RFS: splash -- visualisation tool astrophysics stuff [ITP]

2014-08-13 Thread Ole Streicher
Hi Gürkan,

I just stumpled across your "splash" package that seems to be ready for 
sponsoring since October last year [1].

Maybe you already know that we have now a Debian Astronomy working group [2] 
with a mailing list [3]. Could you imagine to move the packaging sources to 
alioth.debian.org/git/debian-astro/packages/ ? This would allow a collaborative 
maintenance, and would also increase the visibility of the package.

To get the package actually into Debian, could you also upload it to mentors 
[4] and issue an Request For Sponsorship? This way your package would not get 
forgotten again.

I am not a Debian Developer yet, so I cannot sponsor your package myself. Could 
please someone here consider sponsoring?

Best regards

Ole


[1] https://bugs.debian.org/649603
[2] https://alioth.debian.org/projects/debian-astro/
[3] https://lists.debian.org/debian-astro/
[4] http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/53eb22f2.6030...@liska.ath.cx



Bug#757442: RFS: polyphone/1.4 [RFP]

2014-08-13 Thread Davy Triponney
Thank a lot for the report.

- polyphone_1.4.orig.tar.gz

is
now present in SourceForge
(https://sourceforge.net/projects/polyphone/files/polyphone%20releases/1.4/)
Regarding get-orig-source, I read this page:
https://wiki.debian.org/onlyjob/get-orig-source
My watch file is correct since the last version is recognized and
downloaded by uscan. But I don't know how to integrate this nice feature by
modifying the file "rules" even with the explanations. And I don't know
what result I would get. A self-updating package creator?
- copyright file is fixed, copyright headers added in some source files,
- debian/share directory has been removed
- the icon resolution is now 512*512, it doesn't come from a vector file,
- debian/polyphone.1 has been completed,
- ITP bug retitled,
- pdebuilder now can build the package. I'm sorry for
the dependency mistakes.

The new package has been uploaded
https://mentors.debian.net/package/polyphone

Regards,
Davy


Bug#757976: marked as done (RFS: saga/2.1.2+dfsg-2)

2014-08-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 13 Aug 2014 16:25:03 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: saga/2.1.2+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #757976,
regarding RFS: saga/2.1.2+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
757976: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757976
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
  Severity: normal

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "saga" (already in debian)

 * Package name: saga
   Version : 2.1.2+dfsg-2
 * URL : http://www.saga-gis.org
 * License : GPL/LGPGL +others (see copyright file)
   Section : science

  It builds those binary packages:

libsaga- SAGA GIS shared libraries
 libsaga-dev - SAGA GIS development files
 python-saga - SAGA GIS Python bindings
 saga  - System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/saga


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/saga/saga_2.1.2+dfsg-2.dsc

  Changes since the last upload, especially fixes a FTBS on arm:
  * Remove unneeded configure option
  * Fix wrong version number in saga-depends
  * Temporarily disable building saga gui on arm (closes: #755361)



  Regards,
   Johan Van de Wauw
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package saga version 2.1.2+dfsg-2 is in unstable now.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/saga--- End Message ---


Bug#757442: RFS: polyphone/1.4 [RFP]

2014-08-13 Thread Tobias Frost
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 17:46 +0200, Davy Triponney wrote:
> Thank a lot for the report.
> 
> 
> - polyphone_1.4.orig.tar.gz is now present in SourceForge
> (https://sourceforge.net/projects/polyphone/files/polyphone%
> 20releases/1.4/)
> Regarding get-orig-source, I read this page:
> https://wiki.debian.org/onlyjob/get-orig-source
> 
> My watch file is correct since the last version is recognized and
> downloaded by uscan. But I don't know how to integrate this nice
> feature by modifying the file "rules" even with the explanations. And
> I don't know what result I would get. A self-updating package creator?

get-orig-source is needed if you don't cant get the orig.tar. One
example us, if there isn't one and you pull directly from a repository.
A example for this would be my package gmrender-resurrect. 

Or, if you had to remove files for DFSG freeness (which nowerdays uscan
can do for you via ExcludeFiles in d/copyright).

