RFS: libharu
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libharu". Package name: libharu Version : 2.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Takeshi Kanno , Antony Dovgal , libh...@googlegroups.com URL : http://libharu.org License : ZLIB/LIBPNG License (see below) Section : libs It builds these binary packages: libhpdf-2.1.0 - cross platform C library for generating pdf files libhpdf-dev - cross platform C library for generating pdf files The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 581397 My motivation for maintaining this package is: This library can add pdf support to the saga gis package, which I packaged/maintain for debian. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libharu - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libharu/libharu_2.1.0-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Johan Van de Wauw == ZLIB/LIBPNG License: This software is provided 'as-is', without any express or implied warranty. In no event will the authors be held liable for any damages arising from the use of this software. Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any purpose, including commercial applications, and to alter it and redistribute it freely, subject to the following restrictions: 1. The origin of this software must not be misrepresented; you must not claim that you wrote the original software. If you use this software in a product, an acknowledgment in the product documentation would be appreciated but is not required. 2. Altered source versions must be plainly marked as such, and must not be misrepresented as being the original software. 3. This notice may not be removed or altered from any source distribution. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinytwaczr3ntarau-yfw96a-icymomtwiffq...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: libharu
Dear Paul, Thanks for your (extensive!) review. Most of your comments were clear, but still a few questions here: On May 16, 5:50 am, Paul Wise wrote: > The libhpdf-dev package description should have more detail than the > libhpdf-2.1.0 description since the latter will always be > automatically installed and libhpdf-dev will be installed from > build-depends and by people wanting to develop apps using the library. Makes sense. So is it ok to move the (updated) long description to the -dev package and use only a short description for libhpdf? I was randomly searching other libraries, and could not really find examples, if one jumps to your mind, let me know. > > The last release was a long time ago and the git repository has recent > commits, you might want to ask them when the next release will be. It is indeed pending (but has been for quite some time). Do you think it is better to concentrate on making a package (for mentors/experimental) from a git snapshot (eventually contributing some changes upstream) or to concentrate on a package of 2.1.0 (with backported patches) which might still be included in squeeze? > > The upstream tarball contains .res files, which are compiled versions > of the .rc files. I'd suggest that they should only ship source code > in their source tarballs. Same comment applies to the prebuilt-PDFs > from the demos. > > Much of the code is under a different license to the one quoted in > debian/copyright. > /me hits himself: ok, I thought I checked every dir, but it seems I forgot the 'demo' dir. It seems I will definitely have to remove some stuff there. In the mean time since I have to repack, I could also remove the *.rc files (actually the whole win32 directory), which are only used in the windows builds. Or is it better to leave them in there? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikb1iz8chett_vpxhpacm8t00fjokhk7wkuy...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: 'snap2' rsync-based backup program with GUI
Hello Lloyd, * I see no source package. You really need one. Since you don't need to compile anything, just specifying where files have to be copied in the debian/install file should be sufficient. Perhaps search for artwork packages to find examples. Johan On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Lloyd Standish wrote: > Hello DD's: > > My name is Lloyd Standish. I am the author and upstream maintainer of > snap2, a fast, easy-to-use rsync-based backup program with GUI. It is > considered "tested/stable" after several months of testing. I first > released it publicly in 2009, but I used a previous version of the script > (no GUI) for years. Snap2 is licensed under GNU GPL version 3. The Debian > package is Lintian-clean. > > You may already be thinking, "There are already lots of backup programs in > Debian." True, but I believe none of them makes hard-linked snapshot-type > backups easily available for less-technical Debian user, yet with > flexibility and power to please even the most advanced users. > > The snap2 package consists of 3 bash shell scripts, with the GUI implemented > via gtkdialog. There is a non-interactive bash shell script (snap2engine) > and an interactive GUI (snap2) for configuring and optionally running the > backup. Since this program is normally configured and run via the snap2 GUI, > no manual editing of configuration files or running from the command line is > needed (unless it is used in a non-graphical environment, which is > possible). > > snap2's principal feature is rotating 'snapshot' backups to either local or > remote hard disk backup media. (It can also do 'mirror' type - single copy > - backups.) A snapshot backup is a full backup of your files as they were > at a given moment in time. With snapshot backups you can recover any of > several past versions of files. > > When using the snapshot backup method, snap2/rsync uses hard links to > duplicate identical files on the backup drive. This greatly reduces the > disk space required on the backup drive, allowing (in most cases) several > gigs of backup 'snapshots' to fit on a one-gig USB flash drive. These > snapshot backups function just like full backups - no special software > needed. You can access them with any file manager, and use cool file > comparison tools to explore the differences between files. > > As I'm sure most of you know, when backing up a file that was modified since > the last backup, the rsync backend only needs to transmit the changed > *portions* of the file in order to create the new backup file. This saves > bandwidth, particularly important for backup to a remote host (via > Internet). > > In sum, snap2 combines the convenience of full backups with the speed and > backup storage economy of incremental backups. > > The idea of using hard links and rsync to create fast, space-saving snapshot > backups is not a new one, but snap2 is unique (I believe) because of the > GUI, which is used for (1) configuring backups, (2) running them on demand, > and (3) setting up 'Automatic Backups' (via cron). It and its dependencies > are also very lightweight. > > I'd like to get this into Debian because I believe it would be very useful > to many, and because I would like to give back to the Debian community. I > am fully capable of maintaining it, as I have done since I introduced it > last year. Of course, I hope to eventually become a Debian Developer > myself. > > snap2 is already accepted into the latest Puppy Linux (Quirky) and has been > praised by Puppy users. > > Some links: > My snap2 project page on the Puppy forum: > http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?p=374387#374387 > The project website: http://www.linuxbackups.org > download: http://files.lstandish.com/utilities > > PS I had to change file locations as part of the Debianization. I hope this > did not break something (I have run several tests and all looks OK.) > > -- > Lloyd > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/op.vd4jwelzx1l...@localhost > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikjmh2idrblnir7jfr3bj3maycmkxydyzgvm...@mail.gmail.com
Re: A lot of pending packages
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > The fact is that there just aren't enough people who have time and are > interested in sponsoring. Reviewing packages takes up a lot of time to > do properly, especially for new packages. It has been this way for as > long as I can remember. >... So on one hand we have debian developers who lack time to review new packages and on the other hand maintainers who are eagerly awaiting a review or sponsorship of their package. Perhaps maintainers should stand up and review some packages of their peers? One could even change the template to a request for review for *new* packages, and make it a request for sponsorship only after a successful review? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktilmxgnn9odo0r9i8r6c0_jopovrunc0ghjab...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: emu8051
I am not a devian developer, so I can not sponser your upload, however here are some comments: debian/control: XSBC-original maintainer is a field only used by ubuntu, remove it section: I would use 'Electronics' debian/copyright: your last lines read: License: GPL-2 The Debian packaging is hereby placed in the GPL-2 (no rights reserved). I'm not a lawyer, but I would either put your debian packaging under the GPL-2 or release it in the public domain (no rights reserved). Now they conflict. build system: consider using debhelper 7 instead of cdbs, as this is what most new packages use. The minimal rule should work fine /usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.tiny src/Makefile.am consider adding --as-needed to your link flag when using gtk (send this upstream) 17: emu8051_LDADD = $(GTK_LIBS) -Wl,--as-needed Lastly, my most important comment: I recommend you to join the pkg-electronics team, and to request sponsorship there: http://wiki.debian.org/PkgElectronics Johan On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Bhavani Shankar R wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "emu8051". > > * Package name : emu8051 > Version : 1.1.0-1 > Upstream Authors : Hugo Villeneuve , > Jonathan St-André > * URL : http://www.hugovil.com/en/emu8051/index.html > * License : GPL-2 > Section : x11 > > It builds these binary packages: > emu8051 - Emulator and simulator for 8051 microcontrollers > > The upload would fix these bugs: 585446 > > My motivation for maintaining this package is: I m an electrical engineer by > profession and I ve experience working on Intel 8051 and ARM > Microcontrollers and since the usage of the program is simple(It loads Hex > files and it executes the program continuously till the desired output is > got) and since this is my specific area of interest I would like to maintain > this package in debian. > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/emu8051 > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main > contrib non-free > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/emu8051/emu8051_1.1.0-1.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > Regards > > -- > Bhavani Shankar.R > https://launchpad.net/~bhavi, a proud ubuntu community member. > What matters in life is application of mind!, > It makes great sense to have some common sense..! > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktilmvh8g57gftppjxguy399p5txs8l1xggfmh...@mail.gmail.com
Re: A lot of pending packages
2010/6/11 Tanguy Ortolo : > * dokuwiki, a PHP-based wiki, that I co-maintain with a DD that has > almost no time to sponsor me and suggested me to find another sponsor: > such a package (PHP, web application) seems to interest nobody. Which should not really come as a surprise. First of all, not many people actually use packaged php applications. According to popcon, drupal6 has only 444 installations, with only 13 'recent' users[1]. The number will be an underestimation as many servers won't have popcon installed, but still... Not many webapplications have an upstream which supports legacy versions, which means that it is up to the sponsor/maintainer to do so. While the same is true for many packages in debian, the security consequenses are usually more severe for a web app than for most desktop applications. If packages have a high chance of being hardly installed (because most people use upstream releases and not the debian packages, which happens a lot for php programs) and require a lot of work to support, it should be carefully considered whether we really want them in debian. [1]http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=drupal6 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinhwrbokfddvpexmqau27zf-g9ewhzjfkhb4...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: libharu (updated)
Dear mentors/sponsors, I have updated my libharu package, a C library for generating pdf files. dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libharu/libharu_2.1.0+dfsg-1.dsc Three notes: 1) the source package contains bindings for python, pascal, freebasic, ruby and C#. Since my knowledge of those languages is too small to support these bindings, I chose not to package them (yet). 2) Somewhat related: the source package contains a number of sample programs. I was unsure what I should do with them. Package them as documentation in the -dev package? Or a seperate documentation package? Packaging them as a binary package does not seem useful. 3) I used git-buildpackage to create this package. I hope someone can create a repository on alioth (even if it is not sponsored I hope my packaging efforts can be stored on a more reliable place than my pc). Apart from that, I have tried to cope with these issues, raised by Paul Wise: > The libhpdf-dev package description should have more detail than the > libhpdf-2.1.0 description since the latter will always be > automatically installed and libhpdf-dev will be installed from > build-depends and by people wanting to develop apps using the library. > > I'd suggest getting your package descriptions reviewed by debian-l10n-english. I have rewritten the package descriptions > > You can strip the boilerplate from debian/rules (lines 2-9). > You can strip the comments from debian/watch (lines 1-6, 8-9). done > > Your watch file does not work: fixed > > Looking at the upstream download directory, I'd strongly recommend > they switch to a consistent naming scheme. I agree, but at least their current build system (make dist) wiil give names consistent with the watch file and the last release. > > The last release was a long time ago and the git repository has recent > commits, you might want to ask them when the next release will be. I did. However I received no answer, and my messages to their mailinglist didn't even pass moderation. I have chosen to package the current release, but I backported some patches to this build. The major new functionality that would be part of the release is imho not very relevant for most users (I have never seen pdf files with u3d annotations). If they decide to release anyway, most of the packaging can be reused. > The upstream tarball contains .res files, which are compiled versions > of the .rc files. I'd suggest that they should only ship source code > in their source tarballs. Same comment applies to the prebuilt-PDFs > from the demos. > > Much of the code is under a different license to the one quoted in > debian/copyright. > ... I have removed all binary files and files already packaged in debian. These changes are described in debian/copyright and a get-orig-source target was added to debian/rules > > Some of the code references http://libharu.sourceforge.net/, which > redirects to libharu.org. fixed upstream and patched in this package > > lintian complaints: >... fixed > > debhelper warning: >... fixed > > After modifying the packaging to add -Wall to CFLAGS, one gcc warning: > > hpdf_u3d.c: In function 'HPDF_U3D_LoadU3D': > hpdf_u3d.c:136: warning: 'type' may be used uninitialized in this function I checked the code, and 'type' is always initialized when it is used. On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libharu". > > Package name : libharu > Version : 2.1.0+dfsg-1 > Upstream Author : Takeshi Kanno , > Antony Dovgal , libh...@googlegroups.com > URL : http://libharu.org > License : ZLIB/LIBPNG License (see below) > Section : libs > > It builds these binary packages: > libhpdf-2.1.0 - cross platform C library for generating pdf files > libhpdf-dev - cross platform C library for generating pdf files > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The upload would fix these bugs: 581397 > > My motivation for maintaining this package is: This library can add > pdf support to the saga gis package, which I packaged/maintain for > debian. > > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libharu > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable > main contrib non-free > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libharu/libharu_2.1.0-1.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > Kind regards > Johan Van de Wauw > > == > ZLIB/LIBPNG License: > This software is provided 'as-is', without any express or implied warranty. > > In no event will the authors be held liable for a
