dh-autoreconf: aclocal: rename aclocal.m4 to acinclude.m4

2014-12-11 Thread Jerome BENOIT
Hello Forum,

aclocal rewrite the aclocal.m4 files, so precious information can be lost:
a workaround is to rename the `aclocal.m4' files `acinclude.m4'.

When this renaming process can take place ? in d/rules ? at the repacking stage 
?

Thanks in advance,
Jerome


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5489a317.4010...@rezozer.net



Re: dh-autoreconf: aclocal: rename aclocal.m4 to acinclude.m4

2014-12-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:

> aclocal rewrite the aclocal.m4 files, so precious information can be lost:
> a workaround is to rename the `aclocal.m4' files `acinclude.m4'.
>
> When this renaming process can take place ? in d/rules ? at the repacking 
> stage ?

Upstream would be best.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6GODDhYe5ouvi_JCOqfWUmASwUYLU+6DZO_Ty6m=av...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#770449: ITP, RFS for Caml Crush package

2014-12-11 Thread Thomas Calderon
On 02/12/2014 13:34, Thomas Calderon wrote:
> On 24/11/2014 18:01, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
>> Le 21/11/2014 13:31, Thomas Calderon a écrit :
>>> I submitted an ITP (#770296) and an RFS (#770449) request regarding the
>>> packaging of Caml Crush.
>>> [...]
>>
>> First remarks:
>>
>> 1. There is a "debian" directory in the upstream tarball, is that
>>intentional? Keep in mind that is is ignored in favour of the
>>one in .debian.tar.xz; the two agree for now, but this might
>>change in the future.
>> 2. Shouldn't the SOs of caml-crush-clients be installed in their own
>>directory? Have you compared with existing PKCS#11 providers?
>>Moreover, this might remove the need for Lintian overrides.
>> 3. Consider the "Account Naming" section of [1].
>> 4. Why do you enumerate architectures instead of using
>>"Architecture: any"? Is the lack of arm64 on purpose?
>> 5. I am suspicious about the package not using dh-ocaml. Especially on
>>bytecode architectures.
>>
>> [1] https://wiki.debian.org/AccountHandlingInMaintainerScripts
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for the initial review.
> 
> 1. I have split the debian-related files from the master branch. I will
> now use "upstream" and "debian" branches instead. Therefore, release
> tarballs will not contain this directory.
> 2. You were right, there was no valid reason to have the SOs directly in
> /usr/lib, I moved them to /usr/lib//caml-crush. This has indeed
> the positive effect of suppressing the lintian issues.
> 3. I switched to the "Debian-pkcs11proxyd" system account and group.
> 4. Since we rely on OCaml native compilers, I switched from the
> ocaml-nox build dependency to ocaml-native-compilers and have
> "Architecture: any" instead.
> 5. Since Caml Crush does not (yet) support using bytecode-only
> architecture, we rely on ocaml-native-compilers to restrict the
> supported architectures.
> 
> I have uploaded a new version on mentors.debian.net
> 
> Regards,
> 
Hi Stephane,

Did you have the time to look at the up-to-date package I uploaded to
mentors (1.0.4) ?



-- 
Cordialement,

Thomas Calderon
Laboratoire architectures matérielles et logicielles
Sous-direction expertise
ANSSI
Tél: 01 71 75 88 55


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5489a6b9.4080...@ssi.gouv.fr



Bug#772840: RFS: pyzolib/0.3.3-1 [ITP] -- Utilities for the Pyzo environment

2014-12-11 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyzolib":

* Package name: pyzolib
  Version : 0.3.3
  Upstream Author : Almar Klein 
* URL : https://bitbucket.org/pyzo/pyzolib
* License : BSD
  Section : Science

It builds those binary packages:

 python-pyzolib - Utilities for the Pyzo environment (Python 2)
 python3-pyzolib - Utilities for the Pyzo environment (Python 3)

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

 http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/pyzolib.git

I am intending to ask for a sponsor via the sponsorship of blends.


