Bug#668505: RFS: gemrb/0.7.0-5 [ITP] -- Open-source engine for Black Isle Studio's RPGs
Hi, Trying again, since I've got no answer to the last e-mail I sent on the Games Team list. I've uploaded a new version of the GemRB package to mentors.debian.net and I'm still looking for a sponsorship. You'll find all the details here, and on the bug #668505: http://mentors.debian.net/package/gemrb Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gemrb/gemrb_0.7.0-5.dsc Since the last time, I've fixed some compilations errors that have appeared in sid, added fortify compilation flags support and some new icons I made for each game. Best regards, -- Beren Minor -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAONPvZwd7xhU7G5J31wGhGj=pgxydx+cqvpap8a2xthef1g...@mail.gmail.com
dh >= 9 builds strange debug-pkg
Hello! Why does dh >= 9 (in paticular the latest version in sid) put the debugging-symbols in usr/lib/debug/.build-id/$(2-Byte-Random)/$(Random).debug when building a lib with multi-arch-support? The package uses straight debhelper. No tweaks in debian/rules, but some usual override_*-indep and of course override_dh_strip: dh_strip --dbg-package=libsomewhat-dbg added. Best Regards, Björn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAMS3egozuK2Tuv8EMLozHqi4vkPXJRm4JOU7A6=erx2kzkf...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#674997: Sanlock - Sponsor
Still looking for a sponsor. Anyone interested? Cheers, David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/00032a49.4fcc8...@pegasus.munzinger.de
Re: Getting rid of control messages revisited
Arno Töll writes: > Hi, > Jakub asked me to forward his comment from IRC to thhis list (where he's > not subscribed anymore as some might remember): > > 14:14 < jwilk> IME the problem with mailing lists that nobody reads is > that from time to time some misguided people will post to them. Worse, > they'll expect that somebody answers them... > 14:15 < jwilk> But yeah, separate list + forwarding bugs to d-mentors is > certainly better than status quo. FWIW, I will be subscribed to the new list, and if any poor soul might post there, I'll direct them to the appropriate place instead. I'm good at reassigning bugs, reassigning people shouldn't be all that different. *grins* -- |8] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87r4tva3ww.fsf@algernon.balabit
Re: d/copyright for mrtg-ping-probe (ITA)
On Saturday 26 May 2012 22:44:56 gregor herrmann wrote: > My shell history finds > licensecheck -c . -r . | /usr/lib/cdbs/licensecheck2dep5 > but I don't remember if I was impressed by the result or not :) I've used a similar command to update padre package (or was it pan?). Since this command starts from fuzzy data, you get fuzzy results which need to be edited manually. But it does a decent job of grouping files with identical license and copyright statements. That may save quite some time when dealing with large package. HTH -- https://github.com/dod38fr/config-model/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/ http://ddumont.wordpress.com/-o- irc: dod at irc.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201206041039.43147@debian.org
Re: dh >= 9 builds strange debug-pkg
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 10:03:06AM +0200, Björn Esser wrote: > Why does dh >= 9 (in paticular the latest version in sid) put the > debugging-symbols in > usr/lib/debug/.build-id/$(2-Byte-Random)/$(Random).debug when building > a lib with multi-arch-support? Because it uses NT_GNU_BUILD_ID field to identify the binary, not the binary name. It's documented in debhelper(7) under v9 changes. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: dh >= 9 builds strange debug-pkg
Björn Esser writes: > Hello! > > Why does dh >= 9 (in paticular the latest version in sid) put the > debugging-symbols in > usr/lib/debug/.build-id/$(2-Byte-Random)/$(Random).debug when building > a lib with multi-arch-support? See #642158, for an explanation. The short story is, it's easier to support build-id (from a gdb PoV) than N+1 multi-arched paths. It should not cause any issues. -- |8] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87bokza0wc.fsf@algernon.balabit
Re: dh >= 9 builds strange debug-pkg
> See #642158, for an explanation. The short story is, it's easier to > support build-id (from a gdb PoV) than N+1 multi-arched paths. > > It should not cause any issues. Thanks for your answer. So everything is fine as it gets done then, I think. BR, Björn Esser -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cams3egroiop-_q7nk6caqkb29dg6nmzqorq4as4a71r1g_o...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Getting rid of control messages revisited
My preference is for a plain mailing list, at least until debbugs #645974/#485697 is fixed to unbreak threading. Back to the topic, I don't mind either way since I mostly ignore debian-mentors these days. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6EJ1vW+92ORHZuuEGnqdY6jTUAGitXK9C+=8zmqeyo...@mail.gmail.com
[Help] New version of ImageJ does not build in pbuilder because of lacking DISPLAY variable
