Problems with X11 on Ultra10
Hello, I'm new to Debian and trying it out on Ultra10 which has Creator3D framebuffer. I installed Debian stable and seem to be having some issues with X11 or display manager. The system boots OK and I can see boot messages, but when it goes to start display manager the screen goes black and nothing happens. No windows, no mouse cursor, nothing. Any ideas? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140503223911.23ff5009e52f2da1b2108...@googlemail.com
Re: Problems with X11 on Ultra10
On 03/05/14 03:39 PM, Sad Clouds wrote: > Hello, I'm new to Debian and trying it out on Ultra10 which has > Creator3D framebuffer. > > I installed Debian stable and seem to be having some issues with > X11 or display manager. The system boots OK and I can see boot > messages, but when it goes to start display manager the screen goes > black and nothing happens. No windows, no mouse cursor, nothing. > > Any ideas? > > Might as well ask about the obvious right away, do you have your monitor hooked up to the onboard video in the bottom left corner (facing the back), or to the 13W3 video connector on the Creator3D? What could be happening is X11 picked the wrong card by default and is only showing it on the opposite connector. If you have a second monitor try hooking one up to the 13W3 and one to the VGA connector. Hayden K. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/536579c1.30...@gmail.com
gnutls28 transition
Hello all, gmp has been recently re-licensed and all architectures and ports have the updated gmp in jessie/sid. Well, all but powerpcspe & x32 both of which recently have negative slope on their build status graphs. Thus GPLv2 and LGPLv3 compatible software packages can link against gnutls28. Should we start transition to gnutls28 by default, for all packages that are compatible? Can powerpcspe & x32 porters try to get latest gmp built? -- Regards, Dimitri. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CANBHLUgp=ahti1vk2rkqqa__aszjvxg7budltey+ezjfeaz...@mail.gmail.com
Re: gnutls28 transition
Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: Hello all, gmp has been recently re-licensed and all architectures and ports have the updated gmp in jessie/sid. Well, all but powerpcspe & x32 both of which recently have negative slope on their build status graphs. Thus GPLv2 and LGPLv3 compatible software packages can link against gnutls28. Should we start transition to gnutls28 by default, for all packages that are compatible? Can powerpcspe & x32 porters try to get latest gmp built? Personally I'd add a (build-)depends on the relicensed gmp in the next gnutls28 upload. That way packages can (build-)depend on the new gnutls and be assured of getting a GPLv2 compatible version. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53659469.8060...@p10link.net
