Bug#158533: project: qmail is installed on murphy

2002-09-03 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

 >> That's bullshit, and you know it. There are over 10,000
 >> instances in debian where we have taken software, created a patch,
 >> applied it, and distributed the binaries.

 Raul> You asked the question about qmail, not about debian.  I answered
 Raul> in that context.

Well, duh. people do not distribute binaries of modified qmail
 because it is non-free, and doing so would be illegal. 

manoj

-- 
 Climbing onto a bar stool, a piece of string asked for a beer. "Wait
 a minute.  Aren't you a string?" "Well, yes, I am." "Sorry.  We don't
 serve strings here." The determined string left the bar and stopped a
 passer-by.  "Excuse, me," it said, "would you shred my ends and tie
 me up like a pretzel?"  The passer-by obliged, and the string
 re-entered the bar.  "May I have a beer, please?" it asked the
 bartender. The barkeep set a beer in front of the string, then
 suddenly stopped. "Hey, aren't you the string I just threw out of
 here?" "No, I'm a frayed knot."
Manoj Srivastava   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C



doubts about GNU/Linux installation

2002-09-03 Thread Diogo Traldi de Oliveira



I have a Compaq computer with a 7463 AMD-K6-2 processor. I don't known how 
of the installation guide a take. I have these options:

Installation Manual for Alpha
Installation Manual for ARM
Installation Manual for HP PA-RISC
Installation Manual for Intel x86
Installation Manual for Intel IA-64
Installation Manual for Motorola 680x0
Installation Manual for MIPS
Installation Manual for MIPS (DEC)
Installation Manual for PowerPC
Installation Manual for IBM S/390
Installation Manual for SPARC

  What Manual can I take?
Thanks



_
Converse com seus amigos online, faça o download grátis do MSN Messenger: 
http://messenger.msn.com.br




Re: doubts about GNU/Linux installation

2002-09-03 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 04:20:50PM -0300, Diogo Traldi de Oliveira wrote:
> 
> 
> I have a Compaq computer with a 7463 AMD-K6-2 processor. I don't known how 
> of the installation guide a take. I have these options:
> Installation Manual for Intel x86

  This one. An AMD processor is an Intel x86 compatible processor (at
  least for now.

-- 
  Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: doubts about GNU/Linux installation

2002-09-03 Thread Jon Eisenstein
> I have a Compaq computer with a 7463 AMD-K6-2 processor. I don't known how
> of the installation guide a take. I have these options:

The AMD-K6-2 processor is a clone of the Intel x86 instruction set, meaning
that the actual system you use is defined as an x86 system (as opposed to an
Apple Macintosh, or a Sun SPARCstation).






Bug#159511: project: debian smtp servers should be able to support secure SMTP (SSL/TLS)

2002-09-03 Thread Noel Koethe
Package: project
Version: N/A; reported 2002-09-03
Severity: wishlist

Hello,

please support secure SMTP (rfc2487) to have a secure and
private communication on none-official mailinglists.

thx.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux neo 2.4.18-k7 #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US




Debian registered as TM in Spain

2002-09-03 Thread list
Hi

Don't know if Debian people already know about this:
http://www.symlink.ch/article.pl?sid=02/09/03/1147242&mode=nested
(german)
http://www.marcanet.com/Acceso_Gratuito/CPRespMN.ASP?Num=1&L1=1&N=1&C1=42&Nmb=debian&Tp=Es&Sob=Marca
(spanish)
http://barrapunto.com/article.pl?sid=02/09/02/1020219&mode=nocomment
(spanish)

Regards
-- 
Philipp  | work: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  +41 1 632 60 38
Frauenfelder | home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]+41 1 862 73 14
[PGP]| http://www.math.ethz.ch/~pfrauenf/
Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux. See http://www.debian.org/



Bug#158533: marked as done (project: qmail is installed on murphy)

2002-09-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 3 Sep 2002 14:02:29 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line no longer a bug.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2002 20:00:08 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 27 15:00:08 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.hal-pc.org [206.180.145.133] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17jmVU-0004XA-00; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:00:08 -0500
Received: from [24.167.56.11] (HELO stonewall)
  by mail.hal-pc.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.9)
  with SMTP id 18512972; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:00:07 -0500
Received: by stonewall (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:00:10 
+
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:00:10 +
From: "Brian M. Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: project: qmail is installed on murphy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.99.50
X-Operating-System: Linux stonewall 2.4.18-k7 
Content-Conversion: prohibited
X-Request-PGP: http://decoy.wox.org/~bmc/openpgp/pub560553e7.asc
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: project
Version: N/A; reported 2002-08-27
Severity: serious
Justification: violates Social Contract 1, 4, and 5 (maybe others)

The subject says it all. qmail is installed on murphy.debian.org. qmail
is non-free. Debian should not be using non-free software on its own
systems. I will quote from the Social Contract to show why this is so.

