Re: sponsorship-requests

[Boris Pek]

>>  where can we grab the source of the sponsorship-requests Debian package ?
>
> sponsorship-requests is a pseudo-package -- it's like a package, but
> it's not actually. This is so the BTS can be used for bugs, without
> actually having a package in Debian.
>
> It's for use with http://mentors.debian.net/ :)
>
> If you'd like the source to the Debian mentors site (debexpo), I'm
> sure that it's aloith[1] project site (which is down, but should be up
> soonish to later) will do nicely :)

I believe it was a joke.

> [1]: http://alioth.debian.org/projects/debexpo/

Alioth is down now. Again... It's a pity.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/169541327952...@web122.yandex.ru

Re: sponsorship-requests

[Boris Pek]

> Is it active and the preferred way now? So as of now, we should file
> a bug with sponsorship-requests instead of sending an email directly
> to debian-mentors list?

It generates too much noise in this mailing list I think. It will be very
uncomfortable to people who did not setup mailing filters yet.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/186361327955...@web122.yandex.ru

Re: sponsorship-requests

[Boris Pek]

>>>  Is it active and the preferred way now? So as of now, we should file
>>>  a bug with sponsorship-requests instead of sending an email directly
>>>  to debian-mentors list?
>>  It generates too much noise in this mailing list I think. It will be very
>>  uncomfortable to people who did not setup mailing filters yet.
>
> For people not interested in the general discussion on this list, this
> will decrease the noise. You can subscribe directly to your RFS bug
> report rather than to the entire list. Subscribing to a bug can be
> done by sending an email to nnn-subscr...@bugs.debian.org, where nnn
> is the number of the bug.

Yes, this is one of solutions. But this list was quite interesting
(at least for me). Sponsored maintainers can learn more not only by
own mistakes but also when they are reading other emails here.

System messages from the bot are not very useful. Just a noise...


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/132091327957...@web98.yandex.ru

Bug#658959: [Pkg-virtualbox-devel] Bug#658959: RFS: phpvirtualbox-4.1

[Boris Pek]

> Unfortuantly, I cannot find a link to the mailinglist archive for
> pkg-virtualbox-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org

http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-virtualbox-devel/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/598521328601...@web140.yandex.ru

sponsorship-requests and debian-mentors mailing list

[Boris Pek]

Hi everyone,

Continuing the theme of excessive noise in the mailing list, we can look at
simple statistics for the first 7 days of this month:

$ curl -q http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/02/maillist.html 2> 
/dev/null | \
grep '' | wc -l
191

$ curl http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/02/maillist.html 2> 
/dev/null | \
grep '' | grep 'Debian Bug Tracking System' | wc -l
25

$ echo $((100*25/191))%
13%

I.e. 13% of messages are useless for most subscribers.
Is it good reason to filter these messages?

Best regards,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/148741328640...@web4.yandex.ru

Re: sponsorship-requests and debian-mentors mailing list

[Boris Pek]

>>  I.e. 13% of messages are useless for most subscribers. Is it good
>>  reason to filter these messages?
>
> Try your luck: #658498

I haven't seen it. Thanks.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/149521328642...@web12.yandex.ru

Re: creating an orig.tar.gz from a CVS

[Boris Pek]

Hi Jerome,

> does someone know Debian packages using get-orig-source in d/rules  ?

For example you can look at my package:
https://github.com/tehnick/libterm-shellui-perl-debian/blob/master/debian/rules

Nothing difficult. You can add any script or list of commands to get-orig-source
section of makefile.

Best regards,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/106751328774...@web84.yandex.ru

Re: how to manage d/changelog for updated but not yet sponsored package

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

> Personally, I like the middleground best (though, I haven't been
> practicsing this yet, but this is how things would work in my ideal
> world): upload to mentors.d.n with incremental versions (when it makes
> sense; if the reviewer/potential sponsor spots a bug in a version not
> announced, that version is safe to resue as far as I'm concerned), but
> fold it into one entry when uploading to Debian proper.
>
> ${VERSION}-${N}~mentors${X} for mentors, ${VERSION}-${N} for Debian
> proper. A little more work on both sides, but we get the best of both
> worlds with as little of the worst as possible.

VCS repo is very helpful in this case. It eliminates the need to increment
the version of the package. And change log will show real history of package
versions in Debian archive.

Best regards,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/771741329135...@web12.yandex.ru

Re: how to manage d/changelog for updated but not yet sponsored package

[Boris Pek]

> Depends on the situation. If it's a quick update, and I can followup
> within moments, then indeed, there is no reason to increment the version
> (see my "when it makes sense" comment above).
>
> But if hours, or even days can pass between iterations, then I much
> prefer a new version on mentors. That also has the advantage of me not
> neccessarily being a bottle neck, and another sponsor can review it and
> perhaps sponsor it too.

Hmm, another sponsor also could look at commits in VSC to observe changes since
last message. Isn't it?

Best regards,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/793591329137...@web12.yandex.ru

Re: Announcing Debexpo v2

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

Thank you for the announcement. I am glad to see these improvements.
It is really great!

Few negative moments which I am recently faced with [1]:

1) Error "Package closes bugs in a wrong way".

   Your script processes wnpp pseudo-package in wrong way.

2) Package has lintian warnings:
   - newer-standards-version
 3.9.3 (current is 3.9.2)
   - unknown-copyright-format-uri
 http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/

   I think that the last version of lintian from Debian Sid should be used here.

Best regards,
Boris


[1] http://mentors.debian.net/package/kde-gtk-config


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/148451330262...@web64.yandex.ru

Re: "Package closes bugs in a wrong way"

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

> Hm, it doesn't show the error with the new uploaded version, only for the 
> older versions. Now it says "Package closes a WNPP bug" with a green colour 
> instead.

This was discussed yesterday:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/02/msg00687.html

Best wishes,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/164801330343...@web6.yandex.ru

Re: Standard Versions

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

>>  /usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.txt.gz
>
> Thanks a lot, this is exactly what I was looking for :)

Just for a note. It was the message with brief list of changes:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/02/msg00013.html

Best wishes,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/233151330349...@web123.yandex.ru

Documentation generated by doxygen and Debian Policy

[Boris Pek]

Hi list,

I found that in package qxmpp is used HTML documentation from upstream tarball.
This documentation was not generated by doxygen during build process. Should
I make a bug report? If yes, which section of Debian Policy I should point to?

Best regards,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/175731334821...@web6g.yandex.ru

Re: Documentation generated by doxygen and Debian Policy

[Boris Pek]

>>  I found that in package qxmpp is used HTML documentation from upstream 
>> tarball.
>>  This documentation was not generated by doxygen during build process. Should
>>  I make a bug report? If yes, which section of Debian Policy I should point 
>> to?
>
> Well, there's nowhere in the DFSG or copyright (i'm assuming)
> that says that it must be in some format X. If the original source is,
> in fact, HTML, there's no problem.
>
> The idea is that you communicate the program in a preferable format
> which can be used (or in some cases, actually is) the thing you
> distribute.
>
> If the docs were generated, and they have a better source format, you
> should encourage them to use that.
>
> The relevant Debian policy is DFSG point 2[1] (Must include source code) :)

Thank you for a reply.

Perhaps I wrote unclear. In few steps:
1) There is some HTML documentation [1] in upstream tarball.
2) This documentation was generated using Doxygen.
3) This documentation was packaged in package libqxmpp-doc as is.
4) I can not find in tarball the necessary sources for Doxygen and instructions
   how to generate this documentation manually.

The question is: should I make a bug report in this case?

I am not subscribed to debian-devel list, so I've asked here.

Best regards,
Boris

[1] http://qxmpp.googlecode.com/svn-history/tags/qxmpp-0.4.0/doc/html/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/69811334841...@web30e.yandex.ru

Re: Documentation generated by doxygen and Debian Policy

[Boris Pek]

Thanks all for answers.

I was searching for:
/doxyfilter -g
This command generates Doxyfile which is necessary for Doxygen.

> However I can't find anywhere in the Policy that it's an actual
> requirement to re-generate this kind of files at build-time.

So do I. That's why I've asked here should I make a bug report or not?

Best regards,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/128231334844...@web29d.yandex.ru

Re: Documentation generated by doxygen and Debian Policy

[Boris Pek]

>>  You need to add doxygen-latex and graphviz as build-deps.
>
> Rather as Build-Depends-Indep.
>
>>  override_dh_auto_build:
>
> which would also run when building only the arch-dep packages. rather:
>
> build-doc:
>
>>  cd doc ;\
>>  rm -rf html/ ;\
>>  qmake ;\
>>  make ;\
>>  ./doxyfilter -g ;\
>>  sed -i -e's/GENERATE_LATEX.*= NO/GENERATE_LATEX = YES/' ;\
>>  -e's/GENERATE_MAN.*= NO/GENERATE_MAN = YES/' ./Doxyfile ;\
>>  doxygen ./Doxyfile
>
> build-indep: build-doc
> dh $@

I just use override_dh_auto_build-indep, override_dh_auto_install-indep and etc
in such cases.

Best regards,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/312381334907...@web25e.yandex.ru

Bug#671732: RFS: qxmpp-lc/0.3.61-1 [ITP] -- library for Jabber/XMPP clients

[Boris Pek]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qxmpp-lc".

* Package name: qxmpp-lc
  Version : 0.3.61-1
  Upstream Contact: Georg Rudoy <0xd34df...@gmail.com>
* URL : https://github.com/0xd34df00d/qxmpp-dev
* License : LGPL-2.1+
  Programming Lang: C++
  Description : library for Jabber/XMPP clients

It builds those binary packages:
  libqxmpp-lc-dev - Development files for QXmpp-dev library
  libqxmpp-lc-doc - Documentation files for QXmpp-dev library
  libqxmpp-lc0 - QXmpp-dev library for Jabber/XMPP clients
  libqxmpp-lc0-dbg - Debug symbols for QXmpp-dev library

The package is lintian-clean. I always check [1] using:
  lintian -ivIE --pedantic *.changes

You can look at package rules here:
  https://github.com/tehnick/qxmpp-lc-debian/tree/master/debian/

Further information about this package can be found here:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/qxmpp-lc

Direct link for download:
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qxmpp-lc/qxmpp-lc_0.3.61-1.dsc

More information about QXmpp-dev can be obtained here:
  https://github.com/0xd34df00d/qxmpp-dev/blob/master/README

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

I need this library for my package "leechcraft".

Best regards,
Boris

[1] 
https://github.com/tehnick/deb_packages/blob/master/Debian/updating_packages#L105



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/347881336311...@web28h.yandex.ru

Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection

[Boris Pek]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

My regular sponsor is very busy now and I am looking for a sponsor for my new
package "kde-gtk-config".

* Package name: kde-gtk-config
  Version : 2.0-1
  Upstream Author : Aleix Pol Gonzalez 
* URL : 
https://projects.kde.org/projects/playground/base/kde-gtk-config
* License : GPL-3+ and LGPL-3+
  Programming Lang: C++
  Description : KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style 
selection
  Section : kde

It builds those binary packages:
  kde-gtk-config - KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x styles 
selection

The package is lintian-clean. I always check [1] using:
  lintian -ivIE --pedantic *.changes

You can look at package rules here:
  https://github.com/tehnick/kde-gtk-config-debian/tree/master/debian/

Further information about this package can be found here:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/kde-gtk-config

Direct link for download:
  
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-gtk-config/kde-gtk-config_2.0-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Some information about KDE GTK Configurator:
  Configuration dialog to adapt GTK+ applications appearance to your taste
  under KDE. Among its many features, it lets you:
   - Choose which theme is used for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x applications.
   - Tweak some GTK+ applications behaviour.
   - Select what icon theme to use in GTK+ applications.
   - Select GTK+ applications default fonts.
   - Easily browse and install new GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x themes.

Also I should note that very similar package available in Debian:
  http://packages.debian.org/sid/kde-config-gtk-style

But it is for GTK+ 2.x only. This is serious limitation because there is a lot
of programs which use GTK+ 3.x libraries now. And this is the future...

Best regards,
Boris

[1] 
https://github.com/tehnick/deb_packages/blob/master/Debian/updating_packages#L105



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1062691336576...@web18f.yandex.ru

Bug#672268: RFS: uhub/0.4.0~git20120423-9efe4bc-1 (updated) -- High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub

[Boris Pek]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my
package "uhub" which is already available in Debian.

It builds those binary packages:
  uhub - High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub

The package is lintian-clean. I always check [1] using:
  lintian -ivIE --pedantic *.changes

You can look at package rules here:
  https://github.com/tehnick/uhub-debian/tree/master/debian/

Further information about this package can be found here:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/uhub

Direct link for download:
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/uhub/uhub_0.4.0~git20120423-9efe4bc-1.dsc

Changes in the package:
  * Update to GIT snapshot.
  * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3.
  * Changed tarball compression format: LZMA2 is used now.
  * debian/rules was updated:
- now dh is used instead of direct dh_* commands
- now uscan is used for checking current upstream version
  (dpkg-parsechangelog was used earlier)
- USE_SSL configuration option is enabled
  * debian/doc/uhub.1, debian/doc/uhub.conf and debian/doc/users.conf
were removed: now they are available in upstream.
  * debian/doc/uhub-passwd.1 was created: there is no such man page in
upstream yet.
  * debian/uhub.manpages was updated (see above).
  * debian/control was updated: added dependence from packages
fakeroot, libsqlite3-dev and libssl-dev
  * debian/copyright was updated:
- URL in Format field was updated
- years were updated
- OpenSSL exception was officially received
  (see file COPYING.OpenSSL in sources)
  * Upstream possibly fixed build for hurd-i386,
kfreebsd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64, s390 and s390x.

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Best regards,
Boris

[1] 
https://github.com/tehnick/deb_packages/blob/master/Debian/updating_packages#L105



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/137131336587...@web1e.yandex.ru

Bug#672290: RFS: uhub/0.4.0~git20120423-9efe4bc-1 (updated) -- High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub

[Boris Pek]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my
package "uhub" which is already available in Debian.

