RFS: preload
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "preload". * Package name: preload Version : 0.6.4-2 * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/preload/ * License : GPLv2 Section : misc It builds those binary packages: preload- adaptive readahead daemon To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/preload Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/preload/preload_0.6.4-2.dsc The update closes the RFA bug, as well as another two bugs by adding their patches. Some lintian cleaning took place as well. I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Daniel Martí -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#658306: RFS: preload (ITA) -- adaptive readahead daemon
Subject: RFS: preload (ITA) -- adaptive readahead daemon Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "preload". * Package name: preload Version : 0.6.4-2 * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/preload/ * License : GPLv2 Section : misc It builds those binary packages: preload- adaptive readahead daemon To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/preload Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/preload/preload_0.6.4-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Daniel Martí -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#658426: RFS: xfonts-bolkhov [ITA] -- Cyrillic fonts for X
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xfonts-bolkhov". * Package name: xfonts-bolkhov Version : 1.1.20001007-7 * URL : (Abandoned) * License : GPL Section : fonts It builds those binary packages: xfonts-bolkhov-75dpi - 75 dpi Unicode Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-cp1251-75dpi - 75 dpi CP1251 encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-cp1251-misc - Character-cell CP1251 encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-isocyr-75dpi - 75 dpi ISO 8859-5 encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-isocyr-misc - Character-cell ISO-8859-5 encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-koi8r-75dpi - 75 dpi KOI8-R encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-koi8r-misc - Character-cell KOI8-R encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-koi8u-75dpi - 75 dpi KOI8-U encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-koi8u-misc - Character-cell KOI8-U encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-misc - Character-cell Unicode Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/xfonts-bolkhov Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfonts-bolkhov/xfonts-bolkhov_1.1.20001007-7.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Daniel Martí -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#658432: RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo
package: sponsorship-requests severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xeji". * Package name: xeji Version : 1.2-15 * URL : (No upstream available; abandoned) * License : GPL Section : x11 It builds those binary packages: xeji - Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/xeji Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xeji/xeji_1.2-15.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Daniel Martí -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#658432: RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo
Thanks for your quick reply, Arno. "Arno Töll" wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >tags 658432 +moreinfo +wontfix >thanks > >Hi Daniel, > >On 02.02.2012 23:45, Daniel Martí wrote: >> dget -x >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xeji/xeji_1.2-15.dsc > >First let me point out, I don't see much reasons to upload this >package to Debian (not that I could anyway). It was orphaned and >should rather be removed than uploaded. You even say yourself your >primary purpose is to learn packaging [1], hence I'd suggest you to >pick a package you really care for instead. Of course. I did not know packages could be left aside for that reason; thanks for pointing that out >The package you picked has a low popcon [2] no reverse dependencies >and seems generally not helpful at all. That said, if you really want >to maintain this package that's up to you. Here is a review: > >* You modified the orig.tar.gz tarball somehow: > >$ md5sum deb-version/xeji_1.2.orig.tar.gz >mentors-version/xeji_1.2.orig.tar.gz >afc838ca6174ac98d67b1580832e24d4 deb-version/xeji_1.2.orig.tar.gz >68893c38485b8063cdd6fbe81da76e11 mentors-version/xeji_1.2.orig.tar.gz > >That's not acceptable, especially since the tarball was already >uploaded to Debian archives. Thus, you are not allowed to change the >tarball anymore, once it was uploaded without pushing a new upstream >version. Hmm, I don't know what happened there. I don't recall modifying orig.tar.gz. >Feel free to remove the "wontfix" tag once you addressed the tarball >issue. Everything else is of lower importance. Since I won't adopt this package, should I re-orphan it and close this bug? Or is there something else I should do? >* debian/compat 6 is somewhat outdated these days. Joey released >debehelper 9 just recently. Note, using compat 6 is not a tragedy, but >you would profit from using compat 7 or higher a lot. > >* The synopsis line of the package is not really helpful (yet another > does not help anyone) and does not match our guidelines [3]. > >* You use the old copyright format, consider upgrading to DEP-5 >instead (that's optional of course). > >* Why do you install manpages manually in debian/rules? You should use >dh_installman instead. This makes both, the install rule and the >"dirs" file unneeded. > >* You should use the short dh form. Check [5] and dh(1) for examples. >Most people consider the old-style debhelper form deprecated. While >you are it, remove the source and diff targets. They are obsolete >since ages it appears. > >* The package breaks the hardening release goal [6]. See [7] to learn >how to apply hardening flags. > >* Since you upgraded to 3.0/quilt there is no point to add manpages as >a patch anymore. Just put the file into debian/ and install it as I >outlined above. > >* patches/xeji_c.patch misses an appropriate DEP-3 header (that's >optional again) > >* Don't override I: and W: tags in Lintian. Moreover, note your >explanation for overriding >"copyright-should-refer-to-common-license-file-for-gpl" is wrong. >That's not what the tag is about. > >* Remove the README.Debian file. The URL is dead and its information >is redundant to debian/copyright. Thanks for the feedback. Apart from the switch to quilt, all the comments above refer to stuff that the old maintainer did without much documentation. >[1] bugs.debian.org/592977 >[2] http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=xeji >[3] >http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-pkg-synopsis >[4] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/ >[5] /usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.tiny >[6] http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SecurityHardeningBuildFlags >[7] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/09/msg1.html >[8] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ > >- -- >with kind regards, >Arno Töll >IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC >GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D >-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- >Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) >Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > >iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPK0SpAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtQKMP/jktuMN/RzQDF2YfoKnCzbLx >VXb9mB9jx1fdFTpqAXu6ANpnTeaa1gvBhoMrpqxVWGakgqFT2ctbp3l9xHmTEKhB >/SftLz+/AyDPREt99p3Mv1GXbWeo7tWLrIr++vnW95fm62g2VNxR0qpjzyejvK6S >agE/oOiQU2R1OoSj10GhMREZOWCU77DkVOd99XJjC77/4N7BLOC0xk+SKKtsz+9d >2ARsS+VfypBnvtF6rphvoHiV4r8gZOrSJ3KvWo5VNJ+S+d3YLlZIgRx4anoqe1dx >3inUhWPTxDO45tGNP7f5vwbWwDBykqjCsAKM/Vl5HVcJf+pOQ9IHxcSiBXFfq1Zs >HDd7YfrtogZB570OINvoMBgOtVIFf5scpsyI2/F5VqVA7NtUZaIWWpbr3Tb6qzWD >V1n3HuXmnv3CpW/DKrMt/psK1QR2PvqH2R5x6fE4xggTgKG+VdRXMmVJKO7vvPlT >/XEpWvNCA7uWhb3x8oXM2X0FH
Bug#658432: RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo
>Orphan it again. Regarding this bug you can either close it or we >reassign to ftpmaster and ask them for a package removal. Orphaning again, OK. And as far as this bug, I'll leave it up to you :-) >Yes, I understood. However, times change as do packaging styles and >available technologies. This package wasn't touched for years. It is >your job to bring a package in shape if you want to take it over. :) Agreed. I didn't mean I wouldn't solve those issues, the fact is that since support for this package will be dropped, there's no need in talking about them :-) Thanks! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85c2dafc-4510-4719-9501-113fd24a6...@email.android.com
Bug#658432: RFS: xeji [ITA] -- Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo
>I *suggested* that to you. It's your or anyone else's decision whether >or not to maintain a particular package. If people including you find >it interesting enough, feel free to maintain it. > >*I* wouldn't bother - if you do, that's fair enough. Oh, don't take me wrong - You pointed it out, I didn't feel in any way obliged to follow your suggestion. I just think you're right; the package has been abandoned upstream for years now. Cheers! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ed5303f5-73fd-4489-adc3-61e0f647a...@email.android.com
Bug#658306: RFS: preload [ITA] -- adaptive readahead daemon
retitle 658306 RFS: preload [ITA] -- adaptive readahead daemon thanks Just a little fix on that subject style. Nothing important. -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#658530: RFS: ptop [ITA] - PostgreSQL performance monitoring tool akin to top
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ptop". * Package name: ptop Version : 3.6.2-5 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] * License : [fill in] Section : misc It builds those binary packages: ptop - PostgreSQL performance monitoring tool akin to top To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/ptop Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/ptop/ptop_3.6.2-5.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Daniel Martí -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#658530: RFS: ptop [ITA] - PostgreSQL performance monitoring tool akin to top
My apologies, I've by mistake left some fields blank. Upstream author: PostgreSQL team URL: http://ptop.projects.postgresql.org/ License: BSD -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#658530: Closing bug
close 658530 thanks Bas van den Dikkenberg wants to be the new maintainer, thus why I'm removing my package from mentors and closing this bug. Cheers! -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RE: RFS: burp -- A cross platform network backup and restore program.
