Short tribute video in honor of Ian Murdock in FOSDEM

2016-01-16 Thread Laura Arjona Reina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Dear all

We, the Debian Publicity team, are trying to prepare a short tribute
video in honour of Ian Murdock to be screened at FOSDEM[1] (Free and
Open Source Software Developers' European Meeting), that will take
place in Brusels next January 30-31.
Valessio Brito and yours truly have offered time to prepare it.

The video would be released with the same license as the Debian
website[2] if possible, or in any other free license.

If you have any  material (photos, audio, video) that you own (or it's
free licensed) and we could use in the video, it would be great if you
can share it.

Please, commit your files with their license before Friday 22 January
2016 12:00 UTC to this git repo:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/publicity/ian-media.git

This repository is world readable and only  writable for all Debian
Developers (DD). if you're not a DD, please, ask a DD to commit your
files for you or join #debian-publicity and ask us for help there.


[1] https://fosdem.org/
[2] https://www.debian.org/license.en

Best regards
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2

iQGcBAEBCAAGBQJWmgz7AAoJEEw4Yb3McGt06wEMAJ2EXhDNXrv1j9gGrZCUSZ1D
JjMzBGjuMtCW3AoLVQZ9wROTYsE9QLui3o3tG+OzUQY/lc79I//3gOpg4/ZWwLfd
IyQhDm36Dh/NQGxq6ST49YLvB5T+DBxjgehBjyLM+gy9byAJKehbdl6SCr7FHI4i
VZue81tocW0rG97ooz6MGoqjzIR2hKzh1z5bePoE7JRDkCKCX387DlvFLxvAZvL3
nQEZe+XYZJhElgLi7daSg2wl70njjsh0bqurdAdQi/Y8C6LUKz1EWv4JCVPSr6Q5
sb9IMUziANBZBT9KYRWIBnl79k9fTaLBTjJsjLmllFjdLXDJdh1/Gv7/R6nSgNQZ
Ja500juT/rIo+LfAKOTKb63gQNUM7XCB7pgyB6lCWyQn1R/IBsXS2HnOvtWoCpHB
/20hD5heB8ZNG1Kz3DS4jBl1YMhMmC79qZ2MRQG5Jl0JSm/KfTYE0m88iEyWUhtI
wYwR7LOKV5M0UWeVnUJrpluRX5rA30DYa5ku1VIvDg==
=wxSF
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy

2016-01-16 Thread MENGUAL Jean-Philippe
Hello,

I don't know what is this characterization for, but I don't like it very
much. Indeed, it would make more difficult to explain, as I do with
Hypra or free software promotion organizations, that Debian is the best
solution for a universally accessible operating system (and I'm sure it
is). Moreover, it wouldn't be exact, in my opinion.

The main difference between Debian and Ubuntu is that the installer is
less friendly-user, and the firmware are not loaded by default. But I
think Debian is really the Universal Operating System. And it's the
characterization I prefer: saying this, it shows how Debian is for
anybody. But if one is not a technician, it could need help, of course.
But 1st, it matches to the collaborative state of spirit in free
software. 2nd, if paid, it enables to finance free software dev. 3rd,
never forget that any OS, included proprietary ones, would be difficult
to install if not provided in computers. Installing an OS and having all
benefits is not easy for a non-technician, also with Ubuntu.

So really, I wouldn't like such characte!ization if a communication
would be done on it. In my opinion, "the Universal OS" is fine, or "the
multilevels system", or "the system you desire" (as we can use it on
little or powerful machines, for server or end-user desktop, etc. Or "a
base for any usage in free software".

Regards,


Le 16/01/2016 04:48, Stephan Foley a écrit :
> Hello, I'm trying to characterize Debian and have the following:
> 
> Debian is for the tech savvy sys admin type and the server market
> 
> Is this a good characterization or am I off base?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 

-- 

Jean-Philippe MENGUAL

HYPRA, progressons ensemble

Tél.: 01 84 73 06 61
Mail: cont...@hypra.fr

Site Web: http://hypra.fr



Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy

2016-01-16 Thread Miles Fidelman


On 1/15/16 10:48 PM, Stephan Foley wrote:

Hello, I'm trying to characterize Debian and have the following:

 Debian is for the tech savvy sys admin type and the server market

Is this a good characterization or am I off base?

Thanks


Used to be.  These days, in the wake of systemd, at least this sys admin 
will never install it again.  The reasons are technical.