It builds those binary packages:
  uhub - High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub

The package is lintian-clean. I always check [1] using:
  lintian -ivIE --pedantic *.changes

You can look at package rules here:
  https://github.com/tehnick/uhub-debian/tree/master/debian/

Further information about this package can be found here:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/uhub

Direct link for download:
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/uhub/uhub_0.4.0~git20120423-9efe4bc-1.dsc

Changes in the package:
  * Update to GIT snapshot.
  * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3.
  * Changed tarball compression format: LZMA2 is used now.
  * debian/rules was updated:
- now dh is used instead of direct dh_* commands
- now uscan is used for checking current upstream version
  (dpkg-parsechangelog was used earlier)
- USE_SSL configuration option is enabled
  * debian/doc/uhub.1, debian/doc/uhub.conf and debian/doc/users.conf
were removed: now they are available in upstream.
  * debian/doc/uhub-passwd.1 was created: there is no such man page in
upstream yet.
  * debian/uhub.manpages was updated (see above).
  * debian/control was updated: added dependence from packages
fakeroot, libsqlite3-dev and libssl-dev
  * debian/copyright was updated:
- URL in Format field was updated
- years were updated
- OpenSSL exception was officially received
  (see file COPYING.OpenSSL in sources)
  * Upstream possibly fixed build for hurd-i386,
kfreebsd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64, s390 and s390x.

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Best regards,
Boris

[1] 
https://github.com/tehnick/deb_packages/blob/master/Debian/updating_packages#L105



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1134311336589...@web18f.yandex.ru

Strange bug in Qt program after build with gcc 4.7

[Boris Pek]

Hi everyone,

I have strange problem with my package eiskaltdcpp-qt.

When I compile this binary file using gcc 4.6 program works fine.
But when I compile it using gcc 4.7 program crashes at launch time.

Full backtrace from gdb shows that segmentation fault is in Qt library [1].
Bug was also confirmed in Fedora and Arch Linux.

C++11 is actively used in eiskaltdcpp-qt. Could it causes the bug?

I have tried to make minimum reproducible example but without success.

Could anyone look on my package? Any suggestions are welcome.

Package can be found on m.d.n [2][3]. Or you could get sources directly from
upstream [4]. Problem exists in all last releases since 2.2.5 (I have not
checked earlier versions).

Also what mailing list is relevant for such bugs?
Maybe debian-devel or another one?

Best regards,
Boris

PS: I use Debian Sid with all recent updates.

[1] See eiskaltdcpp-qt.gdb.bt_full.log in attachment
[2] http://mentors.debian.net/package/eiskaltdcpp
[3] 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/eiskaltdcpp/eiskaltdcpp_2.2.6-4.dsc
[4] https://github.com/negativ/eiskaltdcpp
$ gdb eiskaltdcpp-qt 
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.4.1-debian
Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later 
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.  Type "show copying"
and "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i486-linux-gnu".
For bug reporting instructions, please see:
...
Reading symbols from /usr/bin/eiskaltdcpp-qt...done.
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/bin/eiskaltdcpp-qt 
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library 
"/lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
Installing handler for: Segmentation fault
Installing handler for: Aborted
Installing handler for: Bus error
Installing handler for: Terminated
Signal handlers installed.
[New Thread 0xb2d09b70 (LWP 2935)]
[New Thread 0xb2508b70 (LWP 2936)]
Loading: Hash database
[New Thread 0xb1bcfb70 (LWP 2937)]
[Thread 0xb2508b70 (LWP 2936) exited]
Loading: Shared Files
[New Thread 0xb2508b70 (LWP 2941)]
Loading: Download Queue
Loading: Users
[New Thread 0xb13ceb70 (LWP 2942)]
UserList icons has been loaded
Application icons has been loaded
[New Thread 0xb0024b70 (LWP 2943)]
[New Thread 0xaf823b70 (LWP 2944)]
[New Thread 0xaf022b70 (LWP 2945)]
[New Thread 0xae821b70 (LWP 2946)]
[New Thread 0xae020b70 (LWP 2947)]

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
__strlen_sse2_bsf () at ../sysdeps/i386/i686/multiarch/strlen-sse2-bsf.S:52
52  ../sysdeps/i386/i686/multiarch/strlen-sse2-bsf.S: No such file or 
directory.
(gdb) bt full
#0  __strlen_sse2_bsf () at ../sysdeps/i386/i686/multiarch/strlen-sse2-bsf.S:52
No locals.
#1  0xb5c414e5 in XSetCommand () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
No symbol table info available.
#2  0xb5c45ee3 in XSetWMProperties () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
No symbol table info available.
#3  0xb70ab646 in QWidgetPrivate::create_sys(unsigned long, bool, bool) ()
   from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libQtGui.so.4
No symbol table info available.
#4  0xb705582f in QWidget::create(unsigned long, bool, bool) ()
   from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libQtGui.so.4
No symbol table info available.
#5  0xb7724c77 in ?? () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libQtGui.so.4
No symbol table info available.
#6  0xb7725a91 in ?? () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libQtGui.so.4
No symbol table info available.
#7  0xb7725bea in ?? () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libQtGui.so.4
No symbol table info available.
#8  0xb770dac8 in QSystemTrayIcon::setVisible(bool) ()
   from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libQtGui.so.4
No symbol table info available.
#9  0x0827519a in show (this=)
at /usr/include/qt4/QtGui/qsystemtrayicon.h:108
No locals.
#10 Notification::enableTray (this=this@entry=0x972dbd0, enable=true)
at ../../eiskaltdcpp-qt/src/Notification.cpp:136
menuAdditional = 0x97836d0
actSupressTxt = 0x8e27838
menu = 0x978fbb0
actSupressSnd = 0x8e29160
show_hide = 
setup_speed_lim = 0x97b1910
close_app = 0x97736d0
sep = 0x8e29fd8
#11 0x08275590 in Notification::Notification (this=0x972dbd0, parent=0x0)
at ../../eiskaltdcpp-qt/src/Notification.cpp:41
No locals.
#12 0x08178fda in dcpp::Singleton::newInstance ()
at ../../dcpp/Singleton.h:47
No locals.
#13 0x080d8bfc in main (argc=1, argv=0xb1a4) at 
../../eiskaltdcpp-qt/src/main.cpp:172
app = { = { = {}, 
static staticMetaObject = {d = {superdata = 0x83db330, 
stringdata = 0x834e2a0 "QtSingleCoreApplication", data = 
0x834e320, 
---Type  to continue, or q  to quit---
extradata = 0x834e290}}, static staticMetaObjectExtraData = {
  objects = 0x0, 
  static_metacall = 0x8198200 
}, _isRunning = false, 
sharedMemory = }, static

Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

Thank you for a reply.

> first, kde configuration modules are packaged as kde-config-foo

Ok, I can rename binary package to kde-config-gtk2-gtk3-style for example.
Does it look good for you? Or have you another suggestion?

> second, what does it do that kde-config-gtk-style doesn't do ?

It was written in my ITP and RFS messages into Debian BTS. Quotation:

> Some information about KDE GTK Configurator:
>   Configuration dialog to adapt GTK+ applications appearance to your taste
>   under KDE. Among its many features, it lets you:
>- Choose which theme is used for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x applications.
>- Tweak some GTK+ applications behaviour.
>- Select what icon theme to use in GTK+ applications.
>- Select GTK+ applications default fonts.
>- Easily browse and install new GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x themes.
>
> Also I should note that very similar package available in Debian:
>   http://packages.debian.org/sid/kde-config-gtk-style
>
> But it is for GTK+ 2.x only. This is serious limitation because there is a lot
> of programs which use GTK+ 3.x libraries now. And this is the future...

But I can repeat it in other words if you need.

kde-config-gtk-style does not allow to:
* select themes for Gtk 3.x applications
* preview available themes for Gtk 2.x and Gtk 3.x applications
* custmize toolbars and menus for Gtk applications
* select icon themes for Gtk applications
* download and apply Gtk 2.x and Gtk 3.x themes from http://opendesktop.org/
  in few mouse clicks

All these things can be done in kde-gtk-config.

Regards,
Boris



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/276281336757...@web4e.yandex.ru

Bug#672268: Didier Raboud

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

You could read the beginning of this thread:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/05/threads.html#00115

(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to pkg-kde-extras mailing list)

>>  kde-config-gtk-style does not allow to:
>>  * select themes for Gtk 3.x applications
>>  * preview available themes for Gtk 2.x and Gtk 3.x applications
>>  * custmize toolbars and menus for Gtk applications
>>  * select icon themes for Gtk applications
>>  * download and apply Gtk 2.x and Gtk 3.x themes from http://opendesktop.org/
>>in few mouse clicks
>>
>>  All these things can be done in kde-gtk-config.
>
> what about the following plan then:
>
> talk with the kde-config-gtk-style maintainers (kde-extras team and
> didier raboud) wether it makes sense to just let your package take over
> the kde-config-gtk-style name.

What is the procedure for replacing the binary package by one from another
source package?

Could I maintain my package outside kde-extras team in this case?

Also I have offtopic question:
How can translations for kde-gtk-config get into kde-l10n-* packages?

> It doesn't look like the current utility
> does something "your" utility doesn't, am I right?

kde-config-gtk-style has only 4 functions:
1) Selecting available Gtk 2 theme.
2) Selecting few paths for searching Gtk 2 themes in the system.
3) Setting up the same font as in KDE applications.
4) Setting up font manually.

Features 2) and 3) are not available in kde-gtk-config.

> No need to have two tools with the same dependencies, same audience and
> one tool just does a subset of the other.

Agreed.

Regards,
Boris



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/245511336765...@web11h.yandex.ru

Re: Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection

[Boris Pek]

Sorry for a broken message. Here is the correct one:

Hi,

You could read the beginning of this thread:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/05/threads.html#00115

(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to pkg-kde-extras mailing list)

>>   kde-config-gtk-style does not allow to:
>>   * select themes for Gtk 3.x applications
>>   * preview available themes for Gtk 2.x and Gtk 3.x applications
>>   * custmize toolbars and menus for Gtk applications
>>   * select icon themes for Gtk applications
>>   * download and apply Gtk 2.x and Gtk 3.x themes from 
>> http://opendesktop.org/
>> in few mouse clicks
>>
>>   All these things can be done in kde-gtk-config.
>  what about the following plan then:
>
>  talk with the kde-config-gtk-style maintainers (kde-extras team and
>  didier raboud) wether it makes sense to just let your package take over
>  the kde-config-gtk-style name.

What is the procedure for replacing the binary package by one from another
source package?

Could I maintain my package outside kde-extras team in this case?

Also I have offtopic question:
How can translations for kde-gtk-config get into kde-l10n-* packages?

>  It doesn't look like the current utility
>  does something "your" utility doesn't, am I right?

kde-config-gtk-style has only 4 functions:
1) Selecting available Gtk 2 theme.
2) Selecting few paths for searching Gtk 2 themes in the system.
3) Setting up the same font as in KDE applications.
4) Setting up font manually.

Features 2) and 3) are not available in kde-gtk-config.

>  No need to have two tools with the same dependencies, same audience and
>  one tool just does a subset of the other.

Agreed.

Regards,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/244391336766...@web29f.yandex.ru

Re: Strange bug in Qt program after build with gcc 4.7

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

Problem is solved. Thanks a lot to Pino Toscano.

Regards,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1164201336840...@web15e.yandex.ru

Re: Bug#671731: RFS: leechcraft/0.5.65+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- modular internet-client

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

Week passed without any reply.

I am still looking for a sponsor for this package.

Regards,
Boris


> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "leechcraft".
>
> * Package name    : leechcraft
>   Version : 0.5.65+dfsg-1
>   Upstream Author : Georg Rudoy <0xd34df...@gmail.com>
> * URL : http://leechcraft.org/
> * License : GPLv3
>   Programming Lang: C++
>   Section : net
>
> It builds those binary packages:
>   leechcraft - Core executable of LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-advancednotifications - Advanced Notifications framework for 
> LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-aggregator - RSS/Atom feed reader for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-anhero - Crash handler for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-auscrie - Screenshooter for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-azoth - Modular IM client for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-bittorrent - BitTorrent client for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-cstp - HTTP client for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-dbg - Debug symbols for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-dbusmanager - D-Bus side of LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-deadlyrics - Song lyrics finder for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-dev - Files required for development for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-doc - Documentation files for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-dolozhee - Plugin for feature requests and bug reports for 
> LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-extra - Extra LeechCraft plugins beyond full installation
>   leechcraft-full - Full LeechCraft installation
>   leechcraft-glance - Provides a quick overview of tabs in LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-gmailnotifier - Notifications about new mail in GMail for 
> LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-historyholder - History keeper for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-kbswitch - Keyboard plugin for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-kinotify - Fancy notifications for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-lackman - Userspace Package Manager for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-lhtr - LeechCraft HTML Text editor in WYSIWYG style
>   leechcraft-liznoo - UPower-based power manager for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-lmp - Music Player for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-netstoremanager - Manages network data storages for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-networkmonitor - Network monitor for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-newlife - Settings importer for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-pintab - Tabs pinning for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-popishu - Plain text editor for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-poshuku - Web browser for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-secman - Security Manager plugin for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-seekthru - OpenSearch-support plugin for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-shellopen - Support for opening files with external apps in 
> LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-sidebar - Sidebar with quick launch, tabs and tray areas in 
> LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-summary - Quick summary of what's going on in LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-tabsessmanager - Tab Session Manager for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-tabslist - Displays list of opened tabs, with navigation between 
> them
>   leechcraft-vgrabber - vkontakte.ru plugin for LeechCraft
>   leechcraft-xproxy - Advanced proxy manager for LeechCraft
>   libleechcraft-util0.5.0 - Common library for LeechCraft
>   libleechcraft-xmlsettingsdialog0.3.0 - Dynamic settings dialog builder for 
> LeechCraft
>
> The package is lintian-clean. I always check [1] using:
>   lintian -ivIE --pedantic *.changes
>
> You can look at package rules here:
>   https://github.com/tehnick/leechcraft-debian/tree/master/debian/
>
> Further information about this package can be found here:
>   http://mentors.debian.net/package/leechcraft
>
> Direct link for download:
>   http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/leechcraft/leechcraft_0.5.65+dfsg-1.dsc
>
> More information about LeechCraft can be obtained here:
>   https://github.com/0xd34df00d/leechcraft/blob/master/README
>
> LeechCraft is a free open source cross-platform modular internet-client. It
> consists of a core which defines common plugin interfaces and a lot of plugins
> for different purposes. User can install any combination of them to achieve
> the necessary functionality.
>
> The main advantage of such approach is that modules could interact more 
> closely
> than standalone programs in usual Desktop Environments. Thus, plugins can also
> rely on functionality provided by each other. Plugins could also have their 
> own
> plugins: for example, support for different protocols or chat window styles in
> an IM client.
>
> Also developers don't reinvent the wheel for each protocol. They use existing
> solutions (rasterbar libtorrent for BitTorrent or QXmpp for XMPP protocol
> for example) if possible. And they contribute back their patches to the 
> upstream
> in these cases.
>
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
> Package "qxmpp-lc" should be built and uploaded before "leechcraft", because
> this is one of build dependencies.
>
> Best regards,
> Boris
>
> [1] 
> https://github.com/tehnick/deb_packages/blob/master/Debian/updating_packages#L1

Re: Bug#671732: RFS: qxmpp-lc/0.3.61-1 [ITP] -- library for Jabber/XMPP clients

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

Week passed without any reply.

