#372268 - ITP: valkyrie

2008-07-08 Thread Hai Zaar
Good day, dear mentor!

I've spotted ITP #372268 being abandoned and decided to step up for
packaging and further maintaining valkyrie package.
So I'm looking for someone to review and upload the package.
Packaged files can be found here:
http://mathnet.technion.ac.il/~gmm/hosting/debs/valkyrie/
They build and work correctly on current Debian/Lenny amd64 and are
lintian and gcc-4.3 clean.

Thanks,
-- 
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Fwd: #372268 - ITP: valkyrie - sponsor wanted

2008-07-14 Thread Hai Zaar
Good day!
I'm looking for a sponsor to upload valkyrie package (ITP #372268).
I've sent mail a week ago, and since no one has replied, I'm kindly
asking again.

Please see forwarded mail below for details.

Thank you.
-- 
Zaar

-- Forwarded message ------
From: Hai Zaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 3:22 AM
Subject: #372268 - ITP: valkyrie
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Good day, dear mentors!

I've spotted ITP #372268 being abandoned and decided to step up for
packaging and further maintaining valkyrie package.
So I'm looking for someone to review and upload the package.
Packaged files can be found here:
http://mathnet.technion.ac.il/~gmm/hosting/debs/valkyrie/
They build and work correctly on current Debian/Lenny amd64 and are
lintian and gcc-4.3 clean.

Thanks,
--
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RFS: valkyrie

2009-05-03 Thread Hai Zaar
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "valkyrie".

* Package name: valkyrie
  Version : 1.4.0-1
  Upstream Author : Donna Robinson
* URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
* License : [fill in]
  Section : devel

It builds these binary packages:
valkyrie   - open-source graphical user interface for the Valgrind

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 372268

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/valkyrie
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/valkyrie/valkyrie_1.4.0-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards,
--
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



RFS: libbash

2009-05-03 Thread Hai Zaar
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libbash".

* Package name: libbash
  Version : 0.9.10b
  Upstream Author : Hai Zaar 
* URL : http://libbash.sf.net
* License : GPLv3
  Section : libs

It builds these binary packages:
libbash- a tool that enables bash dynamic-like shared libraries
libbash-doc - user and developer documentation for libbash

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 526739

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libbash
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libbash/libbash_0.9.10b.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
--
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



RFS: libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup

2009-05-03 Thread Hai Zaar
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup".

* Package name: libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup
  Version : 1.0.1-1
  Upstream Author : Jan Wolter   
* URL : http://www.unixpapa.com/mod_authz_unixgroup/
* License : Apache
  Section : web

It builds these binary packages:
libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup - access control based on on unix group
membership for Apache

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 526790

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup/libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup_1.0.1-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards,
--
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



RFS: libapache2-mod-authnz-external

2009-05-03 Thread Hai Zaar
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libapache2-mod-authnz-external".

* Package name: libapache2-mod-authnz-external
  Version : 3.2.3
  Upstream Author : Jan Wolter 
* URL : http://www.unixpapa.com/mod_auth_external/
* License : Apache
  Section : web

It builds these binary packages:
libapache2-mod-authnz-external - authenticate Apache against external
authentication services

The upload would fix these bugs: 526786

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-authnz-external
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-authnz-external/libapache2-mod-authnz-external_3.2.3-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
 Hai Zaar

--
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



RFS: pwauth

2009-05-03 Thread Hai Zaar
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pwauth".

* Package name: pwauth
  Version : 2.3.8-1
  Upstream Author : Jan Wolter 
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/pwauth/
* License : BSD
  Section : utils

It builds these binary packages:
pwauth - authenticator for mod_authnz_external and the Apache HTTP Daemon

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 526762

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pwauth
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pwauth/pwauth_2.3.8-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards,
--
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



RFS: valkyrie

2009-05-03 Thread Hai Zaar
Dear mentors,
I've accidentally hit "send" button to early. I want to submit my RFS
again with all fields filled in.

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "valkyrie".

* Package name    : valkyrie
 Version         : 1.4.0-1
 Upstream Author : Donna Robinson 
* URL             : http://www.open-works.co.uk/projects/valkyrie.html
* License         : GPLv2/X11-style
 Section         : devel

It builds these binary packages:
valkyrie   - open-source graphical user interface for the Valgrind

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 372268

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/valkyrie
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/valkyrie/valkyrie_1.4.0-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards,
--
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: pwauth

2009-05-04 Thread Hai Zaar
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:06 AM, LI Daobing  wrote:
> 1. lintian warning:
> W: pwauth source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.0 (current is 3.8.1)
Fixed

>
> 2. $ uscan
> uscan warning: In debian/watch,
>  no matching hrefs for watch line
>  http://code.google.com/p/pwauth/downloads/list pwauth-(.*)\.tar\.gz
Can you help me create watch file for this location?
http://code.google.com/p/pwauth/downloads/list

>
> 3. manpage should be put into section 8.
Fixed

Once I'll figure out how to create correct watch file, I'll upload the
updated package.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: pwauth

2009-05-04 Thread Hai Zaar
--
Zaar



On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Mauro Lizaur
 wrote:
> On Tue, 05 May 2009, Hai Zaar wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:06 AM, LI Daobing  wrote:
>> > 1. lintian warning:
>> > W: pwauth source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.0 (current is 3.8.1)
>> Fixed
>>
>> >
>> > 2. $ uscan
>> > uscan warning: In debian/watch,
>> >  no matching hrefs for watch line
>> >  http://code.google.com/p/pwauth/downloads/list pwauth-(.*)\.tar\.gz
>> Can you help me create watch file for this location?
>> http://code.google.com/p/pwauth/downloads/list
>>
>> >
>> > 3. manpage should be put into section 8.
>> Fixed
>>
>> Once I'll figure out how to create correct watch file, I'll upload the
>> updated package.
>>
>
> Hi there,
> Usually the watch files for code hosted in google code has this format:
>  http://code.google.com/p/$PROJECT-NAME/downloads/list 
> http://$PROJECT-NAME.googlecode.com/files/$FILENAME
>
> So, in your case would be something like this:
>  http://code.google.com/p/pwauth/downloads/list 
> http://pwauth.googlecode.com/files/pwauth-(.+).tar.gz
>
> You just missed the full URL for the orig.tar.gz
Yes, the problem was that D/L page link to different site (that does
not provides listings, i.e http://pwauth.googlecode.com/files return
404)

It work now. Thank you the help, LI and Mauro.