Also, might I ask why are there three changelog entries? Or has there been *three* uploads in a two day period? Cheers!
watch-file syntax help
Dear Mentors, I'm having some trouble at creating a watch file for the packace "preload". The upstream tarballs are found as follows: http://sourceforge.net/projects/preload/files/preload/0.6.4/preload-0.6.4.tar.gz The problem lies where its parent folder changes at every release. Would anyone know how to make that work with debian/watch? Thank you. -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#658306: preload/0.6.4-2 [ITA] -- adaptive readahead daemon
retitle 658306 RFS: preload/0.6.4-2 [ITA] -- adaptive readahead daemon thanks I've been working further on this package. The changelog now looks as follows: * New Maintainer (Closes: #646216) * Switched to 3.0 (quilt) source format. * Corrected the logrotate location. Thanks to Tobias for the patch. (Closes: #619384) * Improved init.d script + Add init.d status support. Thanks to Peter Eisentraut for the patch. (Closes: #645156) + The script now provides itself. * Created debian/watch. You can get the source files as usual: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/preload/preload_0.6.4-2.dsc The new changes since the first mentors upload are the watch file and the init.d script providing itself. Apart from that, there's another error I haven't been able to solve: I: preload: spelling-error-in-manpage usr/share/man/man8/preload.8.gz configuratoin configuration When a quilt patch is created for that purpose, for some reason it doesn't work. Maybe because debian/rules contains the following in "clean:"? rm -f src/preload.8 # generated at build time by help2man Here is the "dpkg-buildpackage -sa" report: patching file src/preload.8 Unreversed patch detected! Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file src/preload.8.rej dpkg-source: error: LC_ALL=C patch -R -t -N -p1 -u -V never -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < preload-0.6.4/debian/patches/manpage-spelling.patch gave error exit status 1 dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source --after-build preload-0.6.4 gave error exit status 1 And then there's --pedantic, showing another small bit: P: preload: copyright-refers-to-symlink-license usr/share/common-licenses/GPL Should I solve it? I would very much like to, but then, which GPL license should I refer to when I don't know which one to choose? (GPL-[123]) Thanks for your time, Daniel PS: Still looking for a sponsor, thus I would really appreciate it if someone helped me through this adoption :-) -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#658306: preload/0.6.4-2 [ITA] -- adaptive readahead daemon
I've updated a new version to mentors.d.n. There are absolutely no lintian complaints, even when in pedantic mode. The changelog now looks as follows: * New Maintainer (Closes: #646216) * Switched to 3.0 (quilt) source format. * Corrected the logrotate location. Thanks to Tobias for the patch. (Closes: #619384) * Improved init.d script + Add init.d status support. Thanks to Peter Eisentraut for the patch. (Closes: #645156) + The script now provides itself. * Created debian/watch. * Fixed a spelling mistake in the manpage. * debian/copyright now refers to GPL-2 rather than to the GPL symlink. * Bumped debhelper compatibility up to level 9. The package can be found at mentors, as usual: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/preload/preload_0.6.4-2.dsc Would anyone be willing to upload? Thank you! -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#659522: RFS: prelink/0.0.20111012-1 [ITA] - ELF prelinking utility to speed up dynamic linking
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "prelink". * Package name: prelink Version : 0.0.20111012-1 Upstream Author : Jakub Jelinek * URL : http://people.redhat.com/jakub/prelink/ * License : GPL-2 Section : admin It builds those binary packages: execstack - ELF GNU_STACK program header editing utility prelink- ELF prelinking utility to speed up dynamic linking To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/prelink Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/prelink/prelink_0.0.20111012-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Daniel Martí -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#658426: xfonts-bolkhov/20001007-7 [ITA] -- Cyrillic fonts for X
retitle 658426 xfonts-bolkhov/20001007-7 [ITA] -- Cyrillic fonts for X thanks I've started again from scratch. No lintian reports are left, except for the ones related to upstream since there is no active upstream (debian/watch, homepage field, etc.). The package can be found on mentors.d.n as usual: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfonts-bolkhov/xfonts-bolkhov_1.1.20001007-7.dsc I'd be very grateful if somebody uploaded this package for me. Regards, Daniel -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RFS: preload, prelink and xfonts-bolkhov (2 weeks)
Dear Mentors, It has been a while since I reported three RFS bugs against sponsorship-requests, regarding some packages I would like to adopt. All the new revisions are up in mentors.debian.net: prelink/0.0.20111012-1 [ITA] - ELF prelinking utility to speed up dynamic linking http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/prelink/prelink_0.0.20111012-1.dsc preload/0.6.4-2 [ITA] -- adaptive readahead daemon http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/preload/preload_0.6.4-2.dsc xfonts-bolkhov/20001007-7 [ITA] -- Cyrillic fonts for X http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfonts-bolkhov/xfonts-bolkhov_1.1.20001007-7.dsc I would very much appreciate it if anyone had a quick look at them. Thanks for your time! Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#660128: RFS: heybuddy/0.2.3-1 [ITP] - light identi.ca microblogging client
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "heybuddy". * Package name: heybuddy Version : 0.2.3-1 Upstream Author : Jezra Johnson Lickter * URL : http://www.jezra.net/projects/heybuddy * License : GPLv3 Section : net It builds those binary packages: heybuddy - light identi.ca microblogging client To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/heybuddy Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/heybuddy/heybuddy_0.2.3-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Daniel Martí -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#660982: RFS: identicurse/0.9+dfsg0-1 [ITP] - simple Identi.ca client with a curses-based UI
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "identicurse". * Package name: identicurse Version : 0.9+dfsg0-1 Upstream Author : Psquid, Reality * URL : http://identicurse.net/ * License : GPL-3+ Section : net It builds those binary packages: identicurse - simple Identi.ca client with a curses-based UI To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/identicurse Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/identicurse/identicurse_0.9+dfsg0-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Daniel Martí P.S. There's a debian/collab-maint git site, should I push once the package has been revised and uploaded by a mentor? -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#660982: Thanks again, Benoît.