I am still looking for a sponsor for this package.

Regards,
Boris


> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qxmpp-lc".
>
> * Package name    : qxmpp-lc
>   Version : 0.3.61-1
>   Upstream Contact: Georg Rudoy <0xd34df...@gmail.com>
> * URL : https://github.com/0xd34df00d/qxmpp-dev
> * License : LGPL-2.1+
>   Programming Lang: C++
>   Description : library for Jabber/XMPP clients
>
> It builds those binary packages:
>   libqxmpp-lc-dev - Development files for QXmpp-dev library
>   libqxmpp-lc-doc - Documentation files for QXmpp-dev library
>   libqxmpp-lc0 - QXmpp-dev library for Jabber/XMPP clients
>   libqxmpp-lc0-dbg - Debug symbols for QXmpp-dev library
>
> The package is lintian-clean. I always check [1] using:
>   lintian -ivIE --pedantic *.changes
>
> You can look at package rules here:
>   https://github.com/tehnick/qxmpp-lc-debian/tree/master/debian/
>
> Further information about this package can be found here:
>   http://mentors.debian.net/package/qxmpp-lc
>
> Direct link for download:
>   http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qxmpp-lc/qxmpp-lc_0.3.61-1.dsc
>
> More information about QXmpp-dev can be obtained here:
>   https://github.com/0xd34df00d/qxmpp-dev/blob/master/README
>
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
> I need this library for my package "leechcraft".
>
> Best regards,
> Boris
>
> [1] 
> https://github.com/tehnick/deb_packages/blob/master/Debian/updating_packages#L105


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/62701336909...@web5d.yandex.ru

Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

I uploaded updated package. There are such changes in it:
  * compat level and debhelper version were increased to 8
(not to 9 because I still support packages for Ubuntu Oneiric)
  * debian/control was updated:
- binary package was renamed to kde-config-gtk2-gtk3-styles
- binary package now provides virtual package kde-config-gtk-style
- `Build-Depends' section was simplified
  * debian/rules was updated:
- added `uscan' command line options for replacing `mv' command
- added useful option (--as-needed) to LDFLAGS
- enabled all hardening for build
  * debian/manpages was simplified.

Thanks to Dmitry Smirnov for tips.

Next. There is no reply from maintainer of kcm-gtk source package yet. (We were
talking [1] about replacing the package kcm-gtk by package kde-gtk-config which
has wider functional [2])

Nobody answered me what is the procedure for replacing the binary package from
one source package by same binary package from another source package.
So I decided to provide virtual package kde-config-gtk-style.
Thus my package can be uploaded just now. And it will be able to safely delete
kcm-gtk package from Debian repository in the future.

Wheezy freeze will be quite soon. And I really believe that this configuration
module should be in it.

Links are the same:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/kde-gtk-config
  
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-gtk-config/kde-gtk-config_2.0-1.dsc
  https://github.com/tehnick/kde-gtk-config-debian/tree/master/debian/

And I am still looking for a sponsor.

Best regards,
Boris

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/05/msg00170.html
[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2012/05/msg00166.html



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/299521337023...@web19f.yandex.ru

Bug#672981: RFS: eiskaltdcpp/2.2.6-5 (updated) -- Direct Connect and Advanced Direct Connect client

[Boris Pek]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my
package "eiskaltdcpp" which is already available in Debian.

Source package already has DMUA flag in Debian unstable and testing branches.
But new binary packages were added, so the package should go through NEW queue.

Changes in the package:
  * Added new packages:
- eiskaltdcpp-qt-mini and eiskaltdcpp-qt-mini-dbg
- eiskaltdcpp-gtk3 and eiskaltdcpp-gtk3-dbg
- eiskaltdcpp-cli and libeiskaltdcpp2.2-dev
(all related files were updated)

The package is lintian-clean. I always check [1] using:
  lintian -ivIE --pedantic *.changes

You can look at package rules here:
  https://github.com/tehnick/eiskaltdcpp-debian/tree/master/debian/

Further information about this package can be found here:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/eiskaltdcpp

Direct link for download:
  
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/eiskaltdcpp/eiskaltdcpp_2.2.6-5.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Best regards,
Boris

[1] 
https://github.com/tehnick/deb_packages/blob/master/Debian/updating_packages#L105



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/606731337070...@web18h.yandex.ru

Re: Bug#672290: RFS: uhub/0.4.0~git20120423-9efe4bc-1 (updated) -- High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

Week passed without any reply.

I am still looking for a sponsor for this package.

Regards,
Boris

> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my
> package "uhub" which is already available in Debian.
>
> It builds those binary packages:
>   uhub - High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub
>
> The package is lintian-clean. I always check [1] using:
>   lintian -ivIE --pedantic *.changes
>
> You can look at package rules here:
>   https://github.com/tehnick/uhub-debian/tree/master/debian/
>
> Further information about this package can be found here:
>   http://mentors.debian.net/package/uhub
>
> Direct link for download:
>   http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/uhub/uhub_0.4.0~git20120423-9efe4bc-1.dsc
>
> Changes in the package:
>   * Update to GIT snapshot.
>   * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3.
>   * Changed tarball compression format: LZMA2 is used now.
>   * debian/rules was updated:
> - now dh is used instead of direct dh_* commands
> - now uscan is used for checking current upstream version
>   (dpkg-parsechangelog was used earlier)
> - USE_SSL configuration option is enabled
>   * debian/doc/uhub.1, debian/doc/uhub.conf and debian/doc/users.conf
> were removed: now they are available in upstream.
>   * debian/doc/uhub-passwd.1 was created: there is no such man page in
> upstream yet.
>   * debian/uhub.manpages was updated (see above).
>   * debian/control was updated: added dependence from packages
> fakeroot, libsqlite3-dev and libssl-dev
>   * debian/copyright was updated:
> - URL in Format field was updated
> - years were updated
> - OpenSSL exception was officially received
>   (see file COPYING.OpenSSL in sources)
>   * Upstream possibly fixed build for hurd-i386,
> kfreebsd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64, s390 and s390x.
>
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
> Best regards,
> Boris
>
> [1] 
> https://github.com/tehnick/deb_packages/blob/master/Debian/updating_packages#L105


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/495051337164...@web14g.yandex.ru

Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

Thank you for a reply.

>>   We are talking about replacing the package kcm-gtk by package
>>   kde-gtk-config which has wider functionality.
>  That's debatable.

I can't agree with you: kde-gtk-config has wider functionality objectively.

As I wrote earlier, kcm-gtk does not allow to:
* select themes for Gtk 3.x applications
* preview available themes for Gtk 2.x and Gtk 3.x applications
* custmize toolbars and menus for Gtk applications
* select icon themes for Gtk applications
* download and apply Gtk 2.x and Gtk 3.x themes from http://opendesktop.org/
  in few mouse clicks

All these things can be done in kde-gtk-config.

>>   Wheezy freeze will be soon. And I really believe that this
>>   configuration module should be in it.
>  That's subjective.

There are Gtk 3.x applications in Wheezy. And their look and fill can't be
configured in KDE using current configurations module. Is it subjective?

>  Anyway; I would strongly oppose a duplication of packages with similar
>  functionality: either the existing src:kcm-gtk is enhanced to support
>  the new features or it should be deprecated in favour of a new source
>  package producing a binary package named identically.

Agreed.

But kde-gtk-config already exists and in good shape. Upstream is very friendly.
He accepted my patches and fixed my issues. It was about 40 e-mails between us
during preparing the package. And I don't want to drop this work into trash.

And if you want similar features in kcm-gtk, someone should write them from
scratch. Does it make sense?

>  (A third solution, technically ugly but doable would be to keep the
>  src:kcm-gtk source name but have it's content be the new source's.)

Yep, this is not a variant.

>>   What is the procedure for replacing the binary package by one from
>>   another source package?
>  The only existing procedure is "consensus", reached through discussion.

Ok.

>>   Could I maintain my package outside kde-extras team in this case?
>  This wouldn't make sense.

Ok. Now Debian KDE Extras Team is a maintainer and I am an uploader.

>  So; such a package would make sense if it provides a set of
>  functionalities including _everything_ currently provided by
>  src:kcm-gtk.

kcm-gtk has only 4 functions:
1) Selecting available Gtk 2.x theme.
2) Selecting few paths for searching Gtk 2.x themes in the system.
3) Setting up the same font as in KDE applications.
4) Setting up font manually.

Functions 2) and 3) are not available in kde-gtk-config now. But...

Function 2) has no sense. Because kde-gtk-config allow to install themes from
any local location and from special web site (http://opendesktop.org/).

Function 3) can be added very quickly. But even now it is not very important
because fonts could be set manually.

>  In that case, it shall be named kde-config-gtk-style and
>  get a version bigger than the current 2:0.5.3-1 (such as it's 2.0-1
>  version plus a bigger epoch such as 3:2.0-1).

Done.

>  Then, after some testing,
>  I would be OK to deprecate kcm-gtk (removing the source from unstable).

And what about testing branch of Debian? Will be the package processed
automatically?

>  In order to allow such testing before the Wheezy's release, I think this
>  new kde-gtk-config should be targeted at experimental, to ease upgrading
>  and functionality testing without breaking Wheezy

Done.

>  If such changes are donc, I might consider sponsoring.

Great! Could you look on the package now?

Links:
  
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-gtk-config/kde-gtk-config_2.0-1.dsc
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/kde-gtk-config
  https://github.com/tehnick/kde-gtk-config-debian/tree/master/debian/

Best regards,
Boris



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/309461337203...@web9e.yandex.ru

Bug#673457: RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5333.2-1 [ITP] -- translation files for Psi+

[Boris Pek]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "psi-plus-i18n".

* Package name    : psi-plus-i18n
* URL : https://github.com/tehnick/psi-plus-i18n
* License : GPL-2+
  Description : translation files for Psi+

It builds one binary package:
  psi-plus-i18n - translation files for Psi+

The package is lintian-clean. I always check [1] using:
  lintian -ivIE --pedantic *.changes

You can look at package rules here:
  https://github.com/tehnick/psi-plus-i18n-debian/tree/master/debian/

Some information about this package can be found here:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/psi-plus-i18n

Direct link for download:
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/psi-plus-i18n/psi-plus-i18n_0.15.5333.2-1.dsc

There was no translations for Psi+ program except Russian translation.
So I made a special repository with translation files and invited
translators for other languages. There are 29 translations now and
12 of them are completed more than 50%.

More information about project can be obtained here:
  https://github.com/tehnick/psi-plus-i18n

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Best regards,
Boris

[1] 
https://github.com/tehnick/deb_packages/blob/master/Debian/updating_packages#L105



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/817031337370...@web6h.yandex.ru

Re: Bug#659082: RFS: nestopia/1.40g+dfsg-1 [NEW] -- accurate emulator of the Nintendo Entertainment System

[Boris Pek]

Hi Stephen,

>>  I don't see the package at mentors.  What happened ?
>
> It must have expired - I'm re-uploading it just now.

Have you received the mail with note that your package was deleted from m.d.n.?
If no it could be an imperfection of m.d.n., and it affects all of us.

Regards,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/351271337672...@web14f.yandex.ru

Re: Bug#672290: RFS: uhub/0.4.0~git20120423-9efe4bc-1 (updated) -- High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

Two weeks passed without any reply.

And I am still looking for a sponsor for the package.

Current version (0.3.2-1) of package in Debian Sid is FTBFS on s390 and s390x.
I reported bug to upstream and it was fixed long time ago. Next stable release
(0.4.0) of program will be soon. And I want to check that program builds fine
on s390 and s390x before this release.

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Best regards,
Boris


2012-05-09 21:44, Boris Pek wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my
> package "uhub" which is already available in Debian.
>
> It builds those binary packages:
>   uhub - High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub
>
> The package is lintian-clean. I always check [1] using:
>   lintian -ivIE --pedantic *.changes
>
> You can look at package rules here:
>   https://github.com/tehnick/uhub-debian/tree/master/debian/
>
> Further information about this package can be found here:
>   http://mentors.debian.net/package/uhub
>
> Direct link for download:
>   http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/uhub/uhub_0.4.0~git20120423-9efe4bc-1.dsc
>
> Changes in the package:
>   * Update to GIT snapshot.
>   * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3.
>   * Changed tarball compression format: LZMA2 is used now.
>   * debian/rules was updated:
> - now dh is used instead of direct dh_* commands
> - now uscan is used for checking current upstream version
>   (dpkg-parsechangelog was used earlier)
> - USE_SSL configuration option is enabled
>   * debian/doc/uhub.1, debian/doc/uhub.conf and debian/doc/users.conf
> were removed: now they are available in upstream.
>   * debian/doc/uhub-passwd.1 was created: there is no such man page in
> upstream yet.
>   * debian/uhub.manpages was updated (see above).
>   * debian/control was updated: added dependence from packages
> fakeroot, libsqlite3-dev and libssl-dev
>   * debian/copyright was updated:
> - URL in Format field was updated
> - years were updated
> - OpenSSL exception was officially received
>   (see file COPYING.OpenSSL in sources)
>   * Upstream possibly fixed build for hurd-i386,
> kfreebsd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64, s390 and s390x.
>
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
> Best regards,
> Boris
>
> [1] 
> https://github.com/tehnick/deb_packages/blob/master/Debian/updating_packages#L105


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/733731337843...@web9e.yandex.ru

Re: Bug#672981: RFS: eiskaltdcpp/2.2.6-5 (updated) -- Direct Connect and Advanced Direct Connect client

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

Week passed without any reply.