>
>
> Regards,
> Mauro
>
>
> --
> JID: lavaram...@jabber.org | http://lusers.com.ar/
> 2B82 A38D 1BA5 847A A74D 6C34 6AB7 9ED6 C8FD F9C1
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
>
>


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: valkyrie

2009-05-06 Thread Hai Zaar
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:59 AM, LI Daobing  wrote:
>> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
>> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/valkyrie
>> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
>> main contrib non-free
>> - dget 
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/valkyrie/valkyrie_1.4.0-1.dsc
>>
>> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>>
>
> comments:
>
> 1. lintian warning:
> W: valkyrie source: timewarp-standards-version (2008-05-02 <
> 2008-06-04), you forget to update your changelog's timestamp(you can
> use dch to update this timestamp).
Fixed.
> you also need change standards version to 3.8.1
Fixed.

>
> 2. no watch file and no get-orig-source target in debian/rules
I've created watch file. About get-orig-source - can you provide any
reference what it is exactly and why do we need it? It the first time
I hear about it, and some sources (like this:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=494141) state that
its obsolete?
>
> 3. valkyrie 1.4.0 only works for valgrind >= 3.4, please change the
> description and set version constrain in recommends.
> (from: http://www.valgrind.org/downloads/)
Fixed.

Thank you for comments. I've reuploaded the fixed package to original URL.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: valkyrie

2009-05-06 Thread Hai Zaar
--
Zaar



On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:17 PM, LI Daobing  wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 20:16, Hai Zaar  wrote:
>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 5:59 AM, LI Daobing  wrote:
>>>> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
>>> 2. no watch file and no get-orig-source target in debian/rules
>> I've created watch file. About get-orig-source - can you provide any
>> reference what it is exactly and why do we need it? It the first time
>> I hear about it, and some sources (like this:
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=494141) state that
>> its obsolete?
> if you can not provide a debian/watch file, then the get-orig-source
> is recommended (for example, you need make a dfsg package)
Ok. Well, I've created watch file. So if there are no more fix-ups
required, can you please sponsor package the upload?

>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> LI Daobing
>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: pwauth

2009-05-06 Thread Hai Zaar
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Mauro Lizaur
 wrote:
> On Tue, 05 May 2009, Hai Zaar wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Mauro Lizaur
>>  wrote:
>> > On Tue, 05 May 2009, Hai Zaar wrote:
>> >
>> > So, in your case would be something like this:
>> >  http://code.google.com/p/pwauth/downloads/list 
>> > http://pwauth.googlecode.com/files/pwauth-(.+).tar.gz
>> >
>> > You just missed the full URL for the orig.tar.gz
>> Yes, the problem was that D/L page link to different site (that does
>> not provides listings, i.e http://pwauth.googlecode.com/files return
>> 404)
>>
>> It work now. Thank you the help, LI and Mauro.
>>
>
> It's ok,
> BTW, Please note that I forgot to escape the "filename".
I've reuploaded the fixed package to mentors.debian.net Please have a look.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pwauth

>
> Regards
>
> --
> JID: lavaram...@jabber.org | http://lusers.com.ar/
> 2B82 A38D 1BA5 847A A74D 6C34 6AB7 9ED6 C8FD F9C1
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
>
>


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: pwauth

2009-05-08 Thread Hai Zaar
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:32 PM, LI Daobing  wrote:
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 01:31, Hai Zaar  wrote:
>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Mauro Lizaur
>>  wrote:
>>> On Tue, 05 May 2009, Hai Zaar wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Mauro Lizaur
>>>>  wrote:
>>>> > On Tue, 05 May 2009, Hai Zaar wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > So, in your case would be something like this:
>>>> >  http://code.google.com/p/pwauth/downloads/list 
>>>> > http://pwauth.googlecode.com/files/pwauth-(.+).tar.gz
>>>> >
>>>> > You just missed the full URL for the orig.tar.gz
>>>> Yes, the problem was that D/L page link to different site (that does
>>>> not provides listings, i.e http://pwauth.googlecode.com/files return
>>>> 404)
>>>>
>>>> It work now. Thank you the help, LI and Mauro.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It's ok,
>>> BTW, Please note that I forgot to escape the "filename".
>> I've reuploaded the fixed package to mentors.debian.net Please have a look.
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pwauth
>>
>>>
>
> uploaded.
Thank you!
>
> how about add a Homepage field in debian/control in the next upload?
Sure.

Can you please also look at:
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=libapache2-mod-authnz-external
(and possible to
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup)
Since it possibly the only "customer" of pwauth.

Thanks again,
--
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: pwauth

2009-05-08 Thread Hai Zaar
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:25 PM, LI Daobing  wrote:
> $ dpkg -I libapache2-mod-authnz-external_3.2.3-1_amd64.deb | grep -i depends
>  Depends: libc6 (>= 2.4), apache2.2-common
Well, pwauth is the authenticator to use with mod-authnz-external.
While they do not depend on each other and can be used separately,
together they will finally provide Debian a way to let Apache
authenticate against PAM, without exposing /etc/shadow to www-data
user.

I've added pwauth to Recommends of libapache2-mod-authnz-external and
added note about pwauth in package description.

-- 
--
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: valkyrie

2009-05-09 Thread Hai Zaar
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 3:01 PM, LI Daobing  wrote:
> [2] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/
I've applied this format. I hope I've figured it right. Fixed package reuploaded

--
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Hai Zaar
Good day, dear mentors. A week ago I've the RFS about libbash package.
Since noone replied, I'm resending the request.


-- Forwarded message ------
From: Hai Zaar 
Date: Sun, May 3, 2009 at 1:20 PM
Subject: RFS: libbash
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org


Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libbash".

* Package name    : libbash
 Version         : 0.9.10b
 Upstream Author : Hai Zaar 
* URL             : http://libbash.sf.net
* License         : GPLv3
 Section         : libs

It builds these binary packages:
libbash    - a tool that enables bash dynamic-like shared libraries
libbash-doc - user and developer documentation for libbash

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 526739

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libbash
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libbash/libbash_0.9.10b.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
--
Zaar



-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Hai Zaar
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Patrick Matthäi  wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> * debian/control:
> - - Out of date standards-version
Fixed

>
> * debian/changelog:
> - - It is wrong, that the package has been made native
Well, I'm the author of the project, and I want to debian dir to be
part of the project tree (with all of the consequences I know about
it). Does not it make it native?
I've incremented version (to "0.9.10c") to signify that its a new
version (a not packaging of 0.9.10b version that was released quite a
while ago).

>
> * debian/control:
> - - Missing ${misc:Depends}
Added.
> - - Why does libbash-doc depend on libbash?
It should not. Fixed.
> - - For what do you need in an arch all only package autotools-dev as
> build-depend?
I do not understand. The policy[1] says that "all" "indicates an
architecture-independent package." Should I make it "any" instead of
"all"?