Lintian thinks a Non-Debian Native package is Debian Native
Paul, I'm not an expert, but it seems that your fluxbox_1.1.1+dfsg1-1.tar.gz contains your debian directory. You should repackage your upstream source doing the dfsg cleaning and make it fluxbox-*+dfsg.orig.tar.gz *Don't add your debian dir to the repackaged sources* (Apart from that, you should describe in debian/copyright which files were removed from the upstream release) Johan On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > Hey Mentors, > > > My maintainer ( on Fluxbox ) is on vacation. I'm an Uploader. > > My package is whining that it's debian native, when Fluxbox is > maintained outside of Debian. > > This cropped up after there were dfsg changes, but this is not why ( > Lintian whines that we have a dfsg on a native package, as it should ) > > > I'd love to get the package lintian clean again before he gets back. > Can anyone shed light on this[1] ? > > I'm pretty sure it's a small mistake on my part. > > > ( Yes I know about .git, yes, I know how to fix that one ;) ) > > > Thanks, Mentors! > -Paul > > [1]: http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/un...@debian.org.html#fluxbox > > -- > #define sizeof(x) rand() > :wq > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: > http://lists.debian.org/aanlktile90pkg9-u6-xbxzuez9yqbynnjsijlvphd...@mail.gmail.com > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimjgm6bat3ttftkmocgq6ftfqd5pmr9upx92...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS - mapcatcher
This looks like a package in which debian gis might be interested, I have added them in cc. I cannot sponsor your upload, but will still try to review it. Some comments already: * I'm no legal expert, but I guess that while using google maps you are breaking their license. You should find out whether it is ok to distribute such a program in debian (perhaps debian-legal?). This should not be an issue when openstreetmaps/... is used. * Why is the package name mapcatcher? Wouldn't it be less confusing to use gmapcatcher, like upstream? * README.Debian; legacy.diff: remove these files * debian/control: last standards version is 3.9.0 - check if your package complies and bump the version Anyway, thanks for your work! Johan On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Mark wrote: > Hi prospective Mentors :-) > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mapcatcher". > > * Package name : mapcatcher > Version : 0.7.2.0-1 > Upstream Author : Helder Sepulveda > * URL :http://code.google.com/p/gmapcatcher > * License : GPL V2 + > Section : web > > It builds these binary packages: > mapcatcher - GMapCatcher is an offline maps viewer. > > The package appears to be lintian clean. > > The upload would fix these bugs: 589254 > > My motivation for maintaining this package is: mapcatcher [GMapCatcher] is a > fast, quickly-developing python map viewer that includes gps integration; > download maps while connected to the internet, then it works as a map viewer > / > gps for good. Includes satellite / terrain / hybrid maps when the map > service supports them; it downloads the map tiles that are the basis of web > map services; it already includes 8 of the major web map services, as well > as integration of all the various gps hardware that gpsd supports. Advanced > downloading features allow downloads of large areas / details of paths. It > looks as though it is basically the pre-eminent app in its field, so would > be > a worthy addition to the debian repos. > > > The package may be found at mentors.debian.net: > - URL:http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mapcatcher > - Source repository: deb-srchttp://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main > contrib non-free > - > dgethttp://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mapcatcher/mapcatcher_0.7.2.0-1.dsc > > I would be very pleased were someone to kindly upload the package for me. > > Kind regards > > Mark Benjamin > > http://www.halloit.com > > Key ID EE8E4DE8 > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c457f73.5020...@gmail.com > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktilnp61svi7peosus_romvl1cw05hrwoj5vum...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: obdgpslogger [ITP #580176]
Gary, I recommend joining the Debian GIS team (in cc:) and requesting sponsorship there. They/We maintain many GIS and GPS related packages. I will have a look to your package later. Johan On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Gary Briggs wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:50:57PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: >> > * Package name : obdgpslogger >> > Version : 0.15-1 >> > Upstream Author : Gary Briggs [myself] >> > * URL : http://icculus.org/obdgpslogger/ >> > * License : GPLv2+ >> > Section : science >> > >> > It builds these binary packages: >> > obdgpslogger - Suite of tools to log OBDII and GPS data >> >> First off, thanks for your interest in packaging this package for >> Debian. I have done a little review of your package, though IANADD so I >> cannot upload your package even if you address all my comments. Also a >> DD may have additional comments on top of mine. > > I really appreciate your taking the time to look at it. > >> As far as I can tell the package embeds a copy of sqlite3, which is >> already packaged in Debian (as libsqlite3-dev). Optimally you would not >> ship this in your tarball at all. > > I've added an option to my build to use the system-wide sqlite3 library > instead of the included one, and modified the rules file to set that > option in the debian build. > >> There are several files in the package not under GPL v2; you can find >> some (possibly all) of them by running: >> licensecheck -r * | grep -v v2\ or\ later > > I've added the files in question to the copyright file. I explicitly > disavow copyright on a couple of files, and I added the GPL header to > the top of the others. > > The only remaining file is a simple shell script that's provided > only as an example in doc/ in the source package. Do I need to > explicitly mention it anywhere? It's not distributed in the final > package. We're in the realm of this GPL FAQ here: > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhatIfWorkIsShort > > I'll upload a new package once I know what to do about that. > >> Their copyright holders and licenses should be listed in >> debian/copyright. Also "Michael Carpenter" is listed as a copyright >> holder of a handful of files, but he is not mentioned in d/copyright. > > I've added Michael to the copyright holders list. > >> On a related note, the copyright file refers to the versionless GPL from >> common-licenses, which implies Debian is relicensing it under GPL-3 or >> later (lintian finds this with issue --pedantic). > > Fixed. > >> Your package is also missing a watch file (lintian reports this with >> - -I). Even though you are your own upstream and therefore undeniable >> aware of new upstream releases it is good practise for future packages - >> and it would also be nice to have in case you at some point in the >> future retire either your upstream or your downstream "hat". > > Done. > >> I did not have time to run test it - unfortunately I do not own hardware >> needed either, so at best I would run the simulator. > > Understandable. The only part that communicates with the hardware is > obdgpslogger itself. All the other binaries are utilities associated > with the logfiles created [or the sim]. > > To try obdgpslogger attached to the sim, you can do it in one step > ["obdsim -o"], or multiple steps: > 1) Run "obdsim" without parameters > 2) Read the "SimPort name"; on *nix this is a pty. > 3) Run "obdgpslogger -t -s " > The "-t" flag is "spam stdout"; you'll know if stuff's working because > you see some numbers appear. The default logfile name is "obdgpslogger.db" > > Once you see it working, you can use obd2csv to create a csv file > from the logfile just created: > obd2csv -d obdgpslogger.db -o obdgpslogger.csv > > Thank-you so much for taking the time to look at this, > Gary (-; > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100822195149.gr21...@gamehenge.icculus.org > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinsj8nw167sxojey1szsd-+bkot=+fjndqzm...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Include 0AD, a new fancy 3D RTS
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > DXT compression is based on Simon Brown's squish library. The library > also contains an alternative GPU-accelerated compressor that uses CUDA > and is one order of magnitude faster. > This might make it not suitable for main, since DXT seems to be patented: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=407561 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktinciqeha+y2gpt9_g6+7ijeg7g2xjuaniw2h...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Using ccache with git-buildpackage
I haven't tried this, but from the manpage: "--git-builder=BUILD_CMD Use BUILD_CMD instead of debuild -i\.git -I.git " so specifying: --git-builder='debuild -i.git -I.git --prepend-path=/usr/lib/ccache' should work. On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Hello. I use git-buildpackage and want to use ccache. I tried exporting > overriden CC and PATH, but that had no effect and `echo' in debian/rules > shows that both variables are reverted to the defaults. Does > git-buildpackage clear the environment? How can I use ccache in this > configuration? > > -- > WBR, wRAR > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJMpu30AAoJEOih81koZvPBRIgH/1yJBDUo0fVBtvo0le9WNQ4H > 77U5F4vZnHccUW6B7BGRHxfHmLD23V7S/M8HkjyRvPub+YPljZCcmaBlW0H/bnBf > Rtgbd/fC00GnGsm7yKcLSSD472/BC3qSTeUp77RxLcqM0xYKpqI4+ZgUvDyntNZ3 > mY1+Dz8a3q/Hlrps3GGyZgWnNn0nZ/veMvomhJWugDw6bZ9mBvaix4ZFUaetwEI+ > itcnKFKjAsjL8syv24PzNTEljRQW/jXBOuCTePLCs+Gq8HzztvV+KzWVX5vJulJT > 6Uiu/BdgC2D7myIm38u5iCkNHPL/NkrH9Lu8pduKEa9B3m41wItUeTGFwpV/s9Y= > =mA8n > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=a_8i9hbkhchifajvdmt-3cbu5dxmmumqgh...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Four days
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Asheesh Laroia wrote: > > And what other cultural improvements can we make to debian-mentors? What > else can we do to make this place supportive and helpful for the progress of > y'all mentees into sparkly Debian contributors and developers? Not something that is implemented overnight, but I think there should be a solution for new packages which are often useful for users, but not (yet?) up to debian high standards. I really like the way ubuntu's launchpad ppas are set up: anyone with an account can create an archive and upload his source packages. If such an archive gives the chance to users to report bugs and also the usage (eg popcon, download stats) of packages in that archive, it could be used by sponsors to pick packages which actually have users. And if it is not picked up by a sponsor at least the users can enjoy the packaging work which was done. Apart from that, I believe users in some cases better reviewers than sponsors. A sponsor may complain about the standards version which is not up to date with the latest version and/or some lintian errors, but may not notice bugs which really limit the usability of the application. One could argue that such a packages - if they had a copyright review - could go to experimental, but if a system like launchpad ppas would exist (where you can upload new versions of a package without needing a sponsor) the barrier is lowered even more. What I dislike about this ppa system (and coming more on topic) is that it does not really encourage towards becoming an official package and also doesn't learn about how to work with these official packages. Eg closing bugs by doing an upload, ... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimea+unwnwnanxuq8vuv3=bzbkpt9ixyyykc...@mail.gmail.com
Re: shlibs and lintian
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Zvi Dubitzky wrote: > I am having a package for libraries (several) > The package is called libvae (libvae_1.3_amd64.deb) and include the > libraries (libvae.so.2.0 , libvaeUtil.so.2.0 ..) soname major version: 2; minor version: 0; patch: ? (I assume 0 also) > The shlibs is as follows : > libvae 2 libvae (>= 1.3) dependencies refer to the version number on the soname. libvae 2 libvae should work if you really want (>0.0). [BTW: better call your package libvae2_1.3-1] And make sure that you understand library version numbers http://sourceware.org/autobook/autobook/autobook_91.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikr9dlixshp5lkfvmkaaoij49kmo7_+rz1d+...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-rivet, libapache2-mod-rivet-doc