And I am still looking for a sponsor for the package.

Best regards,
Boris


2012-05-15 11:29, Boris Pek wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> My regular sponsor is very busy now. And I am looking for a sponsor for my
> package "eiskaltdcpp" which is already available in Debian.
>
> Source package already has DMUA flag in Debian unstable and testing branches.
> But new binary packages were added, so the package should go through NEW 
> queue.
>
> Changes in the package:
>   * Added new packages:
> - eiskaltdcpp-qt-mini and eiskaltdcpp-qt-mini-dbg
> - eiskaltdcpp-gtk3 and eiskaltdcpp-gtk3-dbg
> - eiskaltdcpp-cli and libeiskaltdcpp2.2-dev
>   * debian/rules was updated:
> used hardening flags in compiler options
>
> The package is lintian-clean. I always check [1] using:
>   lintian -ivIE --pedantic *.changes
>
> You can look at package rules here:
>   https://github.com/tehnick/eiskaltdcpp-debian/tree/master/debian/
>
> Further information about this package can be found here:
>   http://mentors.debian.net/package/eiskaltdcpp
>
> Direct link for download:
>   http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/eiskaltdcpp/eiskaltdcpp_2.2.6-5.dsc
>
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
> Best regards,
> Boris
>
> [1] 
> https://github.com/tehnick/deb_packages/blob/master/Debian/updating_packages#L105


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/367481337883...@web4e.yandex.ru

Re: Bug#672981: RFS: eiskaltdcpp/2.2.6-5 (updated) -- Direct Connect and Advanced Direct Connect client

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

> No need to send reminders to debian-mentors@lists.debian.org .  The package is
> still on these lists, so it won't be forgotten

Yes, but it can be there during months or years without any reply. There are no
RC or important bugs in this package. And it could be hard to find the sponsor
for it. Because program is too specific and there are no many people interested
in its upload.

But if you think my weekly messages are useless I'll stop them.

> Also, I see that "week passed" is not entirely true.

Package was initially uploaded 2012-05-14 21:09.

> The package at mentors was updated today:
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/eiskaltdcpp
> Uploaded: 2012-05-24 16:05
> Uploaded: 2012-05-24 15:04

Yes, today I have fixed new lintian warnings which were absent when I uploaded
this version of package first time. And it is not enough reason to increase the
version of the package.

Best regards,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/244741337886...@web11d.yandex.ru

Bug#671731: RFS: leechcraft/0.5.70+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- modular internet-client

[Boris Pek]

Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download:
  
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/leechcraft/leechcraft_0.5.70+dfsg-1.dsc



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1633231338191...@web16d.yandex.ru

Bug#672981: RFS: eiskaltdcpp/2.2.7-1 (updated) -- Direct Connect and Advanced Direct Connect client

[Boris Pek]

Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download:
  
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/eiskaltdcpp/eiskaltdcpp_2.2.7-1.dsc



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/308981338361...@web2h.yandex.ru

Bug#672290: RFS: uhub/0.4.0-1 (updated) -- High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub

[Boris Pek]

Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download:
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/uhub/uhub_0.4.0-1.dsc



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/354411338448...@web9f.yandex.ru

Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

Thank you for a reply.

> 2) Handling of the transition
> 
> I just tested with a clean user: the current kde-config-gtk-style creates one
> .gtkrc-2.0-kde while your new kde-config-gtk-style creates one .gtkrc-2.0-kde4
> that is a symlink to .gtkrc-2.0 . You should probably cope with
> 04_no_kde4_in_configfile.diff in src:kcm-gtk and make sure any changes put
> there by kcm-gtk is kept gracefully.

Done.

> As a general rule, make sure that any bug
> fixed in kcm-gtk (by its patches or by its code) is not re-introduced by
> src:kde-gtk-config.

Ok. I have read all bug reports in Debian BTS [1] and in Launchpad [2].

There is only one bug report [3] in Debian BTS (which is still opened).
And this bug is exactly about .gtkrc-2.0-kde symlink. So it will be fixed
by my package when it is uploaded to unstable.

There is the same bug report in Launchpad [4]. All other bugs from Ubuntu
are not related with my new package.

> Other than that, it looks fine but at least 2) ought to be fixed.

Great! So I think the package is ready for upload now.

Direct link for download:
  
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-gtk-config/kde-gtk-config_2.0-1.dsc

Best regards,
Boris

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?archive=both;src=kcm-gtk
[2] http://tinyurl.com/cg8lbwa
[3] http://bugs.debian.org/631591
[4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kcm-gtk/+bug/473197



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/287921338648...@web3f.yandex.ru

Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

> Sorry, but no. I just tested and it doesn't work.
>
> With the attached .gtkrc-2.0-kde as created by the current src:kcm-gtk, when
> entering the dialog of src:kde-gtk-config, the dialogs don't show "Raleigh"
> nor "DejaVu Sans 9", but "oxygen-gtk" and "Bitstream Charter 12" (and "Emacs"
> for the GTK3 theme). That's not what I'd call "any changes there are kept
> gracefully".
>
> I'll upload this package [0] when user changes setup by kde-config-gtk-style
> 2:0.5.3-1 are kept and converted (if needed) by kde-config-gtk-style 3:2.0-1.
> That's rather easy to test…

I thought we were talking about clean install. But not about total changing of
configuration file and its parser.

Ok, I'll use your file for tests.

Best regards,
Boris



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/352861338837...@web9f.yandex.ru

Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

> Sorry, but no. I just tested and it doesn't work.
>
> With the attached .gtkrc-2.0-kde as created by the current src:kcm-gtk, when
> entering the dialog of src:kde-gtk-config, the dialogs don't show "Raleigh"
> nor "DejaVu Sans 9", but "oxygen-gtk" and "Bitstream Charter 12" (and "Emacs"
> for the GTK3 theme). That's not what I'd call "any changes there are kept
> gracefully".
>
> I'll upload this package [0] when user changes setup by kde-config-gtk-style
> 2:0.5.3-1 are kept and converted (if needed) by kde-config-gtk-style 3:2.0-1.
> That's rather easy to test…

Done. Patch is tiny [1], but it works well.

Direct link for download:
  
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-gtk-config/kde-gtk-config_2.0-1.dsc

Best regards,
Boris

[1] 
https://github.com/tehnick/kde-gtk-config-debian/blob/master/debian/patches/mirgation-from-package-src:kcm-gtk



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/592921338841...@web7e.yandex.ru

Re: Bug#673457: RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5333.2-1 [ITP] -- translation files for Psi+

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

More than 2 weeks passed without any reply.

Is here any interested in translations for Debian?

Package is very simple. It will not require a lot of time for check.

Best regards,
Boris


2012-05-18 22:40, Boris Pek wrote:
>  Package: sponsorship-requests
>  Severity: wishlist
>
>  Dear mentors,
>
>  I am looking for a sponsor for my new package "psi-plus-i18n".
>
>  * Package name    : psi-plus-i18n
>  * URL : https://github.com/tehnick/psi-plus-i18n
>  * License : GPL-2+
>    Description : translation files for Psi+
>
>  It builds one binary package:
>    psi-plus-i18n - translation files for Psi+
>
>  The package is lintian-clean. I always check [1] using:
>    lintian -ivIE --pedantic *.changes
>
>  You can look at package rules here:
>    https://github.com/tehnick/psi-plus-i18n-debian/tree/master/debian/
>
>  Some information about this package can be found here:
>    http://mentors.debian.net/package/psi-plus-i18n
>
>  Direct link for download:
>    http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/psi-plus-i18n/psi-plus-i18n_0.15.5333.2-1.dsc
>
>  There was no translations for Psi+ program except Russian translation.
>  So I made a special repository with translation files and invited
>  translators for other languages. There are 29 translations now and
>  12 of them are completed more than 50%.
>
>  More information about project can be obtained here:
>    https://github.com/tehnick/psi-plus-i18n
>
>  I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
>  Best regards,
>  Boris
>
>  [1] 
> https://github.com/tehnick/deb_packages/blob/master/Debian/updating_packages#L105


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/748581338981...@web27g.yandex.ru

Re: Bug#673457: RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5333.2-1 [ITP] -- translation files for Psi+

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

> Yes, but for nearly all packages, they are in the source of the package
> themselves. So even if the translations are in a separate binary
> package, the source is still the same as the main package. So, did you
> consider including it in your psi-plus package?

Yes, most of sources comes with translation files. But I know few packages
in Debian with separate source package for translations (quick look gave me
18 results [1][2][3]) and believe that it is the matter of choice.

It case of my package psi-plus sources and translations come from different
locations and trey are updated independently. I see no good reason to unite
these source packages. But there is good reason for holding them separately:
package with translations can be updated when translators update their
translations (it is always happens after "release" in psi-plus project).

Regards,
Boris

[1] http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=sourcenames&keywords=-l10n
[2] http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=sourcenames&keywords=-i18n
[3] http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=sourcenames&keywords=-translation


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/220371339012...@web11h.yandex.ru

Re: Bug#672290: RFS: uhub/0.4.0-1 (updated) -- High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to the debian-s390 mailing list)

I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "uhub" [1]. Almost a month
passed without any reply.

This version of package should fix FTBFS on s390 and s390x. Which is now
important as I see in debian-devel-announce mailing list [2].

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Direct link for download:
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/uhub/uhub_0.4.0-1.dsc

Best regards,
Boris

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/672290
[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/06/msg3.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/899461339099...@web9g.yandex.ru

kde-gtk-config/2.0-3 [updated] -- updated package and few questions

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

Now package builds fine on kfreebsd-* and hurd-i386:
  
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=kde-gtk-config&suite=experimental

And it should be no problems with linux-based environments on other supported
architectures. So I have updated the package:

kde-gtk-config (3:2.0-3) unstable; urgency=low

  * Package moved to unstable after tests: no changes required.
  * This package replaces src:kcm-gtk and closes its bugs:
- fixed working on clean install (Closes: #631591)
- added support of Gtk+ 3.x (LP: #734979)

You could upload it when you decide it is ready.

Direct link for download:
  
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-gtk-config/kde-gtk-config_2.0-3.dsc

And now I have questions about translations.

Conditions:
1) There are no translation files in the source tree.
2) Translations are available only in common svn repository of KDE project [1].

Questions:
1) Should I package them manually into separate package or they will be updated
   automatically in common package (like src:kde-l10n)?
2) If I should package them manually how to do this in comfortable way?
   I mean: select and copy them one by one from svn repository doesn't look
   good. It should be more common way.
3) If I should package them manually should I make the separate package
   kde-config-gtk-style-i18n or just add them into the same binary package?
   (Note: they will no weigh much)

First part of message is only for sponsor of this package. But any suggestions
and explanations for the second part of message are welcome.

Best regards,
Boris

[1] For example:
http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/l10n-kde4/ru/messages/playground-base/kde-gtk-config.po?view=markup
http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/l10n-kde4/uk/messages/playground-base/kde-gtk-config.po?view=markup


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1176301339144...@web23g.yandex.ru

Re: Bug#672290: RFS: uhub/0.4.0-1 (updated) -- High performance Advanced Direct Connect p2p hub

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

Thank you for a reply.

>  117 files changed, 7945 insertions(+), 1683 deletions(-)

Yes, two years passed since previous stable release of uHub.

> Please ask on mentors or your former sponsor.

Unfortunately my regular sponsor (Dmitry E. Oboukhov) currently is busy.
Package is waiting for upload since the beginning of April [1].
RFS for mentors was done in beginning of May: http://bugs.debian.org/672290
But there was no any reply to it.

In the middle of May I sent [2] request for help to check build on s390/s390x
because I have no possibility to check it myself. There was no any reply.

New stable release of uHub happened in the end of May. It is more stable and
should be compiled fine on all architectures supported in Debian. I believe
this new version of program should be in Wheeze, but the freeze will be soon...

Now I am waiting any interested person who could upload the package or just
test build on s390/s390x. If it still FTBFS on these architectures I can
prepare the patch (but for this new version of package, not for previous).

Best regards,
Boris

[1] History of uploads available here: http://mentors.debian.net/package/uhub
[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-s390/2012/05/msg00053.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/339061339597...@web4f.yandex.ru

Bug#678069: RFS: libquantum/1.1.0-2 [QA] -- library for the simulation of a quantum computer

[Boris Pek]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Hi,

(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to debian-science mailing list)

I am looking for a sponsor for the package "libquantum".

It builds those binary packages:
  libquantum-dev - library for the simulation of a quantum computer 
(development files)
  libquantum7 - library for the simulation of a quantum computer

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/libquantum

Direct link for download:
  
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libq/libquantum/libquantum_1.1.0-2.dsc

Changes in the package:

libquantum (1.1.0-2) unstable; urgency=low

  * QA upload.
  * Set maintainer to Debian QA Group (see #674883).
  * Deleted Vcs-* fields from debian/control.
  * Package was switched to source format 3.0 (quilt).
  * Added build dependency from autotools-dev.
  * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3.
  * debian/rules was updated:
- now dh is used instead of direct dh_* commands
- used hardening flags in compiler options
- added section get-orig-source (uscan is used)
- fixed FTBFS because of outdated config.{sub,guess} (Closes: #572527)
  * Fixed such lintian errors, warnings and wishes:
+ libquantum source:
  - binary-control-field-duplicates-source field "section" in package
libquantum7
  - duplicate-short-description libquantum-dev libquantum7
  - outdated-autotools-helper-file config.sub 2004-11-30
  - outdated-autotools-helper-file config.guess 2004-11-12
  - debhelper-but-no-misc-depends libquantum-dev
  - debhelper-but-no-misc-depends libquantum7
  - missing-debian-source-format
  - debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch
  - debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-indep
  - ancient-standards-version 3.8.1 (current is 3.9.3)
+ libquantum7:
  - hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/lib/libquantum.so.7.0.0
+ libquantum-dev:
  - non-empty-dependency_libs-in-la-file usr/lib/libquantum.la

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Also I need DD's help to create git repository for this package in collab-maint.
I followed instructions from [1] and sent the request to join. Now I am waiting
for reply.

