Re: New sleep code for ATI M6, M7 and M9

2003-03-17 Thread Michael Shields
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a bit annoying since the number of on-off cycles for a LCD
> screen is limited.

Do you have a reference for this information?
-- 
Shields.



Re: put to sleep manually

2003-03-18 Thread Michael Shields
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
stamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> my ibook does no longer detect if the lid gets closed.
> as i don't want to get i repaired because of this, i'll have to put it
> to sleep manually.

pbbuttonsd in its default configuration will put the machine to sleep
if you press the power button.
-- 
Shields.



Re: Debian on an iMac

2003-03-19 Thread Michael Shields
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jeffrey Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Flat Panel - I can't remember, but I think I read about a similar hole
> somewhere (presumably near the CD tray).

No; the flat panel iMac is the first not to have a paper clip hole.
-- 
Shields.



Re: power4 vs intel compatibility

2003-03-19 Thread Michael Shields
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's a 1 million $$$ question: is there any compatibility for data
> (I mean mysql/postgres tables essentially) among a 32bit pentium IV and a
> 64bit powerpc (eg IBM pSeries)? Someone's idea is to build up an heartbeat
> based HA system with 1 IBM and 1 Intel as backup for a DBMS. So data
> should be shared among both the machines,

It depends entirely on your applications.  You should ask on the Mysql
and Postgres lists.
-- 
Shields.



Re: Debian installation from CDs in iMac

2003-03-21 Thread Michael Shields
> On 19/3/03 9:14 pm, "Michael Shields" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>> No; the flat panel iMac is the first not to have a paper clip hole.
>
> I don't really understand Apple's motives.  They promote their machines as
> friendlier than PCs!

And they're correct; there is a dedicated eject key on the keyboard,
and in almost all cases it works.  It is not Apple's fault that the
Debian installer doesn't support it.
-- 
Shields.



Re: Few Newbie Questions TiBook III - woody

2003-04-01 Thread Michael Shields
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Chris Tillman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> UFS is not supported at all.

UFS works fine, at least for reading.  Maybe you meant to say that
HFS+ is not supported.
-- 
Shields.



Re: Debian with Mac.

2003-04-02 Thread Michael Shields
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Björn Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PLEASE, mail me privately since I'm not a member
> of the mailinglist.

I'm sure you meant to say "please cc me, since I'm not a member of the
mailing list, but this way the answers will be seen by all and will
become part of the archives so no one will need to ask again."  Or,
possibly "please mail me privately and I will summarize responses in
a later mail to the list".
-- 
Shields.



Re: airport monitor mode/ ben8

2003-04-03 Thread Michael Shields
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Oliver Ripka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just tried to run kismet, but the ben8 airport module
> seems not to be patched for montior mode. I  remeber
> that older kernels supported that.
> So, am I just doing something wrong or is the support
> simply not included in ben8?

It's not included; but if you apply both the patches:
http://airsnort.shmoo.com/orinoco-0.11b-patch.diff
http://www.swieskowski.net/code/wifi/orinoco-0.11b-airport.diff
then it should work fine.
-- 
Shields.



Re: airport monitor mode/ ben8

2003-04-04 Thread Michael Shields
> with no problems, but when I kick off Airsnort and tell it to start
> sniffing, I get the error
>
> "Could not set promiscuous mode".
>
> What am I missing?

It will need to be root to set that.
-- 
Shields.



Re: comparing x86 and powerpc laptops

2003-04-09 Thread Michael Shields
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wrong, if you look at it really, this is not the case, you pay what you
> get for, and the ibook are rather cheap for the price point. The only
> negative point is that they have smaller screens, but that only means
> that apple can spend more money on other stuff.

For 1024x768, a 12" screen is very reasonable; it keeps the total
laptop size down, so I actually prefer it.  A 14" iBook is available
if you really want the larger screen.

It is difficult if not impossible to find a screen and keyboard of
the iBook's quality on any "budget" i386 laptop.
-- 
Shields.



Re: comparing x86 and powerpc laptops

2003-04-10 Thread Michael Shields
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ross Vumbaca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use my PCMCIA slot to read high capacity compact flash cards, WiFi,
> and for Firewire soon.

Wireless and Firewire are built-in on the Apple laptops, and USB flash
card readers are very inexpensive.
-- 
Shields.



Re: Petition for a Flash plugin for Linux on PPC

2003-04-19 Thread Michael Shields
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Alessandro Selli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pursuant to the terms and conditions of this License, you are granted a
> nonexclusive license to use the Specification for the sole purposes of
> developing Products that output SWF.

Is this believed to be enforceable in any countries?  My understanding
was that you could not put license restrictions on a document, at
least in the US.
-- 
Shields.



Re: Important keyboard problem (^[[B sent indefinitely)

2003-04-20 Thread Michael Shields
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Philipp Kaeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I encountered a similar problem with the eject/F12 key;
> this was helped by just pressing the button once
> more.
>
> it seemed to me like the keyboard driver/interface sometimes
> fails to regognize key release events and therefore just 
> emits a continuous stream of key press events.

Isn't it also possible that the key is physically sticking?
-- 
Shields.