Please upload your source package to debian mentors or tell us where we can find it. http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/maintainer-intro Otherwise it is impossible to review/sponsor it. Johan 2010/10/7 Massimo Manghi : > Dear debian mentors and Debian Apache maintainers > > I'm looking for a sponsor for the packages libapache2-mod-rivet and > libapache2-mod-rivet-doc. > > * Package name : libapache2-mod-rivet > Version : 2.0.1 > Upstream Author : The Rivet Team > * URL :http://tcl.apache.org/rivet/ > * License : Apache-2.0 > Programming Lang: C, Tcl > Description : Server-side Tcl programming system combining ease of use > and power > > > Apache Rivet is a system for creating dynamic web content via a > programming language integrated with Apache Web Server. It is > designed to be fast, powerful and extensible, consume few system > resources, be easy to learn, and to provide the user with a platform > that can also be used for other programming tasks outside the web > (GUI's, system administration tasks, text processing, database > manipulation, XML, and so on). In order to meet these goals > Tcl programming language was chosen to combine with the Apache Web > Server. > > * Package name : libapache2-mod-rivet-doc > Version : 2.0.1 > Upstream Author : The Rivet Team > * URL :http://tcl.apache.org/rivet > * License : Apache-2.0 > Programming Lang: C, Tcl > Description : Server-side Tcl programming system combining ease of use > and power > > This package provides the configuration and programming manual for mod_rivet > > The packages are ready, checked with lintian after itp bugs were filed for > them. > > As a member of the Rivet Developers Team I'm available for answering bug > reports and other requests that may come from the users. > > -- Massimo Manghi > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4cadfd0a.9010...@unipr.it > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti*0xaslnkjyox5iwatucar1duh=0-e181m...@mail.gmail.com
package with new soname: questions about .symbols and uploading
Dear mentors, I've packaged a new version of my library package 'libharu'. Since upstream uses a -RELEASE type of version number, I copied this, and this resulted in a libhpdf-2.1.0 package. I've now updated my package to version 2.2.1. It builds these binary packages: libhpdf-2.2.1 - C library for generating pdf files libhpdf-dev - C library for generating pdf files (development files) The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libharu - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libharu/libharu_2.2.1-1.dsc But I still want to fix the .symbols file. However, I was not able to find how I should do it in this case (new packagename). Should I just generate a new file from scratch (I have not seen incompatible api changes) or refer to the old version number for functions which were available before. Anyway, it's a general concern that I find little advice on how a symbols file should actually look [1] - whether the one I made previously was actually valid - so I was actually considering to perhaps not include a symbols file anymore (better no file than one which is possibly incorrect). So three questions: 1) should I still have a symbols file? 2) what are good references for building/maintaining it? 3) should I recreate it from scratch - or refer to the old version of the package? and one fourth bonus question: One package which I'm not maintaining relies on libharu. If I upload a new version this will need a rebuild. How is this usually handled? Kind regards Johan Van de Wauw [1] eg http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/mole/seedsymbols/main seems to be broken -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35k-mGKa7GuzWJRx0SyF4dno4LdZAhVED=42pdysnfc...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: libharu (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.2.1-1 of my package "libharu". It builds these binary packages: (new) libhpdf-2.2.1 - C library for generating pdf files libhpdf-dev - C library for generating pdf files (development files) I've tested the package and lintian does not complain. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libharu - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libharu/libharu_2.2.1-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. 2 remarks: - dfsg cleaning was necessary in the previous version: this is no longer true because the upstream tarball no longer contains the examples which were causing problems - I've removed the .symbols because it is a bit irrelevant in a package whose name changes when the so-name changes (see discussion on d.mentors: [0]. Kind regards Johan Van de Wauw [0]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/07/msg00365.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35=qgpgfj2c8f1u4cho8yry0nm9g2i9imbbxocleyey...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: libharu (updated package)
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > >> - I've removed the .symbols because it is a bit irrelevant in a >> package whose name changes when the so-name changes (see discussion on >> d.mentors: [0]. >> [0]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/07/msg00365.html > > Ahh, the package name *always* changes when the SONAME changes, not > doing so is a severity serious bug. > > The reason the symbols file is irrelevant is due to a frequently > changing SONAME or one that changes with every upstream version. I agree - bad words from me: since every upstream release causes a soname change anyway. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35=95pTSKJEtq-d=gblkw-_n-r8-m0wtyznhwfo4_be...@mail.gmail.com
Re: package with new soname: questions about .symbols and uploading
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Kilian Krause , 2011-07-14, 20:34: >> >> If you can confirm that the symbols file for your last version and this >> version match up perfectly, then the SONAME shouldn't have been bumped in >> the first place > > Err, no, you can't conclude that ABI wasn't broken just from the fact that > symbol lists didn't change. > Indeed not. But in this case the ABI was not broken. In fact it is a stable library, with some new features and bugfixes the last years. I've checked the git history and since mid 2008 no ABI breaking changes were made (or I looked over them). I like Jakub's suggestion of proposing a soversion number scheme upstream and adopting it in debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cajop35nphgdxcqyu7g_apcnujnpfujh91ji57gybyzgq0vr...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: libharu (updated package)
Dear Michael, Thanks for reviewing. Sorry for the late reply - I've been without internet at home until yesterday. On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.2.1-1 >> of my package "libharu". >> >> It builds these binary packages: >> (new) libhpdf-2.2.1 - C library for generating pdf files >> libhpdf-dev - C library for generating pdf files (development files) >> >> I've tested the package and lintian does not complain. >> > [...] > > The package looks mostly fine, except for the fact that our lintian's seem to > disagree: > > W: libharu source: format-3.0-but-debian-changes-patch ok - fixed > E: libhpdf-2.2.1: helper-templates-in-copyright > E: libhpdf-dev: helper-templates-in-copyright also fixed. If somebody else sees this error and doesn't know why: Make sure you change the Author(s) field to either Author or Authors. (from this lintian bug report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631674 ) Or switch to DEP-5 (which I did as well). > > Could you please git rid of those (all of which should be easily addressed, > the > latter two ideally by a DEP-5 formatted copyright file) and re-upload? done > > Thanks, > Michael > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35mPPzzOgWNyPBGOpPw9p_ac+CA_2py7sNG=r4e0b5a...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Becoming DM [was: Re: Tracking RFSs as bugs]
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 11:09 PM, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > Could you please be more precise about that last bit? What exactly is hard > about > becoming DM? > > I really wish more people applied for DM. Sponsoring the same package more > than > a few times makes little sense in most cases (there are exceptions, and I for > one are regularly sponsoring at least one such exception). I think that he really wants to say: it is hard to get a (first) package into debian. That is not a problem which is solved by becoming a DM. I have never faced problems finding sponsors for updates of my package, and I don't have the impression that it are those packages which don't find a sponsor. Apart from that: I haven't applied for DM yet because I still found it useful that someone reviews my package prior to uploading. Although one can also argue that that is partly the role of 'unstable'. Johan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35=chmkx0pbq1d3o4daunefrmyxojybwvd6_rehvy_h...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: bino
Daniel, I am not a debian developer, so I can not upload your package. However I have checked it contents and it looks very good: I hope this message encourages sponsors to check your package. One comment: you require libswscale >=0.14 to build, which is present in unstable but not (yet) in testing. It may be useful to specify the version needed in debian/control: libswscale-dev (>=4.0.7) [or whatever is more correct] a little nitpicking: There is a double @@ symbol in line 56 of your debian/copyright file Johan On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Daniel Schaal wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bino". > > * Package name : bino > Version : 1.2.0-1 > Upstream Author : Martin Lambers > * URL : http://bino3d.org > * License : GPL-3.0+ > Section : video > > It builds those binary packages: > > bino - 3D video player > bino-dbg - debugging symbols for bino 3D video player > > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > URL: > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/bino > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bino/bino_1.2.0-1.dsc > > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > > Kind regards, > > Daniel Schaal > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1429545.snOU8C3YbQ@daniels-laptop > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35nNGhRHi4vXMfEZX4RHXcG0r8N5-a1=ytxnkpb6_0b...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RFS: parcellite 1.0.2~rc5-1 (updated package)
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: > Anyways, I have no idea how much any sponsor knows about my work. The > majority of packages I've had sponsored through this list over the > years have only had terse replies such as "Uploaded." At least somebody should have advocated your work if you became debian maintainer? Why not ask him/her? Johan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35=lxwm29v_b2nm6imreaifilx5ytozvswp_nk8w57d...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#728105: RFS: libharu/2.2.1-2
Package: sponsorship-requests Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libharu" * Package name: libharu Version : 2.2.1-2 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : http://libharu.org/ * License : zlib Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libhpdf-2.2.1 - C library for generating pdf files libhpdf-dev - C library for generating pdf files (development files) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libharu Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libh/libharu/libharu_2.2.1-2.dsc Changes since previous version in the archive: libharu (2.2.1-2) unstable; urgency=low [ Johan Van de Wauw ] * Bump standards version * Fix copyright file formatting * Support huge fonts (Closes: #726069) * Autoreconf to support recent architectures(Closes: #727409) -- Johan Van de Wauw Sun, 27 Oct 2013 18:07:05 +0100 Or check in git: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/libharu.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/debian Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35k_d_ASATUdAosZCT0bSZHie+2kWPvmGojdhA5CLHz=k...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#754881: RFS: saga/2.1.2+dfsg-1 (update)
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "saga" * Package name: saga Version : 2.1.2+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Olaf Conrad, Volker Wichmann and other contributors * URL : http://www.saga-gis.org * License : GPL Section : science It builds those binary packages: libsaga- SAGA GIS shared libraries libsaga-dev - SAGA GIS development files python-saga - SAGA GIS Python bindings saga - System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/saga Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/saga/saga_2.1.2+dfsg-1.dsc SAGA is already packaged in debian, this is just an update to the last upstream version Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35=Z=7=mSu+GFF9RQ=7X=hgr9vwhegg3xz6zknj_kbn...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#755049: RFS: libharu/2.3.0-1 (update)
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libharu" * Package name: libharu Version : 2.3.0-1 Upstream Author : Takeshi Kanno, Antony Dovgal (see copyrightfile) * URL : http://www.libharu.org * License : Zlib/libpng Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libhpdf-2.3.0 - C library for generating pdf files libhpdf-dev - C library for generating pdf files (development files) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libharu (note that due to a bug in debexpo this site shows the wrong uploader) Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libh/libharu/libharu_2.3.0-1.dsc libharu is already packaged in debian, this is just an update to the last upstream version. It will require a rebuild of the depending packages: saga udav mathgl emboss falconpl Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35=t3q7aoadzgqgs4r79ajgyvw-t2gk0cwa2qwbwdos...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: saga/2.1.2+dfsg-2
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "saga" (already in debian) * Package name: saga Version : 2.1.2+dfsg-2 * URL : http://www.saga-gis.org * License : GPL/LGPGL +others (see copyright file) Section : science It builds those binary packages: libsaga- SAGA GIS shared libraries libsaga-dev - SAGA GIS development files python-saga - SAGA GIS Python bindings saga - System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/saga Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/saga/saga_2.1.2+dfsg-2.dsc More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com. Changes since the last upload, especially fixes a FTBS on arm: * Remove unneeded configure option * Fix wrong version number in saga-depends * Temporarily disable building saga gui on arm (closes: #755361) Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35kvHmc69u_if-K_GhErXsfO_7XM7ck-EEL2zjYypmU=e...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#757976: RFS: saga/2.1.2+dfsg-2
