Bug#662754: Subject: RFS: libre-jigsaw/2012.03.04-1 [ITP]

[Jon Hulka]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libre-jigsaw"

Package name: libre-jigsaw
Version : 2012.03.04-1
Upstream Author : Jonathan Hulka 
URL : https://github.com/jon-hulka/libre-jig
License : GPL-2 and CC BY-SA 3.0
Section : games

It builds those binary packages:

libre-jigsaw - jigsaw puzzle
libre-jigsaw-pics - jigsaw puzzle (pictures)

This application is written in Java.

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/libre-jigsaw


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libr/libre-jigsaw/libre-jigsaw_2012.03.04-1.dsc

More information about libre-jigsaw can be obtained from
http://speedduck.net/games/jigsaw

Changes since the last upload:

Merged the two source packages into a multiple binary package
Removed javahelper build dependencies
Fixed links to home directory in rules file
Modified the short description


Regards,
Jonathan Hulka



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/calkgrc8daewat5qojwokkepbj3lmvqiyqm_vzttgostrmjl...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#662632: RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1

[Benoit Knecht]

Hi Goswin,

Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Benoît Knecht  writes:
> > Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libaio-ocaml"
> >> 
> >>  * Package name: libaio-ocaml
> >>Version : 1.0~rc1
> >>Upstream Author : Goswin von Brederlow 
> >>  * URL : http://forge.ocamlcore.org/projects/libaio-ocaml/
> >>Vcs-Git : 
> >> git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/libaio-ocaml.git
> >>Vcs-Browser : 
> >> http://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/libaio-ocaml.git
> >
> > Vcs-Browser should link to something browsable, like a gitweb or
> > something, if it exists.
> 
> Oh, I copied that from the browsable webpage itself not realizing that
> it was a raw view. Fixed. Going to upload 1.0~rc2 after this mail.
> 
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/libaio-ocaml.git
> 
> >>  * License : LGPL-2.1+ and link execpetion
> >>Section : ocaml
> >> 
> >> It builds those binary packages:
> >> 
> >>  libaio-ocaml - OCaml bindings for libaio (Linux kernel AIO access library)
> >>  libaio-ocaml-dev - OCaml bindings for libaio (Linux kernel AIO access 
> >> library)
> >
> > You should open an ITP bug and close it in the debian/changelog [1].
> 
> Given that I am upstream, currently the only user of it and the package
> is hosted in the ocaml maintainers git I do not think there is a risk of
> anyone else packaging this as well. Didn't feel like writing an ITP just
> to raise the ITP count from 1120 to 1121 for a few days when the
> packaging is done and just pending cosmetic changes.
> 
> But if that is stopping sponsorship I can certainly write one.

Yes, I think you definitely should. Avoiding duplication of efforts
isn't the only benefit of ITP bugs; see [2] for a list of reasons.

> >> To access further information about this package, please visit the 
> >> following URL:
> >> 
> >>   http://mentors.debian.net/package/libaio-ocaml
> >
> > This page shows a few issues already that you should also fix: no watch
> > file, duplicate short description, and no debian version (i.e. package
> > is native).
> 
> I've already fixed the duplicate short description in git, the only info
> I consider valid problem there.
> 
> The package is native because I am both maintainer and upstream
> author. Does a watch file make sense for a native package?

That's not what native means. See the third point of [3].

> I've tried for a while to maintain the package with split upstream and
> debian git repositories but it just causes so much extra work for no
> real benefit. Every upstream change needs to be commited, pulled to the
> upstream branch of the debian git, merged into master, build, test,
> repeat. Besides being extra work for nothing it also seriously disrupts
> my workflow and prevents the use of for example "git commit --amend".
> You can no longer just play with the source till it works and then
> commit in an orderly fashion.

I don't see why it would prevent you from using "git commit --amend"
(although you should never use it once you've pushed to a public
repository anyway). In fact, you can make a non-native package even if
you only have the one git repository; you just need to make sure your
.orig.tar.gz tarball doesn't contain the debian/ directory. See [4].