>
> * debian/rules:
> - - Ehm, why do you need 1777 for var/lock/dirlock/?
For one of the libbash library, dirlocks, I need to store temporary
lock files. I thought that natural place for these is /var/lock/
Such a dir should be writable by any user, but I want to prevent users
from stepping on other's files. That's why 1777.

>
> * debian/libbash-doc.doc-base:
> - - => Author: 
Fixed

>
> * debian/copyright:
> - - There is also a GPLv2 file in your source, add this license.
Fixed. All files are GPLv3 now
> - - There is a missing copyright holder on lib/urlcoding.sh
Fixed

Thank you!
The fixed package has been reuploaded to:
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=libbash

[1] 
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Architecture
-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Hai Zaar
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Patrick Matthäi  wrote:
>
> See: http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html
> <-- quote
> #  When to use a native vs a non-native debian package
>
> You should only use a native Debian package when it is clear that the
> package would only ever be of use in Debian. Even if the software is
> currently only available in Debian, if someone could reasonably use the
> software on another distribution or on another operating system, then
> the package should be non-native.
>
> A few examples of normal packages are: libc6, apache, phpmyadmin. But
> linda, lintian, dpkg and some other tools are purely developed for
> debian, and make no sense being released in another distribution.
> quote -->
Can you please advice on how to create "orig" package, when debian dir
is part of the project file-tree? Do I need to checkout sources and
then just delete debian subdir, pack orig tarball, then restore debian
dir and proceed?
-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Hai Zaar
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Patrick Matthäi  wrote:
>
> I will review it again if (especially the first) both issues are fixed.
All done:
1. I've decided to go for a new release 0.9.10c. The version package
is set to 0.9.10c-1. And I'll do official release (with tarballs,
etc.) as soon we'll done polishing Debian part.
2. Yes, since package arch independent, and after reading
autotools-dev documentation, I see that its indeed should not be
required, so current package builds without it.

Thank you,
-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Hai Zaar
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Hai Zaar  wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Patrick Matthäi  wrote:
>>
>> I will review it again if (especially the first) both issues are fixed.
> All done:
> 1. I've decided to go for a new release 0.9.10c. The version package
> is set to 0.9.10c-1. And I'll do official release (with tarballs,
> etc.) as soon we'll done polishing Debian part.
> 2. Yes, since package arch independent, and after reading
> autotools-dev documentation, I see that its indeed should not be
> required, so current package builds without it.
>
> Thank you,
> --
> Zaar
>
P.S. The package were reuploaded.



-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



RFS (take 2): libapache2-mod-authnz-external

2009-05-10 Thread Hai Zaar
Good time of a day, dear mentors!
This is a second call for sponsor for libapache2-mod-authnz-external.

-- Forwarded message --
From: Hai Zaar 
Date: Sun, May 3, 2009 at 6:14 PM
Subject: RFS: libapache2-mod-authnz-external
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org


Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libapache2-mod-authnz-external".

* Package name    : libapache2-mod-authnz-external
 Version         : 3.2.3
 Upstream Author : Jan Wolter 
* URL             : http://www.unixpapa.com/mod_auth_external/
* License         : Apache
 Section         : web

It builds these binary packages:
libapache2-mod-authnz-external - authenticate Apache against external
authentication services

The upload would fix these bugs: 526786

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-authnz-external
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-authnz-external/libapache2-mod-authnz-external_3.2.3-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
 Hai Zaar

--
Zaar



-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



RFS (take 2): libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup

2009-05-10 Thread Hai Zaar
Good time of a day, dear mentors!
This is a second call for sponsor for libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup


-- Forwarded message --
From: Hai Zaar 
Date: Sun, May 3, 2009 at 6:57 PM
Subject: RFS: libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org


Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup".

* Package name    : libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup
 Version         : 1.0.1-1
 Upstream Author : Jan Wolter       
* URL             : http://www.unixpapa.com/mod_authz_unixgroup/
* License         : Apache
 Section         : web

It builds these binary packages:
libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup - access control based on on unix group
membership for Apache

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 526790

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup/libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup_1.0.1-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards,
--
Zaar



-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Hai Zaar
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Patrick Matthäi  wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hai Zaar schrieb:
>> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Patrick Matthäi  
>> wrote:
>>> I will review it again if (especially the first) both issues are fixed.
>> All done:
>> 1. I've decided to go for a new release 0.9.10c. The version package
>> is set to 0.9.10c-1. And I'll do official release (with tarballs,
>> etc.) as soon we'll done polishing Debian part.
>> 2. Yes, since package arch independent, and after reading
>> autotools-dev documentation, I see that its indeed should not be
>> required, so current package builds without it.
>>
>> Thank you,
>
> Okay nice. But the copyright holder of lib/urlcoding.sh is still missing
> in debian/copyright:
>> lib/urlcoding.sh:# Copyright (c) 2005 Alon Keren
Will you accept it if I rewrite it according to DEP-5?

-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-10 Thread Hai Zaar
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Patrick Matthäi  wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hai Zaar schrieb:
>> Will you accept it if I rewrite it according to DEP-5?
>>
>
> I would welcome this step :)
All done. Reuploaded.

Please do not upload yet - just tell me if its OK. I want to build
against officially released tarball.
-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-11 Thread Hai Zaar
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Patrick Matthäi  wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hai Zaar schrieb:
>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Patrick Matthäi  
>> wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Hai Zaar schrieb:
>>>> Will you accept it if I rewrite it according to DEP-5?
>>>>
>>> I would welcome this step :)
>> All done. Reuploaded.
>>
>> Please do not upload yet - just tell me if its OK. I want to build
>> against officially released tarball.
>
> Could you just put the gpl-3 license header to the Files: * part please.
What for? - I cite it later under separate License: field. It looks
like this example from DEP, isn't it?:
Example 2 (recurrent license).

 Files: src/js/editline/*
 Copyright: 1993, John Doe
1993, Joe Average
 License: MPL-1.1

 Files: src/js/fdlibm/*
 Copyright: 1993, J-Random Corporation
 License: MPL-1.1

 License: MPL-1.1
  [LICENSE TEXT]

-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-11 Thread Hai Zaar
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Patrick Matthäi  wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hai Zaar schrieb:
>>> Could you just put the gpl-3 license header to the Files: * part please.
>> What for? - I cite it later under separate License: field. It looks
>> like this example from DEP, isn't it?:
>> Example 2 (recurrent license).
>>
>>  Files: src/js/editline/*
>>  Copyright: 1993, John Doe
>>                 1993, Joe Average
>>  License: MPL-1.1
>>
>>  Files: src/js/fdlibm/*
>>  Copyright: 1993, J-Random Corporation
>>  License: MPL-1.1
>>
>>  License: MPL-1.1
>>   [LICENSE TEXT]
>>
>
> You are right, sorry.
> It is okay for me at whole.
Great! I've rolled out new SF release and rebuilt debs (reuploaded to
mentors). Looking forward for your upload.