Changes since the last upload:

  Initial release (Closes: #772825)


Regards,
- Ghislain


Bug#772751: marked as done (RFS: osm2pgsql/0.87.0-1~exp1)

2014-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:27:27 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: osm2pgsql/0.87.0-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #772751,
regarding RFS: osm2pgsql/0.87.0-1~exp1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
772751: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772751
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "osm2pgsql"

 Package name: osm2pgsql
 Version : 0.87.0-1~exp1
 Upstream Author : Kai Krueger 
 URL : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osm2pgsql
 License : GPL-2+
 Section : utils

It builds those binary packages:

 osm2pgsql - OpenStreetMap data to PostgreSQL converter

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/osm2pgsql


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/osm2pgsql/osm2pgsql_0.87.0-1~exp1.dsc

More information about osm2pgsql can be obtained from 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osm2pgsql.

Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream release.
  * Add upstream metadata.
  * Update watch file to rename downloaded tarball.
  * Add Boost build dependencies for C++ build.
  * Enable verbose test output.
  * Ignore test failures, some tests require a configured postgres
database.
  * Update copyright file, changes:
- Add Upstream-Name header
- Update Files sections for C++ files
- Update Source URL to match watch file URL
- Fix geos-fallback license, GEOS uses LGPL-2.1+ not LGPL-3+
- Add Copyright & License for win_fsync.h


Regards,
 Bas Couwenberg
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package osm2pgsql version 0.87.0-1~exp1 is in experimental now.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/osm2pgsql--- End Message ---


Bug#772770: marked as done (RFS: openstreetmap-map-icons/1:0.0.svn30838-1~exp1)

2014-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:27:28 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: openstreetmap-map-icons/1:0.0.svn30838-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #772770,
regarding RFS: openstreetmap-map-icons/1:0.0.svn30838-1~exp1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
772770: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772770
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openstreetmap-map-icons"

 Package name: openstreetmap-map-icons
 Version : 1:0.0.svn30838-1~exp1
 Upstream Author : Joerg Ostertag  & Guenther Meyer 
.
 URL : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Map_Icons
 License : public-domain
 Section : utils

It builds those binary packages:

 openstreetmap-map-icons-classic  - Collection of map icons (classic set)
 openstreetmap-map-icons-square   - Collection of map icons (square set)
 openstreetmap-map-icons-scalable - Collection of map icons (scalable set)

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/openstreetmap-map-icons


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openstreetmap-map-icons/openstreetmap-map-icons_1:0.0.svn30838-1~exp1.dsc

More information about openstreetmap-map-icons can be obtained from 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Map_Icons.

Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream SVN snapshot.
  * Fix version in dch example to include epoch.


Regards,
 Bas Couwenberg
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package openstreetmap-map-icons version 1:0.0.svn30838-1~exp1 is in 
experimental now.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/openstreetmap-map-icons--- End Message ---


Bug#772768: marked as done (RFS: josm/0.0.svn7778+dfsg1-1~exp1)

2014-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:27:28 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: josm/0.0.svn7778+dfsg1-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #772768,
regarding RFS: josm/0.0.svn7778+dfsg1-1~exp1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
772768: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772768
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "josm"

 Package name: josm
 Version : 0.0.svn7778+dfsg1-1~exp1
 Upstream Author : JOSM Developers 
 URL : http://josm.openstreetmap.de
 License : GPL-2+
 Section : utils

It builds those binary packages:

 josm  - Editor for OpenStreetMap
 josm-l10n - Editor for OpenStreetMap - translation files

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/josm


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/josm/josm_0.0.svn7778+dfsg1-1~exp1.dsc

More information about JOSM can be obtained from http://josm.openstreetmap.de.

