Bug#706514: RFS: dcraw/9.17-1
Hi Oliver, in attachment is the my suggestion of debian-directory of this package. 2013/6/25 Oliver Sander : >> Yes, but in the previous uploaded version there are in "patch-section" >> only Makefile, badpixels and manpages. You have now also configure, >> Makefile.in etc. > > > That's a thing that I still don't understand. In an AutoTools environment > all you need is configure.in and Makefile.in. The files configure and > Makefile are then created automatically. However when I remove configure > and Makefile from the patch, nothing is built at all. You shoud, probably, use autoreconf. See an attachment. >> use DEP-5 for >> copyright, > > > The standard says this is optional. > http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ It will hopefully be a standard soon. Please, fix it, it will take just 5 min in your case. >> use dcraw.manpages and dcraw.exapmles instead of putting them into the >> override_*. > > > I don't understand what you mean here. man dh_installman See an attachment. Cheers, Anton dcraw_9.17-1.1.debian.tar.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Re: RFS: new powertop version
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 06:08:24PM +0200, Julian Wollrath wrote: > nearly a month passed, since I asked for sponsorship for the new > powertop package [0] and addressed the concerns which Paul Wise had > with it. Sadly Patrick Winnertz, the maintainer, did not react and I When you claim the someone else is not responding, please include a reference to your contact attempts. This makes it much easier to verify your claim. In this case I believe that you should "salvage"[1] the package (i.e. become maintainer). The last maintainer upload has been made more than two years ago and we keep maintaining it with NMUs. This is stupid. To me the basis for a salvage is clear. There has been no maintainer upload in more than two years. Patrick does not currently have a key in the keyring. What more is needed? Barring opposition from fellow developers, I suggest that you become maintainer for the powertop package and prepare a maintainer upload taking over the package. To make this less controversial, please include a list of your previous contact attempts. > would like to see the new powertop version in Debian, since it > addresses 13 bugs, with at least one of them being important. Hence I > am asking again: Could someone please sponsor the package? I would like to see this updated as well. > [0] http://rbw.goe.net/jw/debian/pool/powertop/ When publishing packages, *always* sign them. Even if I have no path to your key, I could still establish some trust in the persistence of your key usage. When you bump standards version, please tell what changes were needed to make the package comply with the newer policy. Often enough this can be "no changes needed", yet I find this informative. In debian/control the powertop-dbg has a redundant Priority: extra. The csstoh patches appear noise. Why not merge them into one patch? Also your patches suggest that you use some well known three-letter version control for the Debian packaging. Can you publish that and add Vcs- headers? The copyright file appears to be still referring to 2.0. There is no pevent anymore, cause it uses traceevent now. I think the copyright file should be fixed before an upload to unstable. If you don't fix this now, you'll get a reject via NEW. Helmut [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/07/msg00540.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130707194920.ga20...@alf.mars
Bug#714292: RFS: s3cmd/1.5.0~alpha3-1 [ITA]
Dear mentors, It looks like the python application packaging team made an upload prior to my new package. I have thus amended the changelog and re-uploaded new version. Changes since the last upload: * New upstream release (Closes: #708538): - debian/patches: refresh. * Add debian/patches/fix-undefined-names.patch due to pyflakes errors. * Remove debian/patches/multipart-upload-elapsed-time.patch fixed upstream. * Update package maintainer (Closes: #674916). * Add new python-tz, python-magic dependencies. * Update debian/copyright. * debian/rules: overwrite to use upstream NEWS file as changelog. * debian/control: Bump Standards-Version, no changes required. On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Robinson Sathaseevan wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "s3cmd" > > * Package name: s3cmd >Version : 1.5.0~alpha3-1 >Upstream Author : Michal Ludvig > * URL : http://s3tools.logix.cz/s3cmd > * License : GPL-2 >Section : utils > > It builds those binary packages: > > s3cmd - command-line Amazon S3 client > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > following URL: > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/s3cmd > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/s3cmd/s3cmd_1.5.0~alpha3-1.dsc > > More information about s3cmd can be obtained from > http://s3tools.logix.cz/s3cmd > > Changes since the last upload: > > [ Jakub Wilk ] > * Use canonical URIs for Vcs-* fields. > > [ Robinson Sathaseevan ] > * New upstream release (Closes: #708538): > - debian/patches: refresh. > * Add debian/patches/fix-undefined-names.patch due to pyflakes errors. > * Update package maintainer (Closes: #674916). > * Compute speed and elapsed time for multipart upload (Closes: #683558). > * Add new python-tz, python-magic dependencies. > * Update debian/copyright. > * debian/rules: overwrite to use upstream NEWS file as changelog. > * debian/control: Bump Standards-Version, no changes required. > > Regards, >Robinson Sathaseevan > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAHvEGEK2OPwcWDJuN9SVvcsMT4r8GYsBF8WBhr=hyw4yvvc...@mail.gmail.com
