Bug#866046: RFS: libcgicc/3.2.18-0.1 NMU
On 2017-06-27 06:59, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Adam Borowski wrote: Please get an ok from the maintainer. this is true in general, unfortunately Chrisb is inactive since one year or so, and his last upload is around 5 years ago. Hi Adam, Gianfranco, thanks for looking into this. Apologies for not including the maintainer in the original mail, it wasn't intentional. Deferring the packet is probably a wise move to give the maintainer an opportunity to step in (I consider that unlikely, to be honest), should you consider going ahead with the review. Should I re-upload this package with a high deferred number or can this be done from mentors? BTW all of the diff, except for ~100 lines is about autotools autogenerated stuff :) Yes, the actual diff in the source code is much smaller than the 400 kloc. Unfortunately this release tar ball contains a lot of autogenerated stuff, in addition to full a archive of the previous release. I considered removing some files in a patch, but that would have increased the total change rather than reducing it. As far as I can see the changes in the source code since the last package are listed below. The latter two bugs were previously patched in the Debian package; these patches are now incorporated upstream, hence I could drop them from the Debian package. bug #49557: XHTMLDoctype.h fails to include MStreamable.h http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?49557 bug #49120: cgicc should not call exit() http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?49120 bug #48677: Generated index.html is empty http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?48677 bug #46426: Pkg-config file does not provide flags for include path or the library itself http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?46426 Thanks, Thomas
Bug#866046: RFS: libcgicc/3.2.18-0.1 NMU
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo > So, if you want I can take care of this one lets put the review in the bug: 1) please delete the two useless patches 2) the upstream tarball is... full of useless stuff they included a subtarball with 3.2.17 inside) this makes the debdiff look scary, and doubled the size of the orig tarball. Was this intentional? I would appreciate a new upstream fixed tarball 3) the conflict Conflicts: libcgicc5-dev Replaces: libcgicc5-dev should be dropped now, since stable already has libcgicc-dev upgrades from oldstable to unstable should have a "stable" in the middle, so the conflict is "useless" now (but I won't mind keeping it for another stable release) G.
Bug#866088: RFS: galternatives/0.13.5+nmu4+deb9u1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "galternatives" into *stable* (stretch-pu). * Package name: galternatives Version : 0.13.5+nmu4+deb9u1 Upstream Author : [not active] * URL : [defunct] * License : GPL-1+ Section : admin It builds those binary package(s): galternatives - graphical setup tool for the alternatives system To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/galternatives Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/galternatives/ galternatives_0.13.5+nmu4+deb9u1.dsc Alternatively, one can view built package on deb-o-matic-amd64: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#stable/galternatives/ 0.13.5+nmu4+deb9u1/buildlog Git repository on Alioth: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/galternatives.git/log/? h=stretch Changes since last upload: galternatives (0.13.5+nmu4+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium . * Adopt and switch maintainer information. * Fix the bug which causes properties window blank. Closes: #325172 Explanations: * This stable upload was approved by stable release managers. See http://bugs.debian.org/864757 . * Bug #325172 was already fixed in Debian testing/unstable in galternatives/ 0.13.6 . Regards, Boyuan Yang signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#866123: RFS: fbkeyboard/0.1-1 [ITP]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fbkeyboard" * Package name: fbkeyboard Version : 0.1-1 Upstream Author : Julian Winkler * URL :https://github.com/julianwi/fbkeyboard * License : GPL Section : devel It builds those binary packages: fbkeyboard - simple on screen keyboard for fbdev To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/fbkeyboard Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -xhttps://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fbkeyboard/fbkeyboard_0.1-1.dsc If you want to test it but you don't have a touchscreen device with working linux text console, it can also be tested on a laptop with touchpad. Regards, Julian Winkler
Bug#864912: RFS: emacs-ivy/0.9.1+dfsg-1 [ITP]