>
> - --
> /*
> Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
>  Patrick Matthäi
>  GNU/Linux Debian Developer
>
> E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
>        patr...@linux-dev.org
>
> Comment:
> Always if we think we are right,
> we were maybe wrong.
> */
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkoIYxYACgkQ2XA5inpabMdd8QCeNN7ViXl3zwfa3+livjwY5ThZ
> 7K8An1RuxVmN/5xNsNFK4xrmidzd+GAL
> =y0z2
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>



-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libapache2-mod-authnz-external

2009-05-11 Thread Hai Zaar
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:21 PM, LI Daobing  wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 05:30, Hai Zaar  wrote:
>> Good time of a day, dear mentors!
>> This is a second call for sponsor for libapache2-mod-authnz-external.
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Hai Zaar 
>> Date: Sun, May 3, 2009 at 6:14 PM
>> Subject: RFS: libapache2-mod-authnz-external
>> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
>>
>>
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libapache2-mod-authnz-external".
>>
>> * Package name    : libapache2-mod-authnz-external
>>  Version         : 3.2.3
>>  Upstream Author : Jan Wolter 
>> * URL             : http://www.unixpapa.com/mod_auth_external/
>> * License         : Apache
>>  Section         : web
>>
>> It builds these binary packages:
>> libapache2-mod-authnz-external - authenticate Apache against external
>> authentication services
>>
>> The upload would fix these bugs: 526786
>>
>> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
>> - URL: 
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-authnz-external
>> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
>> main contrib non-free
>> - dget 
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-authnz-external/libapache2-mod-authnz-external_3.2.3-1.dsc
>>
>> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>>
>
> comments:
>
> 1. lintian warning:
> W: libapache2-mod-authnz-external source: dh-clean-k-is-deprecated
>
> 2. no debian/watch
>
> 3. how about add Homepage field in debian/control?

All fixed. Reuploaded. How come my lintian -viI does not show this warnings?
-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup

2009-05-11 Thread Hai Zaar
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:23 PM, LI Daobing  wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 05:31, Hai Zaar  wrote:
>> Good time of a day, dear mentors!
>> This is a second call for sponsor for libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup
>>
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: Hai Zaar 
>> Date: Sun, May 3, 2009 at 6:57 PM
>> Subject: RFS: libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup
>> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
>>
>>
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup".
>>
>> * Package name    : libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup
>>  Version         : 1.0.1-1
>>  Upstream Author : Jan Wolter       
>> * URL             : http://www.unixpapa.com/mod_authz_unixgroup/
>> * License         : Apache
>>  Section         : web
>>
>> It builds these binary packages:
>> libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup - access control based on on unix group
>> membership for Apache
>>
>> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>>
>> The upload would fix these bugs: 526790
>>
>> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
>> - URL: 
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup
>> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
>> main contrib non-free
>> - dget 
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup/libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup_1.0.1-1.dsc
>>
>> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>>
> comments:
> 1. lintian warning:
> W: libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup source:
> out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.0 (current is 3.8.1)
>
> 2. no debian/watch
>
> 3. no Homepage field in debian/control
>
All fixed. Reuploaded.
Thank you,
-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libapache2-mod-authnz-external

2009-05-11 Thread Hai Zaar
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Hai Zaar  wrote:
> All fixed. Reuploaded. How come my lintian -viI does not show this warnings?
Sorry, forgot dh_prep. Rebuilt and reuploaded.

-- 
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup

2009-05-12 Thread Hai Zaar
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:23 PM, LI Daobing  wrote:
>
> you should not repack the upstream tarball if the upstream tarball is
> already in .tar.gz format. rename or make a soft link is enough.
I'll take it from now on. Thanks.
>
> please fix this and re-upload.
All done. Re-uploaded.

-- 
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libapache2-mod-authnz-external

2009-05-12 Thread Hai Zaar
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:12 PM, LI Daobing  wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 02:29, Hai Zaar  wrote:
>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Hai Zaar  wrote:
>>> All fixed. Reuploaded. How come my lintian -viI does not show this warnings?
>> Sorry, forgot dh_prep. Rebuilt and reuploaded.
>>
>
> uploaded.
>
> and you need not (or should not) repack the upstream tarball if the
> upstream tarball is already in .tar.gz format. rename or make a soft
> link is enough.
Following your advice, I've fixed and re-uploaded this package as well.

Thank you!
-- 
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: sphinxsearch

2009-05-12 Thread Hai Zaar
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Tom Simnett  wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ben Finney wrote:
>> Jérémy Lal  writes:
>> These command names are rather too generic. Perhaps they should be
>> prefixed with ‘sphinx-’?
>>
>> These all look like installing the package with the wrong options to
>> ‘configure’, but that's a guess.
>>
>> Either write something useful in the README.Debian, or remove it if it's
>> not needed for the package.
>>
>> Perhaps Lintian was never run on this package before uploading it?
>
> This has now been re-uploaded. The manpages don't exist, and as there is
> no ITP bug, it can't close it, so those warnings remain. Apart from that
> it appears to me to be clean.
Hi!
I'm not a mentor or DD, but you can:
1. Write man pages yourself - pick template from
/usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/debian/manpage.1.ex
2. Open an ITP bug for sphinxsearch yourself - just file a bug (using
reportbug tool) against wnpp package.

My 2 cents :)
-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup

2009-05-12 Thread Hai Zaar
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:21 PM, LI Daobing  wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 20:56, Hai Zaar  wrote:
>> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:23 PM, LI Daobing  wrote:
>>>
>>> you should not repack the upstream tarball if the upstream tarball is
>>> already in .tar.gz format. rename or make a soft link is enough.
>> I'll take it from now on. Thanks.
>>>
>>> please fix this and re-upload.
>> All done. Re-uploaded.
>>
> sorry to bother again.
>
> copyright issue:
>
> 1. where is the copyright come from? i did not find it in the source
> or the homepage.
You are right. I've just blindly copied copyright file from
mod_authnz_external, assuming it would be the same, since both
packages are alike and come from the same author. I'll write to the
author and ask to put copyright notice into the package.

