.5?) python interpreter.
To fix 122653 we simply need someone to build and upload it again: the real
problem is the incompatibility with zope 2.6.1. They state[1] the have release
a 1.1.0-alpha4 which is wrks with 2.6.1: that's a point to wait for their
reply.

I suggest to wait for the other bugs to be closed, then we see if something
happened for worldpilot: if it will still prevent python transition we may ask
for its removal.

For what concern zope-ldap, i've no ldap access to test it: sorry.

ciao,
-- 
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis  | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][-A-Za-z]*[iy]'?s$   | as fine or rude sentences have
Infinite loop: see `Loop, infinite'.| something in common: they
Loop, infinite: see `Infinite loop'.| don't depend on the language.


pgpICGgsvZGyD.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: bug reports preventing the python transition

2003-04-05 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi.

Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 01:54:00PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
>>Upstream is dead since >1 year, too, and still advertises the thing as
>>incompatible with recent zope. IIRC, there have been 0 CVS commits on SF for a
>>year and 1 post on the mailing list. (Even though it's unfortunate because I
>>liked the idea.)

> I've sent a mail to both the maintainer and the developer list: let's wait
> one or two weeks.
Oh. That'll be 2 mails July-December 2001, in 1 mail in 2002 and one (yours) in
2003. The ones after (the first week of) July 2001 are all about WP not running
with zope>=2.2 and are unanswered. So I'll increase to dead since July, 8th
2001. (And the message from July 7th is the answer "are you dreaming" to a
request for a translation.) It has to be added to these statistics that
development wasn't exactly responsive. (I.e. I remember that there was a long
period of time before worldpilot.org was set up when there was no support. The
time when it flourished was rather short.)

> To fix 122653 we simply need someone to build and upload it again: the real
> problem is the incompatibility with zope 2.6.1. They state[1] the have release
> a 1.1.0-alpha4 which is wrks with 2.6.1: that's a point to wait for their
> reply.
I didn't find your reference, but worldpilot.org talks about 2.1.6 not 2.6.1.

> I suggest to wait for the other bugs to be closed, then we see if something
> happened for worldpilot: if it will still prevent python transition we may ask
> for its removal.
I'd happily adopt it if there was any hope. My point is that there isn't.
WorldPilot is an unfinished, unmaintained product that once had potential. I
don't think it provides any value to Debian, on the contrary, it contributes to
the erosion of the average quality of software packaged by debian. The day it's
gone, debian will be a bit better. (I did use worldpilot, did some fixes, but
didn't even know where to send them before I abandoned wp.)

For some reason zope webmail products don't seem to last very long. If there's
need for a replacement, I could ITP the nuxeo groupware suite. They seem to have
incorporated the (french) WebMail product. The license needs some investigating
(5*GPL, 2*something in LICENSE.txt) , but that is IMO the only zope webmail
amongst those I now that has any chance.

Cheers

T.


pgpwh2T0GSlbB.pgp
Description: PGP signature


gnue-designer is now binary-all

2003-04-05 Thread Jeff Bailey
gnue-designer is now binary all.  This bug is from before I took over
the package and I completely redid the packaging when I took it over.
Closing this bug.

-- 
I have a habit of wearing my mind on my sleeve.
I have a history of losing my shirt.
 - Barenaked Ladies.




Re: bug reports preventing the python transition

2003-04-05 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 11:41:20AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:

> Package: gnue-designer (debian/main)
> Maintainer: Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   167973 [   ] gnue-designer_0.1.1-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: missing 
> build-depends?

Bah, thought I had closed this one, sorry!

>   171332 [R  ] gnue-designer: Missing dependency on wxpython

> Jeff, libwxgtk2.4-python is now the current version. Please fix!

Sure.  I'll upload this on Monday (I do this package at work).  I had
been waiting for the new version of designer to get released, hadn't
realised it was holding on python.

Tks,
Jeff Bailey

--
I have a habit of wearing my mind on my sleeve.
I have a history of losing my shirt.
 - Barenaked Ladies.




Re: bug reports preventing the python transition

2003-04-05 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 11:41:20AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: python-omniorb2 (debian/main)
> Maintainer: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   187079 [   ] python-omniorb2_2.0-2(unstable/arm): missing build-depends

fix in incoming

bastian

-- 
Spock: We suffered 23 casualties in that attack, Captain.


pgpsPcVmNJYac.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: bug reports preventing the python transition

2003-04-05 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 11:41:20AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: python-gnome (debian/main)
> Maintainer: Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   183250 [   ] python-gnome: Package un-installable
> 
> Torsten, Christian, this package is installable (again?). Tagged as
> fixed.

It is in fact not installable in unstable because libpanel-applet0 is 
no longer available. I'll fix this with a new upload today.

Greetings

Torsten


pgpNNftMVcRmY.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: bug reports preventing the python transition

2003-04-05 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 06:37:44PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> > Torsten, Christian, this package is installable (again?). Tagged as
> > fixed.
> 
> It is in fact not installable in unstable because libpanel-applet0 is 
> no longer available. I'll fix this with a new upload today.

Done, new packages in incoming.

Greetings

Torsten


pgpP4peAZR2Nl.pgp
Description: PGP signature