Hi, I just commited packaging stuff for the latest ImageJ version to SVN[1] but I failed in building when using pdebuild: build: [copy] Copying 1 file to /tmp/buildd/imagej-1.46o/build [copy] Copying 1 file to /tmp/buildd/imagej-1.46o/build [copy] Copying 1 file to /tmp/buildd/imagej-1.46o/build [copy] Copying 1 file to /tmp/buildd/imagej-1.46o/build [copy] Copying 1 file to /tmp/buildd/imagej-1.46o/build [copy] Copying 1 file to /tmp/buildd/imagej-1.46o/build [copy] Copying 16 files to /tmp/buildd/imagej-1.46o/build/macros [jar] Building jar: /tmp/buildd/imagej-1.46o/ij.jar run: [copy] Copying 1 file to /tmp/buildd [java] No protocol specified [java] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.InternalError: Can't connect to X11 window server using ':0.0' as the value of the DISPLAY variable. [java] at sun.awt.X11GraphicsEnvironment.initDisplay(Native Method) [java] at sun.awt.X11GraphicsEnvironment.access$200(X11GraphicsEnvironment.java:62) [java] at sun.awt.X11GraphicsEnvironment$1.run(X11GraphicsEnvironment.java:178) [java] at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) [java] at sun.awt.X11GraphicsEnvironment.(X11GraphicsEnvironment.java:142) [java] at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method) [java] at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:186) [java] at java.awt.GraphicsEnvironment.getLocalGraphicsEnvironment(GraphicsEnvironment.java:82) [java] at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:424) [java] at java.awt.Window.(Window.java:477) [java] at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:419) [java] at ij.ImageJ.(ImageJ.java:132) [java] at ij.ImageJ.main(ImageJ.java:657) I can confirm that debuild works fine because there is a properly setup X environment. Any clue? The hint from Steve[2] did not ring a bell when I was looking at the lines of code where the problem occured. Kind regards Andreas. [1] svn://svn.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/imagej/trunk/ or `debcheckout imagej` [2] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-med-packaging/2012-June/015823.html -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120604102731.ge9...@an3as.eu
Re: [Help] New version of ImageJ does not build in pbuilder because of lacking DISPLAY variable
Hello, On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > run: > [copy] Copying 1 file to /tmp/buildd > [java] No protocol specified > [java] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.InternalError: Can't connect > to X11 window server using ':0.0' as the value of the DISPLAY variable. > [java] at sun.awt.X11GraphicsEnvironment.initDisplay(Native Method) > [java] at > sun.awt.X11GraphicsEnvironment.access$200(X11GraphicsEnvironment.java:62) > [java] at > sun.awt.X11GraphicsEnvironment$1.run(X11GraphicsEnvironment.java:178) > [java] at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) > [java] at > sun.awt.X11GraphicsEnvironment.(X11GraphicsEnvironment.java:142) > [java] at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method) > [java] at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:186) > [java] at > java.awt.GraphicsEnvironment.getLocalGraphicsEnvironment(GraphicsEnvironment.java:82) > [java] at java.awt.Window.init(Window.java:424) > [java] at java.awt.Window.(Window.java:477) > [java] at java.awt.Frame.(Frame.java:419) > [java] at ij.ImageJ.(ImageJ.java:132) > [java] at ij.ImageJ.main(ImageJ.java:657) > > > I can confirm that debuild works fine because there is a properly > setup X environment. > > Any clue? The hint from Steve[2] did not ring a bell when I was looking > at the lines of code where the problem occured. I had similar problems that I solved using xvfb, that provides a dummy well-behaved X11 server. Just wrap the call to the build system with xvfb. Let's just hope the results of the build are not X11-server-dependent ! Hope this helps, Vincent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caenrq5owm99piyf2n5y9yqtqnb+0wotbzogv+w4t7efbd71...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#675701: ptop/3.6.2-7
Hi bart, -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Bart Martens [mailto:ba...@master.debian.org] Namens Bart Martens Verzonden: zondag 3 juni 2012 7:50 Aan: Bas van den Dikkenberg CC: 675...@bugs.debian.org Onderwerp: RFS: ptop/3.6.2-7 Hi Bastiaan, Please have another look at the list of architectures. http://mentors.debian.net/package/ptop Uploaded: 2012-06-02 19:35 * Remove architechtures hurd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 because they alway fail Architecture: amd64 armel armhf i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 s390x sparc sparc64 sh4 ppc64 powerpcspe m68k m68k armhf alpha https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ptop http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=ptop Also, have you tried asking help on debian-...@lists.debian.org and debian-h...@lists.debian.org ? Maybe you want to open a bug in the BTS to log all related information. Regards, Bart Martens -- I have talked with both teams and hurd has mayed a patch to make it work. So I uploaded a new version To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/ptop Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/ptop/ptop_3.6.2-8.dsc If someone is willing to sponsor this , it would be nice Bas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1881dbc6-c4e0-4a3b-a981-a73e77e40020@srv06.dikkenberg.local
Processed: FW: retitle
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > Retitle 675701 RFS: ptop/3.6.2-8 Bug #675701 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ptop/3.6.2-7 Changed Bug title to 'RFS: ptop/3.6.2-8' from 'RFS: ptop/3.6.2-7' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 675701: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675701 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133880826126923.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#672185: RFS: gnome-session-shutdown/1.81-1 [ITP] -- Shutdown command for GNOME
(I don't intend to sponsor this package.)
* Jacopo Lorenzetti , 2012-05-09, 02:13:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnome-session-shutdown/gnome-session-shutdown_1.81-1.dsc
I'd use "=" instead of ":=" in debian/rules, so that the variable is not
uselessly evaluated even when it's not used. (And it won't be used most
of the time.)
The definition of DEBIAN_DIR could be simplified to:
$(dir $(firstword ${MAKEFILE_LIST}))
That said, I wouldn't bother with implementing get-orig-source target
when pristine upstream tarballs is being used.
What is build-dependency on docbook2x for?
I see some bugs and weirdnesses in upstream code:
Line 46:
import string
string module is so 90s! ;) Most of functions from that module
(including the ones you use) are deprecated.
