Bug#771774: RFS: libmongo-client/0.1.8-2 [ITA]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libmongo-client" Package name: libmongo-client Version : 0.1.8-2 Upstream Author : Gergely Nagy URL : https://github.com/algernon/libmongo-client License : Apache-2.0, GPL-2+ Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libmongo-client-dev - Development files for the alternate C driver for MongoDB libmongo-client-doc - Documentation for the alternate C driver for MongoDB libmongo-client0 - Alternate C driver for the MongoDB document-oriented datastore libmongo-client0-dbg - Alternate C driver for MongoDB (debugging symbols) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/libmongo-client Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libm/libmongo-client/libmongo-client_0.1.8-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: * New Maintainer (Closes: #770801). * debian/contol: - Set myself as maintainer. - Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6 (no changes required). - Change Vcs-* to collab-maint since old Vcs is not longer available. * debian/copyright: - Add missing license for tests/tools/*. - Add myself to the list of authors for debian/*. * debian/rules: - Remove useless override_dh_builddeb: xz is now standard. - Remove oldstyle debhelper parts. * debian/watch: - disabled because upstream repository contains debian tarballs. Regards, Jörg Frings-Fürst -- New: GPG Fingerprint: 63E0 075F C8D4 3ABB 35AB 30EE 09F8 9F3C 8CA1 D25D GPG Key: 8CA1D25D CAcert Key S/N: 0E:D4:56 Old (will be revoked after 2014-12-31): pgp Fingerprint: 7D13 3C60 0A10 DBE1 51F8 EBCB 422B 44B0 BE58 1B6E pgp Key: BE581B6E Jörg Frings-Fürst D-54526 Niederkail Threema: SYR8SJXB IRC: j_...@freenode.net j_...@oftc.net signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Big data is needed for unit test
Hi and thank you for your answer I'm working on the packaging of fw4spl (a medical software), and I'm faced with a new problematic : One of the unit tests needs to load an important data file, which has a big size (~200 Mo). I assume you mean 200MB here. Yes, I do. Should I simply remove this test, or can I include the data file in the package ? Can you include more details about this data file? What data format is the file in? It is a .jsonz file. What license is the file under? It hasn't any license. Does upstream ship the file in the same source package? Actually the file isn't into the source package. I've the choice, and it's why I would use the best practice. // If you can get upstream to include a smaller test-case or generate one at runtime, that would probably be a good idea. I don't understand. I've just one single data file for the test. How can I include a "smaller" test-case ? If upstream ships the file separately to the source, please use the multi-orig.tar.gz support in 3.0 source packages so that updates to the source but not the test data don't add 200MB to snapshot.d.o for every new upstream release. If upstream doesn't ship the file separately it might be useful to do so for this reason. It seems to be the better solution in my case... Thank you for your advice ! Best regards, Corentin Desfarges
Re: Big data is needed for unit test
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 11:12:35AM +0100, Corentin Desfarges wrote: > >What license is the file under? > > It hasn't any license. Then it's license is the default "all rights reserved", you can't redistribute it, you can't change it, you can't do anything, and you can't use it without explicit permission from it's copyright holder. Of course you can't upload it to the debian archive (see DFSG). Please check better, given that it is the test case of a free software maybe also the data are free. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 4096R/B9444540 http://goo.gl/I8TMB more about me: http://mapreri.org Launchpad User: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri Ubuntu Wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MattiaRizzolo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Big data is needed for unit test
Then it's license is the default "all rights reserved", you can't redistribute it, you can't change it, you can't do anything, and you can't use it without explicit permission from it's copyright holder. Of course you can't upload it to the debian archive (see DFSG). Please check better, given that it is the test case of a free software maybe also the data are free. In fact I'm not sure that the file hasn't license. I meant that I've not found any indication about the license of this file. But, I work for the company which develops the software, so I've asked the question to the responsible, and now I'm waiting for their answer. Thank you ! Best regards, Corentin Desfarges -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/547d9e59.6000...@gmail.com
Bug#770449: ITP, RFS for Caml Crush package