Best regards,
Boris

[1] http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/PackagingProject



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/307501340060...@web28e.yandex.ru

Bug#678069: RFS: libquantum/1.1.0-2 [QA] -- library for the simulation of a quantum computer

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

Thank you for a reply.

> Why don't you upload it into Debian Science instead ? (and set the
> maintainer to Debian Science ?

This is QA upload. I won't be the maintainer of this package.
I just want to improve its quality while it has no maintainer.

> See
> http://debian-science.alioth.debian.org/debian-science-policy.html#idp17627488

Quotation:

"Maintainer and Uploaders Fields

The Maintainer field should be "Debian Science Maintainers 
".

You should also add yourself to the Uploaders field. Doing so shows your
involvement and interest in the package. Developers listed in Uploaders
willtake care of maintenance, bug reports and other QA work, helped by
the Debian Science team."

I don't think that the package with "Debian Science Maintainers" in
Maintainer field and completely without Uploaders field is good idea.

If you think this will be correct and someone will upload such package,
I can prepare it this evening.

Best regards,
Boris



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/379271340089...@web1h.yandex.ru

Bug#678069: RFS: libquantum/1.1.0-2 [QA] -- library for the simulation of a quantum computer

[Boris Pek]

>>  This is QA upload. I won't be the maintainer of this package.
>>  I just want to improve its quality while it has no maintainer.
>
> Well, you should ask to the QA team then, no ?

Hmm, you are right. Thanks.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/392931340090...@web14g.yandex.ru

Bug#678200: RFS: unadf/0.7.11a-3 [RC] [QA] -- Extract files from an Amiga Disk File dump (.adf)

[Boris Pek]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Hi,

(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to debian-qa mailing list)

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "unadf".

It builds binary package:
  unadf - Extract files from an Amiga Disk File dump (.adf)

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/unadf

Direct link for download:
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/unadf/unadf_0.7.11a-3.dsc

The package is lintian-clean. I always check using:
  lintian -ivIE --pedantic *.changes

Changes in the package:

unadf (0.7.11a-3) unstable; urgency=low

  * QA upload.
  * Updated debian/rules:
- now dh is used instead of direct dh_* commands
- fixed FTBFS because of invalid clean section (Closes: #676065)
  * Updated debian/unadf.1: fixed lintian note hyphen-used-as-minus-sign.
  * Added file debian/patches/add-hardening-flags-in-compiler-options.
  * Added debian/unadf.doc-base:
fixed lintian note possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration.
  * Updated debian/control:
ixed lintian note extended-description-is-probably-too-short.
  * Updated debian/copyright:
file was updated in according to Copyright format 1.0.
  * Deleted debian/source/options.
  * Added debian/watch.

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Also I need DD's help to create git repository for this package in collab-maint.
I followed instructions from [1] and sent the request to join. Now I am waiting
for reply.

Best regards,
Boris

[1] http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/PackagingProject



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/137801340140...@web20g.yandex.ru

Queue of uploaded packages on m.d.n.

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

Is any problem with scripts on m.d.n.? I uploaded my package about 9 hours ago
via http. And it was not processed yet. Sources are still in the directory for
uploads (tested using dput).

Best regards,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/199791340261...@web27e.yandex.ru

Re: Queue of uploaded packages on m.d.n.

[Boris Pek]

Processed moment ago. Thanks.

2012-06-21 09:51, Boris Pek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is any problem with scripts on m.d.n.? I uploaded my package about 9 hours ago
> via http. And it was not processed yet. Sources are still in the directory for
> uploads (tested using dput).
>
> Best regards,
> Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/275231340265...@web24h.yandex.ru

Bug#678368: RFS: libvisual/0.4.0-5 [QA] -- Audio visualization framework

[Boris Pek]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Hi,

(Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to debian-qa mailing list)

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libvisual".

It builds those binary packages:
  libvisual-0.4-0 - Audio visualization framework
  libvisual-0.4-0-i18n - Audio visualization framework (translation files)
  libvisual-0.4-dev - Audio visualization framework (development package)

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/libvisual

Direct link for download:
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libv/libvisual/libvisual_0.4.0-5.dsc

Changes in the package:

libvisual (0.4.0-5) unstable; urgency=low

  * QA upload.
  * Added debian/watch.
  * Updated debian/control:
- fixed lintian warnings and notes:
  package-needs-versioned-debhelper-build-depends 9, no-homepage-field
- added new package libvisual-0.4-0-i18n
  * Translation files were moved to new package libvisual-0.4-0-i18n:
fixed bug with arch-dependent files in multiarch package. (Closes: #670031)
  * Updated debian/rules:
fixed broken names of translation files. (Closes: #646964)
  * Added file debian/patches/fix-spelling-errors.
  * Updated files debian/patches/0*_fix:
fixed lintian notes quilt-patch-missing-description.
  * Updated debian/copyright:
file was rewritten in according to Copyright format 1.0.
  * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3.

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Best regards,
Boris



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/276861340265...@web24h.yandex.ru

Bug#678468: RFS: sgml-data/2.0.7 [RC] [QA] -- common SGML and XML data

[Boris Pek]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Hi,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sgml-data".

It builds binary package:
  sgml-data - common SGML and XML data

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/sgml-data

Direct link for download:
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sgml-data/sgml-data_2.0.7.dsc

The package is lintian-clean. I always check using:
  lintian -ivIE --pedantic *.changes

Changes in the package:

sgml-data (2.0.7) unstable; urgency=low

  * QA upload.
  * Bumped debhelper version to 9 (was 5.0.0); updated debian/compat.
  * Deleted file debian/postinst: it is generated automatically now.
This fixes the problem with calling update-catalog in postinst.
(Closes: #675488, #674913, #606038)
  * Now package sgml-data suggests package w3-recs instead of missing
package doc-html-w3. (Closes: #612239)
  * Fixed such lintian warnings and notes:
+ sgml-data source:
  - package-file-is-executable debian/control
  - debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch
  - debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-indep
  - ancient-standards-version 3.8.3 (current is 3.9.3)
  - dh-clean-k-is-deprecated
+ sgml-data:
  - description-possibly-contains-homepage
http://debian-xml-sgml.alioth.debian.org/
  - conflicts-with-version sp (<= 1.1.1-2)
  - possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Best regards,
Boris



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/750841340323...@web26e.yandex.ru

Bug#673457: RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.4-1 [ITP] -- translation files for Psi+

[Boris Pek]

retitle 673457 RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.4-1 [ITP] -- translation files for 
Psi+
thanks

Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download:
  
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/psi-plus-i18n/psi-plus-i18n_0.15.5338.4-1.dsc



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/690021340324...@web6d.yandex.ru

Bug#678581: RFS: libcdaudio/0.99.12p2-12 [QA] -- library for controlling a CD-ROM when playing audio CDs

[Boris Pek]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Hi,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libcdaudio".

It builds those binary packages:
  libcdaudio-dbg - library for controlling a CD-ROM when playing audio CDs 
(debug)
  libcdaudio-dev - library for controlling a CD-ROM when playing audio CDs  
(development)
  libcdaudio1 - library for controlling a CD-ROM when playing audio CDs

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/libcdaudio

Direct link for download:
  
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libc/libcdaudio/libcdaudio_0.99.12p2-12.dsc

Changes in the package:

libcdaudio (0.99.12p2-12) unstable; urgency=low

  * QA upload.
  * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3.
  * Package was switched to source format 3.0 (quilt).
  * Deleted build dependency from quilt.
  * Deleted file debian/README.source.
  * Added build dependency from dh-autoreconf.
  * Updated debian/rules: used dh-autoreconf to update `configure' script
during rebuild. (Closes: #647975)
  * Updated debian/patches/hurd-ftbfs.patch:
- the code was cleaned up (useless data were deleted)
- fixed lintian note quilt-patch-missing-description
  * Fixed lintian notes:
- binary-control-field-duplicates-source field "section" in package
  libcdaudio1
- missing-debian-source-format
  * Updated debian/copyright:
- file was updated in according to Copyright format 1.0
- added missed license and copyright holders
  * Added file debian/watch.

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Best regards,
Boris



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1367311340400...@web28h.yandex.ru

Bug#678468: RFS: sgml-data/2.0.7 [RC] [QA] -- common SGML and XML data

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

Thank you for a reply.

>>  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sgml-data".
>
> You say "QA upload" below, I guess you don't mean to adopt the package,
> right?

Yes, right. That phrase is from template on m.d.n.

> Thanks for taking care of this package. This upload fixes at least one
> RC bug.

Yes, this is the main reason of my QA upload.

>>http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sgml-data/sgml-data_2.0.7.dsc
>
> Your upload already fixes a lot of things, but there is still room for
> improvement.
>
>  * How about using dh_testdir instead of a custom $(checkdir)?
>  * How about using dh_testroot instead of a custom $(checkroot)?
>  * You could also replace some of the $(makedir) with dh_installdirs.
>  * dh_clean removes *~, so there is no need to do this with find.
>  * You no longer need to rmdir /etc/sgml on purge, cause there is a
>conffile in that directory.

Ok, I can update the package this evening.

>  * The description still contains the homepage.

Hmm, is it a problem? I don't see nothing about it in the Debian Policy [1].
That lintian note was about missed homepage field which is possibly present in 
description.

[1] 
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Description

> All of these problems are minor, so I would like to see this (or an
> improved version) uploaded before the freeze.

So do I. But it is too hard to find the sponsor. Not mailing lists, nor new
pseudo-package didn't help me yet.

> If this doesn't happen, I
> will need someone to sponsor a NMU and a get a freeze exception which
> means more work for the release team.

Why NMU? First freeze is soft and QA uploads and even upload with increasing of
version are allowed. Isn't it? But yes, this can be hard for release team.

QA upload is much better than NMU because the quality of package can be
improved, not only small bug fix can be added.

Also I wanted to add the package in collab-maint git repository. But I haven't
received any reply from Alioth administrators...

Regards,
Boris



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1385621340452...@web24d.yandex.ru

Bug#678468: RFS: sgml-data/2.0.7 [RC] [QA] -- common SGML and XML data

[Boris Pek]

>>  Why NMU? First freeze is soft and QA uploads and even upload with 
>> increasing of
>>  version are allowed. Isn't it? But yes, this can be hard for release team.
>
> Because once the freeze is in effect only RC bug fixes are allowed in.
> So the changes need to be minimal at that point. My NMU does just that.

I have read another info. See [1] for example. The quotation:
"As with the Squeeze freeze the process will be gradual, with a more
liberal acceptance policy in the earlier stages. Precise details as to
what that means will be available soon."

So we'll see in details when they are available.

Regards,
Boris

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/06/msg6.html



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1019341340455...@web15h.yandex.ru

Bug#678468: took care of RC bug, for now

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

>  I’ve taken care of the RC bug for now, so the freeze won’t be a
>  problem.

Yes, I've got the messages from BTS. You forgot to close bug #606038.
I'll close it.

> I’ve not got the time to look at your suggested package,

As usual.

>  Like this, you two’ve got more time to get the package into shape

If it makes sense now.

>  (looking at it made me shudder)

Yep, it looks terrible.

Regards,
Boris



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1496531340490...@web25f.yandex.ru

Bug#678803: RFS: sgml-data/2.0.8 [QA] -- common SGML and XML data

[Boris Pek]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org

Hi,

I am looking for a sponsor for the package "sgml-data".

It builds binary package:
  sgml-data - common SGML and XML data

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/sgml-data

Direct link for download:
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sgml-data/sgml-data_2.0.8.dsc

The package is lintian-clean. I always check using:
  lintian -ivIE --pedantic *.changes

RC bug was fixed independently (see #678468), so only minor issues are left.

Changes in the package:

sgml-data (2.0.8) unstable; urgency=low

  * QA upload.
  * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (was 3.8.3).
  * Bumped debhelper version to 9 (was 5.0.0); updated debian/compat.
  * Now package sgml-data suggests package w3-recs instead of missing
package doc-html-w3. (Closes: #612239)
  * Added Homepage field debian/control.
  * Simplified file debian/rules:
- dh_testdir and dh_testroot  commands used instead manual
  "checkdir" and "checkroot" functions
- deleted few useless comments
  * Deleted files debian/postrm and debian/preinst:
- extra commands from them are not necessary now
- necessary commands debhelper generates automatically
  * Fixed such lintian warnings and notes:
+ sgml-data source:
  - package-file-is-executable debian/control
  - debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch
  - debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-indep
  - dh-clean-k-is-deprecated
+ sgml-data:
  - conflicts-with-version sp (<= 1.1.1-2)
  - possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Best regards,
Boris



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1558191340537...@web6f.yandex.ru

Bug#678368: RFS: libvisual/0.4.0-5 [QA] -- Audio visualization framework

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

Thank you for a reply.

> Please use X-Debbugs-Cc instead of regular Cc when filing bugs:
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting#xcc

Yes, I didn't know about it when I sent this RFS, but I already used it in my
recent messages.

>>   * Translation files were moved to new package libvisual-0.4-0-i18n:
>> fixed bug with arch-dependent files in multiarch package. (Closes: 
>> #670031)
>
> Why is this necessary? Now that #671257 is fixed, .mo files shouldn't
> vary with architecture unless something odd is going on.

Thanks a lot! I was not aware of this bug report. I'll revert that change and
update the package this evening.

Best regards,
Boris



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/57121340628...@web11d.yandex.ru

Bug#678368: RFS: libvisual/0.4.0-5 [QA] -- Audio visualization framework

[Boris Pek]

Unnecessary package libvisual-0.4-0-i18n was deleted.

Now there are only such changes:

libvisual (0.4.0-5) unstable; urgency=low

  * QA upload.
  * Added debian/watch.
  * Updated debian/control:
- added homepage field
- fixed lintian warning package-needs-versioned-debhelper-build-depends 9
  * Updated debian/rules:
fixed broken names of translation files. (Closes: #646964)
  * Added file debian/patches/fix-spelling-errors.
  * Updated files debian/patches/0*_fix:
fixed lintian notes quilt-patch-missing-description.
  * Updated debian/copyright:
file was rewritten in according to Copyright format 1.0.
  * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3.