Line 52:
# If running outside X try connecting to main display
try:
display = os.environ['DISPLAY']
except KeyError:
os.environ['DISPLAY'] = ':0.0'
This is weird. I haven't seen any program behaving that way. It's user
responsibility to set DISPLAY correctly, and I wouldn't want any program
to second-guess me on that matter.
Line 233:
wall.communicate(message)[0]
This looks a bit odd. Was the expression supposed to be assigned to
something? If not, the "[0]" part is redundant.
Line 287:
pidf.close
This is no-op. I guess it should be: "pidf.close()".
Line 288:
except:
return False
Catching all exceptions is almost always wrong (unless you re-raise them
later), for two reasons:
- you don't want to catch things like KeyboardInterrupt;
- you don't want to inadvertently ignore an exception that was raised
because of a bug in your program.
Please catch only exceptions you actually expect to be raised during
normal program execution.
Line 304:
if e.errno != errno.EEXIST:
You didn't import the errno module.
Lines 313-131: similar problems like in 287-288.
Line 349:
gettext.install('gnome-session-shutdown', LOCALE_DIR, unicode=1)
AFAIK if you can omit the LOCALE_DIR part, Python will do the right
thing. No need to hard-code path to locale directory.
Line 360:
for fname in os.listdir('/proc'):
if fname.isdigit():
if int(fname) >= 1000:
This looks very dubious to me. Why ">= 1000"?
Running pygettext on the source file results in:
$ pygettext gnome-session-shutdown
*** gnome-session-shutdown:131: Seen unexpected token "+"
*** gnome-session-shutdown:375: Seen unexpected token "+"
*** gnome-session-shutdown:397: Seen unexpected token "+"
*** gnome-session-shutdown:429: Seen unexpected token "+"
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120604135841.ga3...@jwilk.net
Bug#675963: RFS: cynthiune.app/0.9.5-14 [RC]
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "cynthiune.app". This upload would fix #633543, #656604 and #667867. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cynthiune.app/cynthiune.app_0.9.5-14.dsc Changes: cynthiune.app (0.9.5-14) unstable; urgency=low * debian/patches/gcc-4.7.patch: New; fixes FTBFS with GCC-4.7 (Closes: #667867). * debian/patches/libmusicbrainz5.patch: New; port to libmusicbrainz5 (Closes: #656604). * debian/patches/link-libs.patch: Fix FTBFS with ld --as-needed, thanks Colin Watson (Closes: #633543). * debian/patches/series: Update. * debian/source/format: Switch to 3.0 (quilt). * debian/README.source: Delete; redundant. * debian/control (Build-Depends): Remove quilt. Replace libmusicbrainz4-dev with libmusicbrainz5-dev. Add dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1~), for hardening support. (Vcs-Arch, Vcs-Git, Vcs-Browser): Switch from Arch to Git. (Standards-Version): Bump to 3.9.3; no changes needed. * debian/rules: Don't include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make, eliminate patch/unpatch dependencies. Enable hardening. (binary-arch): Remove GS_USE_FHS conditional. Invoke dh_lintian. * debian/preinst: Delete; no longer needed. * debian/lintian-overrides: New file, override some hardening false positives. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87aa0jxlcl.GNUs_Not_Unix!%ya...@gnu.org
Processed: retitle to RFS: ebtables/2.0.10.4-1 [NMU]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 675487 RFS: ebtables/2.0.10.4-1 [NMU] Bug #675487 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ebtables/2.0.10.4-0.1 [NMU] Changed Bug title to 'RFS: ebtables/2.0.10.4-1 [NMU]' from 'RFS: ebtables/2.0.10.4-0.1 [NMU]' > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 675487: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675487 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133882647227292.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#675978: RFS: projectcenter.app/0.6.0-2
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "projectcenter.app". This upload fixes #674920. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/projectcenter.app/projectcenter.app_0.6.0-2.dsc Changes: projectcenter.app (0.6.0-2) unstable; urgency=low * debian/patches/05_link-libs.dpatch: Rename as... * debian/patches/link-libs.patch: ...and remove dpatch header. * debian/patches/gui-0.22.patch: New; fixes FTBFS with gnustep-gui/0.22 (Closes: #674920). * debian/patches/00list: Rename as... * debian/patches/series: ...and update. * debian/source/format: Switch to 3.0 (quilt). * debian/README.source: Delete; redundant. * debian/control (Build-Depends): Remove dpatch. Add dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1~), for hardening support. (Recommends): Add gdb. (Vcs-Arch): Replace with... (Vcs-Git): Since the package is now maintained with Git. (Vcs-Browser): New field. (Standards-Version): Bump to 3.9.3; no changes needed. * debian/rules: Don't include /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch.make. Remove patch/unpatch dependencies. Enable hardening. (binary-arch): Remove GS_USE_FHS conditional. * debian/preinst: Delete; no longer needed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87oboz56se.GNUs_Not_Unix!%ya...@gnu.org
Bug#675701: RFS: ptop