Why did I file the RFS as ITP? :) Thanks for the correction, Benoît. I'll have to start doing the "block # with #" thing as well. Cheers. -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Adopting
Hello, >> I already downloaded and analyzed the source code so I want to start >> working on it. Also, what does maintaining means? Just correcting >bugs >> or improving it? Like UI or something? > >Maintaining a package is to do all the work of taking a non-Debian work >and making it a Debian package, conforming with Debian policy, >receiving >and addressing bug reports on the package, advocating for its users, >and >so on. Have in mind you don't need to be a programmer to do such work; many packages just need lintian cleaning (debian/*) and bug fixing, which can often be either easily fixed or forwarded to upstream :-) Cheers! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c1f5a80-818d-4e81-bf15-2fdeafb1a...@email.android.com
Bug#660128: RFS: heybuddy/0.2.3-1 [ITP]
Dear Jakub and Benoît, Thanks for your help. I've learned quite a lot from fiddling with debhelper. There is a new revision of heybuddy up at mentors.debian.net: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/heybuddy/heybuddy_0.2.3-1.dsc I've solved these issues: * debian/watch. Typo. * debian/control. Spell checking stuff moved to suggests (yes, both are needed), bumped to 3.9.2. * Moved manpage to (1). * Now using dh $@ --with python2, with dh_auto_install overrides. It seems to work; correct me if anything is wrong. * Cleared the manpage from the stuff you told me (wrong copyright holder, AUTHORS and COPYRIGHT). It has also been rewritten. * Added #! and set -e to both postinst and prerm scripts. I hope /bin/bash is fine, or should it be /bin/sh? Stuff I haven't solved: - Modules are not re-byte-compiled when the default Python version changes. * How should I solve this? I understand the problem, but scroogling around hasn't shown me any tips. - In the same file, you run compileall unconditionally; I guess it should only run during configure. * Pardon my ignorance, but the link to the debian guide you attached doesn't give any kind of specific help and I have absolutely no idea as to how to solve this issue. I'm obviously open to more suggestions, and welcome any patience you put in this :-) Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#660128: RFS: heybuddy/0.2.3-1 [ITP]
Dear Jakub and Benoît, I've removed postinst and prerm, and cleaned debian/rules of dh_python2 inside auto_install overrides (it builds exactly fine without it, so I guess it is run already by --with python2). The new package is up at mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/heybuddy/heybuddy_0.2.3-1.dsc I'd be very grateful if you could review it and upload it. Thank you both for your time, much appreciated. Daniel -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#658426: xfonts-bolkhov/20001007-7 [ITA] -- Cyrillic fonts for X
tag 658426 - moreinfo thanks Dear Ansgar, The new .orig.tar.gz has been modified because the folder it contained was xfonts-bolkhov-1.1.20001007.orig, instead of xfonts-bolkhov-1.1.20001007. I just renamed that folder and repacked the orig file. I know this breaks the new revision thing, but as far as I know the correct thing to do is to remove the orig part. What do you think about it? If you think I should've left the orig tarball intact anyway, please do tell me. I'll re-upload the package to mentors.debian.net since 3.9.3 has been released, as well. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#658426: xfonts-bolkhov/20001007-7 [ITA] -- Cyrillic fonts for X
The package has been re-uploaded to mentors.debian.net as follows: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfonts-bolkhov/xfonts-bolkhov_1.1.20001007-7.dsc It appears to be lintian clean and the orig.tar.gz issues are gone. If anyone could sponsor this upload, I'd be very grateful. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#659522: RFS: prelink/0.0.20111012-1 [ITA] - ELF prelinking
A new package is available at mentors as shown below: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/prelink/prelink_0.0.20111012-1.dsc I've solved these issues: * Errors. * Pedantic and informational complaints are gone as well. * I've added a Closes:LP bug which requests the latest upstream version to be packaged. * Bumped standards version to 3.9.3. There are two W: I have left out for now: W: prelink source: ancient-libtool ltconfig W: prelink source: ancient-libtool ltmain.sh 1.4.2 Since the lintian description tells me to contact upstream before patching with quilt (which would give extra work), I've sent a mail to Jakub about the subject. I'll wait a week or two for his answer. For the time being, the newer upload seems to be fine apart from those two warnings. I'd be very glad if someone sponsored this package for me. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#658306: preload/0.6.4-2 [ITA] -- adaptive readahead daemon
Since the 3.9.3 release, here's a new mentors.debian.net upload: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/preload/preload_0.6.4-2.dsc Here's the full changelog entry for this revision: * New Maintainer (Closes: #646216) * Switched to 3.0 (quilt) source format. * Corrected the logrotate location. Thanks to Tobias for the patch. (Closes: #619384) * Improved init.d script + Add init.d status support. Thanks to Peter Eisentraut for the patch. (Closes: #645156) + The script now provides itself. * Created debian/watch. * Fixed a spelling mistake in the manpage. * debian/copyright now refers to GPL-2 rather than to the GPL symlink. * Bumped debhelper compatibility up to level 9. * Bumped standards version to 3.9.3. I'd be very glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Thank you, Daniel -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#661988: RFS: mpdscribble/0.22-3 [ITA] - Last.fm reporting client for mpd
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mpdscribble" * Package name: mpdscribble Version : 0.22-3 Upstream Author : Max Kellermann * URL : http://mpd.wikia.com/wiki/Client:Mpdscribble * License : GPL-2 Section : sound It builds those binary packages: mpdscribble - Last.fm reporting client for mpd mpdscribble-dbg - Last.fm reporting client for mpd - debugger symbols To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/mpdscribble Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mpdscribble/mpdscribble_0.22-3.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New Maintainer (Closes: #612908). * debian/control: - Bumped standards version to 3.9.3. * debian/copyright: - Switched to DEP-5 format 1.0. * Added "status" support to its init.d script. * Bumped debhelper compatibility level to 8. I would be very glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Regards, Daniel Martí -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#661988: Closing bug