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 06:47:47AM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello Nicholas, > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 07:58:54PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > Would you please upload src:emacs-ivy at commit 9776992 if there are > > no further outstanding issues? doc/ivy-ox.el should not be installed, > > (see commit 3f130b9). > > Sorry, I haven't had the opportunity to review it yet. Dear Sean, Ah, I don't mean to rush you! My apologies, Nicholas signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#866088: marked as done (RFS: galternatives/0.13.5+nmu4+deb9u1)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2017 18:11:58 +0200 with message-id <1836a1a1-3f30-401d-d0db-f0b416775...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#864757: stretch-pu: package galternatives/0.13.5+nmu4+deb9u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #866088, regarding RFS: galternatives/0.13.5+nmu4+deb9u1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 866088: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=866088 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "galternatives" into *stable* (stretch-pu). * Package name: galternatives Version : 0.13.5+nmu4+deb9u1 Upstream Author : [not active] * URL : [defunct] * License : GPL-1+ Section : admin It builds those binary package(s): galternatives - graphical setup tool for the alternatives system To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/galternatives Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/galternatives/ galternatives_0.13.5+nmu4+deb9u1.dsc Alternatively, one can view built package on deb-o-matic-amd64: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#stable/galternatives/ 0.13.5+nmu4+deb9u1/buildlog Git repository on Alioth: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/galternatives.git/log/? h=stretch Changes since last upload: galternatives (0.13.5+nmu4+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium . * Adopt and switch maintainer information. * Fix the bug which causes properties window blank. Closes: #325172 Explanations: * This stable upload was approved by stable release managers. See http://bugs.debian.org/864757 . * Bug #325172 was already fixed in Debian testing/unstable in galternatives/ 0.13.6 . Regards, Boyuan Yang signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- > Looks good to me, feel free to upload. > uploaded. G. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message ---
Bug#866134: RFS: jajuk/1:1.10.9+dfsg2-3
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, hello Markus, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jajuk". This fixes a simple classpath error reported against Ubuntu. * Package name: jajuk Version : 1:1.10.9+dfsg2-3 Upstream Author : Bertrand Florat and The Jajuk Team * URL : http://www.jajuk.info * License : GPL-2+ Section : sound It builds those binary packages: jajuk - advanced jukebox and music organizer To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/jajuk Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/jajuk/jajuk_1.10.9+dfsg2-3.dsc Changes since the last upload: jajuk (1:1.10.9+dfsg2-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Include jgoodies-common.jar in classpath (LP: #1650019) * Update standards-version to 4.0.0 (no changes) -- Felix Natter Tue, 27 Jun 2017 16:45:50 +0200 Regards, -- Felix Natter
Bug#864428: RFS: bitfield/1.0.0-2 [ITP #864358]
Thank you very much for your help and comments. > libbitfield$SOVERSION (shared library) > libbitfield-dev (development files) Done. Package name changed from 'bitfield' to 'libbitfield' and SOVERSION is set to 1, so we get: libbitfield1 libbitfield-dev > If you don't have soversioning in place, then it probably means that your > software is still too volatile for you to think about a stable ABI / API. If > that's the case, then it is not a good candidate for packaging in Debian just > yet. Done. SO-versioning (and versioning policy in general) has been set. ABI /API has been stabilized. Version (1.0.0) has been released. Best regards, Vitalie Ciubotaru
Bug#866160: RFS: moka-icon-theme/5.3.6-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "moka-icon-theme" * Package name: moka-icon-theme Version : 5.3.6-1 Upstream Author : Sam Hewitt * URL : github.com/snwh/moka-icon-theme * License : GPL-3+/CC-BY-SA-4.0 Section : misc It builds those binary packages: moka-icon-theme - Tango-esque desktop icon set called Moka To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/moka-icon-theme Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/moka-icon-theme/moka-icon-theme_5.3.6-1.dsc Notes: have run linitian -i -I on the built .changes I have run check-all-the-things to confirm that no additional copyright reconciliation is required Changes since the last upload: * new upstream release - variety of new icons: elasticsearch, wxhexeditor, wxformbuilder, gtkhash, internet archive, zenmap, ubuntu-budgie, laptop-mode-tools, atlassian services, TI code composer studio - symlinks for apps that are comparable i.e. tilix > terminix, nmap > zenmap, budgie-remix > ubuntu-budgie, regedit > wine, wine-regedit > wine * Packaging Changes: - drop patch fix-overly-large-icons since this is now incorporated with the release - change debhelper and compat to v10 - update VCS fields from budgie-remix to UbuntuBudgie - update copyright field year from 2016 to 2016-2017 Regards, David Mohammed
Bug#866160: marked as done (RFS: moka-icon-theme/5.3.6-1)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2017 19:38:57 + (UTC) with message-id <1501357284.5662147.1498592337...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#866160: RFS: moka-icon-theme/5.3.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #866160, regarding RFS: moka-icon-theme/5.3.6-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 866160: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=866160 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "moka-icon-theme" * Package name: moka-icon-theme Version : 5.3.6-1 Upstream Author : Sam Hewitt * URL : github.com/snwh/moka-icon-theme * License : GPL-3+/CC-BY-SA-4.0 Section : misc It builds those binary packages: moka-icon-theme - Tango-esque desktop icon set called Moka To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/moka-icon-theme Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/moka-icon-theme/moka-icon-theme_5.3.6-1.dsc Notes: have run linitian -i -I on the built .changes I have run check-all-the-things to confirm that no additional copyright reconciliation is required Changes since the last upload: * new upstream release - variety of new icons: elasticsearch, wxhexeditor, wxformbuilder, gtkhash, internet archive, zenmap, ubuntu-budgie, laptop-mode-tools, atlassian services, TI code composer studio - symlinks for apps that are comparable i.e. tilix > terminix, nmap > zenmap, budgie-remix > ubuntu-budgie, regedit > wine, wine-regedit > wine * Packaging Changes: - drop patch fix-overly-large-icons since this is now incorporated with the release - change debhelper and compat to v10 - update VCS fields from budgie-remix to UbuntuBudgie - update copyright field year from 2016 to 2016-2017 Regards, David Mohammed --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- hello, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "moka-icon-theme" I like it G.--- End Message ---
Bug#865560: RFS: gexiv2/0.10.6-1
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 09:06:19PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gexiv2" > > I sponsored in deferred/10, but I have some questions/nitpicks: > 1) you can consider having a debian/clean file instead of overriding dh_clean I will do this. > 2) did you test/rebuild reverse-dependencies? I did, and they build and run fine, but... > 3) please fix testsuite > http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/gexiv2/0.10.6-1/autopkgtest For #3 - Thank you for catching this. This could have broken the build of reverse dependencies. This version adds "Requires.private: exiv2" to the pkg-config file to make static linking easier. It turns out that doing this means that the .pc file won't work without exiv2.pc also installed, even when not static linking. I will add libexiv2-dev as a dependency to libgexiv2-dev. I didn't notice this when I ran the tests because I already have libexiv2-dev installed. I see now that I could have run the tests in an sbuild schroot.
watch file is present but does not work?
When I upload my package contextfree to mentors.debian.net, in the QA information I get this: A watch file is present but doesn't work -- Scanning for watchfiles in . -- Found watchfile in ./debian -- Scan finished My watch file looks like this: version=4 options="pgpsigurlmangle=s%$%.asc%,dversionmangle=s/\+dfsg[0-9]*//,repacksuffix=+dfsg1" \ https://www.contextfreeart.org/downloads.html \ download/ContextFreeSource([\d\.]+)\.tar\.xz debian When I run uscan on my system it works just fine. When I bumped the upstream version, uscan determined that local was stale, downloaded the new source version, downloaded and verified the gpg signature, and repackaged a new orig.tar.xz file. Subsequent runs of uscan determine that local was up-to-date but downloaded and verifies the gpg signature anyway. What check does mentors do that my watch file is failing? -- john ~/contextfree-3.0.11.4+dfsg1$ uscan -v uscan info: uscan (version 2.16.2ubuntu3) See uscan(1) for help uscan info: Scan watch files in . uscan info: Check debian/watch and debian/changelog in . uscan info: package="contextfree" version="3.0.11.4+dfsg1-1" (as seen in debian/changelog) uscan info: package="contextfree" version="3.0.11.4+dfsg1" (no epoch/revision) uscan info: ./debian/changelog sets package="contextfree" version="3.0.11.4+dfsg1" uscan info: Process ./debian/watch (package=contextfree version=3.0.11.4+dfsg1) uscan info: Found upstream signing keyring: debian/upstream/signing-key.asc uscan info: opts: pgpsigurlmangle=s%$%.asc%,dversionmangle=s/\+dfsg[0-9]*//,repacksuffix=+dfsg1 uscan info: line: https://www.contextfreeart.org/downloads.html download/ContextFreeSource([\d\.]+)\.tar\.xz debian uscan info: Parsing pgpsigurlmangle=s%$%.asc% uscan info: Parsing dversionmangle=s/\+dfsg[0-9]*// uscan info: Parsing repacksuffix=+dfsg1 uscan info: line: https://www.contextfreeart.org/downloads.html download/ContextFreeSource([\d\.]+)\.tar\.xz debian uscan info: Last orig.tar.* tarball version (from debian/changelog): 3.0.11.4+dfsg1 uscan info: Last orig.tar.* tarball version (dversionmangled): 3.0.11.4 uscan info: Requesting URL: https://www.contextfreeart.org/downloads.html uscan info: Matching pattern: (?:(?:https://www.contextfreeart.org )?\/downloads\.html)?download/ContextFreeSource([\d\.]+)\.tar\.xz uscan info: Found the following matching hrefs on the web page (newest first): download/ContextFreeSource3.0.11.4.tar.xz (3.0.11.4) index=3.0.11.4-4 uscan info: Matching target for downloadurlmangle: https://www.contextfreeart.org/download/ContextFreeSource3.0.11.4.tar.xz uscan info: Upstream URL (downloadurlmangled): https://www.contextfreeart.org/download/ContextFreeSource3.0.11.4.tar.xz uscan info: Newest upstream tarball version selected for download (uversionmangled): 3.0.11.4 uscan info: Download filename (filenamemangled): ContextFreeSource3.0.11.4.tar.xz uscan: Newest version of contextfree on remote site is 3.0.11.4, local version is 3.0.11.4+dfsg1 (mangled local version is 3.0.11.4) uscan info:=> Package is up to date for from https://www.contextfreeart.org/download/ContextFreeSource3.0.11.4.tar.xz uscan info: Not downloading, using existing file: ContextFreeSource3.0.11.4.tar.xz uscan info: Downloading OpenPGP signature from https://www.contextfreeart.org/download/ContextFreeSource3.0.11.4.tar.xz.asc (pgpsigurlmangled) as ContextFreeSource3.0.11.4.tar.xz.pgp uscan info: Requesting URL: https://www.contextfreeart.org/download/ContextFreeSource3.0.11.4.tar.xz.asc uscan info: Verifying OpenPGP signature ContextFreeSource3.0.11.4.tar.xz.pgp for ContextFreeSource3.0.11.4.tar.xz gpgv: Signature made Tue 27 Jun 2017 07:25:54 PM PDT using RSA key ID F25D802B gpgv: Good signature from "John Horigan " uscan info: New orig.tar.* tarball version (oversionmangled): 3.0.11.4 uscan info: Executing internal command: mk-origtargz --package contextfree --version 3.0.11.4 --repack-suffix +dfsg1 --compression gzip --directory .. --copyright-file debian/copyright ../ContextFreeSource3.0.11.4.tar.xz uscan info: New orig.tar.* tarball version (after mk-origtargz): 3.0.11.4+dfsg1 uscan info: Successfully repacked ../ContextFreeSource3.0.11.4.tar.xz as ../contextfree_3.0.11.4+dfsg1.orig.tar.xz, deleting 701 files from it. uscan info: Scan finished ~/contextfree-3.0.11.4+dfsg1$ echo $? 1 ~/contextfree-3.0.11.4+dfsg1$
Re: watch file is present but does not work?
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 04:56:52AM +, John Horigan wrote: > When I upload my package contextfree to mentors.debian.net, in the QA > information I get this: > A watch file is present but doesn't work > -- Scanning for watchfiles in . > -- Found watchfile in ./debian > -- Scan finished > > My watch file looks like this: > version=4 Mentors doesn't support version=4. You can ignore this error. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#866193: RFS/ITP: node-universalify/0.1.0-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-universalify" * Package name: node-universalify Version : 0.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Ryan Zimmerman * URL : https://github.com/RyanZim/universalify * License : Expat Section : web It builds those binary packages: node-universalify - Make a callback- or promise-based function support both promises To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: https://mentors.debian.net/package/node-universalify Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/node-universalify/node-universalify_0.1.0-1.dsc It is packaged within the javascript team: Vcs-Browser: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-javascript/node-universalify.git Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-javascript/node-universalify.git It might be simple enough that you could directly dak me on it... Thanks, Snark on #debian-js and #debian-mentors