Hi Bas, I suggested earlier to have another look at the list of architectures for these reasons : - m68k is twice on the list, - hppa is not on the list but removing hppa is not mentioned in debian/changelog, - powerpcspe is on the list but the build fails for the same reason as hppa. Architecture: amd64 armel armhf i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 s390x sparc sparc64 sh4 ppc64 powerpcspe m68k m68k armhf alpha hurd-i386 There are some typing mistakes in debian/changelog. | ptop (3.6.2-8) unstable; urgency=low | | * Applyed path for hurd architechtur and activate in control file (closes: #675757) | | -- Bastiaan Franciscus van den Dikkenberg Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:50:35 +0200 | | ptop (3.6.2-7) unstable; urgency=low | | * Remove architechtures hurd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 | because they alway fail | * Changed Standards-Version to 3.9.3 | | -- Bastiaan Franciscus van den Dikkenberg Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:13:20 +0200 It would be nice to have 3.6.2-7 and 3.6.2-8 combined into only 3.6.2-7, but it's not really an error. It is good to see that hurd-i386 is back. I guess you don't have a solution for the other removed architectures yet. I see that debian/patches/ptop_hurd contains machine/m_gnu.c and that file contains this: * AUTHOR: Richard Henderson * Order support added by Alexey Klimkin * Ported to 2.4 by William LeFebvre But I don't find any Henderson in debian/copyright. I also don't see any license for machine/m_gnu.c. Maybe Barry deFreese knows more, since he is mentioned in the patch as the author of the patch. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120604173432.gb15...@master.debian.org
Bug#675487: RFS: ebtables/2.0.10.4-1.1 [NMU]
Since "Jochen Friedrich wrote via private e-mail that he prefers that William Dauchy adds himself to "Uploaders" instead of doing an NMU." the link is now dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/ebtables/ebtables_2.0.10.4-1.dsc -- William -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAJ75kXaT=ke5w2vai+pogbn62ev9uwcqmwhdqxfvdddgypo...@mail.gmail.com
Bug#673096: Bug#675167: Bug#674850: RM: figlet -- RoQA; license which "specifically excludes the right to re-distribute"
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 23:51:51 +0100, Jonathan McCrohan wrote: > On 30/05/12 20:05, Julien Cristau wrote: > > There seems to be just about 0 creative content in that file. What > > exactly is the problem with it? > > Figlet 2.2.5 has just been released with the following changelog [1]. > That doesn't seem to answer the above question. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: RFS: ebtables/2.0.10.4-1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 675487 RFS: ebtables/2.0.10.4-1 Bug #675487 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ebtables/2.0.10.4-1 [NMU] Changed Bug title to 'RFS: ebtables/2.0.10.4-1' from 'RFS: ebtables/2.0.10.4-1 [NMU]' > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 675487: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675487 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133883316629485.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Re: [Help] New version of ImageJ does not build in pbuilder because of lacking DISPLAY variable
On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:37:45 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > > [java] No protocol specified > > [java] Exception in thread "main" java.lang.InternalError: Can't > > connect to X11 window server using ':0.0' as the value of the DISPLAY > > variable. > I had similar problems that I solved using xvfb, that provides a > dummy well-behaved X11 server. Just wrap the call to the build system > with xvfb. I had a short look: - Good news: I managed to get rid of the error - Bad news: the test never finished ... My attempts attached as a diff against svn. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Dave Brubeck: It's A Raggy Waltz Index: debian/control === --- debian/control (revision 11201) +++ debian/control (working copy) @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ DM-Upload-Allowed: yes Uploaders: Paolo Ariano , Andreas Tille -Build-Depends: openjdk-6-jdk, debhelper (>=8), ant, javahelper +Build-Depends: openjdk-6-jdk, debhelper (>=8), ant, javahelper, xvfb, xauth Standards-Version: 3.9.3 Vcs-Browser: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-med/trunk/packages/imagej/trunk/ Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/imagej/trunk/ Index: debian/rules === --- debian/rules (revision 11201) +++ debian/rules (working copy) @@ -4,6 +4,21 @@ %: dh $@ --with javahelper +override_dh_auto_test: + # debhelper's ant support ony supports clean and build + # so this doesn't work + # xvfb-run -a dh_auto_test -- run + + # starts and never stops + # xvfb-run -a ant run + + # starts and never stops + # xvfb-run -a ant run2 + +override_dh_auto_build: + # same as `ant build' + dh_auto_build -- build + # install/imagej:: override_dh_auto_install: cp -a $(CURDIR)/debian/imagej.sh $(CURDIR)/debian/imagej/usr/bin/imagej signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection
Le samedi, 2 juin 2012 16.56:10, vous avez écrit :
> > 2) Handling of the transition
> >
> > I just tested with a clean user: the current kde-config-gtk-style creates
> > one .gtkrc-2.0-kde while your new kde-config-gtk-style creates one
> > .gtkrc-2.0-kde4 that is a symlink to .gtkrc-2.0 . You should probably
> > cope with
> > 04_no_kde4_in_configfile.diff in src:kcm-gtk and make sure any changes
> > put there by kcm-gtk is kept gracefully.
>
> Done.
Sorry, but no. I just tested and it doesn't work.
With the attached .gtkrc-2.0-kde as created by the current src:kcm-gtk, when
entering the dialog of src:kde-gtk-config, the dialogs don't show "Raleigh"
nor "DejaVu Sans 9", but "oxygen-gtk" and "Bitstream Charter 12" (and "Emacs"
for the GTK3 theme). That's not what I'd call "any changes there are kept
gracefully".
I'll upload this package [0] when user changes setup by kde-config-gtk-style
2:0.5.3-1 are kept and converted (if needed) by kde-config-gtk-style 3:2.0-1.
That's rather easy to test…
Cheers,
OdyX
[0] But feel free to find another sponsor.