So if uscan won't work for you, you need the target... Otherwise not.

> - copyright file is fixed, copyright headers added in some source
> files,
> - debian/share directory has been removed
> - the icon resolution is now 512*512, it doesn't come from a vector
> file,

ok, I just saw that my comment regarding the icon was incomplete... srry
about that. The intention is that every file needs its source and
regenerated at build time -- the resolution is not a concern, but we
need "the preferred form for modiciations" here. So it would be great if
you could publish the source for the icon and -- if possible --
regenerate it at build time to the desired sizes...

> - debian/polyphone.1 has been completed,
> 
> - ITP bug retitled,
> - pdebuilder now can build the package. I'm sorry for
> the dependency mistakes.
> 
> 
> The new package has been uploaded
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/polyphone
> 

The above reads very good :)

Taking a look now...

-> clavier/RT*.cpp seems like an embedded code copy, fortunately its
already packaged in Debian is rtmidi, but unfortunatly the package in
Debian is much newer than the code in polyphone, so some additional
porting beside patching the build system to use the packaged one might
be necessary. (Embedded code copies are very discouraged -- refer to the
Policy §4.13)

(But patching this will help you on another possible issue: The license
on RTMidi. It says:
 Any person wishing to distribute modifications to 
 the Software is *requested* to send the modifications to the original  
 developer 

Update: I just see that this is a widget, probably from the package
vmpk)... It seems is possible to package the QT Widget on its own...)
However, for this widget I'd ignore that one for the moment...  

In the packaged version "request" has been replaced with "ask" and a
sentence added that this is not a requirements. I discussed this on
d-mentors: there were concerns about DFSG compliance, but the concerns
are void when only "ask"ing. (I'm not saying that the "request" isn't
ok, but this can cause questions at ftp-masters later on)

Another embedded library seems to be the The Synthesis ToolKit 
in synthetiseur/elements/* (also packaged in Debian)

Another one: qcustomplot

Another one: sfarklib.
(However, this one needs to be packaged)

lib/portaudio.h shouldn't be there... :-P
For the moment please remove the file with a patch -- to show that it is
not used.
(If possible, drop that file in your next release)


-> d/copyright:
It probably misses a Files:* rule with 
Copyright Davy Triponney  and 
License: GPL-3+

Files: clavier/*
Copyright: 2008-2014 Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas, p...@users.sf.net
License: GPL-3+

Your name is missing here as copyright holder


Three files without copyright:
./clavier/RtError.h UNKNOWN *No copyright*
./sfark/sfarkglobal.cpp UNKNOWN *No copyright*
./sfark/sfarkglobal.h UNKNOWN *No copyright*

ressources/* are missing in d/copyright.
Is the manual hand written or generated?
(However, as not installed, this is OK)   

Just a question (to avoid a typo)
You license debian/* with GPL-2+ while the rest is GPL-3+
(different version). As you have the "or later" this is ok, but its
easier if license of the packaging is exactly same.
No need to change, though.

Ok so please check the remaining d/copyright issues, and please check if
it is feasible to use the packaged libraries instead of your embedded
copies.
Could you (if feasible to be used) already file an ITP for sfArkLib? 

Cheer up, we're getting closer :)

> Regards,
> Davy

-- 
tobi



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Not seeing uploads in my packages page

2014-08-13 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
In the past two days I've uploaded two packages:

 * qpid-dispatch
 * qpid-cpp

but I don't see either of them showing up in my package upload page[1].
I was recommended to ask here to see if something was wrong or if
anybody else can see my packages.

[1] http://mentors.debian.net/packages/my

-- 
Darryl L. Pierce 
http://mcpierce.blogspot.com/
Famous last words:
   "I wonder what happens if we do it this way?"


pgpM2OBGdEiRD.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Not seeing uploads in my packages page

2014-08-13 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 03:28:24PM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> In the past two days I've uploaded two packages:
> 
>  * qpid-dispatch
>  * qpid-cpp
> 
> but I don't see either of them showing up in my package upload page[1].
Did you get an email?