>
> 2. whether this copyright is free? whether it has been discussed in
> debian-legal? if so, paste a link here, thanks.
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> LI Daobing
>



-- 
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-12 Thread Hai Zaar
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Patrick Matthäi  wrote:
> Hmm there are some new lintian warnings in
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libbash/libbash_0.9.10c-1.dsc
>
>
> I: libbash source: debian-watch-file-is-missing
Oops... fixed
> I: libbash source: build-depends-without-arch-dep doxygen
Fixed - doxygen moved to Build-Depends-Indep. Uploaded.
> E: libbash: dir-or-file-in-var-lock var/lock/dirlocks/
Well... does it mean I'll have to create /var/log/dirlocks during boot
process? If yes, is there any service in Debian that can create
requested files/dirs on boot? (Please do not tell me that I need to
write init script to do it :)

>



-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-12 Thread Hai Zaar
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Patrick Matthäi  wrote:
>>
>> Well... does it mean I'll have to create /var/log/dirlocks during boot
>> process? If yes, is there any service in Debian that can create
>> requested files/dirs on boot? (Please do not tell me that I need to
>> write init script to do it :)
>
> Wouldn't it make sense to write those lockfiles to ~/ instead of a
> systemwide dir?
Some tools that use libbash (my custom app for example), run scripts
as system users that do not have valid ~/

-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-12 Thread Hai Zaar
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Patrick Matthäi  wrote:
> Hai Zaar schrieb:
>>
>> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Patrick Matthäi 
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Well... does it mean I'll have to create /var/log/dirlocks during boot
>>>> process? If yes, is there any service in Debian that can create
>>>> requested files/dirs on boot? (Please do not tell me that I need to
>>>> write init script to do it :)
>>>
>>> Wouldn't it make sense to write those lockfiles to ~/ instead of a
>>> systemwide dir?
>>
>> Some tools that use libbash (my custom app for example), run scripts
>> as system users that do not have valid ~/
>>
>
> A valid point maybe also /tmp, your /var/lock/dirlocks has currently the
> same functions (meant as permissions) as /tmp.
Sure. But still I need to create /tmp/dirlocks (or better
/var/tmp/dirlocks) on boot. How do I do it?



-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-05-12 Thread Hai Zaar
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
 wrote:
> In , Hai Zaar
> wrote:
>>On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Patrick Matthäi 
> wrote:
>>> Hai Zaar schrieb:
>>>> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Patrick Matthäi
>>>> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Well... does it mean I'll have to create /var/log/dirlocks during
>>>>>> boot process? If yes, is there any service in Debian that can create
>>>>>> requested files/dirs on boot? (Please do not tell me that I need to
>>>>>> write init script to do it :)
>>>>> Wouldn't it make sense to write those lockfiles to ~/ instead of a
>>>>> systemwide dir?
>>>> Some tools that use libbash (my custom app for example), run scripts
>>>> as system users that do not have valid ~/
>>> A valid point maybe also /tmp, your /var/lock/dirlocks has currently the
>>> same functions (meant as permissions) as /tmp.
>>Sure. But still I need to create /tmp/dirlocks
>>on boot. How do I do it?
>
> I believe Patrick meant to put the files in /tmp, not in /tmp/dirlocks.  If
> you need the locks to last across reboots, /var/tmp, not /var/tmp/dirlocks.
I need separate 1777 directory for locks library of libbash, since it
may create rather complex file structure there, so I do not want to
put it to just /tmp or /var/tmp/, since it may lead to collisions with
files created manually by users (yes, I understand that users can
occasionally, or on purpose to create files in /var/tmp/dirlocks as
well, but that is  another story).

-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup

2009-05-15 Thread Hai Zaar
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Hai Zaar
>>
>> copyright issue:
>>
>> 1. where is the copyright come from? i did not find it in the source
>> or the homepage.
> You are right. I've just blindly copied copyright file from
> mod_authnz_external, assuming it would be the same, since both
> packages are alike and come from the same author. I'll write to the
> author and ask to put copyright notice into the package.
The author is not answering. Should we wait some more? What is usually
done in cases when there is no copyright of any kind?

>
>>
>> 2. whether this copyright is free? whether it has been discussed in
>> debian-legal? if so, paste a link here, thanks.
>>

-- 
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup

2009-05-15 Thread Hai Zaar
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Neil Williams  wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2009 11:05:08 +0300
> Hai Zaar  wrote:
>
>> >> 1. where is the copyright come from? i did not find it in the source
>> >> or the homepage.
>> > You are right. I've just blindly copied copyright file from
>> > mod_authnz_external, assuming it would be the same, since both
>> > packages are alike and come from the same author. I'll write to the
>> > author and ask to put copyright notice into the package.
>> The author is not answering. Should we wait some more? What is usually
>> done in cases when there is no copyright of any kind?
>
> Without copyright information, the package defaults to non-distributable
> because copyright assumes "All Rights Reserved" unless proven
> otherwise. It's not even suitable for non-free in that condition as the
> licence claim is invalid and you cannot even assume that you have the
> right to distribute the completely unchanged source code, whether in
> source or binary form. Uploading that package to mentors without a
> valid copyright could be deemed copyright infringement but the only
> person who can really complain is the author who isn't
> responding . . . .
>
> If the package source does not contain a claim of copyright, you cannot
> assert any such claim later and you have no way of enforcing the
> licence. The package cannot be sponsored in that condition.
>
> Is there no copyright information in the package at all? (I haven't
> looked.)
The package has only one source file, together with README and INSTALL
file. None of them mention copyright of any kind.
Too bad :(
I guess the only option left is to keep pinging the author, isn't it?

-- 
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup

2009-05-15 Thread Hai Zaar
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Hai Zaar  wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Neil Williams  wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 May 2009 11:05:08 +0300
>> Hai Zaar  wrote:
>>
>>> >> 1. where is the copyright come from? i did not find it in the source
>>> >> or the homepage.
>>> > You are right. I've just blindly copied copyright file from
>>> > mod_authnz_external, assuming it would be the same, since both
>>> > packages are alike and come from the same author. I'll write to the
>>> > author and ask to put copyright notice into the package.
>>> The author is not answering. Should we wait some more? What is usually
>>> done in cases when there is no copyright of any kind?
>>
>> Without copyright information, the package defaults to non-distributable
>> because copyright assumes "All Rights Reserved" unless proven
>> otherwise. It's not even suitable for non-free in that condition as the
>> licence claim is invalid and you cannot even assume that you have the
>> right to distribute the completely unchanged source code, whether in
>> source or binary form. Uploading that package to mentors without a
>> valid copyright could be deemed copyright infringement but the only
>> person who can really complain is the author who isn't
>> responding . . . .
>>
>> If the package source does not contain a claim of copyright, you cannot
>> assert any such claim later and you have no way of enforcing the
>> licence. The package cannot be sponsored in that condition.
>>
>> Is there no copyright information in the package at all? (I haven't
>> looked.)
> The package has only one source file, together with README and INSTALL
> file. None of them mention copyright of any kind.
> Too bad :(
> I guess the only option left is to keep pinging the author, isn't it?
The author has responded and added copyright, but not released another
version for it, so its currently only in SVN trunk:
http://code.google.com/p/mod-auth-external/source/detail?r=62#
Can I just add this as a patch to a current release?