Direct link for download:
  
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libv/libvisual/libvisual_0.4.0-5.dsc

Regards,
Boris



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/180071340643...@web6f.yandex.ru

Bug#679045: RFS: xmhtml/1.1.7-18 [QA] -- Motif widget for display HTML 3.2

[Boris Pek]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org

Hi,

I am looking for a sponsor for the package "xmhtml".

It builds those binary packages:
  xmhtml1 - Motif widget for display HTML 3.2 (library)
  xmhtml1-dev - Motif widget for display HTML 3.2 (development files)

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/xmhtml

Direct link for download:
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xmhtml/xmhtml_1.1.7-18.dsc

Changes in the package:

xmhtml (1.1.7-18) unstable; urgency=low

  * QA upload.
  * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (was 3.6.0).
  * Bumped debhelper version to 9 (was 4.1.0); updated debian/compat.
  * Added files: debian/patches/fix-build-with-hardening-flags.patch
and debian/patches/series.
  * Package switched from cdbs to dh:
- deleted build dependency from cdbs
- updated debian/rules
  * Updated file debian/xmhtml1-dev.docs.
  * Fixed such lintian warnings and notes:
- duplicate-short-description xmhtml1 xmhtml1-dev
- package-uses-deprecated-debhelper-compat-version 4
- missing-debian-source-format
- direct-changes-in-diff-but-no-patch-system Makefile and 8 more
- old-fsf-address-in-copyright-file
- description-synopsis-starts-with-article
- hardening-no-relro usr/lib/libXmHTML.so.1.1.7
  * Changed build dependency from libpng12-dev to libpng-dev.
Added file debian/patches/fix-build-with-libpng15.patch.
Build with libpng version 1.5.10 was tested successfully.
(Closes: #662564)

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Best regards,
Boris



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/273751340663...@web26d.yandex.ru

Bug#679049: RFS: qpxtool/0.7.1.002-6 [QA] -- CD/DVD quality checker

[Boris Pek]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org

Hi,

I am looking for a sponsor for the package "qpxtool".

It builds those binary packages:
  libqpx-dev - CD/DVD quality checker (development files)
  libqpx0 - CD/DVD quality checker (shared libraries)
  pxfw - Plextor firmware updater
  qpxtool - CD/DVD quality checker

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/qpxtool

Direct link for download:
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qpxtool/qpxtool_0.7.1.002-6.dsc

Changes in the package:

qpxtool (0.7.1.002-6) unstable; urgency=low

  * QA upload.
  * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (was 3.9.2).
  * Bumped debhelper version to 9 (was 7.0.50~); updated debian/compat.
  * Added file debian/patches/05-add-hardening-flags-in-compiler-options.patch.
  * Updated debian/rules: added hardening flags in compiler options.
  * Changed build dependency from libpng12-dev to libpng-dev.
Added file debian/patches/04-fix-build-with-libpng15.patch.
Added small hack in debian/rules (see LIBPNG_VER variable).
Build with libpng version 1.5.10 was tested successfully.
(Closes: #662481, #648127)
  * Used [kfreebsd-any] instead of hardcoded list of kFreeBSD architectures
[kfreebsd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64] in build dependency. (Closes: #634714)
  * File debian/copyright was updated in according to Copyright format 1.0.
  * Fixed such lintian warnings and notes:
- out-of-date-copyright-format-uri
- hardening-no-relro and hardening-no-fortify-functions

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Best regards,
Boris



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/287461340671...@web17f.yandex.ru

Bug#678992: RFS: grive/0.1.1+20120619git27g55c0f4e-1 [ITP #675310]

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

> The upstream authors doesn't have this version available as tarball for
> download, I had to create the tarball myself. The main differences
> between the 0.1.1 stable version and this git commit is only about the
> construct system: I have made some suggestions and they included it in
> the repository after the 0.1.1 release.

In this case you could just add the patch in your package. And in the next
upload you will delete it. Also this patch may include only necessary changes,
but not full diff after stable release.

I often use such method in my packages.

Regards,
Boris



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/426951340787...@web27e.yandex.ru

Bug#679321: RFS: exactimage/0.8.7-1 [QA] -- fast image manipulation programs

[Boris Pek]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org

Hi,

I am looking for a sponsor for the package "exactimage".

It builds those binary packages:
  edisplay - fast image manipulation programs (image viewer)
  exactimage - fast image manipulation programs
  exactimage-dbg - fast image manipulation library (debug symbols)
  libexactimage-perl - fast image manipulation library (Perl bindings)
  php5-exactimage - fast image manipulation library (PHP bindings)
  python-exactimage - fast image manipulation library (Python bindings)

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/exactimage

Direct link for download:
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/exactimage/exactimage_0.8.7-1.dsc

Changes in the package:

exactimage (0.8.7-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * QA upload.
  * Update to stable release 0.8.7.
  * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (was 3.9.2).
  * File debian/copyright was updated in according to Copyright format 1.0.
  * Fixed lintian note quilt-patch-missing-description g++-4.7.patch.
  * Changed build dependency from libpng12-dev to libpng-dev.
Build with libpng version 1.5.10 was tested successfully.
(Closes: #662317)

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Best regards,
Boris



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/861571340830...@web13f.yandex.ru

Bug#679439: RFS: lightspeed/1.2a-9 [QA] -- Shows how objects moving at relativistic speeds look like

[Boris Pek]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org

Hi,

I am looking for a sponsor for the package "lightspeed".

It builds binary package:
  lightspeed - Shows how objects moving at relativistic speeds look like

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/lightspeed

Direct link for download:
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lightspeed/lightspeed_1.2a-9.dsc

Changes in the package:

lightspeed (1.2a-9) unstable; urgency=low

  * QA upload.
  * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (was 3.7.2.0).
  * Bumped debhelper version to 9 (was 4.0.0); updated debian/compat.
  * Added file debian/source/format: format 1.0 is still used in this package.
  * Added files debian/docs and debian/manpages to simplify debian/rules.
  * Deleted files config/config.guess and config/config.sub.
Files from the package autotools-dev are used instead.
  * Rewritten debian/rules:
- now dh is used instead of direct dh_* commands
- added --as-needed option to LDFLAGS
- added section get-orig-source (uscan is used)
- used symlinks for config/config.guess and config/config.sub
- fixed lintian warnings:
  + hardening-no-relro
  + hardening-no-fortify-functions
  + debian-rules-ignores-make-clean-error
  + debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch
  + debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-indep
  + dh-clean-k-is-deprecated
  * Updated debian/control:
- added Homepage field
- changed build dependency from libpng12-dev to libpng-dev (Closes: #662418)
- changed build dependency from ftgl-dev to libftgl-dev (Closes: #485799)
- added build dependency from autotools-dev
- added ${misc:Depends} to list of dependencies
- lightspeed now suggests ttf-dejavu instead of ttf-bitstream-vera which
  is not present in repository (Closes: #461272)
  * Updated debian/copyright: fixed lintian warning
debian-copyright-file-uses-obsolete-national-encoding.
  * Updated debian/watch: fixed lintian warning
debian-watch-file-should-use-sf-redirector. (Closes: #449901)
  * Patched file src/snapshot.c. [Thanks to Nobuhiro Iwamatsu] (Closes: #649787)
But build with libpng version 1.5.10 now impossible because
`pkg-config --cflags gtk+-2.0` returns error:
"Package 'libpng12', required by 'GdkPixbuf', not found"

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Best regards,
Boris



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1440291340905...@web14h.yandex.ru

Bug#679045: RFS: xmhtml/1.1.7-18 [QA] -- Motif widget for display HTML 3.2

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

> % debdiff xmhtml1_1.1.7-17_amd64.deb xmhtml1_1.1.7-18_amd64.deb
> [The following lists of changes regard files as different if they have
> different names, permissions or owners.]
>
> Files in first .deb but not in second
> -
> -rw-r--r--  root/root   /usr/share/doc/xmhtml1/README.gz
> -rw-r--r--  root/root   /usr/share/doc/xmhtml1/THANKS
> -rw-r--r--  root/root   /usr/share/doc/xmhtml1/TODO

They were present in xmhtml1-dev package, but I've missed them in xmhtml1
package. Thanks a lot.

Now fixed and uploaded to m.d.n.. Direct link for download:
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xmhtml/xmhtml_1.1.7-18.dsc

Best regards,
Boris



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1931941340967...@web3h.yandex.ru

Bug#678368: RFS: libvisual/0.4.0-5 [QA] -- Audio visualization framework

[Boris Pek]

2012-06-29 05:58, Nicholas Breen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 08:00:06PM +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
>
>>  Unnecessary package libvisual-0.4-0-i18n was deleted.
>>
>>  Now there are only such changes:
>>
>>  libvisual (0.4.0-5) unstable; urgency=low
>
> Uploaded.  Thank you for the QA work.

Hi,

Thanks a lot for upload. But I haven't not received a confirmation from bot on
e-mail. Also there is no changes on PTS page [1] and I don't see the package in
upload queues [2][3]. Are you sure that the package was uploaded successfully?

Best regards,
Boris

[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/libv/libvisual.html
[2] ftp://ftp.upload.debian.org/pub/UploadQueue/
[3] ftp://ftp.eu.upload.debian.org/pub/UploadQueue/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/888041340999...@web9e.yandex.ru

Bug#679578: RFS: awffull/3.10.2-2 [QA] -- web server log analysis program

[Boris Pek]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org

Hi,

I am looking for a sponsor for the package "awffull".

It builds binary package:
  awffull - web server log analysis program

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/awffull

Direct link for download:
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/awffull/awffull_3.10.2-2.dsc

Changes in the package:

awffull (3.10.2-2) unstable; urgency=low

  * QA upload.
  * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (was 3.7.3).
  * Bumped debhelper version to 9 (was 8); updated debian/compat.
  * Added file debian/patches/fix-GeoIP-default-path.patch:
fixed default path to GeoIP database. (Closes: #458647)
  * Added file debian/patches/fix-quietly-run-of-cron-job.patch:
disables useless output messages when job is run without any verbose
options. (Closes: #665680)
  * Added file debian/patches/fix-font-in-use.patch:
- now recommended font ttf-dejavu is used instead of bitstream-vera
  font which is going to be removed from the repository
- fixed path to used font (Closes: #458647)
  * Updated debian/templates: switched from apache to apache2.
(Closes: #467641)
  * Updated debian/awffull.cron.daily:
- deleted useless output message when cron job runs without errors
  (Closes: #482168)
- updated notifications for more correct messages
  (Closes: #565813)
  * Updated debian/control:
- awffull now suggests ttf-dejavu
- changed build dependency from libpng12-dev to libpng-dev
  (Closes: #662274)
  * Rewritten debian/rules:
- now dh is used instead of direct dh_* commands
- added --as-needed option to LDFLAGS
- added section get-orig-source (uscan is used)
- fixed FTBFS because of outdated config.{sub,guess}:
  used symlinks to files from autotools-dev package
  (Closes: #536835)
- fixed lintian warnings:
  + hardening-no-relro
  + hardening-no-fortify-functions
  * Added file debian/awffull.lintian-overrides:
possible-bashism-in-maintainer-script warning is false positive.
  * Added file debian/patches/fix-hyphen-used-as-minus-sign.patch.
  * File debian/copyright was rewritten in according to Copyright format 1.0.
Added missed licenses and copyright holders. Fixed lintian note:
copyright-refers-to-symlink-license usr/share/common-licenses/GPL.

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Best regards,
Boris



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2088421341003...@web24g.yandex.ru

Bug#679594: RFS: zgv/5.9-5 [QA] -- SVGAlib graphics viewer

[Boris Pek]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org

Hi,

I am looking for a sponsor for the package "zgv".

It builds binary package:
  zgv - SVGAlib graphics viewer

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/zgv

Direct link for download:
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zgv/zgv_5.9-5.dsc

Changes in the package:

zgv (5.9-5) unstable; urgency=low

  * QA upload.
  * Updated debian/watch: changed regexp.
  * Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (was 3.9.2).
  * Added debhelper version (9 is used); updated debian/compat.
Fixed lintian note package-lacks-versioned-build-depends-on-debhelper.
  * Added file debian/source/format: format 1.0 is still used in this package.
  * Patched files config.mk and src/Makefile to respect build with
hardening flags. [Thanks to Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe] (Closes: #663625)
  * Rewritten debian/rules:
- now dh is used instead of direct dh_* commands
- added --as-needed option to LDFLAGS
- added section get-orig-source (uscan is used)
- fixed lintian warnings:
  + hardening-no-relro
  + hardening-no-fortify-functions
  + dh-clean-k-is-deprecated
  + debian-rules-ignores-make-clean-error
  + debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-arch
  + debian-rules-missing-recommended-target build-indep
  * Updated debian/control:
- added Homepage field
- added ${misc:Depends} to package zgv
- changed build dependency from libpng12-dev to libpng-dev
  (Closes: #662575)
  * Updated debian/menu: fixed lintian warnings:
- unquoted-string-in-menu-item
- menu-item-uses-apps-section
  * Updated doc/zgv.1: fixed lintian notes hyphen-used-as-minus-sign.
  * Deleted file debian/postinst: generated automatically.

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Best regards,
Boris



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2110981341019...@web29e.yandex.ru

Bug#679049: RFS: qpxtool/0.7.1.002-6 [QA] -- CD/DVD quality checker

[Boris Pek]

package sponsorship-requests
user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org
usertags 679049 - not-fit-for-wheezy + for-wheezy
thanks

Waiting for reply:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg00308.html
(See also timestamps)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1732211342899...@web4e.yandex.ru

Bug#679049: RFS: qpxtool/0.7.1.002-6 [QA] -- CD/DVD quality checker

[Boris Pek]

See also:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/07/msg00680.html

Quotation:
"I don't think targetting experimental for unmaintained packages makes sense."


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1892011342900...@web16h.yandex.ru

Bug#684529: RFS: turnserver/0.6-1 (ITP: #684481)

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

> turnserver - server for ICE/STUN/TURN, NAT traversal for SIP and Jabber

Have you asked Debian VoIP Team [1]? They might be interested in this package.