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "saga" (already in debian) * Package name: saga Version : 2.1.2+dfsg-2 * URL : http://www.saga-gis.org * License : GPL/LGPGL +others (see copyright file) Section : science It builds those binary packages: libsaga- SAGA GIS shared libraries libsaga-dev - SAGA GIS development files python-saga - SAGA GIS Python bindings saga - System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/saga Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/saga/saga_2.1.2+dfsg-2.dsc Changes since the last upload, especially fixes a FTBS on arm: * Remove unneeded configure option * Fix wrong version number in saga-depends * Temporarily disable building saga gui on arm (closes: #755361) Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35nee3pcmq08ogxqs6wttnndgfvnpxcytdsx-id8ksr...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#761581: RFS: libhdf4/4.2.10-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libhdf4" * Package name: libhdf4 Version : 4.2.10-1 Upstream Author : The HDF Group * URL : http://hdfgroup.org * License : HDF license (BSD) Section : graphics It builds those binary packages: hdf4-tools - Hierarchical Data Format library -- runtime package libhdf4-0 - Hierarchical Data Format library -- library package libhdf4-0-alt - Hierarchical Data Format library -- library package libhdf4-alt-dev - Hierarchical Data Format library -- development package libhdf4-dev - Hierarchical Data Format library -- development package libhdf4-doc - Hierarchical Data Format library -- documentation libhdf4g-dev - Hierarchical Data Format library -- transitional development pack To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libhdf4 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libh/libhdf4/libhdf4_4.2.10-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: A package was submitted to experimental a few days ago. That fixed a number of bugs (5), uses the original upstream tarball (instead of a tarball containing the upstream tarball) and added compatibility with ARM64 and PPC64. This library currently blocks +50 other packages for those architectures. This package for unstable is identical but 2 fixes were added for GNU Hurd and kfreebsd: * Add support for GNU Hurd * Fix kfreebsd-64 bit Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing-updates APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140914182439.1662.49953.report...@debian-usb.fritz.box
Bug#763337: RFS: owslib/0.8.9-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "owslib" * Package name: owslib Version : 0.8.9-1 Upstream Author : Several authors * URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/OWSLib * License : BSD-3-Clause Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-owslib - Client library for Open Geospatial (OGC) web services To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/owslib Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/owslib/owslib_0.8.9-1.dsc More information about owslib can be obtained from http://geopython.github.io/OWSLib Changes since the last upload: * Initial debian package Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35=+utJ6RF+8z5CHRP=zRBZ9Lcx2_Ay=9u63-jiqxjv...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#763649: RFS: libhdf4/4.2.10-2
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libhdf4" * Package name: libhdf4 Version : 4.2.10-2 Upstream Author : HDFGroup * URL : http://www.hdfgroup.org/ * License : 4-clause BSD Section : graphics It builds those binary packages: hdf4-tools - Hierarchical Data Format library -- runtime package libhdf4-0 - Hierarchical Data Format library (embedded NetCDF) libhdf4-0-alt - Hierarchical Data Format library (without NetCDF) libhdf4-alt-dev - Hierarchical Data Format development files (without NetCDF) libhdf4-dev - Hierarchical Data Format development files (embedded NetCDF) libhdf4-doc - Hierarchical Data Format library -- documentation libhdf4g-dev - Hierarchical Data Format library -- transitional development pack To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libhdf4 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libh/libhdf4/libhdf4_4.2.10-2.dsc This upload fixes a bug on s390X and mips. I also enabled the tests at build-time that reveal this bugs and a different error on arm64 which was fixed as well. Apart from that I did some cosmetic work which mostly fixes lintian issues. Changes since the last upload: * Add build-time checks * Fix wrong endianness s390x/mips(closes: #761603) * Fix ncgen test errors on arm64 (based on fedora changes) * Fix documentation paths * Add lintian override for spurious svn conflict files * Remove duplicate binary control fields * Add debian/source/format * Fix short descriptions, bump standards version These changes were applied in git: git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-grass/hdf4.git Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35nCtWGMpNvKwWShb=3wK9V-_HdGQFn=d6kZpoX=XrHa=g...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#763819: hdf4 not ready for sponsering
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Johan, > > I'd like to sponsor this package as requested on SoB Wiki page but there > are several lintian issues (including errors) which would cause an > auto-reject: Thanks for taking time to review and sorry for your time. I'll try to find out what went wrong because I'm pretty sure that at least the lintian errors should not be present (they were present before and thought I fixed them in this upload). Just two more questions/comments: > > W: libhdf4-alt-dev: copyright-refers-to-versionless-license-file > usr/share/common-licenses/GPL > W: libhdf4g-dev: copyright-refers-to-versionless-license-file > usr/share/common-licenses/GPL > W: libhdf4-doc: copyright-refers-to-versionless-license-file > usr/share/common-licenses/GPL > > seems to be easy to fix Not really, since this license refers to the debian packaging work. The only reference points to this directory. I will ask the copyright holders to choose a version. Strictly speaking they might even have referred to different versions of the GPL. > > W: libhdf4 source: debian-watch-file-in-native-package > W: libhdf4 source: native-package-with-dash-version > > looks suspicious. There are other not that important things but I'd > call the package in a bad state. Indeed suspicious and strange, I didn't get these. Wonder what went wrong. Probably something while rebasing. Just a final remark: I am planning to make more changes (build only one library version without netcdf) after the freeze (it will require a transition). This can make the d/rules files and patches much easier. I'm now focusing on fixing bugs and ignoring some lintian errors, since it seems more useful to fix them when a "proper" package is built. Anyway, it had 134 lintian warnings before I started working on it, so it is definitely improving :-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35nqnqOGTmtR=sn73kx85znm3hh8x+nybxiku3bex5f...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#763819: hdf4 not ready for sponsering
Andreas, I've uploaded a new version to mentors and pushed to git. I addressed most errors you mentioned, however i was unable to get the errors mentioned below, they were also not mentioned on the mentors page itself (and should be, because it are warnings on the source package). So I remain a bit puzzled how you got those warnings: > > W: libhdf4 source: debian-watch-file-in-native-package > W: libhdf4 source: native-package-with-dash-version > > looks suspicious. There are other not that important things but I'd > call the package in a bad state. > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35=ukm29nco0+v7zjox+uoy1k7mkqjfko+g3mwu10hp...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#764502: RFS: saga/2.1.2+dfsg-3
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "saga" (already in debian) * Package name: saga Version : 2.1.2+dfsg-3 * URL : http://www.saga-gis.org * License : GPL/LGPGL +others (see copyright file) Section : science It builds those binary packages: libsaga- SAGA GIS shared libraries libsaga-dev - SAGA GIS development files python-saga - SAGA GIS Python bindings saga - System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/saga Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/saga/saga_2.1.2+dfsg-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: the most important one is that I have * Use dep-5 style copyright file * Enable OpenMP * Revert "Temporarily disable building saga gui on arm" - bug resolved in gcc * Fix provides tag Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35=msk7ehblq_fet57vm3l7amihmbcdshhx86bk48fj...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#764502: RFS: saga/2.1.2+dfsg-3
Copy pasted too much: the source is at: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/saga/saga_2.1.2+dfsg-3.dsc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35kpsx_dvd+kzopz+hsjjhyvyfxyzpgq8ssd1nq0ved...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#764831: RFS: geolinks/0.0.1-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "geolinks" * Package name: geolinks Version : 0.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Tom Kralidis * URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/geolinks * License : MIT Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-geolinks - Library for using geospatial links (catalogue interoperablity) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/geolinks Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/geolinks/geolinks_0.0.1-1.dsc The version number may suggest it is not ready for debian, but this (very small) package is a prerequisite for pycsw, and has been seperately distributed so others can use it. Changes since the last upload: * Initial upload (closes: #763538) Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35n3xw+nsa5mqrsbb9geyl8vnkko1ktg13lced-s2aq...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#764832: RFS: pycsw/1.10.0+dfsg-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pycsw" * Package name: pycsw Version : 1.10.0+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Angelos Tzotsos, Tom Kralidis * URL : http://pycsw.org * License : MIT Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-pycsw - OGC compliant metadata (catalog service for web) backend python-pycsw-doc - OGC compliant metadata (catalog service for web) server python-pycsw-wsgi - WSGI Apache CSW service based on python-pycsw To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pycsw Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pycsw/pycsw_1.10.0+dfsg-1.dsc This package needs python-owslib (recently uploaded to unstable) and python-geolinks (uploaded to mentors). Changes since the last upload: * Initial upload (closes: #762145) Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35k=5vowpusctxnp6isww_f2u-dyf_gm4yraf0ufsip...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#764832: lintian: W: python-pycsw: empty-binary-package
Andreas, I've fixed the package. Johan On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > lintian says: > > W: python-pycsw: empty-binary-package > > which is in fact true. > > Kind regards > >Andreas. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141011161824.gb11...@an3as.eu > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35=v+sfkqiqobowy8u59+vlhudmyn4drrusycenhazx...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#764958: RFS: click/3.3-1 [ITP #764953]
Alexandre, Thanks for you contribution to debian. I've filed an ITP for fiona [1] which depends on python-click so I hope you find a sponsor. One remark on your pacakge: I would use debhelper 9 (set in d/compat and update d/control). Regards, Johan [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=765470 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35kx6uro1txowtvvje6fnxozt3ygegj4jz4bdzx1pox...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#765883: RFS: avce00/2.0.0-5
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "avce00" * Package name: avce00 Version : 2.0.0-5 Upstream Author : Daniel Morissette * URL : http://avce00.maptools.org/ * License : MIT Section : science It builds those binary packages: avce00 - Conversion of ESRI Arcinfo Vector Coverage in E00 format To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/avce00 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/avce00/avce00_2.0.0-5.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Move to debhelper 9 * Enable hardening when compiling/linking * Bump standards version, fix vcs links (cme fix dpkg-control) * Remove duplicate changelog * Add doc-base * Add myself to uploaders Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35kV5LND1tW1pg7THtdBOHTo7YeA=scghptvv6q7dzy...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#764958: Moved to collab-maint
Alexandre, Note that you can (and should) add this to your d/control file: Vcs-Browser and Vcs-Git. Also make sure you use the canonical version[1]: of the URL to do so, they should look like: Vcs-Browser: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/python-click.git Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/python-click.git Since anonscm seems down currently, I have not actually tested these links, so double check before you copy. Regards, Johan [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/05/msg9.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35kkneebvbm45a85btbkqm43jrtc5k5o5o6yz_j0rx9...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#765661: Pristine-tar is missing
This was done yesterday. Regards, Johan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35kwkoGf53kv15Mxo86SaD+-Q9T7TnWXVNzUMw=3ncn...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#766177: RFS: libhdf4/4.2.10-3 [RC]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important X-Debbugs-CC: debian-...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libhdf4" * Package name: libhdf4 Version : 4.2.10-3 Upstream Author : HDFGROUP * URL : http://www.hdfgroup.org/ * License : BSD-4clause Section : graphics It builds those binary packages: hdf4-tools - Hierarchical Data Format library -- runtime package libhdf4-0 - Hierarchical Data Format library (embedded NetCDF) libhdf4-0-alt - Hierarchical Data Format library (without NetCDF) libhdf4-alt-dev - Hierarchical Data Format development files (without NetCDF) libhdf4-dev - Hierarchical Data Format development files (embedded NetCDF) libhdf4-doc - Hierarchical Data Format library -- documentation libhdf4g-dev - Hierarchical Data Format library -- transitional development pack To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libhdf4 Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libh/libhdf4/libhdf4_4.2.10-3.dsc Changes since the last upload: [ Fernando Seiti Furusato ] * Fix endianness definition for ppc64el. [ Johan Van de Wauw ] * Disable tests on s390x (closes: #764353) * Remove unneeded build dep groff Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35me01x2w5i6yjvzln7y7cg5vqheejn500acaca-mnk...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#765883: RFS: avce00/2.0.0-5
After uploading the package (and filing this RFS) I noticed that the
version number was much higher than in wheezy. It appeared that there
were two versions mentioned in the changelog in the repository that
didn't make their way to unstable in the end.
I've therefore adjusted the version number to 2.0.0-3
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/avce00/avce00_2.0.0-3.dsc
The full changelog, including the other changes:
[ Johan Van de Wauw ]
* Move to debhelper 9
* Enable hardening when compiling/linking
* Bump standards version, fix vcs links (cme fix dpkg-control)
* Remove duplicate changelog
* Add doc-base
* Add myself to uploaders
[ Francesco Paolo Lovergine ]
* Fixed short and long descriptions to make lintian happy.
* Policy bumped to 3.8.3.
* Debhelper level set to 7. Now using dh_prep.