[1] http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
[2] 
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.en.html#newpackage
[3] 
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#What_is_the_difference_between_a_native_Debian_package_and_a_non-native_package.3F
[4] 
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#What.27s_wrong_with_upstream_shipping_a_debian.2BAC8_directory.3F

Cheers,

-- 
Benoît Knecht



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120306081753.ga30...@marvin.lan

Bug#662632: RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1

[Goswin von Brederlow]

tags 662632 - moreinfo
thanks

Stéphane Glondu  writes:

> Le 05/03/2012 12:33, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
>>   I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libaio-ocaml"
>
> I've looked at the git repository (037a448). It is written explicitly in
> [1]:
>
>   "Do not close RFS bugs in debian/changelog."

done

> but the bug you refer to in debian/changelog is a RFS bug (CCed), not an
> ITP bug. Please file a proper ITP bug and use it in debian/changelog.

pending

> Please use debhelper compat >= 8.

done

> Please use [2] for debian/copyright.

done

> You don't need to put the destination path in *.install(.in) files if it
> is the same (relative to debian/tmp).

done

> Your versioned dependencies are not enough: using ${ocaml:foo} variables
> need dh-ocaml (>= 0.9) and ocaml-nox (>= 3.11.1-3~). But I guess just
> not putting any version would be fine too.

done

> "libaio-ocaml (= ${binary:Version})" should not be needed in
> libaio-ocaml-dev's Depends field (thanks to ${ocaml:Depends}).

done. This automatic Provides/Depends: libaio-ocaml-z33v7 is neat.

> Please remove DMUA. Your key is not even in the keyring.
>
> [1] http://wiki.debian.org/Mentors/BTS
> [2] http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/

done

MfG
Goswin



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87hay2unci.fsf@frosties.localnet

Processed: Re: RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 662632 - moreinfo
Bug #662632 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1 [ITP] -- OCaml 
bindings for libaio
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
662632: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662632
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133102370222035.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

who-uploads (was: Bug#661498: marked as done (RFS: burp/1.3.1-1 -- Simple cross-platform network BackUp and Restore Program (new upstream release)))

[Florian Ernst]

Hello there,

some general info, we are on -mentors after all :-)

On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 02:33:06AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> [...]
> This bug appears to be done.
> 
> Not sure who uploaded it, but the pts shows an upload.
> 
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/burp/news/20120303T164731Z.html

:) fernst@fernst:~$ who-uploads burp
   
Uploads for burp:
1.3.1-1 to unstable: Bartosz Fenski 
1.3.0+20120214git-1 to unstable: Bartosz Fenski 
1.3.0-3 to unstable: Bartosz Fenski 
:) fernst@fernst:~$ dpkg -S $(which who-uploads)
devscripts: /usr/bin/who-uploads

Alternatively, the maintainer's packages overview at
http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=b...@dikkenberg.net
provides a mouseover text for the version string.

Cheers,
Flo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120306094014.ga7...@fernst.no-ip.org

Bug#662632: RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1

[Goswin von Brederlow]

Benoit Knecht  writes:

> Hi Goswin,
>
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Benoît Knecht  writes:
>> > Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libaio-ocaml"
>> >> 
>> >>  * Package name: libaio-ocaml
>> >>Version : 1.0~rc1
>> >>Upstream Author : Goswin von Brederlow 
>> >>  * URL : http://forge.ocamlcore.org/projects/libaio-ocaml/
>> >>Vcs-Git : 
>> >> git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/libaio-ocaml.git
>> >>Vcs-Browser : 
>> >> http://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/libaio-ocaml.git
>> >
>> > Vcs-Browser should link to something browsable, like a gitweb or
>> > something, if it exists.
>> 
>> Oh, I copied that from the browsable webpage itself not realizing that
>> it was a raw view. Fixed. Going to upload 1.0~rc2 after this mail.
>> 
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/libaio-ocaml.git
>> 
>> >>  * License : LGPL-2.1+ and link execpetion
>> >>Section : ocaml
>> >> 
>> >> It builds those binary packages:
>> >> 
>> >>  libaio-ocaml - OCaml bindings for libaio (Linux kernel AIO access 
>> >> library)
>> >>  libaio-ocaml-dev - OCaml bindings for libaio (Linux kernel AIO access 
>> >> library)
>> >
>> > You should open an ITP bug and close it in the debian/changelog [1].
>> 
>> Given that I am upstream, currently the only user of it and the package
>> is hosted in the ocaml maintainers git I do not think there is a risk of
>> anyone else packaging this as well. Didn't feel like writing an ITP just
>> to raise the ITP count from 1120 to 1121 for a few days when the
>> packaging is done and just pending cosmetic changes.
>> 
>> But if that is stopping sponsorship I can certainly write one.
>
> Yes, I think you definitely should. Avoiding duplication of efforts
> isn't the only benefit of ITP bugs; see [2] for a list of reasons.