--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.   Yogi Berra



Re: Short tribute video in honor of Ian Murdock in FOSDEM

2016-01-16 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Laura,

On Samstag, 16. Januar 2016, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> We, the Debian Publicity team, are trying to prepare a short tribute
> video in honour of Ian Murdock to be screened at FOSDEM[1]

awesome!

where+when exactly do you plan to show it there? FOSDEM is huuuge. Did you 
contact the organizers to maybe show it at the closing or opening event?


cheers,
Holger


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy

2016-01-16 Thread Andrew McGlashan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256



On 17/01/2016 1:29 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> 
> On 1/15/16 10:48 PM, Stephan Foley wrote:
>> Hello, I'm trying to characterize Debian and have the following:
>> 
>> Debian is for the tech savvy sys admin type and the server 
>> market
>> 
>> Is this a good characterization or am I off base?
>> 
>> Thanks
> 
> Used to be.  These days, in the wake of systemd, at least this sys 
> admin will never install it again.  The reasons are technical.

Yes, it is certainly limiting my view of Debian to be one that is now
broken and definitely not what Ian Murdock envisioned many years ago.  :
(

A.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iF4EAREIAAYFAlaahJAACgkQqBZry7fv4vvLSAD/XagyhyE3hZYw4MC+3SC/Oh0x
mPgfbB56Hci2yjRxGWUA/RiHrnFSLSO/7qyCmJm1vWRuiEvo9Q5JzHCiQA7Os2li
=EFBM
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: Short tribute video in honor of Ian Murdock in FOSDEM

2016-01-16 Thread Daniel Pocock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256



On 16/01/16 16:38, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Laura,
> 
> On Samstag, 16. Januar 2016, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
>> We, the Debian Publicity team, are trying to prepare a short
>> tribute video in honour of Ian Murdock to be screened at
>> FOSDEM[1]
> 
> awesome!
> 
> where+when exactly do you plan to show it there? FOSDEM is huuuge.
> Did you contact the organizers to maybe show it at the closing or
> opening event?
> 
> 

The FOSDEM organizers have been very kind and proactive in this, I saw
some emails that went around about it already.  If you have access to
Pentabarf, you may see an unconfirmed event with Debian in the title,
it looks like they have reserved a suitable location and it should
show up on the FOSDEM public schedule when they confirm it.  I don't
want to steal their thunder though, so we'll just have to wait for
that to be announced.

Regards,

Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWmoYxAAoJEGxlgOd711bEvmwP+gK53ueVoexzBQox2bMVD+bx
NqjqD3AkWdyjId4USf9rMe0E/CBgXlqE5ILFEsF+Bq0pq8Lpu1uqgGb9E8p3TWKq
r8yWaEusBtJNENXk9hQ8LpZVXbBVvdgbflB0FrEoxIUnmgA0NNJRtsFIJ/PVsyWD
EHRWBeyPFbmjdAIhPn24tbXv60oElYkrP1zVdfvB5ZS68olaX5tARDNbGGpxhqGR
fOCq33W76htJumAmhx2W6BW0qeAT+cgcd9P70GwA421RsRe7MX9Ei9+rfH4xvQ7K
PWTZkAWeVUeMQqGYkYSyQbRsno7BrT9QCTjNMsBj6XRzuWFr3MBxbBgOThmyJNSk
vaWWtggXakvggF0UtVpt78f2PBas3sMwqVpKqy4GnW4MqNLDC/9QTNiQ+xL6/lf7
lZ4UqLzs1FRxqvdg5OW9L4A+e99T5rRIpsd/903eSwZy/2dlyB6XfjtIuHDUUMAi
DYv8J6pDpdD63hXU7M8WvN6pedvyAik++VHK+ZorKxHrZPbn+doNMi6/T7Y4HhGD
qrXivKPDjfLyyhbDkrEnmaJGRhMYiFPXHCNOgxTInJcK6qCn5IbjXyKHB12h6PoX
4/aAyHaavFVVOi3P9a2GuwJK7JDphdNU4aZCf40Q9AUbiHV1GZBn7r5zmplcEdD5
3za4znpnGw9One/sWuuX
=EOkv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: Short tribute video in honor of Ian Murdock in FOSDEM

2016-01-16 Thread Holger Levsen
On Samstag, 16. Januar 2016, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> The FOSDEM organizers have been very kind and proactive in this, I saw
> some emails that went around about it already.  If you have access to
> Pentabarf, you may see an unconfirmed event with Debian in the title,
> it looks like they have reserved a suitable location and it should
> show up on the FOSDEM public schedule when they confirm it.  I don't
> want to steal their thunder though, so we'll just have to wait for
> that to be announced.

cool, thanks for the info!


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Short tribute video in honor of Ian Murdock in FOSDEM

2016-01-16 Thread Amaya
Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> Valessio Brito and yours truly have offered time to prepare it.