close 661988 thanks I submitted this RFS since I thought the ITA bug had been abandoned, but it seems like for some reason the package is being left aside for now. Closing this bug. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#662035: RFS: vorbisgain/0.37-1 [ITA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vorbisgain" * Package name: vorbisgain Version : 0.37-1 * URL : http://sjeng.org/vorbisgain.html * License : GPL-2 Section : sound It builds those binary packages: vorbisgain - add Replay Gain volume tags to Ogg Vorbis files To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/vorbisgain Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vorbisgain/vorbisgain_0.37-1.dsc Changes since the last upload: vorbisgain (0.37-1) unstable; urgency=low * New Maintainer (Closes: #547233) * New upstream release. - Refreshed all patches. * Bumped debhelper compat level to 8. * debian/copyright is now in DEP-5 format version 1.0. * debian/rules now removes automake's .log and .status in "clean". * Bumped standards version to 3.9.3. * debian/patches/0006-manpage_hyphens.patch: - Corrected many hyphen-used-as-minus-sign lintian complaints in the manpage. * debian/patches/0007-recursively_spelling.patch: - Corrected a spelling mistake, "recursivly". (Closes: #661999) * debian/patches/0008-manpage_recursion_mistake.patch: - The manpage no longer shows examples which don't work. (Closes: 447402) * debian/watch has been fixed. Regards, Daniel Martí -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#660982: RFS: identicurse/0.9+dfsg0-1 [ITA] - simple Identi.ca client with a curses-based UI
After some problems with unicode in DebExp, I've finally been able to upload a newer revision of the package. It closes two more bugs and improves debian/copyright. Here is the new dsc file: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/identicurse/identicurse_0.9+dfsg0-1.dsc And here is the full changelog entry: identicurse (0.9+dfsg0-1) unstable; urgency=low * New Maintainer (Closes: #650449) * New upstream release (Closes: #630610, #623954) * Refresh patches. * Corrected debian/watch to use dversionmangle. * Bumped standards version to 3.9.3. No changes needed. * debian/copyright is now in DEP-5 format version 1.0. I'd be very glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Regards, Daniel -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#662035: RFS: vorbisgain/0.37-1 [ITA] -- add Replay Gain volume tags to Ogg Vorbis files
tags 662035 - moreinfo thanks Benoît, I've tried carefully solving all the issues you mentioned above. Thanks for your time and support. Here is the dsc file up at mentors.d.n: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vorbisgain/vorbisgain_0.37-1.dsc And here is the full changelog entry for this upload: vorbisgain (0.37-1) unstable; urgency=low * New Maintainer (Closes: #547233) * New upstream release. - Refreshed all patches. * Bumped debhelper compat level to 8. * debian/copyright is now in DEP-5 format version 1.0. * debian/rules now removes automake's .log and .status in "clean". * Bumped standards version to 3.9.3; No changes needed. * debian/patches/0006-manpage_hyphens.patch: - Corrected many hyphen-used-as-minus-sign lintian complaints in the manpage. * debian/patches/0007-recursively_spelling.patch: - Corrected a spelling mistake, "recursivly". (Closes: #661999) * debian/patches/0008-manpage_recursion_mistake.patch: - The manpage no longer shows examples which don't work. (Closes: #447402) * debian/watch has been fixed. * NEWS has been removed from docs and is now installed as upstream's changelog file. I'd be very glad if someone were to upload this package for me. Regards, Daniel -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bumping six RFS bugs
Dear Mentors, These last weeks I've been filing some RFS bugs as follows: RFS: preload/0.6.4-2 [ITA] - http://bugs.debian.org/658306 RFS: xfonts-bolkhov/20001007-7 [ITA] - http://bugs.debian.org/658426 RFS: prelink/0.0.20111012-1 [ITA] - http://bugs.debian.org/659522 RFS: identicurse/0.9+dfsg0-1 [ITA] - http://bugs.debian.org/660982 RFS: vorbisgain/0.37-1 [ITA] - http://bugs.debian.org/662035 RFS: heybuddy/0.2.3-1 [ITP] - http://bugs.debian.org/660128 Jakub Wilk and Jerome Benoît have suggested some improvements upon a few of them, but so far no sponsoring has taken place. I don't mean to disturb your work as volunteers, thus why I've been waiting and will do so for another three or four weeks before bringing up the topic again. My sole intention is to move forward so I can help debian a bit further - a non-DM having more than six adoptions going on at once doesn't seem sensible to me, at least as far as I can tell. That being said, just wanted to thank everyone who is involved in this mentoring project. Really helpful. Cheers, Daniel. -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - 0x58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#658426: Re-Orphaning
# Re-orphaning. submitter 658426 ! owner 658426 ! close 658426 thanks I wish to re-orphan this package. The changes are minimal, plus the package is pretty old and unpopular. Cheers, Dan -- Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3 pgpwpdTVPorfU.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#660128: RFS: heybuddy/0.2.3-1 [ITP] (10th week)
Dear Mentors, I'm still looking for a sponsor for my package "heybuddy". To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/heybuddy Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/heybuddy/heybuddy_0.2.3-1.dsc It has been a while since I first uploaded this package, so I thought a bump wouldn't hurt. This is a pretty popular piece of software; I'd be very grateful if anyone considered uploading it for me. Kind regards, Daniel Martí -- Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3 pgpaSX16c0x5H.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Problems with build
> burp (= 1.3.4-2) build-depends on one of: > - debhelper (= 9.20120513) > > > In the control file Build-Depends is set like this: > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8), autotools-dev, libncurses5-dev, libssl-dev, > zlib1g-dev, librsync-dev, libacl1-dev, libattr1-dev, uthash-dev, openssl That doesn't seem to make much sense. Where does burp come in here? Unless you've packaged the wrong debian/control file, I can't understand why would it warn about burp's build-depends if it's neither any of the packages nor in any of their depends. -- Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3 pgp5re3i6khMR.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#659522: RFS: prelink
> As a first step when inspecting the package, I compared the 'original' > source archive that you uploaded, with the one that looks like > being the upstream one. > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/prelink/prelink_0.0.20111012.orig.tar.gz > http://people.redhat.com/jakub/prelink/prelink-20111012.tar.bz2 > > Can you explain why they differ ? Is it the Lintian description that > confused you to repack the archive instead of patching it ? Thanks for looking over the package. And sorry for the delay. I did not know we could have orig's packaged in any other format other than .tar.gz. I suppose renaming it to prelink-20111012.orig.tar.bz2 would be enough? All the patching is done via *.debian.tar.gz as usual. Thanks for your time. -- Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3 pgpJfavEg2O7W.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Bug#659522: RFS: prelink
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:03:55PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> Yes, you should just use a properly named, untouched upstream tarball.
> Regarding your question, read dpkg-source(1):
>
>
>Format: 3.0 (quilt)
>A source package in this format contains at least an original
> tarball (.orig.tar.ext where ext can be gz, bz2, lzma and xz) and a
> debian tarball (.debian.tar.ext). It can also contain additional
> original tarballs
>(.orig-component.tar.ext). component can only contain
> alphanumeric characters and dashes ("-").