-- 
WBR, wRAR


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#758056: RFS: binwalk/2.0.1-1

2014-08-13 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

 
  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "binwalk"

 * Package name    : binwalk
   Version : 2.0.1-1
   Upstream Author : Craig Heffner 
 * URL : https://github.com/devttys0/binwalk
 * License : Expat/Zlib
   Section : devel

  It builds those binary packages:

    binwalk    - tool for searching binary images for embedded files and 
executables

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/binwalk

  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

    dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/binwalk/binwalk_2.0.1-1.dsc

  Changes since the last upload:

  * Imported Upstream version 2.0.1 (Closes: #727553)
    - Updated docs location
  * d/r: Removing binary files when cleaning
  * d/c: X-Python-Version: >= 2.7
  * d/p/destdir.patch: Override install path
  * Add some b-d and d
  * Bump std-version to 3.9.5, no changes required
  * Add myself to uploaders.
  * d/{control,watch,copyright} New website (Closes: #734708)
  * Canonical VCS urls.
  * Update man page.

  Regards,
   LocutusOfBorg



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1407959379.82118.yahoomail...@web171805.mail.ir2.yahoo.com



Re: Not seeing uploads in my packages page

2014-08-13 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 01:48:19AM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 03:28:24PM -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> > In the past two days I've uploaded two packages:
> > 
> >  * qpid-dispatch
> >  * qpid-cpp
> > 
> > but I don't see either of them showing up in my package upload page[1].
> Did you get an email?

Nope, nothing.

-- 
Darryl L. Pierce 
http://mcpierce.blogspot.com/
Famous last words:
   "I wonder what happens if we do it this way?"


pgpXUxaOaL8vY.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#758061: RFS: pyshp/1.2.1-1

2014-08-13 Thread Ross Gammon
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyshp"

 * Package name: pyshp
Version : 1.2.1-1
 * URL : https://code.google.com/p/pyshp/
 * License : MIT
Section : python

It builds these binary packages:

 python-pyshp - read/write support for ESRI Shapefile format
 python3-pyshp - read/write support for ESRI Shapefile format - Python 3.x

To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/pyshp


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyshp/pyshp_1.2.1-1.dsc

More information about hello can be obtained from
https://code.google.com/p/pyshp/.

Changes since the last upload:

  * Imported Upstream version 1.2.1
  * Update to policy 3.9.5 - no changes required
  * Fix lintian error - canonical VCS fields
  * Add myself to uploaders
  * Reformat debian control using Config::Model
  * Reformat Copyright file using Config::Model
  * Add gbp configuration file


Regards,
Ross Gammon



-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers trusty-security
  APT policy: (990, 'trusty-security'), (900, 'trusty-updates'), (500, 
'trusty'), (400, 'trusty-proposed'), (200, 'utopic-proposed'), (100, 
'trusty-backports')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.13.0-33-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/20140813204140.32625.18306.reportbug@ross-ixtreme-M5120



Re: RFS: splash -- visualisation tool astrophysics stuff [ITP]

2014-08-13 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi,

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:33:54AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> 
> Maybe you already know that we have now a Debian Astronomy working group [2] 
> with a mailing list [3]. Could you imagine to move the packaging sources to 
> alioth.debian.org/git/debian-astro/packages/ ? This would allow a 
> collaborative maintenance, and would also increase the visibility of the 
> package.
> 
> To get the package actually into Debian, could you also upload it to mentors 
> [4] and issue an Request For Sponsorship? This way your package would not get 
> forgotten again.
> 
> I am not a Debian Developer yet, so I cannot sponsor your package myself. 
> Could please someone here consider sponsoring?

I could easily sponsor if the package meets Sponsering of Blends
criteria[1] which means the package ins in Debian Astro repository and
on the according tasks pages.  (Note that I'm sponsering from VCS and
not from what is uploaded to mentors.d.n.)

Kind regards

  Andreas.