# This file was written by KDE
# You can edit it in the KDE control center, under "GTK Styles and Fonts"
include "/usr/share/themes/Raleigh/gtk-2.0/gtkrc"
style "user-font"
{
font_name="DejaVu Sans"
}
gtk-theme-name="Raleigh"
gtk-font-name="DejaVu Sans 9"
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection
Hi, > Sorry, but no. I just tested and it doesn't work. > > With the attached .gtkrc-2.0-kde as created by the current src:kcm-gtk, when > entering the dialog of src:kde-gtk-config, the dialogs don't show "Raleigh" > nor "DejaVu Sans 9", but "oxygen-gtk" and "Bitstream Charter 12" (and "Emacs" > for the GTK3 theme). That's not what I'd call "any changes there are kept > gracefully". > > I'll upload this package [0] when user changes setup by kde-config-gtk-style > 2:0.5.3-1 are kept and converted (if needed) by kde-config-gtk-style 3:2.0-1. > That's rather easy to test… I thought we were talking about clean install. But not about total changing of configuration file and its parser. Ok, I'll use your file for tests. Best regards, Boris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/352861338837...@web9f.yandex.ru
Bug#673096: Bug#674850: Bug#675167: Bug#674850: RM: figlet -- RoQA; license which "specifically excludes the right to re-distribute"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi! On 04.06.2012 19:56, Julien Cristau wrote: >>> There seems to be just about 0 creative content in that file. What >>> exactly is the problem with it? >> Figlet 2.2.5 has just been released with the following changelog [1]. > That doesn't seem to answer the above question. The problem is that someone claims that he has copyrights on some of these files. It doesn't actually matter, what I or anyone else thinks about that, unless it's a judge ruling that said files are not copyrightable. Best regards, Alexander -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJPzQzPAAoJEMJLZaJnLIsSpR0P+gPw6X5ZoP32wMnlqJB8dKA7 wXAaoHDSsWn8oGQXvHOI9tysic+jcjKnjbbaqXlyr+YMeTNPWlxFieHtmRMhNv7l komcM7ckMfFQyhNHGMHk8cSQlEPBW9+0YFVp4bknSqAsGKWAzJWTZBLxXv1il/+o aKuGVK1v6aQjh271/vGNYUzzA5TzBrJsRnruIm4wIapZrXdPzvaKz5JY7Cr+4mnE bAI+/6EdGBjP9/4w2fIQZp+w5jL1rUJPaYfme3kiLTLZna9DKFZt3mOCWdbl0U3w 8n+9MB3HsVBEB5+xn/Dy96da83GNp+9PYT38nxSG24NwaLu6FAwKrLGg2aYumA8L qQcKMwyZ8MURL7JiW7+VgyRZWiFm9XIb/eJUoYY0epRHP9ecamSHfwBrmnggpGRb Ro0Ze52geLU2osmqghOiwU3wkrBJPuOxW8SYrokLZsPLrA9hILqWxxhJQF9MqIt2 8MyV7nfaMouwrypPTTHJy81ZzIoKKNG68M0B8IGD84jUDi2HuHCpzKFYphZjYzhi xpMBkvTCYEseHUSG4xPprro2B4bYg+YZDNoqsP6mMdIo+2IsDnmpxfkvQrFJO4J5 xiraUo8trC+YsgO49EfeEuo5O4i+RMefVmO8x7fgkyYalE96yvwwECQ56vPUm9O2 Si26VsLe0Wzt85OSoNNN =ya74 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fcd0cd4.9050...@debian.org
Bug#675701: ptop
Hi bart, -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Bart Martens [mailto:ba...@master.debian.org] Namens Bart Martens Verzonden: maandag 4 juni 2012 19:35 Aan: Bas van den Dikkenberg CC: 675...@bugs.debian.org; Barry deFreese Onderwerp: RFS: ptop Hi Bas, I suggested earlier to have another look at the list of architectures for these reasons : - m68k is twice on the list, Oke removed one - hppa is not on the list but removing hppa is not mentioned in debian/changelog, Added to changelog - powerpcspe is on the list but the build fails for the same reason as hppa. Removed from control and added to changelog Architecture: amd64 armel armhf i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 s390x sparc sparc64 sh4 ppc64 powerpcspe m68k m68k armhf alpha hurd-i386 There are some typing mistakes in debian/changelog. | ptop (3.6.2-8) unstable; urgency=low | | * Applyed path for hurd architechtur and activate in control file (closes: #675757) | | -- Bastiaan Franciscus van den Dikkenberg Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:50:35 +0200 | | ptop (3.6.2-7) unstable; urgency=low | | * Remove architechtures hurd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 | because they alway fail | * Changed Standards-Version to 3.9.3 | | -- Bastiaan Franciscus van den Dikkenberg Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:13:20 +0200 corrected It would be nice to have 3.6.2-7 and 3.6.2-8 combined into only 3.6.2-7, but it's not really an error. Done It is good to see that hurd-i386 is back. I guess you don't have a solution for the other removed architectures yet. DOne I see that debian/patches/ptop_hurd contains machine/m_gnu.c and that file contains this: * AUTHOR: Richard Henderson * Order support added by Alexey Klimkin * Ported to 2.4 by William LeFebvre But I don't find any Henderson in debian/copyright. I also don't see any license for machine/m_gnu.c. Maybe Barry deFreese knows more, since he is mentioned in the patch as the author of the patch. After doing a diff with machine/m_linux.c these files are the same but this the fix to let it work on hurd. I just uploaded the new version to mentors -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/B1AA70CF260D6446B5DBB7B8C7E4CED501C2E8FF@srv03.dikkenberg.local
Bug#662026: RFS: shotdetect/1.0.86-1 [ITP]
Il 03/06/2012 22:33, Thorsten Alteholz ha scritto: > Hi Giulio, > > On Sun, 3 Jun 2012, Giulio Paci wrote: >> You are right, that link still points to the upload you reviewed the >> first time: new uploads did not overwrote those file, due to the section >> change. > > oh, no, this has been my first time looking at that package. I did not checked your name carefully... I just got confused by the message. :-) >> The right url is: >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/shotdetect/shotdetect_1.0.86-1.dsc >> > > Is there a reason to use debhelper 7? Not that I am aware, just some old files being copied. > The pedantic info from lintian > goes away with something like: debhelper (>=9),(of course you need > to change debian/compat as well). > If you use 'dh' in the rules file, dh9 should automatically take care of > the hardening-stuff (this is a release goal for wheezy). I am sure that > there is also a way for cdbs. I just uploaded a new version of the package which depends on debhelper >= 9; lintian seems not to report the warnings you pointed out anymore. and the software is still working. > So if you don't have a sponsor yet and let those complaints from lintian > disappear, I will upload the package. I do not have a sponsor yet, so you are welcome! Bests, Giulio. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fcd141f.4010...@gmail.com
Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection
Hi, > Sorry, but no. I just tested and it doesn't work. > > With the attached .gtkrc-2.0-kde as created by the current src:kcm-gtk, when > entering the dialog of src:kde-gtk-config, the dialogs don't show "Raleigh" > nor "DejaVu Sans 9", but "oxygen-gtk" and "Bitstream Charter 12" (and "Emacs" > for the GTK3 theme). That's not what I'd call "any changes there are kept > gracefully". > > I'll upload this package [0] when user changes setup by kde-config-gtk-style > 2:0.5.3-1 are kept and converted (if needed) by kde-config-gtk-style 3:2.0-1. > That's rather easy to test… Done. Patch is tiny [1], but it works well. Direct link for download: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-gtk-config/kde-gtk-config_2.0-1.dsc Best regards, Boris [1] https://github.com/tehnick/kde-gtk-config-debian/blob/master/debian/patches/mirgation-from-package-src:kcm-gtk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/592921338841...@web7e.yandex.ru
Bug#673549: RFS: beef/1.0.0-1 -- flexible Brainfuck interpreter
Any takers? On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "beef" > > * Package name: beef > Version : 1.0.0-1 > Upstream Author : Andrea Bolognani > * URL : http://kiyuko.org/software/beef > * License : GPL-2+ > Section : devel > > It builds these binary packages: > > beef - flexible Brainfuck interpreter > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > following URL: > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/beef > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/beef/beef_1.0.0-1.dsc > > Changes in this release: > > * New upstream release. (Closes: #639247) > * Fix watch file. (Closes: #529748) > * U01-fix-whatis-entry.diff: > - use the conventional format for the NAME section of the man > page, so that programs such as whatis and apropos can parse it. > * D01-skip-documentation-files.diff: > - don't install duplicated documentation files. > * D02-leave-changelog-alone.diff: > - don't overwrite upstream changelog. > * Switch to 3.0 (quilt) source format. > * Switch to compat level 9. > * Update Debian copyright file to DEP5 candidate version. > * Add Vcs-* control fields. > * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (no changes needed). > > > I would be glad if someone could upload this package for me. -- Andrea Bolognani Resistance is futile, you will be garbage collected. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#673550: RFS: cattle-1.0/1.0.1-1 [ITP] -- Brainfuck language toolkit
Any takers? On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 05:23:10PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cattle-1.0" > > * Package name: cattle-1.0 > Version : 1.0.1-1 > Upstream Author : Andrea Bolognani > * URL : http://kiyuko.org/software/cattle > * License : GPL-2+ > Section : libs > > It builds these binary packages: > > libcattle-1.0-0 - Brainfuck language toolkit > gir1.2-cattle-1.0 - Brainfuck language toolkit (introspection files) > libcattle-1.0-dev - Brainfuck language toolkit (development files) > libcattle-1.0-doc - Brainfuck language toolkit (API reference) > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > following URL: > > http://mentors.debian.net/package/cattle-1.0 > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cattle-1.0/cattle-1.0_1.0.1-1.dsc > > Changes in this release: > > * Initial release. (Closes: #617304) > * D01-tweak-build-system.diff: > - avoid building example programs to speed up compilation. > > > Cattle is a dependency for the latest release of Beef, which is already in > Debian and for which I've filed a separate RFS as #673549. > > I would be glad if someone could upload this package for me. -- Andrea Bolognani Resistance is futile, you will be garbage collected. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#675701: ptop
On 6/4/2012 3:53 PM, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote: > Hi bart, > > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: Bart Martens [mailto:ba...@master.debian.org] Namens Bart Martens > Verzonden: maandag 4 juni 2012 19:35 > Aan: Bas van den Dikkenberg > CC: 675...@bugs.debian.org; Barry deFreese > Onderwerp: RFS: ptop > > Hi Bas, > > I suggested earlier to have another look at the list of architectures for > these reasons : > > - m68k is twice on the list, > > Oke removed one > > - hppa is not on the list but removing hppa is not mentioned in > debian/changelog, > Added to changelog > - powerpcspe is on the list but the build fails for the same reason as hppa. > Removed from control and added to changelog > Architecture: amd64 armel armhf i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc s390 s390x > sparc sparc64 sh4 ppc64 powerpcspe m68k m68k armhf alpha hurd-i386 > > There are some typing mistakes in debian/changelog. > > | ptop (3.6.2-8) unstable; urgency=low > | > | * Applyed path for hurd architechtur and activate in control file > (closes: #675757) > | > | -- Bastiaan Franciscus van den Dikkenberg Mon, 04 > Jun 2012 12:50:35 +0200 | | ptop (3.6.2-7) unstable; urgency=low | > | * Remove architechtures hurd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 > | because they alway fail > | * Changed Standards-Version to 3.9.3 > | > | -- Bastiaan Franciscus van den Dikkenberg Sat, 02 > Jun 2012 21:13:20 +0200 > > corrected > > It would be nice to have 3.6.2-7 and 3.6.2-8 combined into only 3.6.2-7, but > it's not really an error. > > Done > > It is good to see that hurd-i386 is back. I guess you don't have a solution > for the other removed architectures yet. > > DOne > > I see that debian/patches/ptop_hurd contains machine/m_gnu.c and that file > contains this: > > > * AUTHOR: Richard Henderson > * Order support added by Alexey Klimkin > * Ported to 2.4 by William LeFebvre > > But I don't find any Henderson in debian/copyright. I also don't see any > license for machine/m_gnu.c. Maybe Barry deFreese knows more, since he is > mentioned in the patch as the author of the patch. > > After doing a diff with machine/m_linux.c these files are the same but this > the fix to let it work on hurd. > > I just uploaded the new version to mentors > > Hi gents, I literally just copied m_linux.c to m_gnu.c so that's why that AUTHOR line is there. Probably should be removed, I was just being lazy. You should be able to do a very similar/easy thing for kfreebsd and other archs. Thanks, Barry deFreese -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fcd1f81.8010...@debian.org