Perfect! Thanks for the heads up.
I'm waiting for a reply in its O/ITA bug, because this upload might be a
NMU after all. Once it's decided, I'll fix this issue and re-upload to
mentors.
Cheers.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgp866Mw7f9oq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bug#659522: RFS: prelink/0.0.20111012-1 [ITA] - ELF prelinking utility to speed up dynamic linking
Bart, Thanks for the QA upload. I'll repack my ITA as NMU and retitle this bug now. If I understand the process correctly, I should put the QA team as its maintainer, but leave myself in the changelog entry for this NMU, right? Thank you. -- Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3 pgp19sxMJAOca.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#659522: RFS: prelink/0.0.20111012-1 [ITA] - ELF prelinking utility to speed up dynamic linking
I'm waiting for -3 to hit Unstable to repackage my version from scratch as a QA upload. This latest revision includes the patches in -2, I suppose. -- Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3 pgpfZ7YvO7L4J.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#659522: prelink - problems with 0.0.20090925-4
retitle 659522 RFS: prelink/0.0.20111012-1 [QA upload] - ELF prelinking utility to speed up dynamic linking thanks Guys, I started my package again from scratch from 0.0.20090925-4 to make sure all your changes are taken into account. Problem is, for some reason I'm stuck with the switch to 3.0 (quilt). Did any of you change debian/rules? Anyhow, this is the basic procedure to get to my error: apt-get source prelink cd prelink* deb3 (deb3 is a script that converts all dpatch patches to quilt and adds the 3.0 (quilt) bit to source/format) repack *.diff.tar.gz into *.debian.tar.gz and try to build. It will throw these errors shorty after gcc: /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccH3oLmR.o: undefined reference to symbol 'bar' /usr/bin/ld: note: 'bar' is defined in DSO ./reloc1lib1.so so try adding it to the linker command line ./reloc1lib1.so: could not read symbols: Invalid operation collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status cp: cannot stat `reloc1': No such file or directory FAIL: reloc1.sh PASS: reloc2.sh /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccP4mMtb.o: undefined reference to symbol 'f3' /usr/bin/ld: note: 'f3' is defined in DSO ./reloc3lib1.so so try adding it to the linker command line ./reloc3lib1.so: could not read symbols: Invalid operation collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status strip: 'reloc3': No such file cp: cannot stat `reloc3': No such file or directory FAIL: reloc3.sh There's about two pages of them, then fails and so doesn't build. The deb3 script is well able to convert all the patches with no errors, that's not the cause. This happens with 20111012-1 as well, in the exact same way. I've tried compat level 9 on both of them, both failed equally. Since the last time I did the 20111012-1 package from 2090925-1 it worked flawlessly with the same dpatch -> quilt script, I'm assuming some change took effect between revisions 1 and 4 that broke this package for quilt, but apparently not for dpatch. Any clues? P.S. I tried once again, now deleting debian/patches completely. 3.0 without patches fails, but 1.0 succeeds both with and without patches. -- Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3 pgpk1rXsFyZai.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#659522: prelink - problems with 0.0.20090925-4
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:11:30PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: > There were two patches applied in -2 that were cherry-picked from the > upstream version you're working on now. The patch systems will still > be trying to apply those, but quilt may be a bit less forgiving than > dpatch. > > Since they exist in the upstream, the can just be dropped. > > Best wishes, > Mike I did remove them before running deb3, that's not the problem. Moreover, building 20111012-1 *without* any patches fails both with the old compat level 5 and with any newer compat level. -- Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3 pgpHYgDRtxvyb.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#659522: prelink - problems with 0.0.20090925-4
Hmm, my bad. Taking a closer look at the deb3 script, it does change debian/rules. So much for that. That was the problem. Sorry for bothering you. Will upload soon. -- Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3 pgpyKdrKCluKn.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#659522: RFS: prelink/20111012-1 [QA]
Dear Debian Mentors,
A new package can be found up at mentors.debian.net:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/prelink
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/prelink/prelink_0.0.20111012-1.dsc
Here is the full changelog:
prelink (0.0.20111012-1) unstable; urgency=low
* QA upload.
* New upstream release. (LP: #731719)
* Switched to source format 3.0 (quilt).
- Refreshed all patches.
* Bumped debhelper compat level to 7.
* Some lintian complaints solved.
- Add ${misc:Depends}
- Changed deprecated dh_clean -k by dh_prep in debian/rules
- Added build-arch and build-indep to debian/rules
- Added a debian/watch file
- debian/NEWS doesn't use a bulleted list anymore
- Added a Homepage field
- execstack's Conflicts: prelink is now Replaces: prelink
- Added dh_md5sums to binary-arch
- debian/rules now imports dpkg build flags
- postrm uses set -e in its body rather than in #!
* Bumped standards version to 3.9.3.0. No changes needed.
I'd very much appreciate if anybody could review this package and upload
it for me.
Thank you for your time.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpTCUwYJsUKe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bug#659522: RFS: prelink/20111012-1 [QA]
> Would you mind incorporating the libtool fixes that I pushed in the -6 upload? Sure. But please, if you want to incorporate more changes, either do it all at once or email them to me so I can add them to the newer package. I'm starting to get a bit lost after so many revisions. > Also, could you take a stab at solving the build failure on kfreebsd-i386? > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=prelink This was working before, right? version -4 builds in kfreebsd-i386? > Some references that may be useful related to that: > https://github.com/OpenELEC/OpenELEC.tv/issues/812 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/204502?id=204502 I'll look into it. This problem used to happen back in 2003, we are obviously doing something wrong. -- Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3 pgpenyeJgGwSe.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#659522: RFS: prelink/20111012-1 [QA]
> No, most of my changes were aimed at bringing prelink to more > architectures, but this one is stubborn for some reason, and its the > last one. Ah, thanks then. > >> Some references that may be useful related to that: > >> https://github.com/OpenELEC/OpenELEC.tv/issues/812 > >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/204502?id=204502 > > > > I'll look into it. > > This problem used to happen back in 2003, we are obviously doing > > something wrong. > > The first link is a discussion happening a couple days ago. I don't > know exactly what the solution is going to be, but those discussions > are about related problems, which I hope to somehow guide you in the > right direction. Hmm, right. A quick google search brought up threads almost ten years old, but now that I take a closer look at your links this is rather new. -- Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3 pgpQwiISvWb9P.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#659522: RFS: prelink/20111012-1 [QA]
Dear Mentors,
There's a new version of prelink up at mentors.debian.net.
Here is the full changelog:
prelink (0.0.20111012-1) unstable; urgency=low
* QA upload.
* New upstream release. (LP: #731719)
* Switched to source format 3.0 (quilt).
- Refreshed all patches.
* Bumped debhelper compat level to 7.
* Some lintian complaints solved.