* Removed Jean-Denis Giguere among Uploaders.
* Moved to source format 3.0
* Repository moved to git and Vcs-* changed in debian/control.
* Debhelper level set to 8. No changes required.
* Policy bumped to 3.9.1. No changes required.
* Added ${misc:Depends} by dh use.
* Make lintian happy about debian-rules-ignores-make-clean-error.
* Fixed extended-description-line-too-long lintian warning.
Regards,
Johan Van de Wauw
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/cajop35mvyk5p8mxdrmjut5gpdz_ogafaodm7pdotyh1kybx...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Package with CMAKE based C library
Werner, I'd recommend using debhelper for a new package and not cdbs. Cmake is recognised normally, try with the minimal rules file: #!/usr/bin/make -f %: dh $@ Johan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35nasxep61or40amzpydfbobmecskidxx-8jp9o9q4_...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#765883: Did anybody just upload avce00?
Andreas, Given the fact that there was a -3 and -4 version in the old changelog (see discussion [1] and solution [2]), I suspect that a version -3 has been uploaded long before but somehow didn't make it to unstable. Is there a way to check this? Or should we just ask the ftp-masters. Johan [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2014/10/msg00151.html [2] http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/avce00.git/commit/?id=3924566b2160ae7074f29b4368b0a1c01e7fcf4e -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35nRyAra8s9ZTtouc854kDte=eigahajjtqvtl3l7wj...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Package with CMAKE based C library
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Werner Detter wrote: > It build's the package. So far, so good. But I'm still wondering what > needs to be done to split the package into "libcmime" and "libcmime-dev" :) Add both to the debian/control file. Then add files libcmime.install and libcmime-dev.install which contain the files you would like to have in each package. Check libharu for a simple example: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/libharu.git/tree/debian?id=01f51df5a7424f4dba53aa63eb1545ee78c1e715 Johan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35keyrQCBn_Emd=EEvgwaTsvUYQuTYVJ2rWceCDW8c5v=a...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#765883: Fwd: Did anybody just upload avce00?
Dear FTP masters, It seems avce00_2.0.0-3 failed to upload (sponsored by Tille) because a previous file was present. $ dput avce00_2.0.0-3_amd64.changes ... Uploading avce00_2.0.0-3.dsc Upload permissions error You either don't have the rights to upload a file, or, if this is on ftp-master, you may have tried to overwrite a file already on the server. ... Can you verify what is the latest version of avce00 present? In unstable the last version is 2.0.0-2, however the changelog in git (before updating this package) suggested that versions -3 and -4 also exist. Have they been uploaded and have they disappeared (I could not find any error in our mailing list archives)? Or was there an entirely different reason responsible for this error and should I just prepare a new upload of the same version. Regards, Johan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35mbtc_Z-tN8FTHPG3u4z=EnCy5qRxsugcp09=zvzvv...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#766421: RFS: libharu/2.2.1-2
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libharu" * Package name: libharu Version : 2.2.1-2 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : http://libharu.org/ * License : zlib Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libhpdf-2.2.1 - C library for generating pdf files libhpdf-dev - C library for generating pdf files (development files) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libharu Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libh/libharu/libharu_2.2.1-2.dsc Changes since previous version in the archive: libharu (2.2.1-2) unstable; urgency=low * Fix copyright file formatting * Support huge patch (Closes: #726069) * Update watchfile * Update vcs-field to be canonical * Switch to debhelper 9 - enable multiarch * cme-fix d/control * Fix typo in package description (closes:#753246) * properly clean all build files Note that previously I packaged a new upstream release. However that would require a transition, so I've now created a package with only minor changes. Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35=smxe0tcq4mdgwvtaly2fdn-5n8ghkh0ium0tkcvn...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#766583: RFS: libgeotiff-dfsg/1.4.0-3
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libgeotiff-dfsg" * Package name: libgeotiff-dfsg Version : 1.4.0-3 * URL : http://geotiff.osgeo.org/ Section : science It builds those binary packages: geotiff-bin - GeoTIFF (geografic enabled TIFF) library -- tools libgeotiff-dev - GeoTIFF (geografic enabled TIFF) library -- development files libgeotiff2 - GeoTIFF (geografic enabled TIFF) library -- run-time files To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libgeotiff-dfsg Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libg/libgeotiff-dfsg/libgeotiff-dfsg_1.4.0-3.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Team Upload * Enable hardening * Update debian/control (standards version, vcs url) * Update short descriptions * Install manfile for listgeo.1 * Fix macro error in manfile * Update debhelper dep to 9 Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35kog+qwuzfyltmokqj9rclbbw7dkbhvzg+j+m2hhfn...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#766583: [ti...@debian.org: [libgeotiff-dfsg] 01/01: pristine-tar data for libgeotiff-dfsg_1.4.0.orig.tar.gz]
Yep, thought about it when I saw the mail on pkg-grass-devel passing by -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35nzk9isx1w7ukkfm5-frdalzyirh5kywoktnbegawp...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#766852: RFS: cronolog/1.6.3-1
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Andreas Moog wrote: > On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 11:43:12AM +0100, Maxime Chatelle wrote: > > Unless I'm missing something, I don't think the license is GPL2+: The license > header of the files in src/* looks like > https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-1.0, > the license of the files in lib/* looks like LGPL2+. > > The only reference to GPL2+ seems to be the COPYING file. upstream should probably add the option "foreign" to AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE in configure.ac . Otherwise it may give you a COPYING file with GPL2+ for free if you do --add-missing. Johan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35kyt+ufonh8ll2oklfrovyh5iqdqr6sgriuvrmzfxc...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#767137: RFS: bsdowl/2.2.1-1 ITP
Michael, you should add a homepage to your package add this line to debian/control: Homepage: https://github.com/michipili/bsdowl I'd also add a watchfile, this will show whether the version in debian is in line with the last upstream release. In your case the example below seems to work well (you can check by running uscan --verbose in the package directory) debian/watch version=3 https://github.com/michipili/bsdowl/tags .*/v(\d.*)\.(?:tgz|tbz2|txz|tar\.(?:gz|bz2|xz)) On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Michael Grünewald wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bsdowl". > > Package name: bsdowl > Version : 2.2.1-1 > Upstream Author : Michael Grünewald > URL : https://github.com/michipili/bsdowl > License : CeCILL-B > Section : devel > > It builds those binary packages: > > bsdowl - Highly portable build system targeting modern UNIX systems > > This collection of BSD Make directives aims at providing a highly > portable build system targetting modern UNIX systems and supporting > common or less command languages. > > It can already be used to: > > - Preparation and publication of TeX documents; > - Development of TeX macros with NOWEB; > - Development of OCaml software; > - Maintainance of a FreeBSD workstation configuration files; > - Preparation of a static website with ONSGMLS. > > It is well tested under: > > - Mac OS X, version 10.6.8 and above > - FreeBSD, version 9.0 and above > - Debian Jessie and newer > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > following URL: > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/bsdowl > > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bsdowl/bsdowl_2.2.1-1.dsc > > More information about bsdowl can be obtained from > https://github.com/michipili/bsdowl > -- > Regards, > Michael Grünewald > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: https://lists.debian.org/544fceb5.7000...@gmail.com > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35=bitvg2evakt0vlytybh5js+ymy-v-xur3zlgnapy...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#767309: RFS: python-affine/1.0.1-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-affine" * Package name: python-affine Version : 1.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Sean Gillies, * URL : https://github.com/sgillies/affine * License : BSD-3 Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-affine - Python Library for handling affine transformations of the plane python3-affine - Python 3 Library for handling affine transformations of the plane To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-affine Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-affine/python-affine_1.0.1-1.dsc Note that this (small) python lilbrary is a dependency of rasterio which I'm packaging at : http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/rasterio.git Changes since the last upload: * Initial upload (closes: #767033) Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35nbumwkgyizxkqxiav3xc+akjsoy3eoakomm9bcdrh...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#767309: RFS: python-affine/1.0.1-1 [ITP]
Andrey, Thanks for taking time to review! On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Please remove debian/python-rasterio. Oops > shlibs:Depends is only needed when you package binaries. > python:depends is spelled python:Depends (the same for python3). Both fixed > dh_auto_test doesn't work, raising "ImportError: Start directory is not > importable: 'cd'" Fixed, a bit ashemed I didn't notice the errors. Anyway, I"ve taken time to check again and now it really builds from source in pbuilder. I've uploaded a new version to mentors. Regards, Johan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35n1DHUGoASM_=oemqgh8gwbmcvubdut0fhyocpdztz...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#767309: RFS: python-affine/1.0.1-1 [ITP]
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 09:37:28PM +0100, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: > > Now it doesn't run any tests. > Added setup.cfg Should now really run all the tests Johan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35nYAM8tmJ5n6wDO0EWnCT_b4aLZ7KeoTqgM=vvy5aj...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#767309: RFS: python-affine/1.0.1-1 [ITP]
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > You should use python3:Depends instead of python:Depends in the python3 > subpackage. Thanks once more for your reviews! I've changed this line. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35mffzfnlufgvivetnsw7mh28cgmhue8jbktz8nrguu...@mail.gmail.com
How to package a binary provided by python2 and python3
Hello all, I'm currently packaging two similar python libraries rasterio [1] and fiona [2]. Both libraries provide a python library and a command line tool that uses this library. Since both libraries can be build and used in both python 2 and 3 I created two packages: python-rasterio and python3-rasterio (and python-fiona, python3-fiona). My question is what I should do with the binary '/usr/bin/rio' (or /usr/bin/fiona'): I certainly don't want to have a conflict between both library packages by including it in both. I see a number of options here: * include one binary in python-rasterio and discard it from python3-rasterio * create a seperate package (eg python-rasterio.rio or python-rasterio-bin) with the binary, but only for python2 * create two separate binary packages which conflict (seems worst option to me) * create two packages containing the binary which don't conflict, but rename the binary ie one is /usr/bin/rio and the other /usr/bin/rio3 Is there any policy/recommended workflow here? Johan [1]http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/rasterio.git [2]http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-grass/fiona.git -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35k9s7ckj_=lmcuodwz7cnsk+hfm+c6gcwemw7vtjfe...@mail.gmail.com
Re: How to package a binary provided by python2 and python3
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Etienne Millon wrote: > Hi, > > The best practice is indeed to discard the binary in one of the > packages, like your solution 1. However, it is better to use the > python3 version (this is the recommended way now, can't find the > debian-python thread from earlier this year). Probably this mail: https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2014/05/msg00037.html While reading through the archives I also found this one, which basically asks the same question as I do: https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2014/02/msg0.html > > If most of your users will use only the binary, they shouldn't have to > know that it's written in python, so you can add an extra binary > package that only ships the binary. In this case, you can also do it > using a virtual package (just add a Provides: fiona to python3-fiona > for example) but I think that it is clearer with a real package. > > You can see examples on two of my packages: guessit (first case, > binary in python3-guessit) and subliminal (second case, binary in > subliminal). Thanks for the examples. I think I will follow the subliminal example. I like to have a separate package with a proper short+long description, since the binaries can be used by people who shouldn't need to know that the tool is using python. I'm reading up on alternatives (which as Frank mentioned indeed also is a possiblesollution), but I don't think it is possible to write a description for the binary there. In that case I would prefer a separate package. Johan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35muv_pbbbofwzwxwto+jqegwvfzlvzhtnr97pb1s6r...@mail.gmail.com
Re: VCS history inconsistency (Jessie version not found)