On 24/11/2014 18:01, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > Le 21/11/2014 13:31, Thomas Calderon a écrit : >> I submitted an ITP (#770296) and an RFS (#770449) request regarding the >> packaging of Caml Crush. >> [...] > > First remarks: > > 1. There is a "debian" directory in the upstream tarball, is that >intentional? Keep in mind that is is ignored in favour of the >one in .debian.tar.xz; the two agree for now, but this might >change in the future. > 2. Shouldn't the SOs of caml-crush-clients be installed in their own >directory? Have you compared with existing PKCS#11 providers? >Moreover, this might remove the need for Lintian overrides. > 3. Consider the "Account Naming" section of [1]. > 4. Why do you enumerate architectures instead of using >"Architecture: any"? Is the lack of arm64 on purpose? > 5. I am suspicious about the package not using dh-ocaml. Especially on >bytecode architectures. > > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/AccountHandlingInMaintainerScripts > > > Cheers, > Hi, Thanks for the initial review. 1. I have split the debian-related files from the master branch. I will now use "upstream" and "debian" branches instead. Therefore, release tarballs will not contain this directory. 2. You were right, there was no valid reason to have the SOs directly in /usr/lib, I moved them to /usr/lib//caml-crush. This has indeed the positive effect of suppressing the lintian issues. 3. I switched to the "Debian-pkcs11proxyd" system account and group. 4. Since we rely on OCaml native compilers, I switched from the ocaml-nox build dependency to ocaml-native-compilers and have "Architecture: any" instead. 5. Since Caml Crush does not (yet) support using bytecode-only architecture, we rely on ocaml-native-compilers to restrict the supported architectures. I have uploaded a new version on mentors.debian.net Regards, -- Cordialement, Thomas Calderon Laboratoire architectures matérielles et logicielles Sous-direction expertise ANSSI Tél: 01 71 75 88 55 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/547db1c1.5000...@ssi.gouv.fr
Re: Big data is needed for unit test
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Corentin Desfarges wrote: > It is a .jsonz file. I assume that is a gzip compressed JSON file. > Actually the file isn't into the source package. I've the choice, and it's > why I would use the best practice. Please keep it separate then, it is better for Debian to do that. > I don't understand. I've just one single data file for the test. How can I > include a "smaller" test-case ? I don't know enough about the software and the file we are talking about to answer that. Can you link to the file we are talking about? -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6FYYkZEpRdUL+rirSE=5jeoaoeodfqv4hogz0kuee4...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Re: Big data is needed for unit test
I don't know enough about the software and the file we are talking about to answer that. The "software" (fw4spl) is a framework focused on processing and visualization of medical images. Here, the repository of the project : [1] Can you link to the file we are talking about? With the authorization of the responsibles of the project, I published the file here [2] Best Regards, Corentin Desfarges [1] https://code.google.com/p/fw4spl/ [2] http://goo.gl/53sAzM -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/547de8d8.6020...@gmail.com
Bug#740032: marked as done (RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0.1-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Tue, 02 Dec 2014 16:26:49 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0.1-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #740032, regarding RFS: sweethome3d-textures/1.0.1-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 740032: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=740032 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sweethome3d-textures" * Package name: sweethome3d-textures Version : 1.0-1 Upstream Author : Emmanuel Puybaret eTeks * URL : http://www.sweethome3d.com/ * License : CC-BY-4.0 International Programming Lang: no code, zip archives containing properties files and jpeg images Description : Interior 2D design application with 3D preview (additional textures) Section : graphics Upstream started releasing additional textures libraries: http://www.sweethome3d.com/blog/2014/02/24/textures_libraries_1_0.html It builds those binary packages: sweethome3d-textures - Interior 2D design application with 3D preview (additional textures) To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/sweethome3d-textures Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sweethome3d-textures/sweethome3d-textures_1.0-1.dsc Regards, -- G..e --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package sweethome3d-textures has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---
Bug#770638: RFS: python-cachetools/0.7.0-1 [ITP]
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 10:08:01PM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote: > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-cachetools/python-cachetools_0.7.0-1.dsc > > Changes since the last upload: > > * Initial release. Closes: #767298 Uploaded and tagged, thanks! -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#770636: RFS: gitinspector/0.3.2+dfsg-1 [ITP]
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 09:56:33PM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote: > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gitinspector/gitinspector_0.3.2+dfsg-1.dsc > > Changes since the last upload: > > * Initial release. Closes: #768508 Uploaded, thanks! I didn't tag this in SVN because Add-missing-HTML-footer-to-htmlembedded-output.patch is newer in the mentors package, please commit it and tag. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Re: Big data is needed for unit test