- Add ${misc:Depends}
- Changed deprecated dh_clean -k by dh_prep in debian/rules
- Added build-arch and build-indep to debian/rules
- Added a debian/watch file
- debian/NEWS doesn't use a bulleted list anymore
- Added a Homepage field
- execstack's Conflicts: prelink is now Replaces: prelink
- Added dh_md5sums to binary-arch
- debian/rules now imports dpkg build flags
- postrm uses set -e in its body rather than in #!
- Added prelink.pdf to doc-base
- hyphens.patch solves the hyphens - minus signs lintian complaint
- manpage-spelling.patch corrects a spelling mistake (Closes: #418805)
* Bumped standards version to 3.9.3.0. No changes needed.
In respect to the last upload, I've added the changes in -5 and -6, and
I've added three more fixes of my own: doc-base, hyphens.patch and
manpage-spelling.patch. With these three, we can now assure prelink is
100% lintian clean, including all pedantic warnings :-)
I've read quite a bit on the kfreebsd-i386 problems with ELF, but I
have encountered a different solution in every thread on the internet.
Some said to patch libelf.h, which is sadly not shipped with prelink. We
have libelf-0.7.0.patch, but that patchs a nonexistent file. We do have
libelf.m4, but I have no clue as to how to modify it.
Some other threads suggest moving on to elfutils, but I'm not sure how
would that be done. Since debian/rules makes no reference to any of the
two, I suppose it would need a quilt pach.
Anyhow, for now this is as far as I've gotten.
Cheers.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpHvvJ74anfo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bug#660128: RFS: heybuddy/0.2.3-1 [ITP] (16th week)
Dear Mentors, It's been almost four months now since I first uploaded this package, and the last reply I got is almost eight weeks old. Heybuddy is a great piece of software and I'd very much like to get it into Debian. Package name: heybuddy Version : 0.2.3-1 Upstream Author : Jezra Johnson Lickter URL : http://www.jezra.net/projects/heybuddy License : GPLv3 Section : net The package is lintian --pedantic clean, and uses straight debhelper compat level 9. You can see its mentors.d.n page here: http://mentors.debian.net/package/heybuddy Alternatively, here is its .dsc file ready to be downloaded: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/heybuddy/heybuddy_0.2.3-1.dsc I'd very much appreciate it if anyone took the time to review this package. With kind regards, Daniel Martí -- Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3 pgpHxHBfopVAA.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#660128: RFS: heybuddy/0.2.3-1 [ITP] (16th week)
> Build-dependency on python is insufficient. As per dh_python2
> manpage, it should be (>= 2.6.6-3~).
Fixed.
> Similarly, Depends of the binary package is not sufficient. Please
> use "${python:Depends}" (instead of hard-coded "python (>= 2.6)"),
> so that dh_python2 can generate the dependency automatically.
Fixed.
> What is /usr/share/pixmaps/heybuddy.png for? Also, aren't files in
> /usr/share/pixmaps/ supposed to be in XPM format? (Please forgive my
> ignorance on this subject.)
heybuddy.png is its icon image file. A quick scroogle search for "debian
filelist /usr/share/pixmap png" shows many packages shipping both .xpm
and .png files, and as there are no lintian complaints in respect to
that, I'm going to assume that's not a problem.
>
> Shebang of the script is "#!/usr/bin/env python".
> "#!/usr/bin/python" is strongly preferred (see Python Policy 3.1).
Added a quilt patch to solve that, thanks.
> Copyright/license of CertificateValidatingHTTPSHandler.py is not
> documented in debian/copyright. Is CC-BY-SA-3.0 compatible with
> GPL-3?
CC-BY-SA 3.0 is accepted by the DFSG, but not by the GPLv3. I've emailed
the upstream author about the subject. For now, debian/copyright has
been solved.
A new .dsc file is up at mentors.debian.net:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/heybuddy/heybuddy_0.2.3-1.dsc
Thanks for your help, Jakub.
--
Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3
pgpaRRmAl2IrJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Bug#679785: RFS: vorbisgain/0.37-2 -- add Replay Gain volume tags to Ogg Vorbis files
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vorbisgain" * Package name: vorbisgain Version : 0.37-2 Upstream Author : Gian-Carlo Pascutto * URL : http://sjeng.org/vorbisgain.html * License : LGPL-2+ Section : sound It builds those binary packages: vorbisgain - add Replay Gain volume tags to Ogg Vorbis files To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/vorbisgain Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vorbisgain/vorbisgain_0.37-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: * Updated maintainer's info * debian/patches - 0001-temp_files.patch re-adds X's in mktemp() (Closes: #676926) - 0009-hardening.patch added to solve an issue with debian's build flags. + Bumped debhelper compat level to 9 + Solved lintian complaints on hardening - 0010-fclose.patch added (Closes: #488126). Thanks to Marcel Rehberg for the patch. * debian/rules - Fixed lintian hardening complaints by adding the Debian build flags. Regards, -- Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3 pgpo53gpW3Dai.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Any script to populate debian/copyright file ?