Perhaps you can import the dsc in a seperate branch, and work on that? It will be easy to cherry-pick your changes into the master branch later if the maintainer pushes his repository. Johan On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Maxime Chatelle wrote: > Hi, > > I'm tring to fix this RC bug: > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2014-0350 > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=746637 > > The history of the Git repository on Alioth do not contain the actual > version found in testing. The package was probably built outside the VCS > and someone forgot to update the repository. And new versions was added > later (uploaded to experimental). I do not want to blame anyone. I want > just fix this. > > Rewriting the git history using git rebase can be an option ? (by > setting denyNonFastForwards to false temporaly on Alioth) > > If not, which are the other options ? > > I can resolve the bug without the VCS but I prefer a sane basis. > > Regards, > xakz > > > Some detail about the package: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/poco.git > https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/poco.html > > Version in squeeze: 1.3.6p1-1+b1 > Version in wheezy, jessie, sid: 1.3.6p1-4 > > tags in the repository: > 19:57 xakz@hermes ~/devel/debian/packages/poco/git % git tag > debian/1.3.5-1 > debian/1.3.6-1 > debian/1.3.6p1-1 > debian/1.3.6p2-1 > debian/1.4.2p1-1 > debian/1.4.2p1-10 > debian/1.4.2p1-1_real > debian/1.4.2p1-2 > debian/1.4.2p1-2_real > debian/1.4.2p1-3 > debian/1.4.2p1-4 > debian/1.4.2p1-5 > debian/1.4.2p1-6 > debian/1.4.2p1-7 > debian/1.4.2p1-8 > debian/1.4.2p1-9 > debian/1.4.3p1-1 > debian/1.4.6-1 > debian/1.4.6p1-1 > upstream/1.3.5 > upstream/1.3.6 > upstream/1.3.6p1 > upstream/1.3.6p2 > upstream/1.4.0 > upstream/1.4.1 > upstream/1.4.1p1 > upstream/1.4.2 > upstream/1.4.2p1 > upstream/1.4.3p1 > upstream/1.4.4 > upstream/1.4.5 > upstream/1.4.6 > upstream/1.4.6p1 > > No tag for debian/1.3.6p1-4 found. > No entry in debian/changelog for 1.3.6p1-4 > > -- > Maxime Chatelle (xakz) > gpg: 5111 3F15 362E 13C6 CCDE 03BE BFBA B6E3 24AE 0C5B > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141106204633.ga6...@hermes.rxsoft.eu > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35na-_xeczvsm+0pl0aen3788kfdqqj_1+s4hzskeah...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#770521: RFS: rasterio/0.15.1-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rasterio" * Package name: rasterio Version : 0.15.1-1 Upstream Author : Mapbox, Sean Gillies, other contributors * URL : https://github.com/mapbox/rasterio * License : BSD-3-Clause Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-rasterio - Python API for using geospatial raster data with Numpy rasterio - Command line tool for investigating geospatial rasters To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/rasterio Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rasterio/rasterio_0.15.1-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Initial upload (closes: #767027) Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35=ESXQCKi4o=cwdg+x59qfdk1pn-ocscpkp5kfk5nb...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#770875: RFS: saga/2.1.4+dfsg-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "saga" * Package name: saga Version : 2.1.4+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Olaf Conrad, Volker Wichmann, other contributors * URL : http://www.saga-gis.org * License : LPGLv2.1+ GPLv2 Section : science It builds those binary packages: libsaga- SAGA GIS shared libraries libsaga-dev - SAGA GIS development files python-saga - SAGA GIS Python bindings saga - System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/saga Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/saga/saga_2.1.4+dfsg-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Update to new upstream version * Fix order in copyright file Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35nrr3o9Uk2JXB=Y3vbc=DJYLvqaos=so13kwo32g_x...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#771373: RFS: pycsw/1.10.0+dfsg-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pycsw". Please not that this package should be uploaded to "non-free" [1]. I've updated the copyright file to reflect this. * Package name: pycsw Version : 1.10.0+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Tom Krialdis, Angelos Tzotsos * URL : http://pycsw.org * License : MIT Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-pycsw - OGC compliant metadata (catalog service for web) backend python-pycsw-doc - OGC compliant metadata (catalog service for web) server python-pycsw-wsgi - WSGI Apache CSW service based on python-pycsw To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pycsw Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pycsw/pycsw_1.10.0+dfsg-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Initial upload (closes: #762145), targeting non-free after ftp-masters comments Regards, Johan Van de Wauw [1] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/2014-November/024520.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35=lfwph0h6d4parqkx2mlzxuxhfua16zfppf4efqfh...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#770875: Sponsorship for saga package
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > Hi Johan, > I checked your package and I am willing to sponsor its upload. > > I noticed that you are not accepting parallel building. Is this done on > purpose? Just for testing it, I added "--parallel" the the first "dh" > command in debian/rules and build time went from 18 to about 7 minutes > when running dpkg-buildpackage with "-j8" option on amd64 arch. I would > not change your package now, but I suggest you to investigate if with a > parallel build the resulting package is ok or if anything is wrong. In a > next version you might then add this option. I was not aware of the option. I will definitely investigate this. > > Would you like me to upload your package, or have you already another > sponsor or a different planning? Go ahead and sponsor! > > Bye, > Giuseppe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35njp-96sa2nun9sdieysof1ypmoo4r8vf582r1trgg...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#771373: Non-free ?
I've reuploaded to mentors with the correct section. Johan On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Johan, > > the changelog says "targeting non-free" but d/control has > > Section: python > > instead of > > Section: non-free/python > > Please clarify and ping me once both are consistent. > > Kind regards > >Andreas. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141206221316.ga22...@an3as.eu > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35kxgbgg1tuemx5nqjiqaxnt1vk+adtscy1etaoiue_...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#773505: python-descartes/1.0.1-1 [ITP]
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for reviews/a sponsor for my package "python-descartes" * Package name: python-descartes Version : 1.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Sean Gillies, descartesdevelopers * URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/descartes,https://bitbucket.org/sgillies/descartes * License : BSD-3 Programming Lang: Python python-descartes - Matplotlib extension to work with geometric objects (Python2) python3-descartes - Matplotlib extension to work with geometric objects (Python3) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-descartes Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-descartes/python-descartes_1.0.1-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: Initial upload Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35m4uutzcf3ek225zsyxiqm4h2n78p3h3da+c27l2gg...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#774106: RFS: owslib/0.8.12-1~exp [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "owslib" Package name: owslib Version : 0.8.12-1~exp Upstream Author : Tom Kralidis URL : http://geopython.github.com/OWSLib/ License : BSD-3-Clause Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-owslib - Client library for Open Geospatial (OGC) web services To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/owslib Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/owslib/owslib_0.8.12-1~exp.dsc More information about OWSLib can be obtained from http://geopython.github.com/OWSLib/. Changes since the last upload: [ Bas Couwenberg ] * Update Vcs-Browser URL to use cgit instead of gitweb. * Add Upstream-Contact to copyright file. [ Johan Van de Wauw ] * Imported Upstream version 0.8.12 Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35ndjfesuwa3rf2g5yhmay_yu2prpgs+tjblwyfpuhv...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#774512: RFS: python-osmapi/0.5.0-1~exp1 [ITP]
Bas, Is there a specific reason you are targeting experimental and not unstable? Can this package be used by Osgeo live or is there a reason not to do so (Angelos recently packaged version 0.4.1)? Keep up the good work! Johan https://launchpad.net/~osgeolive/+archive/ubuntu/nightly/+packages -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35mkkypnbpggccwav+nrzxbvjjffvocmd153owr7uvc...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#775693: RFS: python-cligj/0.1.0-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-cligj" Package name: python-cligj Version : 0.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Sean Gillies URL : https://github.com/mapbox/cligj License : BSD-3 Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-cligj - Common arguments and options for GeoJSON processing commands python3-cligj - Common arguments and options for GeoJSON processing commands To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-cligj Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-cligj/python-cligj_0.1.0-1.dsc More information about cligj can be obtained from https://github.com/mapbox/cligj. Changes since the last upload: * Initial upload (closes: #775528) Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35mgdk4t0tl-amch+ese61gzv0stq2s-pzahw1k06vt...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#775693: RFS: python-cligj/0.1.0-1 [ITP]
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Hi Johan, > > Sorry for not doing this sooner, but I have reviewed the package now. > Some comments follow. Thanks! > > The copyright file only documents the upstream copyright, documenting > the copyright & license for debian/* is a good idea unless you want to > assign the copyright to MapBox. Good catch > > There seems to be an issue with the setup.py and Python 3.2, the package > fails to build because the clean target fails before even starting the > build: > > This is on one of my wheezy systems, the package builds fine with Python > 3.4 on sid. On jessie it works as well. I don't think it is useful to change it. > > lintian reports a duplicate short description. Because the short > description is already 60 characters long this doesn't leave much room > to add something like "Python 3 module for ...". Appending "for Python > V" would fall within 80 characters, although the line length including > field name exceeds it. Improved the short description > > Kind Regards, > > Bas > > -- > GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1 > Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35mjt6boq+e_ckynahtr9guu0u-bj9zdbgfmaoo8ari...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#776793: RFS: python-geojson/1.0.9-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-geojson" Package name: python-geojson Version : 1.0.9-1 Upstream Author : Corey Farwell URL : http://geopython.github.com/OWSLib/ License : BSD-3-Clause Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-geojson - Python 2 bindings and utilities for GeoJSON python3-geojson - Python 3 bindings and utilities for GeoJSON To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-geojson Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-geojson/python-geojson_1.0.9-1.dsc More information about python-geojson can be obtained from http://geopython.github.com/OWSLib/. Changes since the last upload: * Initial upload (closes: #690833) Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35ks0tmcA-QDzUjt9Mc7jmrxYKU6_yrG=eaier6vbat...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#777146: RFS: fiona/1.5.0-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fiona" Package name: fiona Version : 1.5.0-1 Upstream Author : Sean Gillies URL : https://github.com/Toblerity/Fiona License : BSD-3-Clause Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-fiona - Python API for reading/writing vector geospatial data python3-fiona - Python 3 API for reading/writing vector geospatial data fiona - Command line tool for reading/writing vector geospatial data fiona-doc - Python API for reading/writing vector geospatial data (docs) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/fiona Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fiona/fiona_1.5.0-1.dsc More information about Fiona can be obtained from https://github.com/Toblerity/Fiona. Changes since the last upload: * Initial upload (closes: #765470) Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35kD-sBij=3ojckemq8khfj3y4vbemtwt4ujz_wqum7...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#777146: Fiona does not build
Strange,
gdal-config (libgdal-dev) and cython are in the control file.
Something strange seems to be happening in that pbuilder.
It works for me in unstable. You will need a recent update of unstable
as fiona relies on python-cligj which was only added yesterday.
Also fiona requires a recent version of Cython, so building under
jessie is not possible without further tweaking.
Johan
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> when trying to build fiona I get:
>
> ...
> Cythonizing fiona/ogrext.pyx
> /usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py:267: UserWarning: Unknown distribution
> option: 'metadata_version'
> warnings.warn(msg)
> /usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py:267: UserWarning: Unknown distribution
> option: 'requires_python'
> warnings.warn(msg)
> /usr/lib/python2.7/distutils/dist.py:267: UserWarning: Unknown distribution
> option: 'requires_external'
> warnings.warn(msg)
> running clean
> removing
> '/home/andreas/debian-maintain/alioth/debian-gis/build-area/fiona-1.5.0/.pybuild/pythonX.Y_2.7/build'
> (and everything under it)
> 'build/bdist.linux-x86_64' does not exist -- can't clean it
> 'build/scripts-2.7' does not exist -- can't clean it
> I: pybuild base:170: python3.4 setup.py clean
> WARNING:root:Failed to get options via gdal-config: [Errno 2] No such file or
> directory: 'gdal-config'
> CRITICAL:root:Cython.Build.cythonize not found. Cython is required to build
> from a repo.
