Bug#1030528: RFS: mg/20221112-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hi folks, I am looking for a new sponsor for my "mg" package, which is already in Debian and hosted on Salsa. I tried to contact the old sponsor several times, but I got no response. * Package name : mg Version : 20221112-1 Upstream contact : Han Boetes * URL : https://github.com/hboetes/mg * License : public-domain * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/mg The source builds the following binary packages: mg - microscopic GNU Emacs-style editor To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/mg https://packages.debian.org/sid/mg https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/mg Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: none yet Changes since the last upload: mg (20221112-1) unstable; urgency=medium * new upstream version 20221112 -- Harald Dunkel Sat, 19 Nov 2022 19:16:48 +0100 Thank you very much Harri
Bug#1029186: reply: RFS: libcommons-validator-java/1:1.7-1 [Team] -- ease and speed development and maintenance of validation rules
> Hello Min Sun, > > is there a particular reason why you opt for / stick to distribution > `UNRELEASED` for a package already monitored by the tracker?[1] It is the > entry e.g., `dch -i` puts into file `/debian/changelog` when you start to work > on a new version (increment) of a package. After all other other work on your > side is done, an eventual change to the string `unstable` (then lower case > only) is one of the keys necessary to let results of your work enter branch > `unstable`, and later `testing`, etc. Thanks for your clarification, Tony, I did not mean to specify it as `UNRELEASE`, the ‘uscan and uupdate” tools insert this keyword to debian/changelog. I am not clear about the internal mechanism from `UNRELEASED` to `testing` and later stage. I need learn more about Debian policy along with your guideline. All the best.
Bug#1030390: marked as done (RFS: termpaint/0.3.0-2 -- low level terminal access)
Your message dated Sat, 4 Feb 2023 16:43:51 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: termpaint/0.3.0-2 -- low level terminal access has caused the Debian Bug report #1030390, regarding RFS: termpaint/0.3.0-2 -- low level terminal access to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1030390: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030390 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "termpaint": * Package name : termpaint Version : 0.3.0-2 Upstream contact : Martin Hostettler * URL : https://termpaint.namepad.de/ * License : 0BSD or BSL-1.0 or MIT-0, BSL-1.0, BSD-3-clause, bzip2-1.0.6, BSD-2-clause, BSL-1.0 or Expat * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/termpaint Section : libs The source builds the following binary packages: libtermpaint0a - low level terminal access - shared library libtermpaint-dev - low level terminal access - headers To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/termpaint/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/termpaint/termpaint_0.3.0-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: termpaint (0.3.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium . * Fix Vcs-Git URL in debian/control * Fix mismatched lintian override very-long-line-length-in-source-file * Add patch to enable building on armel supplied by upstream * Update out-of-date-standards-version to 4.6.2 Regards, -- Christoph Hueffelmann --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Thanks for the update!--- End Message ---
Re: Bug#1029186: reply: RFS: libcommons-validator-java/1:1.7-1 [Team] -- ease and speed development and maintenance of validation rules
`UNRELEASED` is used because it will cause a failure if you accidentally try to upload it, which prevents accidental releases before they are intended. At the point of release, you should change it to be `unstable` or `experimental` or a backports repository. On Saturday, February 4, 2023 8:18:19 AM MST min sun wrote: > > Hello Min Sun, > > > > is there a particular reason why you opt for / stick to distribution > > `UNRELEASED` for a package already monitored by the tracker?[1] It is the > > entry e.g., `dch -i` puts into file `/debian/changelog` when you start to > > work on a new version (increment) of a package. After all other other > > work on your side is done, an eventual change to the string `unstable` > > (then lower case only) is one of the keys necessary to let results of > > your work enter branch `unstable`, and later `testing`, etc. > > Thanks for your clarification, Tony, > > I did not mean to specify it as `UNRELEASE`, the ‘uscan and uupdate” tools > insert this keyword to debian/changelog. > > I am not clear about the internal mechanism from `UNRELEASED` to `testing` > and later stage. > > I need learn more about Debian policy along with your guideline. > > All the best. -- Soren Stoutner so...@stoutner.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#1030163: marked as done (RFS: ipmiutil/3.1.8-4 -- IPMI management utilities)