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 06:04:25PM +, Bart Martens wrote: > On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:51:46AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote: > > Hi Debian-Mentors! > > > > Is anyone aware/have a script to populate debian/copyright file ? > > No idea. Probably not. As far as I have seen the debian/copyright file is carefully made, since not only the licenses must be listed but the copyright owners too. -- Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3 pgpIzbnj93WY9.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#687083: RFS: heybuddy/0.2.4-1 [ITP] -- light identi.ca microblogging client
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "heybuddy" * Package name: heybuddy Version : 0.2.4-1 Upstream Author : Jezra Johnson Lickter * URL : http://www.jezra.net/projects/heybuddy * License : GPLv3 Section : net It builds those binary packages: heybuddy - light identi.ca microblogging client To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/heybuddy Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/heybuddy/heybuddy_0.2.4-1.dsc More information about heybuddy can be obtained from http://www.launchpad.net/heybuddy. This new RFS bug has been opened since the latest concerned heybuddy-0.2.3 and was quite old. The package is lintian clean and fixes the CC-BY-SA + GPLv3 issue the 0.2.3 release had. Regards, -- Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3 pgptSHUgtdQ01.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Bug#651606: RFP: gitlab -- git project/repository hosting management app
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 08:57:41AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 02:44:00PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > [ CCing debian-mentors in the hope to find someone who is willing to > > package this software ] > > > > On Sat, 10 Dec 2011, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > > > Package: wnpp > > > Severity: wishlist > > > > > > * Package name: gitlab > > > Version : 1.2.0 (+git...) > > > Upstream Author : Dmitriy Zaporozhets > > > * URL : http://gitlabhq.com > > > * License : MIT > > > Programming Lang: Ruby > > > Description : git project/repository hosting management app > > > > > > Ruby on Rails based application to manage your own git > > > project/repository hosting, using gitosis or gitolite to manage ssh > > > access. > > > > FWIW, there are some unofficial Debian package at > > https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlab-public-wiki/wiki/GitLab-Debian-packages-%28unofficial%29 > > but they are far from perfect since many gems are > > packaged in a giant gitlab-bundle. > > > > Cheers, > > I'd also love to add my +1 to this RFP. It's sorely needed software, and > I'd be happy to help a future maintainer get this going. I'd be happy to be of assistance. Later this evening I'll get to it and let you know if there's anything new. Is there any packaging team I should contact? Should I start using collab-maint on anonscm.debian.org for its packaging right away? On a side note, I'm neither a DD nor a DM yet - a sponsor would be needed. Thank you for your time. -- Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3 pgprUFdbjlxMY.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Bug#651606: RFP: gitlab -- git project/repository hosting management app
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 06:56:12PM +0100, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:12:45AM -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:09:00PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > On Wed, 19 Dec 2012, Daniel Martí wrote: > > > > Is there any packaging team I should contact? Should I start using > > > > collab-maint on anonscm.debian.org for its packaging right away? > > > > > > The packaging work will surely require you to create a bunch of ruby gems > > > so you might want to joint the ruby extras team. > > > > > > http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby > > > > > > But for gitlab itself, collab-maint is certainly OK. > > > > > > > On a side note, I'm neither a DD nor a DM yet - a sponsor would be > > > > needed. > > > > > > I think Paul just volunteered to sponsor ;-) > > > Aye! While I'm not up on Ruby policy, I'd be more then happy to brush up > > and sponsor it on an ongoing basis. > > I would be happy to help with that and review and/or upload packages for > Ruby gems needed for gitlab. Just contact debian-r...@lists.debian.org > for questions or your RFS requests. Perfect! I'm now reading the wiki, and will subscribe to both debian-ruby and debian-ruby-extras lists. -- Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3 pgpHHSj1pYLmv.pgp Description: PGP signature
Questions on maintaining xeji
Hello, my name is Daniel and I've recently filed an ITA against the RFA bug for xeji (wnpp list). I've gone though most part of the new maintainer's guide, as well as the packaging basics. I do know how to make a package from scratch and build it, but I am having more trouble with creating a new revision for xeji (which would close the ITA bug). Would any of you be willing to be my mentor and guide me through this? I am not looking for a teacher, but just for some specific assistance and sponsorship. Any help would be very appreciated. Thank you very much in advance for your time.
Re: Questions on maintaining xeji
Etienne Millon wrote: >* Daniel Martí [22 20:40]: >> Hello, my name is Daniel and I've recently filed an ITA against the >> RFA bug for xeji (wnpp list). I've gone though most part of the new >> maintainer's guide, as well as the packaging basics. I do know how >> to make a package from scratch and build it, but I am having more >> trouble with creating a new revision for xeji (which would close the >> ITA bug). >> >> Would any of you be willing to be my mentor and guide me through >> this? I am not looking for a teacher, but just for some specific >> assistance and sponsorship. Any help would be very appreciated. > >Hello Daniel, > >Thanks for your interest in this package. It looks simple enough to >be a perfect first package ! > >The basic thing for preparing a package would be to add a new >changelog entry, and of course fix a few things for your first >upload. For example, you can make the package lintian clean (including >removing some unnecessary overrides). > I know how I must update the changelog and the maintainer in the description (control?). Any other files I should change? Of course, I should sign it with my own key. >You can do it "by hand" or using the dch tool (from the devscripts >package). But the best would be to use a VCS helper such as >git-buildpackage. The intermediate steps are not visible in the >resulting .dsc and .debs, but it helps you remember where you were and >allows easier collaboration (just like with source code). > >If you have any questions about it, feel free to ask in this thread, >so that either me or another one can reply to them. In fact, I do :-) What should I send to the sponsor, the .deb file or some other file? > >Have a nice day ! Thank you so much for your interest! > >-- >Etienne Millon > > >-- >To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org >with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact >listmas...@lists.debian.org >Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2022200110.GB23420@klow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e91c86c9-106e-4782-8852-e20bcbe17...@email.android.com
Re: dmaths: 30 days waiting for sponsor (package already in Debian)
>$ dget -q >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmaths/dmaths_3.4+dfsg1-2.dsc >curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404 >dget: curl dmaths_3.4+dfsg1-2.dsc >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmaths/dmaths_3.4+dfsg1-2.dsc >failed I confirm that behaviour. Maybe it's in the ftp server? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/c016faa7-b033-47ac-ba0f-c6a2b1ffe...@email.android.com
RFS: xeji
--- Begin Message --- Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xeji". Package name: xeji Version : 1.2-15 License : GPLv1 Section : x11 It builds those binary packages: xeji - Yet Another Follow the Mouse X demo To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/xeji Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xeji/xeji_1.2-15.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. This will hopefully be my first package update, so please be patient in case I made any mistakes. Thanks for your time. Kind regards, -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - gpg 58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature --- End Message --- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RFS: xfonts-bolkhov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xfonts-bolkhov". Package name: xfonts-bolkhov Version : 1.1.20001007-7 Upstream Author : Dmitry Bolkhovityanov Section : x11 It builds those binary packages: xfonts-bolkhov-75dpi - 75 dpi Unicode Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-cp1251-75dpi - 75 dpi CP1251 encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-cp1251-misc - Character-cell CP1251 encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX colle xfonts-bolkhov-isocyr-75dpi - 75 dpi ISO 8859-5 encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collectio xfonts-bolkhov-isocyr-misc - Character-cell ISO-8859-5 encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX c xfonts-bolkhov-koi8r-75dpi - 75 dpi KOI8-R encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-koi8r-misc - Character-cell KOI8-R encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX colle xfonts-bolkhov-koi8u-75dpi - 75 dpi KOI8-U encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-koi8u-misc - Character-cell KOI8-U encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX colle xfonts-bolkhov-misc - Character-cell Unicode Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) The update seems to be lintian-clean, and it has been brought to 3.0 (quilt). I'm still an unexperienced maintainer, so please be patient with me. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/xfonts-bolkhov Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfonts-bolkhov/xfonts-bolkhov_1.1.20001007-7.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - gpg 58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: dmaths
Jakub Wilk wrote: >* Innocent De Marchi , 2012-01-15, 17:12: >>Here you have the link again! >>http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dmaths/dmaths_3.4.2+dfsg1-1.dsc > >s/rule/rules/ in debian/changelog. > >I have a feeling that the new description is not (much) better than the > >old one. Could you please ask at debian-l10n-engl...@lists.debian.org >for a review? I might be of help. I'm not member of the l10n english team, but since I'm catalan as well I should be able to spot common spanish/english writing mistakes. Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/7548f57f-7f31-4190-ba0f-9820380df...@email.android.com
Re: dput only .dsc file is uploaded .
