MOL

2005-05-18 Thread Fallen_Angel
Hi, it's been a while since I have posted to this list, and for that I 
apologize.  Am I still welcome to post here since I have changed to 
ubuntu?  At first I would think no, but then again it is based on SID, 
so I am not sure.  Well if not tell me, and I will duck out, but if so I 
have a question as always.
I just compiled a 2.6.12-rc4 kernel, and am planning to use it as a main 
kernel, not just to test it, and to use MOL you have to compile the 
kernel module, and it says to use the current kernel headers, so my 
question is this, must I recompile them, since they were compiled off 
the 2.6.10-5-powerpc ubuntu kernel, and if so where do I put, and which 
files are, the kernel headers for this kernel that I have just 
compiled.  Ofcourse I still have the full source of the kernel I 
compiled awaiting a response from this list.

As always any help is appreciated.
--Mike S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: MOL

2005-05-19 Thread Fallen_Angel
John Levin wrote:
On 19 May 2005, at 01:09, Fallen_Angel wrote:
Hi, it's been a while since I have posted to this list, and for that 
I apologize.  Am I still welcome to post here since I have changed to 
ubuntu?  At first I would think no, but then again it is based on 
SID, so I am not sure.  Well if not tell me, and I will duck out, but 
if so I have a question as always.

LOL. I'm an Ubuntu-using lurker - I find this list a good source of 
info for general linux ppc problems, esp with hardware.

This question would probably be better directed to the ubuntu-users 
list. But first things first, have you read the MOL how to?
http://www.ubuntulinux.org/wiki/MacOnLinuxHowto
And what version of Ubuntu (Hoary/Warty/Breezy) are you using?

Also, what version of Mac OS X - I beleive that MOL doesn't work with 
Tiger yet.

John
www.ubuntulinux.org
linux for humans

I'm using Hoary.  I haven't yet ventured into using mol with OS X yet, 
just 9 for now.  I have read that mol doesn't work on Tiger, but I don't 
have Tiger, stuck with Jaguar.  (main reason for swithing to linux, 
Jaguar just didn't cut it for compiling a lot of Open Source stuff)  And 
besides I like gnome a hell of a lot better than the Mac OS X "look" I 
guess you would call it, and I also like the ability to compile what I 
want, and not be stuck with the "Mac" Compiler for one.  gcc 3.4.3 was a 
nightmare.
I will probably lurk on the list for the fact that I like the people on 
it.  I have had nothing but positive results from people here, and have 
not run into anyone putting me down for questions that I look back and 
they were so "newbie" or obvious answers, and that is just not something 
I have found a lot of other places.
I thought the question I asked was a general linux question, in that all 
it was was where do I put the header files, and what are the header 
files fom the upstream kernel I just compiled.
To answer the question to what version of MOL I have "startmol 
--version" reports Mac-on-Linux 0.9.70
I did real the MacOnLinux wiki that you asked me about above.

--Mike S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: MOL

2005-05-19 Thread Fallen_Angel
Lee Braiden wrote:
On Thursday 19 May 2005 01:09, Fallen_Angel wrote:
 

Hi, it's been a while since I have posted to this list, and for that I
apologize.  Am I still welcome to post here since I have changed to
ubuntu?  At first I would think no, but then again it is based on SID,
so I am not sure.  Well if not tell me, and I will duck out, but if so I
have a question as always.
  

I would say that you should probably ask questions of your own distro 
first, just in case they have done something different.  If no one 
from ubuntu knows, and they confirm that it's not an ubuntu-specific 
thing, that's a good time to take it to a larger, but similar distro, 
or the to mailing lists of the actual software itself.

This is pretty much what debian folk do with bugs anyway: we have our 
own bug reporting system, which "wraps" the bug reporting systems of 
the actual software, just in case debian has caused the problem itself.

 

I just compiled a 2.6.12-rc4 kernel, and am planning to use it as a main
kernel, not just to test it, and to use MOL you have to compile the
kernel module, and it says to use the current kernel headers, so my
question is this, must I recompile them, since they were compiled off
the 2.6.10-5-powerpc ubuntu kernel, and if so where do I put, and which
files are, the kernel headers for this kernel that I have just
compiled.  Ofcourse I still have the full source of the kernel I
compiled awaiting a response from this list.
  

Debian has a module-helper (or module-installer, or something like 
that) package to help with this, and other, lower-level utilities that 
make sure modules get installed to the right place.  I'm not sure if 
ubuntu has those.

 

I'm not sure the question I asked is a "bug",  The instructions for 
using MOL on ubuntu consisted of downloading the MOL packages, for the 
main stuff, and then downloading the source for the kernel module.  Then 
to compile the kernel module you had to download the header files for 
the kernel you were running.  (2.6.10-5-powerpc) in my case.  And then 
it said that if you everr changed kernels you needed to recompile the 
kernel module with the header files from the kernel you are using, and 
my only question was what are these "header files" since ubuntu would 
surely not have a "header-file" package for a self compiled kernel.

--Mike S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]