Hi, Quoting Corentin Desfarges (2014-12-02 17:29:12) > > Can you link to the file we are talking about? > With the authorization of the responsibles of the project, I published the > file here [2] > [2] http://goo.gl/53sAzM this looks a bit weird. I guess this google thing allows you to inspect the content of zip files? The 178 MiB file in question named md_1.jsonz is not a gzipped json file as the name suggests but a zip archive which contains a 1.4 MiB json file with metadata and 470 MiB of what seems to be binary data. If you want to add more complexity to compress this further and save space, you could add the md_1.jsonz file to a Debian source package in its *unzipped* version. The xz compressor will then be able to compress the data down to 120 MiB (with both, -9 and -9e). During build time you would then zip the content again (with --compression-method=store for speed because size doesn't matter now) because I guess your software expects the data in this zipped format and cannot handle it in unpacked form. This method would allow you to safe another 58 MiB in comparison to just adding the original file. I guess it is up to you whether you want to do it like that to reduce file size or not because as pabs already pointed out, there are already source packages in Debian that are larger than 200 MiB. So this is just an idea :) cheers, josch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141202182705.6173.3052@hoothoot
Bug#771860: RFS: gnucheese/1.00-1
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnucheese" * Package name: gnucheese Version : 1.00-1 Upstream Author : Michel Van den Bergh * URL : http://hardy.uhasselt.be/GnuCheese * License : GPL Section : games It builds those binary packages: gnucheese - Modern chess engine based on GNU Chess 5.07. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gnucheese Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnucheese/gnucheese_1.00-1.dsc More information about gnucheese can be obtained from http://hardy.uhasselt.be/GnuCheese . Changes since the last upload: * Initial release (Closes: #771853) Regards, Michel Van den Bergh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/547e3efe.8040...@uhasselt.be
Bug#770636: RFS: gitinspector/0.3.2+dfsg-1 [ITP]
On 2014-12-02 18:42, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 09:56:33PM +0100, Christian Kastner wrote: >> dget -x >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gitinspector/gitinspector_0.3.2+dfsg-1.dsc >> >> Changes since the last upload: >> >> * Initial release. Closes: #768508 > Uploaded, thanks! I didn't tag this in SVN because > Add-missing-HTML-footer-to-htmlembedded-output.patch is newer in the > mentors package, please commit it and tag. Ow. Apparently I added an Applied-Upstream header to the patch, but forgot to commit that. Corrected, then tagged. Thank you very much for sponsoring gitinspector and python-cachetools! Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/547e5f5a.8050...@kvr.at
Re: Re: Big data is needed for unit test
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Corentin Desfarges wrote: > With the authorization of the responsibles of the project, I published the > file here [2] It contains the names of one patient and his birth date so that probably wasn't a good idea. This file appears to contain CT scan results in a custom format? I can't view the scan itself as the software isn't packaged yet :) I was able to view the metadata though. Back to the original question of reducing the size of the data: You could unzip the file, remove all of the large .raw files and leave some small ones, modify root.json to remove the entries for .raw files you removed and then zip the file up again. I'm not sure if this would result in a valid file or not. You could also do another scan at a much lower resolution if that is possible with the equipment you have. Anyway, I don't consider the size to be a big issue as long as you put the data in a second orig.tar.gz. An example of this can be seen here: http://snapshot.debian.org/package/megaglest-data/3.7.1-1/ http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20130918T21Z/pool/main/m/megaglest-data/megaglest-data_3.7.1-1.dsc > [2] http://goo.gl/... Google Drive is very unfriendly to people who turn off JS, Cookies etc, next time please upload the file to somewhere else and link directly to the file download URL instead of indirect ways to find the file. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caktje6ecs5jfdfmwezxckb-_9gsaw0og0twn7bgbybag02p...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#769810: marked as done (RFS: phamm/0.6.2-1.1 [RC][NMU])
Your message dated Wed, 03 Dec 2014 04:25:34 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: phamm/0.6.2-1.1 [RC][NMU] has caused the Debian Bug report #769810, regarding RFS: phamm/0.6.2-1.1 [RC][NMU] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 769810: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769810 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "phamm" It builds those binary packages: phamm - PHP front-end to manage virtual services on LDAP - main package phamm-ldap - PHP front-end to manage virtual services on LDAP - back-end files phamm-ldap-amavis - PHP front-end to manage virtual services on LDAP - back-end files phamm-ldap-vacation - PHP front-end to manage virtual services on LDAP - back-end files To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/phamm Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/phamm/phamm_0.6.2-1.1.dsc Changes since the last upload: phamm (0.6.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload. * Add support for apache2.4 (Closes: #669841): - Move conffile from /etc/phamm/apache.conf to /etc/apache2/conf-available/phamm.conf - let dh_apache2 handle the conffile - drop debconf entries reconfigure-webserver and restart-webserver: Only apache2 is supported, and dh_apache2 causes automatic reload. - Remove obsolete apache1 and apache2.2 conf.d/ links on upgrade. * Added Dutch translation (Closes: #763643). Thanks Frans Spiesschaert. -- Jean-Michel Nirgal Vourgère Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:15:52 +0100 Regards, Jean-Michel Vourgère signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package phamm version 0.6.2-1.1 is in unstable now. http://packages.qa.debian.org/phamm--- End Message ---