Changes since the last upload:

  * New tested snapshot () + next revision to include logo fix for Linux.
Thanks to Vincent Privat for the notification about the logo fix.
  * Update watch file to use the pkg-grass JOSM Redirector.
  * Update copyright file:
- Add comment with the GPL-2+/GPL-3+/Apache-2.0 information from LICENSE
  file
- Correct license from GPL-3+ to GPL-2+ for JOSM
- Update JOSM contributors list
- Add License section for GPL-2 with Classpath exception and CDDL-1.1
- Add Files section for Glassfish JSON source using GPL-2 with Classpath
  exception or CDDL-1.1
- Add License section for BSD-2-Clause
- Add Files section for openhours Javascript source using BSD-2-Clause
- Add License section for GPL-1+
- Add Files section for Diff source using GPL-1+
- Correct license from GPL-3+ to BSD-3-Clause for JOSM translations.
(LP: #1273178)
  * Strip comments from translations, but preserve copyright header.
  * Install the appstream appdata.xml file.
Thanks to Marcus Lundblad for the patch.
(closes: #770881)
  * Add upstream metadata.
  * Refresh patches.


Regards,
 Bas Couwenberg
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package josm version 0.0.svn7778+dfsg1-1~exp1 is in experimental now.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/josm--- End Message ---


Bug#772614: marked as done (RFS: qgis/2.6.1-1~exp1)

2014-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 11 Dec 2014 16:27:27 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: qgis/2.6.1-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #772614,
regarding RFS: qgis/2.6.1-1~exp1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
772614: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772614
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qgis"

 Package name: qgis
 Version : 2.6.1-1~exp1
 Upstream Author : qgis-develo...@lists.osgeo.org
 URL : http://qgis.org/
 License : GPL-2+
 Section : science

It builds those binary packages:

 qgis - Geographic Information System (GIS)
 qgis-common  - QGIS - architecture-independent data
 libqgis-core2.6.1- QGIS - shared core library
 libqgis-gui2.6.1 - QGIS - shared gui library
 libqgis-analysis2.6.1- QGIS - shared analysis library
 libqgis-networkanalysis2.6.1 - QGIS - shared network analysis library
 libqgisgrass2.6.1- QGIS - shared grass library
 libqgispython2.6.1   - QGIS - shared Python library
 libqgis-customwidgets2.6.1   - QGIS custom widgets for Qt Designer
 libqgis-dev  - QGIS - development files
 qgis-plugin-grass- GRASS plugin for QGIS
 qgis-plugin-grass-common - GRASS plugin for QGIS - 
architecture-independent data
 qgis-plugin-globe- OSG globe plugin for QGIS
 qgis-plugin-globe-common - OSG globe plugin for QGIS - 
architecture-independent data
 python-qgis  - Python bindings to QGIS
 python-qgis-common   - Python bindings to QGIS - 
architecture-independent files
 qgis-providers   - collection of data providers to QGIS
 qgis-providers-common- collection of data providers to QGIS - 
architecture-independent files
 qgis-server  - QGIS server providing various OGC services
 qgis-api-doc - QGIS API documentation

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/qgis


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qgis/qgis_2.6.1-1~exp1.dsc

More information about QGIS can be obtained from http://qgis.org/.

Changes since the last upload:

  [ Jürgen E. Fischer ]
  * Release of 2.6.1

  [ Bas Couwenberg ]
  * New upstream release.
  * Add upstream metadata.
  * Refresh patches.
  * Update symbols for amd64.
  * Replace qgis-mapserver by qgis-server using Provides/Conflicts/Replaces.
  * Add patch from release-2_6 branch to fix layer selection issue.


Regards,
 Bas Couwenberg
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package qgis has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---


Re: dh-autoreconf: aclocal: rename aclocal.m4 to acinclude.m4

2014-12-11 Thread Jakub Wilk

* Paul Wise , 2014-12-11, 22:17:

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
aclocal rewrite the aclocal.m4 files, so precious information can be 
lost: a workaround is to rename the `aclocal.m4' files `acinclude.m4'.


When this renaming process can take place ? in d/rules ? at the 
repacking stage ?


Upstream would be best.


Indeed!