Regards,
Boris

[1] http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/VoIP/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/938551344941...@web17g.yandex.ru

Re: Question about PTS

[Boris Pek]

Forwarded from debian...@lists.debian.org :

>>  Hi,
>>
>>  Some time ago PTS checked http://mentors.debian.net/ for new source packages
>>  which were waiting for a sponsor. If new version of source package available
>>  an appropriate item was added in todo section on package page.
>>
>>  But now there is no such item. What happened?
>>
>>  Regards,
>>  Boris
>>
>>  PS: Also I think such information can be useful in new service:
>>  http://udd.debian.org/dmd.cgi
>>  Because some packages can wait for a sponsor during months. And this is not
>>  the maintainer fault that they were not uploaded yet.
>
> Indeed. Does mentors.debian.net provide a dump of all relevant info,
> that we could easily import in UDD?
>
> Lucas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1810141345453...@web21f.yandex.ru

Re: Advice on a new package

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

> I'm interested in making a Debian package of my own software Fortuner,
> homepage https://github.com/jnumm/fortuner . The software is a
> modernization of classic UNIX fortune program. I think it falls under
> the games category so I'm writing on pkg-games list, too.
>
> Should I put this package on a VCS (preferably git, that's what I've
> been using), on something like
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/fortuner.git ? How would
> that be done?

It is not necessarily to use repository on Alioth for your package. You can
use a separate repo on Github. But if you want to join Debian Games Team and
use Alioth for packaging you should read:
http://wiki.debian.org/Games/
http://wiki.debian.org/Games/VCS/git
http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/Git

> The package has a Lintian warning: W: fortuner:
> hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/games/fortuner. How should that be
> treated?

http://wiki.debian.org/Hardening

Note: Lintian can generate false positive here. So you should check it manually.

> And lastly, I've understood there is a freeze now on Debian Wheezy,
> how does this affect to packaging a new piece of software? To what
> distribution would the new package come?

New packages don't affect Wheezy. So you can prepare your package for unstable
(as usual).

Regards,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2611346268...@web23d.yandex.ru

Interaction between m.d.n. and Ubuntu

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

> Unfortunately your package "..." was rejected because of the following
> reason:
> 
> You are not uploading to one of those Debian distributions: oldstable stable
> unstable experimental stable-backports oldstable-backports 
> oldstable-backports-sloppy
> oldstable-security stable-security testing-security stable-proposed-updates
> testing-proposed-updates sid wheezy squeeze lenny squeeze-backports 
> lenny-backports
> lenny-security lenny-backports-sloppy lenny-volatile squeeze-security 
> squeeze-updates
> wheezy-security unreleased
> 
> Please try to fix it and re-upload. Thanks,

How about adding Ubuntu names to the list? It can be useful.

For example, I need to upload updated package with Ubuntu-specific patch.
This package will be uploaded into Ubuntu by avoiding Debian archive.

Regards,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/73671347046...@web12g.yandex.ru

Re: Interaction between m.d.n. and Ubuntu

[Boris Pek]

>>  I need to upload updated package with Ubuntu-specific patch. This
>>  package will be uploaded into Ubuntu by avoiding Debian archive.
>
> Wouldn't an Ubuntu PPA be more appropriate for that use case?

Add temporary PPA for this? These files will needed during less than a day in 
my case.

> How does uploading Ubuntu-specific packages to Debian's MDN help with
> getting them sponsored directly into Ubuntu?

In no way. I usually maintain packages for Debian. But now faced with necessary
to do Ubuntu-specific update. And usual way of exchanging files is not working.
Could you suggest any free hosting where I can put source package files and
they will be available using dget?

Regards,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/68931347047...@web26d.yandex.ru

Re: Interaction between m.d.n. and Ubuntu

[Boris Pek]

>>  Could you suggest any free hosting where I can put source package
>>  files and they will be available using dget?
>
> Unfortunately no, I usually just serve them off my home Internet
> connection when I need to do that, but I'm also a sysadmin by trade.
> I guess you don't have a personal Web site you could drop those
> files on temporarily? AFAIK, dget doesn't need any fancy
> repository... just drop the .dsc and tarballs/diffs for your source
> package in the same path together.

Yes, I've just found that dget works fine with files uploaded to github.

Thank you for replies.

Regards,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/84431347049...@web4g.yandex.ru

Re: Interaction between m.d.n. and Ubuntu

[Boris Pek]

>>  Add temporary PPA for this? These files will needed during less than a day 
>> in my case.
>
> I assure you no one will mind having one hang around. PPAs are nice to
> have around, even if you don't use them.
>
> I have one that I use for stuff like this, it's not like it's a burden
> on the system.
>
> I suggest you use a PPA, that's the best way to get sponsored in Ubuntu,
> IMHO.
>
> After all, they'll get built for a few arches, on the PPA farm, whereas 
> mentors
> will just hold the source. You'd be doing your sponsor a favor!

I already use it [1]. Thanks. =)

[1] https://launchpad.net/~tehnick

But I think this is not that case.

Regards,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/84561347050...@web19f.yandex.ru

Re: New Maintainer Question: Upgrade to Sid?

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

> Sounds like a good idea. Which (pbuilder or cowbuilder) would you recommend?

I recommend cowbuilder. It's much faster and it less pull a hard drive.
(Last is important for me as I use laptop)

Best wishes,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/568161348044...@web18h.yandex.ru

Re: How to re-add removed packages

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

>>  I'd like to maintain some packages, which are removed in sid now.
>>  (scim-hangul, scim-sunpinyin, scim-pinyin, scim-array).
>>  How should I do? Should I send a WNPP bug report as a usual new
>>  package, or just package it, change the maintainer to me and
>>  upload it to mentors.debian.net to find a sponsor?
>>  Thanks!
>
> Yes. Removed packages can be re-introduced like any other package using
> the same procedures. Please check the reason for the removal, however.
> You new package should fix that problem as very least.

Also you can find some useful information here:
http://bugs.debian.org/685039

Best wishes,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/238101348047...@web1h.yandex.ru

Bug#673457: RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.4-1 [ITP] -- translation files for Psi+

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

Unfortunately my sponsor of "psi-plus" package still has no time for package
"psi-plus-i18n" (since March month) and I am looking for a sponsor for it:
  http://bugs.debian.org/673457

To prevent possible questions: yes, newer translations are available in
upstream repo, but this version (0.15.5338.6-1) of "psi-plus-i18n" package was
prepared for unstable where package "psi-plus" has version 0.15.5338-1. Next
upload will be to experimental and newer version of translations will be in it.

Direct link for download:
  
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/psi-plus-i18n/psi-plus-i18n_0.15.5338.6-1.dsc

Other links:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/psi-plus-i18n
  https://github.com/tehnick/psi-plus-i18n-debian/tree/master/debian/

Package is very small and simple. It will not require much time.

Anyone interested in localization?

Best regards,
Boris

-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/BorisPek


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1704791348563...@web5g.yandex.ru

Re: exclude

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

> How can i exclude hurd-i386 from a build

Architecture: linux-any kfreebsd-any

Best wishes,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/83861349362...@web27f.yandex.ru

Bug#671731: RFS: leechcraft/0.5.85+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- modular internet-client

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

I am still looking for a sponsor for my package "leechcraft".

It builds those binary packages:
  leechcraft - Full LeechCraft installation
  leechcraft-advancednotifications - Advanced Notifications framework for 
LeechCraft
  leechcraft-aggregator - RSS/Atom feed reader for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-anhero - Crash handler for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-auscrie - Screenshooter for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-azoth - Modular IM client for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-bittorrent - BitTorrent client for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-core - Core executable of LeechCraft
  leechcraft-cstp - HTTP client for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-dbg - Debug symbols for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-dbusmanager - D-Bus side of LeechCraft
  leechcraft-deadlyrics - Song lyrics finder for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-dev - Files required for development for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-doc - Documentation files for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-dolozhee - Plugin for feature requests and bug reports for 
LeechCraft
  leechcraft-extra - Extra LeechCraft plugins beyond full installation
  leechcraft-gacts - Global Actions provider plugin for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-glance - Provides a quick overview of tabs in LeechCraft
  leechcraft-gmailnotifier - Notifications about new mail in GMail for 
LeechCraft
  leechcraft-historyholder - History keeper for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-hotstreams - Radio streams provider module for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-kbswitch - Keyboard plugin for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-kinotify - Fancy notifications for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-knowhow - Plugin for displaying tips of the day about LeechCraft
  leechcraft-lackman - Userspace Package Manager for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-lads - Ubuntu Unity integration layer for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-lastfmscrobble - Last.fm scrobbler for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-lhtr - LeechCraft HTML Text editor in WYSIWYG style
  leechcraft-liznoo - UPower-based power manager for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-lmp - Music Player for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-monocle - Document viewer for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-nacheku - Clipboard/download dir watcher for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-netstoremanager - Manages network data storages for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-networkmonitor - Network monitor for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-newlife - Settings importer for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-otlozhu - (Getting Things Done style) TODO manager for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-pintab - Tabs pinning for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-popishu - Plain text editor for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-poshuku - Web browser for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-secman - Security Manager plugin for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-seekthru - OpenSearch-support plugin for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-shellopen - Support for opening files with external apps in 
LeechCraft
  leechcraft-sidebar - Sidebar with quick launch, tabs and tray areas in 
LeechCraft
  leechcraft-summary - Quick summary of what's going on in LeechCraft
  leechcraft-tabsessmanager - Tab Session Manager for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-tabslist - Displays list of opened tabs, with navigation between 
them
  leechcraft-vgrabber - vkontakte.ru plugin for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-vrooby - removable storage devices manager for LeechCraft
  leechcraft-xproxy - Advanced proxy manager for LeechCraft
  libleechcraft-util0.5.0 - Common library for LeechCraft
  libleechcraft-xmlsettingsdialog0.3.0 - Dynamic settings dialog builder for 
LeechCraft

The package is lintian clean (checked with options `-ivIE --pedantic`) except
few false positives (hardening-no-fortify-functions).

Direct link for download:
  
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/leechcraft/leechcraft_0.5.85+dfsg-1.dsc

Other links:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/leechcraft
  https://github.com/tehnick/leechcraft-debian/tree/master/debian/

More information about LeechCraft can be obtained here:
  https://github.com/0xd34df00d/leechcraft/blob/master/README
  http://leechcraft.org/

LeechCraft is a free open source cross-platform modular internet-client. It
consists of a core which defines common plugin interfaces and a lot of plugins
for different purposes. User can install any combination of them to achieve
the necessary functionality.

The main advantage of such approach is that modules could interact more closely
than standalone programs in usual Desktop Environments. Thus, plugins can also
rely on functionality provided by each other. Plugins could also have their own
plugins: for example, support for different protocols or chat window styles in
an IM client.

Also developers don't reinvent the wheel for each protocol. They use existing
solutions (rasterbar libtorrent for BitTorrent or QXmpp for XMPP protocol
for example) if possible. And they contribute back their patches to the upstream
in these cases.

Many changes were done in the project during these months. For example, fork of
QXmpp library was finally merged into upstream and current package "qxmpp" from
unstable satisfies build dependencies of "leechcraft". See details:
  http://bugs.debian.org/669615

Package "leechcraft

Bug#690245: RFS: zgv/5.9-6 [QA] -- SVGAlib graphics viewer

[Boris Pek]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org

Hi,

I am looking for a sponsor for the package "zgv".

It builds one binary package:
  zgv - SVGAlib graphics viewer

Direct link for download:
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zgv/zgv_5.9-6.dsc

Other links:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/zgv
  http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/zgv.git

Changes in the package:

zgv (5.9-6) unstable; urgency=low

  * QA upload.
  * Update debian/control:
- add Vcs-* fields (Git repo in collab-maint is available now)
- changed build dependency from libtiff4-dev to libtiff-dev
  (preparation for switching to libtiff5 in Debian Jessie)
  * Update debian/rules:
- delete unnecessary override_dh_strip section
- fix get-orig-source section in according with Debian Policy §4.9

To prevent possible questions:
Yes, this updated package is not for Wheezy, it is for Jessie. But current
version (5.9-5) from unstable will not migrate to Wheezy in any case, so it
can be replaced by new one.

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Best regards,
Boris


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/21761349966...@web17e.yandex.ru

Re: Bug#690245: RFS: zgv/5.9-6 [QA] -- SVGAlib graphics viewer

[Boris Pek]

Anyone interested?

2012-10-11 17:39, Boris Pek wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
>
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the package "zgv".
>
> It builds one binary package:
>   zgv - SVGAlib graphics viewer
>
> Direct link for download:
>   http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zgv/zgv_5.9-6.dsc
>
> Other links:
>   http://mentors.debian.net/package/zgv
>   http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/zgv.git
>
> Changes in the package:
>
> zgv (5.9-6) unstable; urgency=low
>
>   * QA upload.
>   * Update debian/control:
> - add Vcs-* fields (Git repo in collab-maint is available now)
> - changed build dependency from libtiff4-dev to libtiff-dev
>   (preparation for switching to libtiff5 in Debian Jessie)
>   * Update debian/rules:
> - delete unnecessary override_dh_strip section
> - fix get-orig-source section in according with Debian Policy §4.9
>
> To prevent possible questions:
> Yes, this updated package is not for Wheezy, it is for Jessie. But current
> version (5.9-5) from unstable will not migrate to Wheezy in any case, so it
> can be replaced by new one.
>
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
> Best regards,
> Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/446821351756...@web30h.yandex.ru

Bug#684220: RFS: tinysvm/0.09-1 [ITP] -- SVM trainer and classifier toolkit

[Boris Pek]

Hi,

> I can do everything using uscan, tar, sed and wget, so I think this is not a
> problem.
>
> During the process I need to create a temporary directory. Should I delete it
> at the end of get-orig-source? Should I delete it in clean?

Yes, only tarball should be left as a result.
See Debian Policy §4.9 for details.

Best wishes,
Boris

-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/BorisPek


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/344931352127...@web3f.yandex.ru

Bug#696192: RFS: matanza/0.13+ds1-3 [updated] -- Space ascii war game

[Boris Pek]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org

Hi,

I am looking for a sponsor for a package "matanza".

It builds binary package:
  matanza - Space ascii war game

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/matanza

Direct link for download:
  http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/matanza/matanza_0.13+ds1-3.dsc

Changes in the package:

matanza (0.13+ds1-3) experimental; urgency=low

  * Team upload.
  * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.4 (was 3.9.1).
  * Update debian/copyright in according to Copyright format 1.0.
  * Add patch debian/patches/04-format.patch:
fix FTBFS with GCC >= 4.7 and hardening compiler options.
(Closes: #675295)
  * Add patch debian/patches/05-fix-build-with-libpng1.5.patch:
fix build with libpng >= 1.5. (Closes: #636984)
  * Update debian/control:
- changed build dependency from libpng12-dev to libpng-dev
  (Closes: #662427)
- updated Homepage field

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Best regards,
Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/3684921355780...@web22e.yandex.ru

Bug#696385: RFS: astromenace/1.3.1+ds-1 [ITP] -- hardcore 3D space shooter with spaceship upgrade possibilities

[Boris Pek]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel-ga...@lists.debian.org

Hi,

I am looking for a sponsor for my packages "astromenace" and "astromenace-data".

Basic information:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/astromenace
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/astromenace-data

Direct links for download:
  
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/a/astromenace/astromenace_1.3.1+ds-1.dsc
  
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/a/astromenace-data/astromenace-data_1.3.1+ds-1.dsc

Git repos:
  http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/astromenace.git
  http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-games/astromenace-data.git

AstroMenace is an astonishing hardcore scroll-shooter where brave space
warriors may find a great opportunity to hone their combat skills.
Gather money during the battle to spend them on turning your spaceship
into an ultimate weapon of mass destruction and give hell to swarms of
adversaries. Enjoy the wonderfully crafted 3d graphics and high-quality
special effects along with a detailed difficulty adjustment and a handy
interface of AstroMenace.

Package with data files is separated due to license issues: it includes
precompiled 3D models under CC-BY-SA-3.0.

More information about the game:
  http://www.viewizard.com/astromenace/

I would be glad if someone uploaded these packages for me.

Best regards,
Boris

-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/BorisPek


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/109601355994...@web17h.yandex.ru

Bug#696388: RFS: kde-style-qtcurve/1.8.14-2

[Boris Pek]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: Fathi Boudra 

Hi,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kde-style-qtcurve". I have tried
to contact with previous sponsor 3 times, but there are no replies still.
(Last email I sent on 30 October 2012)

Basic information:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/kde-style-qtcurve

Direct link for download:
  
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-style-qtcurve/kde-style-qtcurve_1.8.14-2.dsc

Git repo:
  https://github.com/tehnick/kde-style-qtcurve-debian

Changes in the package:

kde-style-qtcurve (1.8.14-2) experimental; urgency=low

  * Rename package qtcurve-i18n to qtcurve-l10n.
New package provides virtual package qtcurve-i18n for smooth transition.
  * Fix get-orig-source section in according with Debian Policy §4.9.
  * Remove obsolete DM-Upload-Allowed flag.

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Also it would nice if someone could update my DMUA flags for packages
"kde-style-qtcurve" and "gtk2-engines-qtcurve" in according with new
procedure:
  https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/09/msg8.html

Best regards,
Boris

-- 
http://wiki.debian.org/BorisPek


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/132661355995...@web3f.yandex.ru

RFS: plasma-widget-cwp (updated package)

[Boris Pek]

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.1-1
of my package "plasma-widget-cwp".

It builds these binary packages:
plasma-widget-cwp - Customizable Weather Plasmoid (CWP)

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/plasma-widget-cwp
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main 
contrib non-free
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/plasma-widget-cwp/plasma-widget-cwp_1.1.1-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
 Boris


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/e1odtbc-00051h-00.tehnick-8-mail...@foot.mail.ru

Re: RFS: psi-plus

[Boris Pek]

I forgot to note that this is just bug-fix update of package with very small 
changes:

psi-plus (0.15~svn3910-2) unstable; urgency=low

  * File debian/control was updated:
- removed dependence from non available package psi-plus-icons
  (Closes: #640399, #640723)
- added additional fields Vcs-Svn and Vcs-Browser
  * Removed useless file README.source

So potential sponsor doesn't need to spent much time for its checking.

Also this update is quite important because it closes bugs and improves the 
package quality.


Boris Pek wrote:
> Dear mentors,
> 
> My regular sponsor is very busy now. And he don't know when he will find 
> enough free time. So maybe someone else can sponsoring this version of 
> package.
> 
>  * Package name: psi-plus
>Version : 0.15~svn3910-2
...

RFS: eiskaltdcpp (updated package)

[Boris Pek]

Dear mentors,

My regular sponsor unfortunately can not upload packages at present time due to 
life circumstances. So maybe someone else can sponsoring this version of 
package.

There are such changes in this updated package:

eiskaltdcpp (2.2.4-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Update to stable release 2.2.4.
  * Updated file debian/copyright:
- new author was added in upstream
- new files were added in upstream
  * Updated file debian/rules:
- enabled DHT support in configurating options

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/eiskaltdcpp

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/eiskaltdcpp/eiskaltdcpp_2.2.4-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Best regards,
Boris

Re: Re: RFS: leechcraft (closes ITP bug)

[Boris Pek]

>> It builds those binary packages:
>>  leechcraft - Core executable of LeechCraft
>>  leechcraft-aggregator - RSS/Atom feed reader for LeechCraft
>> []

> None of the short descriptions make any sense to me without knowing what 
> leechcraft is.

Thank you for interest. Of cause I can describe in more detail.

LeechCraft is a free open source cross-platform modular internet-client. It 
consists of a core which defines common plugin interfaces and a lot of plugins 
for different purposes. User can install any combination of them to achieve the 
necessary functionality.

The main advantage of such approach is that modules could interact more closely 
than standalone programs in usual Desktop Environments. Thus, plugins can also 
rely on functionality provided by each other. Plugins could also have their own 
plugins: for example, support for different protocols or chat window styles in 
an IM client. 

Also developers don't reinvent the wheel for each protocol. They use existing 
solutions (rasterbar libtorrent for BitTorrent or QXmpp for XMPP protocol for 
example) if possible. And they contribute back their patches to the upstream in 
these cases.

There are active developers command and quite wide community in the project. So 
it will improving in the future.

Best regards,
Boris

Re: Re: RFS: uhub (closes ITP bug)

[Boris Pek]

> Didn't have time for a through review yet, but a couple of things I'd
> like to comment on:

Thanks a lot for your remarks. I fixed some of them.


>* debian/copyright appears to be a mix between free-form and DEP-5. I
>  would recommend using either, but not a mix between the two, as that
>  looks just awkward.

I have not aimed to support DEP5. Such form of writing just seems more human
readable for me. Maybe I will update copyright file according the DEP-5 spec 
later.

>  It would also be nice if you'd describe how exactly the .orig.tar.bz2
>  is generated: is it downloaded from the specified location as-is? Is
>  it repackaged in one way or the other? (I suppose so, the debian/ dir
>  is not present in the .orig.tar.gz)

All necessary information available in debian/copyright file:
https://github.com/tehnick/uhub-debian/blob/master/debian/copyright#L7

The GitHub has no possibility to make bzip tarballs from git tags
automatically. So only zip archive and gzip tarballs are available there.

debian/ dir in upstream was made by program developer. It has no relation to me
and it don't conform to Debian Policy.

So .orig.tar.bz2 formed in such way:
https://github.com/tehnick/deb_packages/blob/master/Debian/uhub/automatic_update_uhub#L77
 

>* debian/uhub.docs
>
>  AUTHORS is already documented in the copyright file, BUGS is - in my
>  opinion - not useful in a Debian package, TODO is an empty file, and
>  README does not contain all that much information, either.
>
>  debian/doc/getstarted.txt also contains a lot of useless information,
>  stuff that's not relevant for users of the Debian binary package.
>
>  Not having a clue about what uhub is, though, there might be things in
>  it that users DO need, so this is the only file I'd leave in
>  debian/uhub.docs. And add the WiKi link from README to it.

Updated. Thanks.

>* debian/uhub.postrm, debian/uhub.prerm
>
>  These files can be safely removed, as they only includes a #DEBHELPER#
>  tag.

Deleted. Thanks.

>* debian/uhub.postinst
>
>  The postinst unconditionally chmods /var/log/uhub to 750 on every
>  upgrade.

This is important security issue. I think this logs shouldn't be available
for reading by others.

>  I would suggestshipping the directory in the deb with that
>  permission already, and drop the postinst.

This is bad idea:
W: uhub: non-standard-dir-perm var/log/uhub/ 0750 != 0755
N: 
N:The directory has a mode different from 0755, and it's not one of the
N:known exceptions.
N:
N:Refer to Debian Policy Manual section 10.9 (Permissions and owners) for
N:details.
N:
N:Severity: normal, Certainty: possible
N:
N:Check: files, Type: binary, udeb

>* debian/rules
>
>  Please do NOT set SILENT=YES! We do want to see the exact commandline,
>  together with command-line options and whatnot, so that any possible
>  build failiures or miscompilations can be tracked easier.

Yes, this was my fault. Fixed.

>* Other notes
>
>  Since uhub seems to have the option of being compiled with SSL
>  support, it might be a good idea to enable that, perhaps?

In this stable release SSL support is very experimental on my opinion.
But in current developing version it is quite good. So I will enable this
option in the next stable release.

Re: RFS: uhub (closes ITP bug)

[Boris Pek]

> (Please don't CC me, when replying to list mail)

Ok, I have just read interesting document:
http://catb.org/%7Eesr/faqs/smart-questions.html
I have never used mailing lists befor.
It's a little bit archaic method of interaction...

>>>  It would also be nice if you'd describe how exactly the .orig.tar.bz2
>>>  is generated: is it downloaded from the specified location as-is? Is
>>>  it repackaged in one way or the other? (I suppose so, the debian/ dir
>>>  is not present in the .orig.tar.gz)
>>
>> All necessary information available in debian/copyright file:
>> https://github.com/tehnick/uhub-debian/blob/master/debian/copyright#L7
>>
>> The GitHub has no possibility to make bzip tarballs from git tags
>> automatically. So only zip archive and gzip tarballs are available there.
>
> Yeah, I know how GitHub works, but those two lines don't tell me what
> you wrote just above: that it's the same as the tarball from github,
> except it's bz2 and debian/ is not included in the orig.tar.gz.
> 
> This is the information I'd like to see in the copyright file, as it
> tells me exactly what steps were taken to generate the
> tarball. Otherwise I have to guess and double-check, and I'm waaay too
> lazy to do that.

I really don't understand that do you want. Present information is enough
to make own tarball.

Or maybe should I cite you in this file? Smth. like that:
"It's the same as the tarball from github, except it's bz2 and debian/ 
is not included in the orig.tar.gz"

But this is absolutely the same...

>> So .orig.tar.bz2 formed in such way:
>> https://github.com/tehnick/deb_packages/blob/master/Debian/uhub/automatic_update_uhub#L77
>>  
> 
> This could be included in the package sources, perhaps even worked into
> debian/rules get-orig-source. That'd be awesome.

Ok, I'll make it.

"awesome"? In what sense?

>>>  I would suggestshipping the directory in the deb with that
>>>  permission already, and drop the postinst.
>>
>> This is bad idea:
>> W: uhub: non-standard-dir-perm var/log/uhub/ 0750 != 0755
>> N: 
>> N:The directory has a mode different from 0755, and it's not one of the
>> N:known exceptions.
>> N:
>> N:Refer to Debian Policy Manual section 10.9 (Permissions and owners) for
>> N:details.
>> N:
>> N:Severity: normal, Certainty: possible
>> N:
>> N:Check: files, Type: binary, udeb
> 
> Note the Certainty: possible. Also, quoting the first two sentences of
> the referenced section:
>
> "The rules in this section are guidelines for general use. If necessary
> you may deviate from the details below. "
> 
> I believe that setting /var/lib/uhub to 0750 in the deb, instead of the
> postinst is a good enough reason to deviate from the recommendation, and
>override the lintian warning.
>  
> On the other hand, there exist packages in the archive that do this in
> postinst, so.. whichever way you prefer.

I have tried to follow by your recommendations.
I have added file uhub.lintian-overrides:
https://github.com/tehnick/uhub-debian/blob/master/debian/uhub.lintian-overrides
But I still get the same lintian warning.
What am I doing wrong?

>>>* Other notes
>>>
>>>  Since uhub seems to have the option of being compiled with SSL
>>>  support, it might be a good idea to enable that, perhaps?
>>
>> In this stable release SSL support is very experimental on my opinion.
>> But in current developing version it is quite good. So I will enable this
>> option in the next stable release.
> 
> Fair enough!

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=fair%20enough

Hmm, such different meaning... =)

RFS: uhub (closes ITP bug, new attempt)

[Boris Pek]

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "uhub".

uHub is a server software for Advanced Direct Connect protocol wich uses by
client's software like linuxdcpp or eiskaltdcpp (these packages are present
in Debian repo for a long time).

This package contains small count of source files.
So it don't required a lot of time for review.

You can browse previous discussion here:
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/10/msg00071.html
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/10/msg00072.html
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/10/msg00083.html
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/10/msg00084.html
  http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2011/10/msg00095.html

All remarks were fixed, even not obligatory ones.

You can look at package rules here:
  https://github.com/tehnick/uhub-debian

Further information about this package you can find here:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/uhub

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
  dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/uhub/uhub_0.3.2-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Best regards,
Boris

RFS: plasma-widget-cwp (updated package)

[Boris Pek]

Dear mentors,

My regular sponsor unfortunately can not upload packages at present time due to
life circumstances. So maybe someone else can sponsoring this version of 
package.

There are such changes in this updated package:

plasma-widget-cwp (1.5.5-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Update to stable release 1.5.5.
  * Additional fields Vcs-Svn and Vcs-Browser were added in debian/control.
  * Additional section get-orig-source was added in debian/rules.
  * File debian/copyright was rewritten in according to DEP-5.

You can look at package rules here:
  https://github.com/tehnick/plasma-widget-cwp-debian

Further information about this package you can find here:
  http://mentors.debian.net/package/plasma-widget-cwp

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/plasma-widget-cwp/plasma-widget-cwp_1.5.5-1.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Best regards,
Boris