-- 
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup

2009-05-15 Thread Hai Zaar
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Didier Raboud  wrote:
> Hai Zaar wrote:
>
>> The author has responded and added copyright, but not released another
>> version for it, so its currently only in SVN trunk:
>> http://code.google.com/p/mod-auth-external/source/detail?r=62#
>> Can I just add this as a patch to a current release?
>
> If necessary, I would rather be "clean" and go for a 3.2.3+svn62-1
I've repackaged it using tarball from svn export. Now the version is
1.0.1+svn67. Thanks for the hint.

LI, I've re-uploaded the fixed package. I guess we go on now.


-- 
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup

2009-05-16 Thread Hai Zaar
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 10:24 AM, LI Daobing  wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 06:05, Hai Zaar  wrote:
>> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Didier Raboud  wrote:
>>> Hai Zaar wrote:
>>>
>>>> The author has responded and added copyright, but not released another
>>>> version for it, so its currently only in SVN trunk:
>>>> http://code.google.com/p/mod-auth-external/source/detail?r=62#
>>>> Can I just add this as a patch to a current release?
>>>
>>> If necessary, I would rather be "clean" and go for a 3.2.3+svn62-1
>> I've repackaged it using tarball from svn export. Now the version is
>> 1.0.1+svn67. Thanks for the hint.
>>
>> LI, I've re-uploaded the fixed package. I guess we go on now.
>>
> comments for:
> dget 
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup/libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup_1.0.1+svn67-1.dsc
>
> sounds the last issue:
> 1. debian/copyright:
>    a. you should provide a link to /usr/share/common-licenses/Apache-2.0
>    b. you should declare the license of your packaging works
>
> you can take a look on the following file:
> /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/licenses/apache

I've rewritten it according to DEP-5 together with fixes your the
issues you've mentioned. Re-uploaded.

P.S. My Lenny system does not have /usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/licenses/apache

Thanks,
-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



RFS: libapache2-mod-authnz-external

2009-06-25 Thread Hai Zaar
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.2.4-2
of my package "libapache2-mod-authnz-external".

It builds these binary packages:
libapache2-mod-authnz-external - authenticate Apache against external
authentication services

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 534492

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-authnz-external
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-authnz-external/libapache2-mod-authnz-external_3.2.4-2.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
-- 
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



RFS: libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup

2009-06-25 Thread Hai Zaar
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.1+svn67-2
of my package "libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup".

It builds these binary packages:
libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup - access control based on on unix group
membership for Apache

This upload is to fix bug about apache .load file not being installed.

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup/libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup_1.0.1+svn67-2.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
-- 
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-authnz-external

2009-06-26 Thread Hai Zaar
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 8:24 PM, LI Daobing wrote:
>
> E: libapache2-mod-authnz-external: duplicate-conffile
> /etc/apache2/mods-available/authnz_external.load
> Finished running lintian.
How can I fix this? I just have this line in
libapache2-mod-authnz-external.install file:
debian/authnz_external.load etc/apache2/mods-available
And after building the package, conf file appears twice:
$ cat libapache2-mod-authnz-external/DEBIAN/conffiles
/etc/apache2/mods-available/authnz_external.load
/etc/apache2/mods-available/authnz_external.load


Thanks,
-- 
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-authnz-external

2009-06-26 Thread Hai Zaar
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Hai Zaar  writes:
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 8:24 PM, LI Daobing wrote:
>
>>> E: libapache2-mod-authnz-external: duplicate-conffile
>>> /etc/apache2/mods-available/authnz_external.load
>>> Finished running lintian.
>
>> How can I fix this? I just have this line in
>> libapache2-mod-authnz-external.install file:
>> debian/authnz_external.load etc/apache2/mods-available
>> And after building the package, conf file appears twice:
>> $ cat libapache2-mod-authnz-external/DEBIAN/conffiles
>> /etc/apache2/mods-available/authnz_external.load
>> /etc/apache2/mods-available/authnz_external.load
>
> windlord:~> lintian-info -t duplicate-conffile
> N: duplicate-conffile
> N:
> N:   The file is listed more than once in your debian/conffiles file.
> N:   Usually, this is because debhelper (dh_installdeb, compat level 3 or
> N:   higher) will add any files in your package located in /etc
> N:   automatically to the list of conffiles, so if you do that manually
> N:   too, you'll get duplicates.
> N:
> N:   Severity: important, Certainty: certain
>
> Does that help any?  Usually this means you have a conffiles
> configuration file in your packaging directory that you don't want
> because debhelper is handling it.
I think, first, the file is added to conf files because its listed in
.install file. Then, after its installed to etc, its added
again.
The question is "How do I install conf files using .install files"?


>
> --
> Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
>
>



-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-authnz-external

2009-06-26 Thread Hai Zaar
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Hai Zaar  writes:
>
>> I think, first, the file is added to conf files because its listed in
>> .install file. Then, after its installed to etc, its added
>> again.  The question is "How do I install conf files using
>> .install files"?
>
> Just listing it in *.install will not cause this problem.  There's
> something else wrong.
May be you can look at the package and give me a hint please?
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=libapache2-mod-authnz-external
There is really nothing complicated there.

>
> --
> Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
>
>



-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-authnz-external

2009-06-27 Thread Hai Zaar
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Hai Zaar  writes:
>
>> May be you can look at the package and give me a hint please?
>> http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=libapache2-mod-authnz-external
>> There is really nothing complicated there.
>
> I suspect the problem is that your rules file is running all the
> debhelper commands twice.  You only have one architecture-dependent
> package, but you have both populated binary-arch and binary-indep
> targets and your binary-indep target actually calls all the debhelper
> commands with the flag for building architecture-dependent packages.  So
> you're running everything multiple times, particularly since they both
> depend on install and install in turn doesn't create a stamp file.
>
> I think you should toss out that debian/rules file and start again from
> a debhelper template, either rules.arch or rules.tiny with an override
> to handle the build.
Thanks, Russ! Frankly, I've just copied rules file from another apache
module and just changed names.
Going from scratch indeed solved the problem. Thanks!