And until it's fixed upstream, I'd suggest to rename it in debian/rules.
Don't forget to rename it back in the clean target. :-)

--
Jakub Wilk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141211172444.ga8...@jwilk.net



Bug#772840: RFS: pyzolib/0.3.3-1 [ITP] -- Utilities for the Pyzo environment

2014-12-11 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
I have added an entry for pyzolib in the SoB page [1]. For some reason, I
could not
access the tasks/ under /git/debian-science to edit any of the task files.
Has it been
moved to anywhere else ?

This package is pretty straightforward, pure Python, no deps and lintian
clean. AFAIK,
it is only meant to exist as a dependency to IEP.

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends/SoB#preview

Cheers,
- Ghis


Bug#772895: RFS: osm2pgsql/0.87.0-1~exp2

2014-12-11 Thread Bas Couwenberg
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "osm2pgsql"

 Package name: osm2pgsql
 Version : 0.87.0-1~exp2
 Upstream Author : Kai Krueger 
 URL : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osm2pgsql
 License : GPL-2+
 Section : utils

It builds those binary packages:

 osm2pgsql - OpenStreetMap data to PostgreSQL converter

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/osm2pgsql


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/osm2pgsql/osm2pgsql_0.87.0-1~exp2.dsc

More information about osm2pgsql can be obtained from 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osm2pgsql.

Changes since the last upload:

  * Add patch to not use Boost lockfree queues even for Boost >= 1.53,
hopefully fixes the FTBFS on arm64, armel, powerpc, ppc64el & s390x.


Regards,
 Bas Couwenberg


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20141212004626.11800.41639.report...@osiris.linuxminded.xs4all.nl



Bug#772769: marked as done (RFS: josm-plugins/0.0.svn30838+ds1-1~exp1)

2014-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 12 Dec 2014 04:24:27 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: josm-plugins/0.0.svn30838+ds1-1~exp1
has caused the Debian Bug report #772769,
regarding RFS: josm-plugins/0.0.svn30838+ds1-1~exp1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
772769: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772769
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "josm-plugins"

 Package name: josm-plugins
 Version : 0.0.svn30838+ds1-1~exp1
 Upstream Author : JOSM Developers
 URL : http://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Plugins
 License : GPL
 Section : science

It builds those binary packages:

 josm-plugins - Plugins for JOSM

To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/josm-plugins


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/j/josm-plugins/josm-plugins_0.0.svn30838+ds1-1~exp1.dsc

More information about josm-plugins can be obtained from 
http://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Plugins.

Changes since the last upload:

  * New upstream SVN snapshot.
  * Bump JOSM dependency to 7778.
  * Refresh patches.


Regards,
 Bas Couwenberg
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package josm-plugins version 0.0.svn30838+ds1-1~exp1 is in experimental now.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/josm-plugins--- End Message ---


launchpad for debian and autobuilders

2014-12-11 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi,


do you know if exist some place where someone could dput a debian source 
package and it was built in a clean environtment for a debian distro, as  
launchpad service for ubuntu?

And, if it doesn't exist, could some of you explain why we don't have this? 
Or, should I have to create a something similar to a jenkins infrastructure to 
test and build my own packages?

Best regards,

Leopold




-- 
--
Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Bug#764460: libu2f-host update

2014-12-11 Thread Simon Josefsson
Hi.  I have updated libu2f-host-dpkg and uploaded new packages to
mentors.d.n -- see http://mentors.debian.net/package/libu2f-host --
with the following changes:

* Update to latest upstream 0.0.2 version.

* u2f-host.pdf is included in the -dev package (the PDF is for
  programmers, not users, since it covers the C library API).  I also
  installed the GTK-DOC HTML files.  Please review doc-base etc and
  other files related to this.

* The watchfile is fixed.

As far as I am aware, all outstanding issues are resolved -- please
take a look at the package and upload it if you feel comfortable
sponsoring it!

/Simon


pgplZnpjdUxdy.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur