Re: combined manpage with symlinks to multiple binaries across packages: how to do?

2016-07-10 Thread Christian Seiler
On 07/09/2016 12:20 AM, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> On 8 July 2016 at 23:53, Christian Seiler  wrote:
>>  - If I use dh_installman's ".so" feature to do automatic linking,
>>dh_installman will not replace the manpage with a link, because
>>it also doesn't see the link target. In that case, I get a
>>plain text file installed that just contains
>>   .so isns_config.5
>>Which man doesn't really interpret itself, and which is hence
>>completely useless.
> 
> That's strange, as normally man would interpret that, and it actually
> worked for me.

Ok, I re-checked, and it does indeed work. No idea why it didn't
in the first place (maybe I had a typo?), and thanks for making me
recheck this so I now have an elegant solution. Yay. :)

I'll update my package for the RFS bug to incorporate this.

Regards,
Christian



Bug#829242: RFS: open-isns/0.96-1 [ITP]

2016-07-10 Thread Christian Seiler
Dear mentors,

I've uploaded an updated version of the package to mentors
(and pushed to git), that incorporates the following two
changes:

 - debian/copyright:
  s/License: MIT/License: Expat/
 - use .so for manpages (see [1] an followups)

The package is available under:

https://mentors.debian.net/package/open-isns
dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/open-isns/open-isns_0.96-1.dsc
git clone https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-iscsi/open-isns.git -b 
debian/master

Best regards,
Christian

[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2016/07/msg00246.html



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#830682: RFS: engauge-digitizer/8.3-1

2016-07-10 Thread Tobias Winchen
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal


Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "engauge-digitizer"

 * Package name: engauge-digitizer
   Version : 8.3-1   
   Upstream Author : Mark Mitchell 
 * URL : https://github.com/markummitchell/engauge6
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : science

  It builds those binary packages:

engauge-digitizer - interactively extracts numbers from bitmap graphs or 
maps
 engauge-digitizer-doc - engauge-digitizer user manual and tutorial

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/engauge-digitizer


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/engauge-digitizer/engauge-digitizer_8.3-1.dsc

  More information about hello can be obtained from https://www.example.com.

  Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream release
- New grid line removal dialog (Closes: #426421) 
- Raw data export format for multiple curves available (Closes: 426579)
- Crosshair customizable (Closes: #426340) 
  * Updated description in control to be consistent with appdata
  * Removed obsolete dependency on libpng  
  * Enabled support for jpeg2000 and pdf formats 
  * Patch add_search_path_for_help included upstream 
  * Added appdata information
  * Use provided .desktop file


  Regards,
   Tobias Winchen



Re: pbuilder error

2016-07-10 Thread David Kalnischkies
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:27:03PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> I still have an yakkety chroot that needs update, and with the following 
> content
> 
> Acquire::http::Pipeline-Depth 0;
> #Acquire::http::No-Cache true;
> #Acquire::BrokenProxytrue;
> Debug::Acquire::http "true";
> Debug::pkgAcquire::Worker "true";
> Acquire::Progress::Ignore::ShowErrorText "true";
> 
> this is the output
> I: Copy  /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/00aptitude /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/00trustcdrom 
> /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/01-vendor-ubuntu /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/01autoremove 
> /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/01autoremove-kernels /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/10periodic 
> /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/15update-stamp /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/20archive 
> /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/20auto-upgrades /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/20dbus 
> /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50appstream /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades 
> /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/70debconf /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/99fixbadproxy 
> /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/99synaptic /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/99update-notifier  to 
> chroot
[…]
> >That causes apt (or to be specific: apts 'http' method) to display the HTTP
> >request it makes as well as the responses it gets while the second shows the
> >interprocess communication between apt and its methods (beware, lots of 
> >output).
> >And third causes apt to tell us the error it ignored, just for completeness.

H. I see your fixbadproxy config being copied, so I wonder whats up,
but its quite obvious that the options didn't take effect at all as, as
mentioned (in the quote), the first two are very noisy.


> >[aka: No need for wireshark or other "hard" debug stuff just yet, There
> >tends to be an option for everything in apt… so much that some are even
> >made up and people believe they exist: BrokenProxy from above ;) ]
[…]
> BTW googling for Acquire::BrokenProxy=true shows *lots* of results

I know, experts call it "placebo effect". ;)

As an APT developer I can certify that this option has no effect because
it doesn't exist (anymore). The option used to exist, git history tells
me that it was introduced on 1st April 2005 and less than a year later
(in Feb 2006, so more than a decade ago!) removed. In case you wonder:
signed Release files were a new thing at that point in time and the
option forced re-downloading of the Release.gpg file. That was fixed
later in a more automatic way & for a few years now apt prefers to use
a file called InRelease; only using the pair Release + Release.gpg if it
must so even if the code would be still there it wouldn't be reached in
your case. What makes this particularily funny is that it is suggested
to fix hashsum mismatches which it can't and never could: The error it
intended to workaround for the moment was "bad signature on the Release
file" (as an old signature in Release.gpg "obviously" doesn't apply to
a new Release file).