> E: pybuild pybuild:256: clean: plugin distutils failed with: exit code=1:
> python3.4 setup.py clean
> dh_auto_clean: pybuild --clean -i python{version} -p 3.4 --dir . returned
> exit code 13
> debian/rules:14: recipe for target 'clean' failed
> make: *** [clean] Error 13
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: fakeroot debian/rules clean gave error exit status 2
> gbp:error: '~/bin/git-pbuilder' failed: it exited with 2
>
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35nDPi-hTr4e4DVX_gV3Ar=ggoem0cfoyggl0c7uasf...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#777146: Fiona does not build
>> Also fiona requires a recent version of Cython, so building under >> jessie is not possible without further tweaking. > > jessie & sid have the same cython version, so it should work. The wheezy > version is not sufficient though. Interesting. In that case it got a freeze exception. When I last checked it was still at an older version [1]. So I really closed a jessie RC bug there :-). https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754752 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35=0dqstrL7wHQHT0mWC0W-PDoWM9pYnceg_0h=ydxo...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#778488: RFS: python-geojson/1.0.9-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-geojson" Package name: python-geojson Version : 1.0.9-1 Upstream Author : Corey Farwell URL : https://github.com/frewsxcv/python-geojson License : BSD-3-Clause Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-geojson - Python 2 bindings and utilities for GeoJSON python3-geojson - Python 3 bindings and utilities for GeoJSON To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-geojson Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-geojson/python-geojson_1.0.9-1.dsc More information about python-geojson can be obtained from https://github.com/frewsxcv/python-geojson. Changes since the last upload: * Initial upload (closes: #690833) Not that this package was previously uploaded but rejected in new because it contained some cruft (leftovers of a wrong build) in debian. This should now be fixed. I also improved testing and corrected the homepage. Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35=zqHLPZmShF7dEQ5FSjGBioizbrx6=t9zvnvp5en3...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#778488: RFS: python-geojson/1.0.9-1 [ITP]
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Please increment the Debian revision and add the changes made after the > REJECT to the changelog. > > Documenting the changes is important. > > See also: https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2008/07/msg00686.html > I fixed this in git and I uploaded to mentors. I have been trying to find out how to get all the changelog entries int the .changes file. I managed doing this by specifying a version to -v which is lower than anything in the changelog. -vversion Causes changelog information from all versions strictly later than version to be used. For uploading to mentors I used debuild -S -v0 -sa It was not immediately clear how to proceed if you wanted to use a version older than the changelog. If you use -v0 it will work: dpkg-genchanges -S -sa -v0 >../python-geojson_1.0.9-2_source.changes parsechangelog/debian: warning: 'since' option specifies non-existing version parsechangelog/debian: warning: use newest entry that is earlier than the one specified parsechangelog/debian: warning: none found, starting from the oldest entry Regards, Johan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35k+unATnuQD=kwxfhkborfaog0fra3o9hdak44tkdx...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#778638: Debian Bug Tracking System
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "owslib" Package name: owslib Version : 0.8.13-1~exp Upstream Author : Tom Kralidis URL : http://geopython.github.com/OWSLib/ License : BSD-3-Clause Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-owslib - Client library for Open Geospatial (OGC) web services To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/owslib Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/owslib/owslib_0.8.13-1~exp.dsc More information about OWSLib can be obtained from http://geopython.github.com/OWSLib/. Changes since the last upload: * Import Upstream version 0.8.13 * Fix Watchfile Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35mcfvqv9zceh03-ocewymkwybbokskrwf-r7qpnhfq...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#786968: RFS: python-snuggs/1.3.1-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-snuggs" Package name: python-snuggs Version : 1.3.1-1 Upstream Author : Sean Gillies URL : https://github.com/mapbox/snuggs License : BSD-3 Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-snuggs - S-expressions for numpy - Python 2 version python3-snuggs - S-expressions for numpy - Python 3 version To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-snuggs Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-snuggs/python-snuggs_1.3.1-1.dsc More information about Snuggs can be obtained from https://github.com/mapbox/snuggs. Changes since the last upload: * Initial upload (closes: #783712) Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35nELjyr9EPKSwrqsfkoRVX3sGm1LV1ZzGQbDDg=adf...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#786974: RFS: owslib/0.8.13-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "owslib" Package name: owslib Version : 0.8.13-1 Upstream Author : Tom Kralidis URL : http://geopython.github.com/OWSLib/ License : BSD-3-Clause Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-owslib - Client library for Open Geospatial (OGC) web services To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/owslib Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/owslib/owslib_0.8.13-1.dsc More information about OWSLib can be obtained from http://geopython.github.com/OWSLib/. Changes since the last upload: * Move to unstable Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35=q7+pvaz-rkcrq2hgabyw9ezuwwkqnq12d+6fktxe...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#788375: RFS: python-geopandas/0.1.1-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-geopandas" Package name: python-geopandas Version : 0.1.1-1 Upstream Author : Kelsey Jordahl URL : http://www.geopandas.org License : BSD-3-Clause Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-geopandas - Python tools for geographic data python3-geopandas- Python3 tools for geographic data python-geopandas-doc - Documentation for the geopandas library To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-geopandas Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-geopandas/python-geopandas_0.1.1-1.dsc More information about geopandas can be obtained from http://www.geopandas.org. Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #773394) Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35ko4jj6gxp_yi3htaw5-u24yp9zb_gfs_tttzjvbap...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#788385: RFS: fiona/1.5.1-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fiona" Package name: fiona Version : 1.5.1-1 Upstream Author : Sean Gillies URL : https://github.com/Toblerity/Fiona License : BSD-3-Clause Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-fiona - Python API for reading/writing vector geospatial data python3-fiona - Python 3 API for reading/writing vector geospatial data fiona - Command line tool for reading/writing vector geospatial data fiona-doc - Python API for reading/writing vector geospatial data (docs) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/fiona Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fiona/fiona_1.5.1-1.dsc More information about Fiona can be obtained from https://github.com/Toblerity/Fiona. Changes since the last upload: * Make build reproducible (Closes: #788308) * Imported Upstream version 1.5.1 Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35=DrRc4soyjnAC0wfvH4rwXjNQey-z7=_y55q4nmyo...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#788850: RFS: python-cligj/0.2.0-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-cligj" Package name: python-cligj Version : 0.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Sean Gillies URL : https://github.com/mapbox/cligj License : BSD Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-cligj - Python 2 library for processing GeoJSON commands python3-cligj - Python 3 library for processing GeoJSON commands To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-cligj Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-cligj/python-cligj_0.2.0-1.dsc More information about cligj can be obtained from https://github.com/mapbox/cligj. Changes since the last upload: * Imported Upstream version 0.2.0 Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35kmEG-+ktt7WyNSvz4C=myxdtzhvt_ujnhpaqvnirp...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#788984: RFS: owslib/0.9.0-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "owslib" Package name: owslib Version : 0.9.0-1 Upstream Author : Tom Kralidis URL : http://geopython.github.com/OWSLib/ License : BSD-3-Clause Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-owslib - Client library for Open Geospatial (OGC) web services To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/owslib Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/owslib/owslib_0.9.0-1.dsc More information about OWSLib can be obtained from http://geopython.github.com/OWSLib/. Changes since the last upload: * Imported Upstream version 0.9.0 * Add dependency to python-requests Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35kh+tyuz0smepsv__29jgrsoq7v4q+rad7vpxoqfds...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#788986: RFS: geolinks/0.1.0-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "geolinks" Package name: geolinks Version : 0.1.0-1 Upstream Author :Tom Kralidis URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/geolinks License : MIT Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-geolinks - Library for using geospatial links (catalogue interoperablity) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/geolinks Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/geolinks/geolinks_0.1.0-1.dsc More information about geolinks can be obtained from https://pypi.python.org/pypi/geolinks. Changes since the last upload: [ Bas Couwenberg ] * Fix broken watch file, use pypi.debian.net instead of pypi.python.org. [ Johan Van de Wauw ] * Imported Upstream version 0.1.0 Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35mq6GREM9BYs7zEoqPtzZBzJ38wTP=5p7ax+zhmkgn...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#788984: RFS: owslib/0.9.0-1
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Hi Johan, > > Thanks for your work on this package. > > On 06/16/2015 09:10 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "owslib" > > The copyright for several authors is missing from the debian/copyright > file, among them Luís de Sousa for the newly added wcs111.py for example. > > Please add the missing copyright holders. Other than that the package > looks good. > I have rewritten the copyright file. Apart from that I've also enabled Python 3, which is now supported by upstream as well. Note that this means that the package will have to go through new. Kind Regards, JOhan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35=dsybthumotxorrkbqak8wdiw7rexjuf0-vvolkzt...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#789522: RFS: pycsw/1.10.1+dfsg-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pycsw" Package name: pycsw Version : 1.10.1+dfsg-1 Upstream Author: see copyright URL : http://pycsw.org License : BSD-3-clause Section : non-free/python It builds those binary packages: python-pycsw - OGC compliant metadata (Catalogue service for the Web) server python-pycsw-wsgi - WSGI Apache CSW service based on python-pycsw python-pycsw-doc - OGC compliant metadata (Catalogue Service for the Web) server To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/pycsw Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/p/pycsw/pycsw_1.10.1+dfsg-1.dsc More information about pycsw can be obtained from http://pycsw.org. Changes since the last upload: * Imported Upstream version 1.10.1+dfsg * Fix description (wsgi instead of cgi) * Update patches * Don't include external references to images * Fix description (wsgi instead of cgi) * Update patches Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35m_D8PSBOn=mxr7je11zqh8ipcevhritnrzctq7tyu...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#788986: RFS: geolinks/0.1.0-1
Updated. On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Hi Johan, > > Thanks for your work on this package too. > > On 06/16/2015 09:18 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "geolinks" > > This package also as small copyright issue. Please add a Files section > for debian/* with your copyright unless you want to assign this to upstream. > > Kind Regards, > > Bas > > -- > GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 > Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35mHTjeLR3BT3qMWtfz9J_4uMPFPqoOXmEZNPF=u0vb...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#789701: RFS: python-geojson/1.2.0-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-geojson" Package name: python-geojson Version : 1.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Corey Farwell URL : https://github.com/frewsxcv/python-geojson License : BSD-3-clause Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-geojson - Python 2 bindings and utilities for GeoJSON python3-geojson - Python 3 bindings and utilities for GeoJSON To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-geojson Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-geojson/python-geojson_1.2.0-1.dsc More information about python-geojson can be obtained from https://github.com/frewsxcv/python-geojson. Changes since the last upload: * Imported Upstream version 1.2.0 * Add names of copyright holders Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35nt4nMGSZCmKycfY=Z86ta5TgFgg9sPWjBms=9ttap...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#790505: RFS: rasterio/0.24.0-1 [RC]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rasterio" Package name: rasterio Version : 0.24.0-1 Upstream Author : Sean Gillies/Mapbox URL : https://github.com/mapbox/rasterio License : BSD-3-Clause Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-rasterio - Python API for using geospatial raster data with Numpy rasterio- Command line tool for investigating geospatial rasters To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/rasterio Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rasterio/rasterio_0.24.0-1.dsc More information about rasterio can be obtained from https://github.com/mapbox/rasterio. Changes since the last upload: * Imported Upstream version 0.24.0 * Add extra dependency to python-snuggs * Dependency on click via cligj * Rename-rio-to-rasterio (Closes:#788463) * Fix compatibility w/Cython 0.22(Closes: #788408) * Add _io.pyx changes to Cython patch * Also fix manpage installscript rio --> rasterio * Update manfile * Fix compatibility with numpy < 1.9 * Bump copyright year/add myself for packaging copyright Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5591c386.5030...@vandewauw.be