Your message dated Sat, 4 Feb 2023 17:50:23 +0100 with message-id <72450037-ed99-b6fa-d06a-2a785ce54...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: ipmiutil/3.1.8-4 -- IPMI management utilities has caused the Debian Bug report #1030163, regarding RFS: ipmiutil/3.1.8-4 -- IPMI management utilities to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1030163: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1030163 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ipmiutil": Package name : ipmiutil Version : 3.1.8-4 Upstream contact : [fill in name and email of upstream] URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/ipmiutil/ License : GPL-2+, GPL-2+ with OpenSSL exception, Zlib, BSD-3-clause, BSD-2-clause, Artistic-2.0 Vcs : https://jff.email/cgit/ipmiutil.git Section : utils The source builds the following binary packages: ipmiutil - IPMI management utilities To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/ipmiutil/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/ipmiutil/ipmiutil_3.1.8-4.dsc or from git https://jff.email/cgit/ipmiutil.git/?h=release%2Fdebian%2F3.1.8-4 Changes since the last upload: ipmiutil (3.1.8-4) unstable; urgency=medium . * debian/patches/0705-crontab.patch: Fix typo (Closes: #1030120). * debian/control: - Remove superseded package lsb-base. - Remove version information no longer needed. * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.6.2.0 (No changes needed). * debian/copyright: - Add year 2023 to myself. CU Jörg -- New: GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB 30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D GPG key (long) : 09F89F3C8CA1D25D GPG Key: 8CA1D25D CAcert Key S/N : 0E:D4:56 Old pgp Key: BE581B6E (revoked since 2014-12-31). Jörg Frings-Fürst D-54470 Lieser git: https://jff.email/cgit/ Threema: SYR8SJXB Wire: @joergfringsfuerst Skype: joergpenguin Ring: jff Telegram: @joergfringsfuerst My wish list: - Please send me a picture from the nature at your home. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Thanks for the update.--- End Message ---
Bug#1030307: RFS: posixsignalmanager/0.3-2 -- posix signal handling for qt
Hi Christoph, Please do not fold the upstream PR into one patch file. That makes tracking it very hard. Thanks, Bastian
Bug#1030307: RFS: posixsignalmanager/0.3-2 -- posix signal handling for qt
Hello Bastian, I am very sorry about that. I will do that next time. Thank you for your time and effort. Christoph Am 04.02.23 um 18:07 schrieb Bastian Germann: Hi Christoph, Please do not fold the upstream PR into one patch file. That makes tracking it very hard. Thanks, Bastian
Bug#1030307: RFS: posixsignalmanager/0.3-2 -- posix signal handling for qt
Hello Bastian, sorry, now I understand. I have split the patches, cherry-pick the commits from upstream and reupload it. Thank you for your time and effort. Christoph
Bug#1030547: RFS: ghostscript/9.53.3~dfsg-7+deb11u3 [NMU] -- interpreter for the PostScript language and for PDF
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ghostscript": * Package name : ghostscript Version : 9.53.3~dfsg-7+deb11u3 Upstream contact : Ghostscript development and discussion * URL : https://www.ghostscript.com/ * License : GPL-2+, public-domain, BSD-3-Clause, NTP~Open, GPL-3+ with Autoconf exception, Apache-2.0, none, LGPL-2.1, ZLIB, NTP~WSU, BSD-3-Clause~Adobe, AGPL-3+ and custom, AGPL-3+ with font exception, GAP~configure, ISC, NTP~Lucent, AGPL-3+, Adobe-2006, GPL, Expat~Ghostgum, Expat, AGPL-3+ and FTL, Expat~SunSoft with SunSoft exception * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/printing-team/ghostscript Section : text The source builds the following binary packages: ghostscript - interpreter for the PostScript language and for PDF ghostscript-x - interpreter for the PostScript language and for PDF - X11 support ghostscript-doc - interpreter for the PostScript language and for PDF - Documentation libgs9 - interpreter for the PostScript language and for PDF - Library libgs9-common - interpreter for the PostScript language and for PDF - common files libgs-dev - interpreter for the PostScript language and for PDF - Development Files To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/ghostscript/ Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/ghostscript/ghostscript_9.53.3~dfsg-7+deb11u3.dsc Changes since the last upload: ghostscript (9.53.3~dfsg-7+deb11u3) bullseye; urgency=medium . * Non-maintainer upload. * Cherry-pick upstream patch to fix path for PostScript helper file in ps2epsi. Closes: #1003926, #1029541 Upload is confirmed for stable [1]. Regards, Håvard [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029619