It probably was a bad idea to use such a catchy option name for such
a limited purpose code… or perhaps it a very clever april fouls joke
– who could tell the difference…


Best regards

David Kalnischkies


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Bug#829605: RFS: aspell-sk/2.02-0-0.1 [RC, NMU]

2016-07-10 Thread Pali Rohár
Hi! Now I updated package on mentors.debian.net. Look if it is better 
now or needs something else...

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: Call for review: Improving RFS template for mentors.debian.net

2016-07-10 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello,

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 06:13:03AM +0900, HAYASHI Kentaro wrote:
> P.S. Does anyone knows the way to check [RC] case easily - the package 
> contains
> fixed RC bugs
>  usually listed Closes:# in debian/changelog?

Yes: I think that's the only way you can find out.

-- 
Sean Whitton



Bug#829605: RFS: aspell-sk/2.02-0-0.1 [RC, NMU]

2016-07-10 Thread Andrew Shadura
I'll have a look / Skúsim sa na to pozrieť ;)

-- 
Cheers,
  Andrew
On 10 Jul 2016 13:00, "Pali Rohár"  wrote:

> Hi! Now I updated package on mentors.debian.net. Look if it is better
> now or needs something else...
>
> --
> Pali Rohár
> pali.ro...@gmail.com
>


Re: Call for review: Improving RFS template for mentors.debian.net

2016-07-10 Thread Jakub Wilk

* HAYASHI Kentaro , 2016-07-10, 06:13:

  Collect 'QA upload.' information by debianqa plugin
  https://github.com/debexpo/debexpo/pull/42


Um, that's... unusual way to search for a string. Have you tried using 
regular expressions? :)


Or alternatively, it might be simpler to look at the Maintainer field. 
The e-mail address should be packa...@qa.debian.org for all QA uploads.


P.S. Does anyone knows the way to check [RC] case easily - the package 
contains fixed RC bugs


debexpo already knows about bugs the upload would close and their 
severities. For example https://mentors.debian.net/package/aspell-sk 
reads:


| Package closes bugs
|
|aspell-sk:
|#603719 (normal): Please update package aspell-sk
|src:aspell-sk:
|#817360 (serious): aspell-sk: Removal of debhelper compat 4

--
Jakub Wilk



Bug#830697: RFS: minetest-mod-torches (ITP)

2016-07-10 Thread Julien Puydt

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "minetest-mod-torches"

 * Package name: minetest-mod-torches
   Version : 5-1
   Upstream Author : Blockmen and sofar
 * URL : https://github.com/minetest-mods/torches
 * License : LGPL-2.1+ and CC-BY-SA-3.0
   Section : games

  It builds those binary packages:

minetest-mod-torches - Minetest mod - A mesh-based torch replacing 
in-world torches


  To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://mentors.debian.net/package/minetest-mod-torches


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/minetest-mod-torches/minetest-mod-torches_5-1.dsc


 It is packaged within the Debian Games Team:
Vcs-Git: 
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-games/minetest-mod-torches.git 
Vcs-Browser: 
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-games/minetest-mod-torches.git


  Regards,
   Julien Puydt



Bug#830704: RFS: minetest-mod-advspawning (ITP)

2016-07-10 Thread Julien Puydt

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "minetest-mod-advspawning"

 * Package name: minetest-mod-advspawning
   Version : 0.0.13-1
   Upstream Author : sapier
 * URL : https://github.com/sapier/adv_spawning
 * License : WTFPL
   Section : games

  It builds those binary packages:

minetest-mod-advspawning

  To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://mentors.debian.net/package/minetest-mod-advspawning


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/minetest-mod-torches/minetest-mod-advspawning_0.0.13-1.dsc


 It is packaged within the Debian Games Team:
Vcs-Git: 
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-games/minetest-mod-adv_spawning.git
Vcs-Browser: 
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-games/minetest-mod-advspawning.git


  Regards,
   Julien Puydt



Bug#830711: RFS: adabrowse/4.0.3-7

2016-07-10 Thread Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Hello,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "adabrowse"

 * Package name: adabrowse
   Version : 4.0.3-7
   Upstream Author : Thomas Wolf 
 * URL : http://home.datacomm.ch/t_wolf/tw/ada95/adabrowse/
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : devel

  It builds those binary packages:

adabrowse  - HTML generator for Ada 95 library unit specifications

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  https://mentors.debian.net/package/adabrowse


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/adabrowse/adabrowse_4.0.3-7.dsc

The package has been transitioned to the gnat-6 compiler and thus fixes
bugs #827099 and #830401. I would be glad if someone uploaded this
package for me.

Regards,
Adrian



Bug#830724: RFS: minetest-mod-mobf-core (ITP)

2016-07-10 Thread Julien Puydt

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "minetest-mod-mobf-core"

 * Package name: minetest-mod-mobf-core
   Version : 2.5.1-1
   Upstream Author : sapier
 * URL : https://github.com/sapier/mobf_core
 * License : CC-BY-SA-3.0
   Section : games

  It builds those binary packages:

minetest-mod-mobf-core - Minetest modpack providing a framework for 
creating mobs

 minetest-mod-mobf-trap - Minetest mod providing traps for mobs

  To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://mentors.debian.net/package/minetest-mod-mobf-core


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/minetest-mod-mobf-core/minetest-mod-mobf-core_2.5.1-1.dsc


  It is packaged within the Debian Games Team as:
Vcs-Git: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-games/minetest-mod-mobf-core.git
Vcs-Browser: 
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-games/minetest-mod-mobf-core.git


  Notice that minetest-mod-mobf-trap depends on 
minetest-mod-animalmaterials which is another package I'm preparing (and 
which in turn depends on the binary minetest-mod-mobf-core!).


  Regards,
   Julien Puydt



How to upgrade my gpg key to debian standards?

2016-07-10 Thread Paul Elliott
I am looking at upgrading my gpg key.

What parameters should I use?

Is there a standard way to get all the people that signed
the old key to sign the new key?

Thank You.

-- 
Paul Elliott   1(512)837-1096
pelli...@blackpatchpanel.com   3300 Plaza Drive, apt 1
http://www.free.blackpatchpanel.com/pme/   New Albany, IN 47150


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: How to upgrade my gpg key to debian standards?

2016-07-10 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello,

On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 06:39:27PM -0400, Paul Elliott wrote:
> I am looking at upgrading my gpg key.
>
> What parameters should I use?

Do you mean increasing the key length, or other stuff too?

For the other stuff, here are some nice links:

- https://debian-administration.org/users/dkg/weblog/48
- https://help.riseup.net/en/security/message-security/openpgp/best-practices
- the hopenpgp-tools package to check your key -- very useful!

> Is there a standard way to get all the people that signed
> the old key to sign the new key?

Some people use transition statements like this one:



However, most Debian people will want to meet you in person again in
order to re-sign your key.

-- 
Sean Whitton



Bug#807763: marked as done (RFS: tomahawk-player/0.8.4+dfsg1-1 [ITP])

2016-07-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jul 2016 04:32:01 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: tomahawk-player/0.8.4+dfsg1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #807763,
regarding RFS: tomahawk-player/0.8.4+dfsg1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
807763: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=807763
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tomahawk-player"

* Package name: tomahawk-player
  Version : 0.8.4-1 
  Upstream Author : Christian Muehlhaeuser 
* URL : http://tomahawk-player.org
* License : GPL-3+
  Section : libs


It builds those binary packages:

 libtomahawk - Core libraries for tomahawk
 libtomahawk-dev - Core libraries for tomahawk – development files
 tomahawk   - Multi source music player
 tomahawk-dbg - Multi source music player - debugging symbols

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/tomahawk-player


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tomahawk-player/tomahawk-player_0.8.4-1.dsc

At the moment there is only one missing dependence libjreen, which is waiting 
in the "new"-queue. 
Because of the complexity of the software and the package, I decide to ask for 
a revision now.

I have some questions about the package. 

How can I handle the lintian error message "source-is-missing"? 
I'm unable to find the source code of this JavaScript files in the internet.

Do I have to cleanup the source code and remove all windows/mac related files? 

Kind Regards,
   Stefan Ahlers
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package tomahawk-player has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---


Bug#830753: RFS: minetest-mod-animalmaterials (ITP)

2016-07-10 Thread Julien Puydt

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "minetest-mod-animalmaterials"

 * Package name: minetest-mod-animalmaterials
   Version : 0.1.3-1
   Upstream Author : sapier
 * URL : https://github.com/sapier/animalmaterials
 * License : CC-BY-SA-3.0, CC-0 and animalmaterials-license
   Section : games

  It builds those binary packages:

minetest-mod-animalmaterials - Minetest mod providing models for 
animals


  To access further information about this package, please visit the 
following URL:


  https://mentors.debian.net/package/minetest-mod-animalmaterials


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/minetest-mod-animalmaterials/minetest-mod-animalmaterials_0.1.3-1.dsc


  It is packaged within the Debian Games Team repository:
Vcs-Git: 
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-games/minetest-mod-animalmaterials.git 

 Vcs-Browser: 
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-games/minetest-mod-animalmaterials.git



  Regards,
   Julien Puydt