Re: 22" apple flatpanel

2003-08-14 Thread Michael Shields
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jay Graves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just was looking at the same thing (but I don't have a
> display.yet) and I cam accross this.  I have no experience with this
> but it looks good.
>
> http://www.dviator.com/en/DVIator.html

The DVIator works as advertised.  I am even using one to drive an
Apple TFT display from a PC.

One drawback is that there does not seem to be any recognition that
the power or brightness buttons are pressed; Linux does see the
monitor as an HID device, and the buttons flash when you touch them,
but HID events are not generated.

Apart from that, it works great.
-- 
Shields.



Re: procmail recipe for this list ?

2003-08-14 Thread Michael Shields
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
David Oakes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whenever some on this list reply to me, I get two copies, one through
> the list and one cc'd to me. As if I wouldn't be getting the one sent
> to the list! So much for netiquette...

You can suppress duplicates using this example from the procmailex(5)
manpage:

   If you are subscribed to several mailinglists and people
   cross-post to some of them, you usually receive several
   duplicate mails (one from every list).  The following simple
   recipe eliminates duplicate mails.  It tells formail to keep an
   8KB cache file in which it will store the Message-IDs of the
   most recent mails you received.  Since Message-IDs are
   guaranteed to be unique for every new mail, they are ideally
   suited to weed out duplicate mails.  Simply put the following
   recipe at the top of your rcfile, and no duplicate mail will
   get past it.

  :0 Wh: msgid.lock
  | formail -D 8192 msgid.cache

You might want to increase the cache beyond 8 KiB.
-- 
Shields.



Re: french airport cards compatible to swiss ones or vice versa

2003-10-08 Thread Michael Shields
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mich Lanners <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IIRC all the other countries except Japan use 1-13.

US and Canada use only 1-11.
-- 
Shields.



Re: share partition between macosx and debian

2003-10-15 Thread Michael Shields
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Thomas Otto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can even install OS X on UFS, yet I don't know if it is the plain
> UFS from FreeBSD which Linux can read/write or something Apple
> modified and/or screwed up somewhat.

Linux has no problems reading a UFS partition containing an
installation of OS X (at least 10.2).
-- 
Shields.



Re: 12" G4 iBook - AirPort Extreme support

2003-11-26 Thread Michael Shields
I have heard that the Airport Extreme is a mini-PCI card.  Is there a
chance that another, less obnoxious mini-PCI wireless card could be
used in the same slot?
-- 
Shields.



Re: 12" PB less supported than 15", 17" ?

2003-12-11 Thread Michael Shields
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 11:06, Orion Buckminster Montoya wrote:
[...]
>> If you want to run GNU/Linux right now, don't get the 12".  If anyone
>> wants to trade me a decent, recent iBook for my 12", I will seriously
>> consider it.
>
> Or an earlier model of titanium PowerBook. The earlier 1Ghz tipb was
> fully supported.

However, the Ti and the G3 iBooks have only 133 MHz memory.  It would
be great if the aluminum Powerbooks were supported; they are credible
desktop replacements.

> Regarding sleep support, there's always hope as far as ATI chips are
> concerned as ATI has always been helpful with that in the past, though
> it takes time. For nVidia chips, there is no hope.

Is this the only obstacle to sleep?  Is it possible to put the rest of
the machine to sleep while leaving the graphics chip active?

> However, I do plan at one point in the future to implement suspend-to
> disk for all PowerMacs, that would be a good fallback solution for
> machines that don't have sleep support.
>
> I don't know when I'll have this done though, I hope not too far away
> from now, maybe a couple of monthes.

Is sleep support for aluminum Powerbooks closer than that?
-- 
Shields.



Re: Recommended Orinoco PCMCIA card?

2003-12-21 Thread Michael Shields
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   It looks like the Proxim Orinoco wireless cards work well with
>   those needing to avoid the Broadcom-based Airport Extreme
>   cards in Apple portables.  Any recommendation or enlightenment
>   on whether the Silver World card versus the Gold World card
>   makes a difference regarding Linux use?

They should both work, but the silver supports only 40-bit WEP, while
the gold supports 104-bit WEP which is less weak.  Both should work
equally well if you're using non-WEP access points.

> Are folks getting
>   802.11g throughput in addition to 802.11b?

Note that the "Orinoco" 802.11g cards are entirely different from the
802.11b cards.  The 802.11b versions are the same as the venerable
Lucent "WaveLAN IEEE", which is extremely well-supported and is the
same chipset as in the first-generation Apple Airport base stations
and cards.  The newer versions with a and g support use Atheros
chipsets, which do not have stable Linux drivers.

There are other chipsets that are supported under Linux for 802.11g;
do some searching.
-- 
Shields.



Re: Recommended Orinoco PCMCIA card?

2003-12-22 Thread Michael Shields
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   The past couple of weeks have been expensive reminders of the
>   "costs" of free software.  I will Google for the
>   802.11g-compatible Linux chipsets as you mentioned.

I haven't tried it, but you might look at one of these cards:
http://prism54.org/supported_cards.php
It sounds like good progress is being made there.

Don't forget to write to the vendors of closed cards, explaining why
you won't be buying their products.
-- 
Shields.



Re: Userland tool for mouse buttons emulation

2003-12-31 Thread Michael Shields
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Colin Leroy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any other archs having only one mouse button ? :-) It should be
> crossplatform anyway.

Many architectures have USB and could potentially use an Apple mouse.
-- 
Shields.