Li, fixed files are uploaded.
-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup

2009-06-27 Thread Hai Zaar
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 8:26 PM, LI Daobing wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 16:19, Hai Zaar wrote:
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.1+svn67-2
>> of my package "libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup".
>>
>> It builds these binary packages:
>> libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup - access control based on on unix group
>> membership for Apache
>>
>> This upload is to fix bug about apache .load file not being installed.
>>
>> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>>
>> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
>> - URL: 
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup
>> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
>> main contrib non-free
>> - dget 
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup/libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup_1.0.1+svn67-2.dsc
>>
>> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>>
> same problem as the last RFS:
>
> 1. no "updated" in mail title
>
> 2. lintian error:
>
> Now running lintian...
> W: libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup source:
> out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.1 (current is 3.8.2)
> E: libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup: duplicate-conffile
> /etc/apache2/mods-available/authz_unixgroup.load
> Finished running lintian.
All fixed. Reuploaded.

>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> LI Daobing
>



-- 
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup

2009-06-28 Thread Hai Zaar
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:07 AM, LI Daobing wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 1. debian/watch no longer works.
Yes, they've moved to code.google.om. I've updated the watch file.
>
> 2. version 1.0.2 has been released.
> http://code.google.com/p/mod-auth-external/downloads/detail?name=mod_authz_unixgroup-1.0.2.tar.gz
Version update. I've uploaded new package to mentors.

Thanks,
-- 
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup

2009-06-28 Thread Hai Zaar
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:31 AM, LI Daobing wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 15:58, Hai Zaar wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 7:07 AM, LI Daobing wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> 1. debian/watch no longer works.
>> Yes, they've moved to code.google.om. I've updated the watch file.
>>>
>>> 2. version 1.0.2 has been released.
>>> http://code.google.com/p/mod-auth-external/downloads/detail?name=mod_authz_unixgroup-1.0.2.tar.gz
>> Version update. I've uploaded new package to mentors.
>>
> lintian warning:
>
> Now running lintian...
> W: libapache2-mod-authz-unixgroup source:
> out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.1 (current is 3.8.2)
> Finished running lintian.
Fixed.

Regards,
-- 
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (take 2): libbash

2009-07-27 Thread Hai Zaar
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
 wrote:
>
> In , Hai Zaar
> wrote:
> >I need separate 1777 directory for locks library of libbash, since it
> >may create rather complex file structure there, so I do not want to
> >put it to just /tmp or /var/tmp/, since it may lead to collisions with
> >files created manually by users
It took me a while, but I've fixed this issue. Now temporary files are
stored under /tmp/.dirlocks-$USER.

I've uploaded fixed version to mentors.debian.net.

Patrick, can you look at it please?

>
> That's a *desire*, not a *need*.
>
> Follow the lead set by GPG, KDE, ORBit, PulsaAudio, SCIM, and SSH.[1]  Put
> files in /tmp and if you need a "complex directory structure", create a per-
> user (or "instance") directory in /tmp and place your files inside.
>
> mkdtemp is your friend here, although it is not completely portable.
> mktemp+mkdir are portable, but make sure your code does not have a race
> condition.
>
> So far you haven't provided any evidence that /tmp or /var/tmp are
> inappropriate for your program.
> --
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                   ,= ,-_-. =.
> b...@iguanasuicide.net                   ((_/)o o(\_))
> ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy         `-'(. .)`-'
> http://iguanasuicide.net/                    \_/
>
> [1] Taken together, it is a good crowd to be in.



--
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



RFS (take 3(!)): libbash

2009-08-21 Thread Hai Zaar
Dear mentors,
I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "libbash". All of the
pointed issues have been fixed
(http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-mentors@lists.debian.org/msg63502.html).
Someone, please have a look.
Thanks.

* Package name: libbash
 Version : 0.9.10b
 Upstream Author : Hai Zaar 
* URL : http://libbash.sf.net
* License : GPLv3
 Section : libs

It builds these binary packages:
libbash- a tool that enables bash dynamic-like shared libraries
libbash-doc - user and developer documentation for libbash

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 526739

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libbash
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libbash/libbash_0.9.10b.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards

-- 
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: RFS (yet another try): libbash

2009-08-31 Thread Hai Zaar
Good day, dear all!
Another week has passed, and still no replies. Anyone, please?

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Hai Zaar wrote:
> Dear mentors,
> I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "libbash". All of the
> pointed issues have been fixed
> (http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-mentors@lists.debian.org/msg63502.html).
> Someone, please have a look.
> Thanks.
>
> * Package name    : libbash
>  Version         : 0.9.10c
>  Upstream Author : Hai Zaar 
> * URL             : http://libbash.sf.net
> * License         : GPLv3
>  Section         : libs
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> libbash    - a tool that enables bash dynamic-like shared libraries
> libbash-doc - user and developer documentation for libbash
>
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
> The upload would fix these bugs: 526739
>
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libbash
> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
> main contrib non-free
> - dget 
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libbash/libbash_0.9.10c.dsc
>
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
> Kind regards
>
> --
> Zaar
>



-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



CDBS question

2009-09-01 Thread Hai Zaar
I have several patches for a package called varlkyrie. Some of these
patches change configure.in and Makefile.am. I.e. I need to run
autoreconf after applying patches. Following CDBS documentation, I've
added these lines to debian/rules
makebuilddir/valkyrie::
cat m4/* > acinclude.m4
autoreconf

But the problem is that this got executed _before_ patches get
applied. Here is the log:
 debian/rules build
test -x debian/rules
cat m4/* > acinclude.m4
autoreconf
valkyrie/Makefile.am:18: `%'-style pattern rules are a GNU make extension
valkyrie/Makefile.am:146: `:='-style assignments are not portable
vk_logmerge/Makefile.am:19: `%'-style pattern rules are a GNU make extension
vk_logmerge/Makefile.am:45: `:='-style assignments are not portable
mkdir -p "."
/usr/bin/make -f debian/rules reverse-config
make[1]: Entering directory
`/build/user-valkyrie_1.4.0-1-amd64-cdE7Mo/valkyrie-1.4.0'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `reverse-config'.
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/build/user-valkyrie_1.4.0-1-amd64-cdE7Mo/valkyrie-1.4.0'
if [ "debian/stamp-patched" = "reverse-patches" ]; then rm -f
debian/stamp-patched; fi
patches: debian/patches/valkyrie-1.3.0-docdir-fix-1.patch
debian/patches/valkyrie-1.3.0-honour-system-style-1.patch
debian/patches/valkyrie-1.3.0-kate-use-1.patch
Trying patch debian/patches/valkyrie-1.3.0-docdir-fix-1.patch at level
1 ... success.
Trying patch debian/patches/valkyrie-1.3.0-honour-system-style-1.patch
at level 1 ... success.
Trying patch debian/patches/valkyrie-1.3.0-kate-use-1.patch at level 1
... 0 ... success.