Bug#792701: RFS: saga/2.2.0+dfsg-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "saga" Package name: saga Version : 2.2.0+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Olaf Conrad URL : http://www.saga-gis.org/ License : GPLV2 + LGPLv2.1 Section : science It builds those binary packages: saga- System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses libsaga-dev - SAGA GIS development files libsaga - SAGA GIS shared libraries python-saga - SAGA GIS Python bindings To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/saga Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/saga/saga_2.2.0+dfsg-1.dsc More information about SAGA GIS can be obtained from http://www.saga-gis.org/. Changes since the last upload: [ Johan Van de Wauw ] * Enable parallel building * Add patch to work with recent versions of libvigraimpex Patch provided by Adam Conrad (closes: #792696) [ Bas Couwenberg ] * Add repacksuffix in watch file to use +dfsg in version. * Remove trailing space after . control statement. [ Johan Van de Wauw ] * Fix manpages build * Remove B/D on liblas * Imported Upstream version 2.2.0+dfsg * Fix manfile generation once more * Add opencv module Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35mEnxR6K2tAfHTdij8gpKHrabbTCtTpxs2s=ntjurt...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#792701: RFS: saga/2.2.0+dfsg-1
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 7:13 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > Unfortunately I cannot build the package because the pristine-tar branch > hasn't been updated for saga_2.2.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz. Maybe you forgot to > push the branch? I've imported it manually and pushed. No idea why it was not added. Note that I'm mostly offline the next two weeks. Kind Regards, Johan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAJOp35=rxUKJ-z1t7-oU4EXUHGsAD36f7kQmfBGA=spu0hd...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#795191: RFS: python-click-plugins/1.0-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-grass-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-click-plugins" Package name: python-click-plugins Version : 1.0-1 Upstream Author : Kevin D. Wurster URL : https://github.com/click-contrib/click-plugins License : BSD-3-Clause Section : python It builds those binary packages: python-click-plugins - Click extension to register external CLI commands (Python 2) python3-click-plugins - Click extension to register external CLI commands (Python 3) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-click-plugins Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-click-plugins/python-click-plugins_1.0-1.dsc More information about click-plugins can be obtained from https://github.com/click-contrib/click-plugins. Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #794816) Regards, Johan Van de Wauw -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cajop35njz4l2jrzkcz3_wfk6b79nod-cwzuqeltehuvnw8f...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#796191: RFS: libharu/2.3.0+dfsg-1~exp1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libharu" * Package name: libharu Version : 2.3.0+dfsg-1~exp1 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : http://libharu.org * License : Zlib Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libhpdf-2.3.0 - C library for generating pdf files libhpdf-dev - C library for generating pdf files (development files) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libharu Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libh/libharu/libharu_2.3.0+dfsg-1~exp1.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Imported Upstream version 2.3.0 (Closes: #726069) * Bump standards version (no changes needed) * Bump library package number * Update install filename * Switch to debhelper 9 - enable multiarch * Remove unneccessary patches * Revert "Update copyright/rules file, no dfsg cleaning needed anymore" * Update rules to new upstream tarball format * Add info on how to build dfsg-free version * Imported Upstream version 2.3.0+dfsg * Make sure autoconf is used (as was in previous packages) * Use Files-excluded to repack original tarball * Fix version dependency in control file * Fix scm urls * Add symbols * Add gbp.conf * Fix rebuild * Remove symbols of old library * Update copyright year * Fix package description (Closes: #753426) Note that I'm uploading to experimental as this will require a transition (as upstream uses release sonames)(and I found abi changes). Reverse dependencies are: witty-examples libwt38 saga libsaga udav python-mathgl mathgl libmgl7.2.0 libmgl-wx7.2.0 libmgl-wnd7.2.0 libmgl-qt7.2.0 libmgl-glut7.2.0 libmgl-fltk7.2.0 libhpdf-dev emboss-lib emboss I was not entirely sure how to handle symbols with a release soname, I just rebuild them for the package. Regards, Johan Van de Wauw
Bug#796191: RFS: libharu/2.3.0+dfsg-1~exp1
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Control: owner -1 ! > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > Hi Johan, > > multiarch should be mentioned in control file. > > https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Implementation Ok, I will check - some time since I last did this. > > > > this should be fine, please check if reverse dependencies still builds and ask > > for a transition slot by opening a bug on release.debian.org metapackage > (shouldn't be needed for ABI only changes, but with the libstdc++6 transition > ongoing... well, they might not appreciated some more binNMUs :) ) Should I do so before uploading to experimental? > > other stuff > > d/readme.source should be named README.source and maybe just dropped, since > the last > release is dfsg Looking at the policy I think it is better to document this in debian/copyright. I like to document why I remove files from the original source. > > > d/rules, the get-orig-source can be dropped, right? yes, uscan will do so > > d/p/fix-rebuild.diff > > what is the pourpose of this patch? > if files are autogenerated you might ad > > > d/p/fix-version.diff > > well, upstream should pay attention when releasing :) Strictly speaking both are not necessary when you build the package the first time, however, when you rebuild a source package after building a binary package (or when using eg git-buildpackage) it will complain that these files have changed compared to the version in the tarball/repository. Kind Regards, Johan
Bug#796191: RFS: libharu/2.3.0+dfsg-1~exp1
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >>Looking at the policy I think it is better to document this in >>debian/copyright. I like to document why I remove files from the >>original source. > > > but you didn't remove them anymore, right? > anyway, let me know your solution :) > (looks e.g. to Files-Excluded copyright feature) See: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/libharu.git/commit/?id=63bc1c455053197917b15e3bcee3e25d0b3f1f2a @@ -2,6 +2,13 @@ Format: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.1/ Upstream-Name: libharu Upstream-Contact: libh...@googlegroups.com Files-Excluded: demo/pngsuite win32 demo/*.pdf demo/ttfont demo/type1 +Comment: These files are removed from the upstream archive: + demo/pngsuite: non dfsg-free license + demo/type1: fonts already in package gsfonts + demo/ttfont: font already in package ttf-dustin + demo/*.pdf: binary files + win32/: binary files and/or unneeded files for debian build + Files: * Copyright: 1999-2006, Takeshi Kanno diff --git a/debian/readme.source b/debian/readme.source deleted file mode 100644 I do remove them now. Not in the previous release where the tarball was made with make dist (vs github snapshot now). >>Strictly speaking both are not necessary when you build the package >>the first time, however, when you rebuild a source package after >>building a binary package (or when using eg git-buildpackage) it will >>complain that these files have changed compared to the version in the >>tarball/repository. > > > I know this so well, the question is: > > isn't something like > $ cat debian/clean > > _configs.sed > include/hpdf_config.h > include/hpdf_version.h > > > more elegant that the patch itself? I tried this but reverted: I still get errors when rebuilding. Probably the best solution would be to use the debian/clean file and add these files to Files-Excluded in d/copyright (since I'm repackaging anyway). Then there would be no difference. For this release I prefer keeping the patches and not changing my source tarball. I've uploaded a new package with these changes and the multiarch-fields in d/control Kind Regards, Johan
Bug#796191: RFS: libharu/2.3.0+dfsg-1~exp1
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> now the changelog has one line extra (line 1)
>
> and maybe you can remove something, like a double
> "Imported Upstream version 2.3.0+dfsg"
I changed it to avoid confusion.
> regarding multiarch
>
> "Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}" should be added, and the dev package
> should not
> marked as multiarch same.
Given the discussion I have not changed this.
I also made one minor change to the copyright file: it had a wrong
version number (1.1 vs 1.0).
I've uploaded a new version and pushed to alioth.
Kind Regards,
Johan
Re: Questions before my first upload attempt
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > i am the upstream developer of freshly orphaned packages > libburn4, libisofs6, libisoburn1, cdrskin, and xorriso. > Now preparing to get them in shape for sponsorship and > for closing old bug reports. Thanks for taking time to improve debian! > So is there a way to do my packaging work in Debian 8.1 ? > (The PackagingTutorial says i shall write "9" into >debian/compat. Is that enough of a sid ?) No, this is unrelated. debian/compat is about which version of debhelper to is used. Read about pbuilder. https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/build.en.html#pbuilder > > Else: Is there a shortcut description how to quickly set up > Debian package development in a virtual machine and how > to keep it up to date ? > (Hardware is plenty but my own VM scripts date back to Debian 6.) > > - I still did not find a hands-on description of fulfilling > the demand of http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers: > "All packages must be signed with the GnuPG key you configured > in your control panel." Use debuild -S (for source packages) or debuild -b (for binary packages). It should ask for your signature when you are finished. In fact I never use dpkg-buildpackage, debuild also runs lintian checks which spot many common errors. Kind Regards, Johan
Re: paflib uploaded to mentors.debian.net
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:37 PM, tfauck wrote: > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the package paflib I just uploaded > (ITP - #781117) http://bugs.debian.org/781117 paflib > > debuild passes ok, but lintian -EviIL +pedantic gives the following messages: > Do I have to sort them out ? > lintian -EviIL +pedantic | grep -v ^N: note that if you dont add -I grep should not be needed. -I will help solving the problem if you read the complete text. > > W: paflib source: changelog-should-mention-nmu > W: paflib source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 0.2.0-1 You should use your name as the maintainer field in debian/control. > > P: paflib source: no-dep5-copyright Your debian/copyright file almost fits the definitions to be machine readable, so better make some last changes to fix it completely. See https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0 > P: libpaf-dsc0: copyright-refers-to-symlink-license > usr/share/common-licenses/GPL Fist of all, I would advise using the same license for packaging as the package itself. Better link to the exact license: /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-3 Note that in your text you also write a wrong path (/etc instead of /usr) > > X: libpaf-dsc0: shlib-calls-exit > usr/lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/libpaf-dsc.so.0.0.2 This is something to report upstream: you probably don't want your program to exit if something goes wrong in a library. > > I: libpaf-dsc0: no-symbols-control-file > usr/lib/powerpc64le-linux-gnu/libpaf-dsc.so.0.0.2 Read about generating symbols: https://wiki.debian.org/UsingSymbolsFiles >I: libpaf-ebb0: unused-override no-upstream-changelog You shouldn't override informational lintian tags. Just remove all these overrides. Thanks Thierry >
Re: Questions before my first upload attempt
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > after some fight with the keyring i am able to produce > signed packages on sid. > > Will this warning be a problem ? > > $ gpg --verify ../libisoburn_1.4.0-1.1_source.changes > gpg: Signature made Fri 21 Aug 2015 10:44:01 PM CEST using DSA key ID > ABC0A854 > gpg: Good signature from "Thomas Schmitt " > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the > owner. > Primary key fingerprint: 44BC 9FD0 D688 EB00 7C4D D029 E9CB DFC0 ABC0 A854 This indicates that you have not set a trust level for that key. If you run gpg --edit-key ABC0A854 type "trust" and set to: I trust fully (or whatever you trust yourself :-)) > --- > > I need a translator from debian-speak to english (or german). > > My first runs of debuild showed lintian warnings, which i could > silence, except this class from debuild -b: > > W: libburn4: hardening-no-relro usr/lib/libburn.so.4.93.0 > W: cdrskin: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/cdrskin > W: libisofs6: hardening-no-relro usr/lib/libisofs.so.6.76.0 > W: libisoburn1: hardening-no-relro usr/lib/libisoburn.so.1.97.0 > W: xorriso: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/xorriso > > "This package was likely not built with the default > Debian compiler flags defined by dpkg-buildflags." > > What does it want me to do ? > Where ? In debian/rules ? In upstream ? Examples available ? What debhelper version are you using (check debian/compat). Try going to 9, if that does not help: share your packaging work, it is hard to find out without seeing the code. More explanations here: https://wiki.debian.org/HardeningWalkthrough > > -- > Riddle: > > During my work something caused unconditional regeneration > of unpacked > libisoburn-1.4.0/xorriso/xorrecord.info > The versions of makeinfo differ between release machine > and sid, which causes different .info result. > In subsequent runs of debuild this causes a complaint > about uncommitted changes. > > The makeinfo run is indeed in my upstream autotools empire. > But it should only trigger if .info is missing or outdated. > In a build run out of the upstream tarball, the makeinfo > run is not triggered. On the same sid. > > Only one of three .info gets regenerated in this way: > -rw-r--r-- 1 thomas thomas 41768 Aug 21 22:25 xorriso/xorrecord.info > -rw-r--r-- 1 thomas thomas 291521 Aug 21 14:56 xorriso/xorriso.info > -rw-r--r-- 1 thomas thomas 108424 Aug 21 14:56 xorriso/xorrisofs.info > > > What is the magic difference between tar xzf and cp ? > Why does it not happen with ./configure && make > from upstream tarball ? I suppose it is this: copying will set the timestamp at the time of copying, so make (or another tool) does not detect a changed version: the generated version is newer than it sources. When extracting you get the original timestamp. Kind Regards, Johan