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianPureBlends/SoB 

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140813214408.gj25...@an3as.eu



Bug#757176: RFS: xombrero/2:1.6.3-1 -- Minimalist's web browser

2014-08-13 Thread Eriberto
Hi Luis,

Sorry for my delay and congratulations for your work. I agree with
your considerations. However, I didn't see the general licensing in
your d/copyright.

The common situation is put 'Files: *' and 'Files: debian/*' to refer
to general licenses and add, if necessary, special cases. You can see
a simple example at
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/h/heartbleeder/unstable_copyright

You needn't list all files and its licenses. You can quote the main
authors and the range of years in 'Files: *'; after this you must list
the exceptions. So, the xombrero.{1,c,conf,css,desktop,h}  (main
files) have a list of the authors and some years. So, I expected to
see something as this text in your d/copyright:

Files: *
Copyright: 2010-2012  Marco Peereboom 
 Edd Barrett 
2011  Conformal Systems LLC 
 Jason McIntyre 
 Michal Mazurek 
 Raphael Graf 
 Stevan Andjelkovic 
 Todd T. Fries 
2012-2013  Josh Rickmar 
2013  David Hill 
License: ISC

The next step is search for each name in other files to see if exist
references to other years for each main upstream author. You can use
'grep -sri' to do it. So, I also found two more using the ISC license:

config-checker.pl:# Copyright (c) 2012 Stevan Andjelkovic


ascii2txt.pl:# Copyright (c) 2010,2011,2012 Todd T. Fries 

The file externaleditor.c must be considered because has the same
license (ISC), quote a main upstream (Josh Rickman) and do an include
of xombrero.h.

The final situation is:

Files: *
Copyright: 2010-2012  Marco Peereboom 
 Edd Barrett 
 Todd T. Fries 
2011  Conformal Systems LLC 
 Jason McIntyre 
 Michal Mazurek 
 Raphael Graf 
2011-2012  Stevan Andjelkovic 
2012  Elias Norberg 
2012-2013  Josh Rickmar 
2013  David Hill 
License: ISC


Note that all files under ISC and made by main authors above needn't
be listed again in d/copyright. An example: cookie.c and unix.c. The
last step is list, separately, the eventual authors, as Ian F. Darwin.
So, you can keep these files and your licenses:

- autoscroll.js
- hinting.js input-focus.js
- js-merge-helper.pl
- tld-rules
- linux/linux.c
- linux/tree.h dragonfly/util.h netbsd/util.h
- freebsd/freebsd.c dragonfly/dragonfly.c
- netbsd/netbsd.c osx/osx.c

I have two doubts:

Where you saw that the files style.css, *.png, tordisabled.ico and
torenabled.ico are using the CC-BY-SA license?

Where you found *.xpm files?

Cheers,

Eriberto


2014-08-11 17:54 GMT-03:00 Luis Henriques :
> Hi Eriberto,
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 05:19:31PM -0300, Eriberto Mota wrote:
>> tags 757176 moreinfo
>> thanks
>>
>> Hi Luis Henriques,
>>
>> Please:
>>
>
> First of all, thank you a lot for your review.  I've already gone through
> all your comments and I've uploaded a new xombrero package into
> mentors.debian.net that contains most of your comments implemented.
>
> Comments inline below:
>
>> 1. d/control, in package xxxterm:
>>
>> - Change the section from oldlibs to web.
>> - Change priority extra to optional.
>
> According to the Debian Developer's Reference, section 6.7.7. ("Make
> transition packages deborphan compliant"):
>
>   "Also, it is recommended to adjust its section to oldlibs and its
>priority to extra in order to ease deborphan's job."
>
> Also, if I implement these 2 changes, I get additional lintian warnings
> such as transitional-package-should-be-oldlibs-extra:
>
>  The package appears to be a transitional package, but it is not priority
>  extra and in the oldlibs section.
>
>  Using oldlibs/extra assists package managers in handling the transition
>  package correctly.
>
>  Refer to http://bugs.debian.org/645438 and Debian Developer's Reference
>  section 6.7.7 (Make transition packages deborphan compliant) for
>  details.
>
> So, I've decided not to include these 2 fields changed in the
> debian/control file.  Please let me know if you disagree with my position.
>
>> - In short description, remove the word 'rename'.
>>  As long description, use only:
>>
>>  This is a transitional dummy package to xombrero. It can safely be removed.
>>
>> The last change is to discourage the install of the xxxterm. So, the
>> text needs to be short and direct.
>>
>
> Done!
>
>> 2. d/copyright: update all information, even the packaging years. In
>> the upstream code, you need to check file by file. Please, fix the
>> line that says "Copyright (c) 2013 David Hill ".
>>
>
> Done.
>
>> 3. I think that d/docs can be removed, because all relevant
>> information are in manpage.
>>
>
> Done.
>
>> 4