GPL and OpenSSL
I'm starting the packaging work for grive [1]. When I finished the first aproach to the Debian package, I run lintian to see the possible errors, and between a big set of warning, I found the next error: possible-/gpl/-code-linked-with-openssl I speak with upstream authors and they tell me that they know the problem between OpenSSL and GPL, but for now they keep using OpenSSL because they only uses the MD5 sum function. Is this md5 function compatible with GPL license? If it isn't, are there any other implementation compatible with GPL2? Best regards y thanks in advance for your help :-) [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675310 -- José Luis Segura Lucas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: GPL and OpenSSL
It could be replaced via Debain patch. AFAIK something similar is done for Apache (or APR?) 2012/6/5 José Luis Segura Lucas : > I'm starting the packaging work for grive [1]. > > When I finished the first aproach to the Debian package, I run lintian to > see the possible errors, and between a big set of warning, I found the next > error: > > possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl > > I speak with upstream authors and they tell me that they know the problem > between OpenSSL and GPL, but for now they keep using OpenSSL because they > only uses the MD5 sum function. > > Is this md5 function compatible with GPL license? If it isn't, are there any > other implementation compatible with GPL2? > > Best regards y thanks in advance for your help :-) > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675310 > > -- > José Luis Segura Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CALL-Q8z4zXiQF_gJw7Pk7PYdqddKG-HLTzW=rrta6fygowz...@mail.gmail.com
Re: GPL and OpenSSL
Hi, On 04.06.2012 23:07, José Luis Segura Lucas wrote: > Is this md5 function compatible with GPL license? If it isn't, are there > any other implementation compatible with GPL2? No it is not. The OpenSSL crypto routines are under the same terms as the whole OpenSSL project. The OpenSSL license is not compatible to any GPL software which makes the whole approach a GPL violation. This is a problem on the GPL code side, however. Thus you have two alternatives: a) Do not link against OpenSSL but GnuTLS b) Tell the upstream authors of your software (i.e. those who provide the GPL software) to make an OpenSSL linking exception [1][2] I find it quite strange that the upstream authors are aware of this problem but do not care to violate their own licensing terms by the way (this makes alternative b) quite appealing to them I guess). [1] http://people.gnome.org/~markmc/openssl-and-the-gpl [2] http://www.openssl.org/support/faq.html#LEGAL2 -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: GPL and OpenSSL
Hi, On 04.06.2012 23:27, Игорь Пашев wrote: > It could be replaced via Debain patch. > AFAIK something similar is done for Apache (or APR?) Both, Apache and APR is licensed under the terms of the Apache 2.0 Software License which is GPL compatible. There is no need to do such things for ASF software. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: GPL and OpenSSL
On 04.06.2012 23:41, Arno Töll wrote: > Software License which is GPL compatible. There is no need to do such ^ that should read: OpenSSL compatible -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#673600: RFS: nyancat/1.0+git20120519.5fe3de9-1
On 03/06/12 20:56, Jakub Wilk wrote: > You wrote: > > if [ "fgrep -q -x ..." -o "fgrep -q -x ..." ]; then > > This condition is always true (also: not very portable). You want this > instead: > > if fgrep -q -x ... || fgrep -q -x ...; then Thanks for catching this. Another version uploaded with a revised postinst which is based on the updated DEP-9 example. Jon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fcd669c.7070...@gmail.com
Bug#674997: marked as done (RFS: sanlock/2.2-1 [ITP])
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jun 2012 04:14:18 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: sanlock/2.2-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #674997, regarding RFS: sanlock/2.2-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 674997: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674997 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sanlock" * Package name: sanlock Version : 2.2-4 Upstream Author : David Teigland * URL : https://fedorahosted.org/sanlock/ * License : (LGPLv2+, GPLv2, GPLv2+) Section : libs It builds those binary packages: libsanlock-client1 - client library for sanlock sanlock- shared storage lock manager sanlock-dev - development files for sanlock To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/sanlock Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sanlock/sanlock_2.2-4.dsc More information about sanlock can be obtained from https://fedorahosted.org/sanlock/ Changes since the last upload: * Add debian/README.Source Regards, David Weber --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package sanlock version 2.2-1 is in unstable now. http://packages.qa.debian.org/sanlock --- End Message ---
Processed: retitle to RFS: ptop/3.6.2-7