I have given Ana mine, but please also look into these:

https://joeyh.name/pics/debconf/4/afp.jpg
Make sure to choose the bigger size for these, hosted at debconf.org
They belong to Debconf4 (Portoalegre, Brazil, 2004)
https://gallery.debconf.org/main.php?g2_itemId=14841
https://gallery.debconf.org/main.php?g2_itemId=16367
https://gallery.debconf.org/main.php?g2_itemId=15917
https://gallery.debconf.org/main.php?g2_itemId=16235
https://gallery.debconf.org/main.php?g2_itemId=16259
https://gallery.debconf.org/main.php?g2_itemId=14608
https://gallery.debconf.org/main.php?g2_itemId=14611
https://gallery.debconf.org/main.php?g2_itemId=15142
https://gallery.debconf.org/main.php?g2_itemId=15148
https://gallery.debconf.org/main.php?g2_itemId=15140
https://gallery.debconf.org/main.php?g2_itemId=15168
https://gallery.debconf.org/main.php?g2_itemId=15402
https://gallery.debconf.org/main.php?g2_itemId=15548

From: https://www.flickr.com/search/?q=ian+murdock
https://www.flickr.com/photos/linux_ssa/400574184/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/alexdeoliveira/319652889/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/juantomas/124739109/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/juanje/45206140/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/warthog9/342831/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jimgris/2471389340/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/textdriveinc/470533469/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/sebsto/490863958/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ivoyager/2398474826/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ed/3617707330/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ivoyager/2398462112/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ivoyager/2397646593/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ivoyager/2398479060/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ivoyager/2398477046/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/mlinksva/2412251544/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ivoyager/2398478158/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/mlinksva/2411422041/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/mlinksva/2411424021/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/warthog9/342916/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/jimgris/2471389340/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/tmolini/2420732067/
... there are just too many.


-- 
 .''`.The world breaks everyone, and afterward, some are
: :' :strong at the broken places.- Ernest Hemingway
`. `'   
  `-Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux



Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy

2016-01-16 Thread Stephan Foley
> [Miles Fidelman]
>> Used to be.  These days, in the wake of systemd, at least this sys
>> admin will never install it again.  The reasons are technical.

[Andrew McGlashan]
> Yes, it is certainly limiting my view of Debian to be one that is now
> broken and definitely not what Ian Murdock envisioned many years ago.

I haven't researched the systemd issues but I should look into them.
Thanks for the input, guys.



Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy

2016-01-16 Thread Stephan Foley
[Teemu Likonen]

> You have the old stereotype of Debian. The reality is different: the
> default Debian desktop install gives you a normal easy-to-use end-user
> operating system and applications. This has been the case for a long
> time but many people still maintain old stereotypes.
>
> Of course, Debian is for servers and technical people too.

Thanks for the reply. I got the stereotype from this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzjOtVL76C8
Open Source Developers' Conf 2014

@ 2:30 - Prime audience:
official motto - "universal operating system"
unofficial motto - "the sys admin's distribution for sys admins"



Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy

2016-01-16 Thread Stephan Foley
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 6:20 AM, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe
 wrote:

> The main difference between Debian and Ubuntu is that the installer is
> less friendly-user, and the firmware are not loaded by default. But I
> think Debian is really the Universal Operating System. And it's the
> characterization I prefer: saying this, it shows how Debian is for
> anybody. But if one is not a technician, it could need help, of course.
> But 1st, it matches to the collaborative state of spirit in free
> software. 2nd, if paid, it enables to finance free software dev. 3rd,
> never forget that any OS, included proprietary ones, would be difficult
> to install if not provided in computers. Installing an OS and having all
> benefits is not easy for a non-technician, also with Ubuntu.

I do respect all the qualities you mentioned about Debian's commitment
to only free software, although it does make installing more
difficult. It is also true that all distros can be made to look like
one another with a little work.

Thanks for the reply. It is good to keep in mind that Debian is used
by a lot of non tech savvy people (who may or may not of installed
their system).



Re: Would you agree - Debian is for the tech savvy

2016-01-16 Thread MENGUAL Jean-Philippe


Le 17/01/2016 00:31, Stephan Foley a écrit :
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 6:20 AM, MENGUAL Jean-Philippe
>  wrote:
>
>> The main difference between Debian and Ubuntu is that the installer is
>> less friendly-user, and the firmware are not loaded by default. But I
>> think Debian is really the Universal Operating System. And it's the
>> characterization I prefer: saying this, it shows how Debian is for
>> anybody. But if one is not a technician, it could need help, of course.
>> But 1st, it matches to the collaborative state of spirit in free
>> software. 2nd, if paid, it enables to finance free software dev. 3rd,
>> never forget that any OS, included proprietary ones, would be difficult
>> to install if not provided in computers. Installing an OS and having all
>> benefits is not easy for a non-technician, also with Ubuntu.
>
> I do respect all the qualities you mentioned about Debian's commitment
> to only free software, although it does make installing more
> difficult.

Right. However, the driver issue exists also on other OS, even modern
(including Windows XP and newer). So this problem, while existing, is
not Debian-specific. That's why I think Debian needs to be considered as
a classical OS, easy to use once installed, some9hat hard to install
like any OS, and more stable in the time and with few risk updates.

Regards,