Bug#739889: RFS: twython/3.1.2-1 [ITP] -- Pure Python wrapper for the Twitter API

2014-08-13 Thread Eriberto
Hi, Josué,

Sorry for my delay.

>From my email:

--
1. Remove requirements.txt from d/docs. This information is specific
to packager, not to final user.
--

You didn't remove. See d/docs.

You din't installed the changelog correctly. Please, use
dh_installchangelogs in d/rules.

I understood that you would use the version from
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/twython. However, your d/control and
d/copyright point to GitHub.

Cheers,

Eriberto




2014-08-11 0:03 GMT-03:00 Josué Ortega :
> Hi Eriberto,
> The new revision is on mentors:
>
> dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/twython/twython_3.1.2-1.dsc
>
> Thanks!
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Eriberto  wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > I suggest working with the pypi releases which don't include the
>> > minified js
>> > files.
>>
>> Hi Josué. Ok to me. Send me your package.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Eriberto
>
>
>
>
> --
> Josue Ortega
> Happy Hacking
> http://josueortega.org
> PGP key 4096R/AB4AFD3F 2012-08-20
> Fingerprint = 7733 B328 D279 5F5B E232  5ADD 0150 9D5C AB4A FD3F
>


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/cap+dxjfrkxvw+z+m2dxrgphggxysltd-vsh6ygldmne...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#758056: RFS: binwalk/2.0.1-1

2014-08-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:

>   I am looking for a sponsor for my package "binwalk"

binwalk is already in Debian and is maintained by someone else. Please
talk to them about getting it uploaded.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/caktje6feln8yec4++osxzm4ejw_ozvyyttxd1aqfe1uxmek...@mail.gmail.com



Re: Not seeing uploads in my packages page

2014-08-13 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:28 AM, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:

> In the past two days I've uploaded two packages:
>
>  * qpid-dispatch
>  * qpid-cpp

I can't see mention of either of these in the logs. Are you sure you
uploaded to mentors and not somewhere else like the main archive?

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/caktje6geogm_a1fe74to+vnf1xbmljrqibfoeelmqsvsk+1...@mail.gmail.com



Bug#758079: RFS: hfsutils/3.2.6-13 [QA] [RC]

2014-08-13 Thread Juhani Numminen
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the orphaned package "hfsutils"
to fix a RC bug.

 * Package name: hfsutils
   Version : 3.2.6-13
   Upstream Author : Robert Leslie
 * URL : http://www.mars.org/home/rob/proj/hfs/
 * License : GPL-2+
   Section : otherosfs

It builds those binary packages:

hfsutils   - Tools for reading and writing Macintosh volumes
hfsutils-tcltk - Tcl/Tk interfaces for reading and writing Macintosh volumes

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/hfsutils

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this
command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hfsutils/hfsutils_3.2.6-13.dsc

More information about hello can be obtained from
http://www.mars.org/home/rob/proj/hfs/.

Changes since the last upload:

 * QA upload.
 * Fix a FTBFS caused by a missing filename and doubled diff for that file
   in man-macros.diff. Closes: #753178.


Regards,
 Juhani


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140814073617.480be...@gmail.com



Bug#742711: marked as done (RFS: mathopd/1.5p8-1 ITP)

2014-08-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Aug 2014 04:24:46 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: mathopd/1.5p8-1 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #742711,
regarding RFS: mathopd/1.5p8-1 ITP
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
742711: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=742711
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

  Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mathopd"

 * Package name: mathopd
   Version : 1.5p8-1
   Upstream Author : Michiel Boland 
 * URL : http://www.mathopd.org/
 * License : BSD
   Section : web

  It builds those binary packages:

mathopd- Very small, yet very fast HTTP server

  To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/mathopd


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mathopd/mathopd_1.5p8-1.dsc

  More information about mathopd can be obtained from http://www.mathopd.org/.

  Changes since the last upload:

  * Updated to latest stable upstream release
  * Patch for getline no longer needed
  * Use default compile and link flags with all hardending options
  * LSB init script
  * Default document root changed to /var/www/html
  * Most lintian warnings fixed

  Regards,
   Gregor Pintar
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package mathopd has been removed from mentors.--- End Message ---


Bug#758061: marked as done (RFS: pyshp/1.2.1-1)

2014-08-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Aug 2014 04:24:46 +
with message-id 
and subject line closing RFS: pyshp/1.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #758061,
regarding RFS: pyshp/1.2.1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
758061: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758061
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

 I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyshp"

 * Package name: pyshp
Version : 1.2.1-1
 * URL : https://code.google.com/p/pyshp/
 * License : MIT
Section : python

It builds these binary packages:

 python-pyshp - read/write support for ESRI Shapefile format
 python3-pyshp - read/write support for ESRI Shapefile format - Python 3.x

To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/pyshp


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyshp/pyshp_1.2.1-1.dsc

More information about hello can be obtained from
https://code.google.com/p/pyshp/.

Changes since the last upload:

  * Imported Upstream version 1.2.1
  * Update to policy 3.9.5 - no changes required
  * Fix lintian error - canonical VCS fields
  * Add myself to uploaders
  * Reformat debian control using Config::Model
  * Reformat Copyright file using Config::Model
  * Add gbp configuration file


Regards,
Ross Gammon



-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers trusty-security
  APT policy: (990, 'trusty-security'), (900, 'trusty-updates'), (500, 
'trusty'), (400, 'trusty-proposed'), (200, 'utopic-proposed'), (100, 
'trusty-backports')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.13.0-33-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Package pyshp version 1.2.1-1 is in unstable now.
http://packages.qa.debian.org/pyshp--- End Message ---


Bug#739889: RFS: twython/3.1.2-1 [ITP] -- Pure Python wrapper for the Twitter API

2014-08-13 Thread Josué Ortega
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Eriberto  wrote:

> Hi, Josué,
>
> Sorry for my delay.
>
> From my email:
>
> --
> 1. Remove requirements.txt from d/docs. This information is specific
> to packager, not to final user.
> --
>
> You didn't remove. See d/docs.
>
> You din't installed the changelog correctly. Please, use
> dh_installchangelogs in d/rules.
>
> I understood that you would use the version from
> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/twython. However, your d/control and
> d/copyright point to GitHub.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Eriberto
>
>
>
>
> 2014-08-11 0:03 GMT-03:00 Josué Ortega :
> > Hi Eriberto,
> > The new revision is on mentors:
> >
> > dget -x
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/twython/twython_3.1.2-1.dsc
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Eriberto 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > I suggest working with the pypi releases which don't include the
> >> > minified js
> >> > files.
> >>
> >> Hi Josué. Ok to me. Send me your package.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Eriberto
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Josue Ortega
> > Happy Hacking
> > http://josueortega.org
> > PGP key 4096R/AB4AFD3F 2012-08-20
> > Fingerprint = 7733 B328 D279 5F5B E232  5ADD 0150 9D5C AB4A FD3F
> >
>

Hi Eriberto,
Thanks again for reviewing the package. I've changed the debian rules as
you asked and I've changed
the URL.

The new version is on mentors

 dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/twython/twython_3.1.2-1.dsc

Cheers


-- 
Josue Ortega
Happy Hacking
http://josueortega.org
PGP key 4096R/AB4AFD3F 2012-08-20
Fingerprint = 7733 B328 D279 5F5B E232  5ADD 0150 9D5C AB4A FD3F