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 675701 RFS: ptop/3.6.2-7 Bug #675701 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ptop/3.6.2-8 Changed Bug title to 'RFS: ptop/3.6.2-7' from 'RFS: ptop/3.6.2-8' > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 675701: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675701 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133886965923031.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#675811: marked as done (RFS: rsskit/0.3-2)
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jun 2012 04:14:18 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: rsskit/0.3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #675811, regarding RFS: rsskit/0.3-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 675811: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675811 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "rsskit". http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rsskit/rsskit_0.3-2.dsc Changes since the last upload: rsskit (0.3-2) unstable; urgency=low * debian/rules (binary-arch): Invoke dh_makeshlibs. * debian/librsskit0.lintian-overrides: Add postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig and postrm-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig; typical false positives for GNUstep libraries. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Package rsskit version 0.3-2 is in unstable now. http://packages.qa.debian.org/rsskit --- End Message ---
Bug#675701: RFS: ptop/3.6.2-7
Hi Bas, I suggest to do the following changes: - Remove machine/m_gnu.c from debian/patches/ptop_hurd, - Add "cp -f machine/m_linux.c machine/m_gnu.c" to debian/rules, - Add debian/clean containing "machine/m_gnu.c", - Add similar changes for the other arch(s) with the same problem, - Rename debian/patches/ptop_hurd to debian/patches/archs, - Update "Architecture:" in debian/control. I'm not sure about removing hppa and powerpcspe from ptop's archs list because I don't know the issue with debhelper on these archs. Is it really a permanent problem ? Maybe ptop can have "Architecture: any". This page http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=debhelper&suite=sid states "No entry in hppa database, check Packages-arch-specific" but this page https://buildd.debian-ports.org/quinn-diff/sid/Packages-arch-specific seems to fail at this time. I looked this up: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile "must be accompanied by a verbatim copy of its copyright information" "should name the original authors" I see in the file LICENSE that William LeFebvre is copyright holder but that is not yet mentioned in debian/copyright. That's a "must" for debian-policy. I see that there are quite some authors. Mentioning them in debian/copyright is a "should" for debian-policy. To help you with listing them, I found these authors so far: Andrew Herbert Andrew S. Townley Anthony Baxter Ariel Faigon Christos Zoulas Joep Vesseur John Haxby John Schimmel Kevin Schmidt Larry McVoy Mike Hopkirk Richard Henderson Sandeep Cariapa Thorsten Lockert Torsten Kasch William LeFebvre Rich Holland Mark Wong I think that the list is pretty complete, but it's possible that I've missed a few. I have left out the e-mail addresses to prevent complaints about spam. I suggest to add this list to debian/copyright. It's a "should" for debian-policy. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120605052029.gb21...@master.debian.org
Bug#670334: Sponsoring of notion, a first look
Hi Axel, thank you very much for your comments. > a few observations (without having gone too deep yet, so I might have overseen > some reasoning): > > notion_3+2012042300.orig.tar.gz from your package and > notion-3-2012042300-src.tar.gz from SF seem to differ: > > 0ffd57a75f2c1a75ce551b3baef1fee0 notion_3+2012042300.orig.tar.gz > 96d004374e92e3188608a39afea2d75f notion-3-2012042300-src.tar.gz > > -rw-r--r-- 1 abe tar 754121 May 16 15:29 notion_3+2012042300.orig.tar.gz > -rw-r--r-- 1 abe tar 762655 Apr 23 18:42 notion-3-2012042300-src.tar.gz > > Is this on purpose? The files in the two archives are the same according to a recursive md5sum, only the parent directories are called differently (we use 3-... as an upstream version, which we change to 3+... when importing into the Debian git repository to comply with [1]) and some file status information differs (maybe/probably for the same reason). > The upstream ChangeLog says "(The ChangeLog will be generated by > release scripts from svn logs)" -- looks like packaging a VCS > snapshot. But the version suggests that an official upstream release > and not a snapshot is packaged. Also such a ChangeLog stub should IMHO > not show up in the Debian package as it's useless. Arnout has dropped the changelog, thanks. > Even if mentors.d.n hasn't found relevant lintian warnings, the new > lintian does. :-) > > [hardening flags] We have enabled hardening flags through a Debian patch to the build system. A few Lintian warnings remain, but according to a discussion in #debian-mentors, these are false positives. Regards, Philipp [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/first.en.html#namever -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120605054118.GA14404@debian
Re: GPL and OpenSSL
El 04/06/12 23:38, Arno Töll escribió: > I find it quite strange that the upstream authors are aware of this > problem but do not care to violate their own licensing terms by the way > (this makes alternative b) quite appealing to them I guess). > Well, I think they know that *after* developing it. I have copied and pasted your answer to them and waiting news about it. Hope that they change the necessary. Thanks a lot for your answers -- José Luis Segura Lucas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#675910: RFS: grr.app/0.9.0-1
Hi Yavor, The information in debian/copyright is not yet complete, see GNUstep.h. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120605060911.gc21...@master.debian.org