How can I make it to run after patching?

Thanks,
-- 
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: CDBS question

2009-09-01 Thread Hai Zaar
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Zak B. Elep wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 17:23 +0300, Hai Zaar wrote:
>> I have several patches for a package called varlkyrie. Some of these
>> patches change configure.in and Makefile.am. I.e. I need to run
>> autoreconf after applying patches. Following CDBS documentation, I've
>> added these lines to debian/rules
>> makebuilddir/valkyrie::
>>     cat m4/* > acinclude.m4
>>     autoreconf
>>
>> But the problem is that this got executed _before_ patches get
>> applied. Here is the log:
> [...]
>
>> How can I make it to run after patching?
>
> Try the post-patches target, like this:
That helped indeed. Thank you!!

>
> post-patches::
>        cat m4/* > acinclude.m4
>        autoreconf
>
> Though I would usually defer to an autogen.sh if its supplied in the
> source (and if it doesn't prompt for stuff like gettextize,) over
> autoreconf.
>
> --
> Zak B. Elep -- 1486 7957 454D E529 E4F1  F75E 5787 B1FD FA53 851D
>  I like the idea of 256 bits, though: 32 for the (Unicode) character
> leaves room for 224 Bucky bits, which ought to be enough for anyone.
>                        -- Roland Hutchinson, in alt.folklore.computers
>
>



-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



RFS (updated): valikirye

2009-09-03 Thread Hai Zaar
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.4.0-2
of my package "valkyrie".

It builds these binary packages:
valkyrie   - open-source graphical user interface for the Valgrind

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 543108 - this is an RC bug.

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/valkyrie
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/valkyrie/valkyrie_1.4.0-2.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards,
-- 
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Problem with debian/rules

2009-09-08 Thread Hai Zaar
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Mathieu
Malaterre wrote:
> Hi there,
>
>  There is a problem with the following rules file (in dicom3tools), I wrote:
>
>        for file in ancp andiff antodc.all binpatch bmpdump dcanon dcburn
> dccmp dccomb dcdecmpr dcdiff dclutburn \
>                                                        dclutmix 
> dcmvhier.8only dcmvhier.all dcortho dcostosr dcpost
> dcproj dcrmsfx.all dcsrdump \
>                                                        dcsrmrg dcsub dcswab 
> dctopgm8 dcunjpeg.all dumptiff dumpwhat
> gentodc.dat.all jpegdump \
>                                                        jpegsplit pbmswbit 
> pgmtobmp pnmpred pnmtoraw pqsplit rawarith
> rawdiff rawmask rawnjl; do \
>                find $(CURDIR)/debian/dicom3tools -type f -name $$file\* 
> -print | xargs rm; \
>        done
>
>
> But this seems to be a problem on every single buildd machine (*).
> Does anyone see what could be wrong ?
I think the problem is that sometimes find does not find anything and
rm complain about missing argument. Like this:
$ rm
rm: missing operand
Try `rm --help' for more information.
Try to use rm -rf:
$ rm -rf
$ echo $?
0
$

> What I am trying to do is
> remove, at the same time any existing man page ($file.1) or executable
> ($file) from a top level directory.
>
> Thanks,
>
> (*)
> https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=dicom3tools&arch=amd64&ver=1.0~20090716-1&stamp=1251914363&file=log&as=raw
>
> for file in ancp andiff antodc.all binpatch bmpdump dcanon dcburn
> dccmp dccomb dcdecmpr dcdiff dclutburn \
>                                                        dclutmix 
> dcmvhier.8only dcmvhier.all dcortho dcostosr dcpost
> dcproj dcrmsfx.all dcsrdump \
>                                                        dcsrmrg dcsub dcswab 
> dctopgm8 dcunjpeg.all dumptiff dumpwhat
> gentodc.dat.all jpegdump \
>                                                        jpegsplit pbmswbit 
> pgmtobmp pnmpred pnmtoraw pqsplit rawarith
> rawdiff rawmask rawnjl; do \
>                find /build/buildd/dicom3tools-1.0~20090716/debian/dicom3tools 
> -type
> f -name $file\* -print | xargs rm; \
>        done
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
> rm: missing operand
> Try `rm --help' for more information.
>
>
> --
> Mathieu
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
>
>



-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: Problem with debian/rules

2009-09-08 Thread Hai Zaar
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Mathieu
Malaterre wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> * Mathieu Malaterre , 2009-09-08, 11:38:
>>>
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>>  There is a problem with the following rules file (in dicom3tools), I
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>        for file in ancp andiff antodc.all binpatch bmpdump dcanon dcburn
>>> dccmp dccomb dcdecmpr dcdiff dclutburn \
>>>                                                        dclutmix
>>> dcmvhier.8only dcmvhier.all dcortho dcostosr dcpost
>>> dcproj dcrmsfx.all dcsrdump \
>>>                                                        dcsrmrg dcsub
>>> dcswab dctopgm8 dcunjpeg.all dumptiff dumpwhat
>>> gentodc.dat.all jpegdump \
>>>                                                        jpegsplit pbmswbit
>>> pgmtobmp pnmpred pnmtoraw pqsplit rawarith
>>> rawdiff rawmask rawnjl; do \
>>>                find $(CURDIR)/debian/dicom3tools -type f -name $$file\*
>>> -print | xargs rm; \
>>>        done
>>
>> `find | xargs rm` complains if no files were found. A more robust way to
>> find-and-delete files is to use the -delete option for find.
>>
>> Of course, you should investigate why some files you are trying to delete
>> are missing
>
> Looking at the log, I can find:
>
> nawk -f ../../.././libsrc/support/strval.awk \
>                role=declare outname=strvalc 
> <../../.././libsrc/standard/strval.tpl >strvalc.h
> nawk: cannot open "/dev/tty" for output (No such device or address)
Wild guess: if you run build from chroot, then probably your /dev
(under chroot) is not populated, thus awk can not access /dev/tty (I
do not know why it tries).

> make[5]: *** [strvalc.h] Error 2
>
>
> I cannot find any result in google.
>
> Does anyone know what this means ?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Mathieu
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
>
>



-- 
Zaar


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Python binaries as part of the package

2009-10-12 Thread Hai Zaar
Good day, dear mentors!

I have a package that has both C++ and Python executables. I have the
following questions regarding python packaging:
1. How do I properly package python executable? - By default they are
handled as regular executables, but I want .pyc files to be created
for them.
2. My python code also uses several modules that are part of the
package. I guess the proper way to package those modules is to use
pycentral, but how do I do it using CDBS? - I've already loaded
autotools class for C++ code.

Thank you in advance.
-- 
Zaar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org