Make sure the .orig.tar.gz and .debian.tar.gz are correctly named, and if you are just doing a debian update (e.g. upstream.version-2) make sure to build the package with dpkg-buildpackage -sa. Then, dput mentors *.changes should do the trick. Alex Mestiashvili wrote: >Hi All , > >I run into a problem with package upload to mentors . >It seems to me that only dsc file is uploaded . > >I've recently uploaded a new version of my package libpam-abl and >after >upload noticed that QA information section had many error messages . >The >problem was that time on my lxc container I used for packaging was >wrong >and I was getting messages from tar about time stamps in the future ... > >I fixed that problem and rebuilt the package . >But before the upload I decided to delete the package with wrong >timestamps , so I deleted the most recent package via web interface . >After that I uploaded the new one with the same version . > >But now dget gives me the following >dget >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libpam-abl/libpam-abl_0.4.2-2.dsc >dget: retrieving >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libpam-abl/libpam-abl_0.4.2-2.dsc > % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time >Current > Dload Upload Total SpentLeft >Speed >100 1916 100 19160 0 46894 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- >--:--:-- >91238 >dget: retrieving >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libpam-abl/libpam-abl_0.4.2.orig.tar.bz2 > % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time >Current > Dload Upload Total SpentLeft >Speed > 0 00 00 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- >--:--:-- 0 >curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404 >dget: curl libpam-abl_0.4.2.orig.tar.bz2 >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libp/libpam-abl/libpam-abl_0.4.2.orig.tar.bz2 >failed >libpam-abl_0.4.2-2.dsc: > Good signature found > skipping libpam-abl_0.4.2.orig.tar.bz2 (not present) > skipping libpam-abl_0.4.2-2.debian.tar.gz (not present) >dscverify: libpam-abl_0.4.2-2.dsc didn't specify any files present >locally >Validation FAILED!! > >I tried to upload several times , but it doesn't help >I get messages that upload is successful and mail notification >afterwards , but nothing changes . > >Could anybody tell me what I'm doing wrong ? > >Best regards , >Alex > > >-- >To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org >with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact >listmas...@lists.debian.org >Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f1538b0.6000...@biotec.tu-dresden.de
RFS: xfonts-bolkhov (2nd try)
Original Message From: "Daniel Martí" Sent: Sun Jan 15 17:49:03 GMT+01:00 2012 To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: RFS: xfonts-bolkhov Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xfonts-bolkhov". Package name: xfonts-bolkhov Version : 1.1.20001007-7 Upstream Author : Dmitry Bolkhovityanov Section : x11 It builds those binary packages: xfonts-bolkhov-75dpi - 75 dpi Unicode Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-cp1251-75dpi - 75 dpi CP1251 encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-cp1251-misc - Character-cell CP1251 encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX colle xfonts-bolkhov-isocyr-75dpi - 75 dpi ISO 8859-5 encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collectio xfonts-bolkhov-isocyr-misc - Character-cell ISO-8859-5 encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX c xfonts-bolkhov-koi8r-75dpi - 75 dpi KOI8-R encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-koi8r-misc - Character-cell KOI8-R encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX colle xfonts-bolkhov-koi8u-75dpi - 75 dpi KOI8-U encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) xfonts-bolkhov-koi8u-misc - Character-cell KOI8-U encoded Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX colle xfonts-bolkhov-misc - Character-cell Unicode Cyrillic fonts for X (Cyr-RFX collection) The update seems to be lintian-clean, and it has been brought to 3.0 (quilt). I'm still an unexperienced maintainer, so please be patient with me. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/xfonts-bolkhov Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xfonts-bolkhov/xfonts-bolkhov_1.1.20001007-7.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, -- Daniel Martí - mvdan.cc - gpg 58BF72C3 signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: xfonts-bolkhov (2nd try)
I was not aware of such packaging team, thanks for the tip. Vasudev Kamath wrote: >Hello Daniel, > >On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Daniel Martí > wrote: >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xfonts-bolkhov". > >Since this is a font package I would suggest you to forward your RFS >to Debian Fonts task force Team - pkg-fonts-devel mailing list. Also >consider maintaining it as part of Fonts Task force team > >Best Regards > >-- > >Vasudev Kamath >http://vasudevkamath.blogspot.com >http://identi.ca/vasudev >http://twitter.com/vasudevkamath
Re: RFS: suckless-tools 39-1
Wow, thanks for that work. Michael Stummvoll wrote: >Hi mentors, > >I am looking for a sponsor for my fresh adopted package >"suckless-tools". > > * Package name: suckless-tools > Version : 39-1 >Upstream Author : Serval (look at the projects in the URL for more >info) > * URL : http://tools.suckless.org/ > * License : MIT > Section : x11 > >It builds this binary package: > >suckless-tools - simple commands for minimalistic window managers > >which installs follow binaries: > * dmenu: dynamic menu is a generic menu for X. >* lsw: Lists the titles of all running X windows to stdout, similar to >ls(1). > * slock: Simple X display locker that locks the X session. > * st: Simple terminal implementation for X. >* sselp: Simple X selection printer that prints the X selection to >stdout. > * ssid: Simple setsid replacement. >* swarp: Simple X warping tool to warp the mouse pointer to a given >position. > * tabbed: Simple generic tabbed fronted to xembed aware applications. >* wmname: wmname prints/sets the window manager name property of the >root > window similar to how hostname(1) behaves. > >I fixed serval bugs listed in BTS and updated dmenu and lsw to the >current upstream-release. > >To access further information about this package, please visit the >following URL: > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/suckless-tools > >Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this >command: > >dget -x >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/suckless-tools/suckless-tools_39-1.dsc > >I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. > >Kind regards, > >Michael Stummvoll > > >-- >To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org >with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact >listmas...@lists.debian.org >Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f181f55.7080...@stummi.org
Bug#694778: A little test message to see whether our filters work now
The message has been sent to debian-mentors, so if you're subscribed to the list that is probably why you are getting the e-mails like I am. On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 02:18:48PM -0200, Carlos Jordão wrote: > just curious, I'm not related to this RFS, should I still receive this > message? > > > > > 2013/1/15 Arno Töll > > > >> Sorry for the hijack of your RFS, I'm testing our new mail filter. > >> Please ignore me :) > >> -- Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3 pgpC6ejxKbOoy.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#698501: RFS: vorbisgain/0.37-3 -- add Replay Gain volume tags to Ogg Vorbis files
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vorbisgain". * Package name: vorbisgain Version : 0.37-3 Upstream Author : Gian-Carlo Pascutto * URL : http://sjeng.org/vorbisgain.html * License : LGPL-2+ Section : sound It builds the following binary package: vorbisgain - add Replay Gain volume tags to Ogg Vorbis files To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/vorbisgain Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vorbisgain/vorbisgain_0.37-3.dsc The changes from the last version are pretty straightforward: * Removed 0001-temp_files.patch - Upstream's 0.37 already solved this issue, thus there's no further need for this patch. (Closes: #537043) * Fixed vorbisgain.1 to make the use of -r clearer. (Closes: #698253) Thank you for your time. -- Daniel Martí - mv...@mvdan.cc - GPG 0x58BF72C3 pgpxLLTnuC21R.pgp Description: PGP signature