"Debian Will Remain 100% Free Software" is very clear, I think. "[W]e
will never make the system depend on an item of non-free software." Your
systems are depending on items of non-free software. The default
mail-transport-agent for installation is exim, and that is what most
other machines run, but not murphy. "Thus, although non-free
software isn't a part of Debian, we support its use, and we
provide infrastructure (such as our bug-tracking system and mailing
lists) for non-free software packages." I think the "support" you meant
here was "provide quality assurance for" not "endorse". I think running
qmail is the latter. Also, note that "non-free software isn't a part of
Debian". So it should not be on your machines. "We will be guided by the
needs of our users and the free-software community. We will place
their interests first in our priorities." I'm sorry, but it does not seem
like you have the interests of the free-software community first by
running qmail.

I have included two telnet sessions: one is with murphy, and one is with
a friend's machine, which is also a Debian machine running qmail. The
dead giveaway is that even with an EHLO, qmail is silent about the
software which is running.

Transaction with murphy.debian.org:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet murphy.debian.org 25
Trying 65.125.64.134...
Connected to murphy.debian.org.
Escape character is '^]'.
ehlo stonewall
220 murphy.debian.org ESMTP
250-murphy.debian.org
250-PIPELINING
250 8BITMIME
rset
250 flushed
quit
221 murphy.debian.org
Connection closed by foreign host.

Transaction with decoy.wox.org:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet decoy.wox.org 25
Trying 206.180.155.20...
Connected to 206.180.155.20.adsl.hal-pc.org.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 decoy.wox.org ESMTP
ehlo stonewall
250-decoy.wox.org
250-PIPELINING
250 8BITMIME
rset
250 flushed
quit
221 decoy.wox.org
Connection closed by foreign host.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux stonewall 2.4.18-k7 #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC (ignored: LC_ALL set)

-- no debconf information


--=20
Brian M. Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  0x560553=
E7
"If John Madden steps outside on February 2, looks down, and doesn't see hi=
s=20
feet, we'll have 6 more weeks of Pro football."
-- Chuck Newcombe

--gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.1.90 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Ubi libertas, ibi patria.

iQFKBAEBAwA0BQI9a9pILRpodHRwOi8vZGVjb3kud294Lm9yZy9+Ym1jL29wZW5w
Z3AvcG9saWN5LnRleAAKCRDlkf/JVgVT5/ZCB/4qGvddRttTndHauDGdOHaB

Re: Debian registered as TM in Spain

2002-09-03 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 10:13:58PM +0200,  wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Don't know if Debian people already know about this:
> http://www.symlink.ch/article.pl?sid=02/09/03/1147242&mode=nested
> (german)
> http://www.marcanet.com/Acceso_Gratuito/CPRespMN.ASP?Num=1&L1=1&N=1&C1=42&Nmb=debian&Tp=Es&Sob=Marca
> (spanish)
> http://barrapunto.com/article.pl?sid=02/09/02/1020219&mode=nocomment
> (spanish)
> 

  A lawyer currently working in the Spanish translation team has just
 answered[1] telling us that with the Spanish laws, the previous use of a
 mark and the acceptation by the people who use it, invalidates the
 trademark. We only have to initiate a process to opposite to it.

  Related to this, perhaps we should try to fill a trademark
 registration valid in the most countries. At least I know that you can
 fill a patent in Europe valid in (at least) the UE countries. And
 perhaps we should try even to register it in more countries. IMHO, SPI
 should look into this.

   Cheers,

[1]
http://lists.debian.org/debian-l10n-spanish/2002/debian-l10n-spanish-200209/msg00022.html

-- 
  Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]


pgp8MqE4qfQGL.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: "Bug of the month", or how to get people fixing bugs

2002-09-03 Thread Torsten Landschoff
On Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 11:04:30PM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 12:29:01PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> > There is also another positive effect - this will make maintainers broaden
> > their horizon by touching some other packages which I think would be 
> > a good thing for Debian.
> 
> Well, if with "touching" you mean NMU'ing right away to score a point, I
> wouldn't call it "possitive".

With touching I mean downloading the sources and trying to make a patch
for a problem.

cu
Torsten


pgp8In0TViABN.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#158533: acknowledged by developer (no longer a bug.)

2002-09-03 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 04:03:11PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #158533: project: qmail is installed on murphy,
> which was filed against the project package.
> 
> It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
> Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> 
> Their explanation is attached below.  If this explanation is
> unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
> message then please contact the developer, by replying to this email.

This explanation is quite satisfactory, thank you.
 
> From: Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

> This is no longer an issue.

I just looked, and murphy is now running postfix. Thank you very much! I
really appreciate it. Your response was fast and efficient.
 
-- 
Brian M. Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  0x560553E7
Soap and education are not as sudden as a massacre, but they are more
deadly in the long run.
-- Mark Twain


pgphW5x4PS9eH.pgp
Description: PGP signature