Filed, pending BTS response.

>> >> To access further information about this package, please visit the 
>> >> following URL:
>> >> 
>> >>   http://mentors.debian.net/package/libaio-ocaml
>> >
>> > This page shows a few issues already that you should also fix: no watch
>> > file, duplicate short description, and no debian version (i.e. package
>> > is native).
>> 
>> I've already fixed the duplicate short description in git, the only info
>> I consider valid problem there.
>> 
>> The package is native because I am both maintainer and upstream
>> author. Does a watch file make sense for a native package?
>
> That's not what native means. See the third point of [3].

It says "should" and not "must" and a native package is just so much
simpler to work with at the current state of the package. Current state
is about 50 upstream releases to 3 debian changes only releases.
That might change in the future and then the package can become
non-native. But for now I feel native is the best way.

>> I've tried for a while to maintain the package with split upstream and
>> debian git repositories but it just causes so much extra work for no
>> real benefit. Every upstream change needs to be commited, pulled to the
>> upstream branch of the debian git, merged into master, build, test,
>> repeat. Besides being extra work for nothing it also seriously disrupts
>> my workflow and prevents the use of for example "git commit --amend".
>> You can no longer just play with the source till it works and then
>> commit in an orderly fashion.
>
> I don't see why it would prevent you from using "git commit --amend"
> (although you should never use it once you've pushed to a public

Because with 2 seperate gits I will have pushed/pulled the commit from
one git to the other and then using --amend just creates problems for
the next push/pull.

> repository anyway). In fact, you can make a non-native package even if
> you only have the one git repository; you just need to make sure your
> .orig.tar.gz tarball doesn't contain the debian/ directory. See [4].

Even with a single repository I need to roll out a new orig.tar.gz for
every upstream change or have to commit upstream changes to
debian/patches/* every time I build a source package and send it to
build. The recent change that dpkg now needs "dpkg --commit" is
partially to blame there.

Both ways mean extra work just to build and test a new version. At the
moment the costs simply outweight the benefits. So unless I must change
this I will stick with a native package.

> [1] http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/
> [2] 
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.en.html#newpackage
> [3] 
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#What_is_the_difference_between_a_native_Debian_package_and_a_non-native_package.3F
> [4] 
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#What.27s_wrong_with_upstream_shipping_a_debian.2BAC8_directory.3F
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- 
> Benoît Knecht

MfG
Goswin

PS: Parts of libaio-ocaml (those not specific to libaio) might move to
ocaml-extunix so a bunch more upstream

Bug#661975: marked as done (RFS: gearman-interface [NMU] -- fixes 2 RC bugs)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 6 Mar 2012 14:41:58 +0100
with message-id 

and subject line Re: Bug#661975: RFS: gearman-interface [NMU] -- fixes 2 RC bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #661975,
regarding RFS: gearman-interface [NMU] -- fixes 2 RC bugs
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
661975: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661975
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Dear mentors,

  I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gearman-interface".

  It fixes two filed RC bugs and one unfiled FTBFS.

  The intention to NMU was expressed in the BTS, please upload it to the 
delayed queue. 

 * Package name: gearman-interface
   Version : 0.13.2-2.1
   Section : python

  It builds those binary packages:

python-gearman.libgearman - Python wrapper of libgearman
 python3-gearman.libgearman - Python 3 wrapper of libgearman

  To access further information about this package, please visit the following 
URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/gearman-interface


  Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gearman-interface/gearman-interface_0.13.2-2.1.dsc

  More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.

  Changes since the last upload:

gearman-interface (0.13.2-2.1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Non-maintainer upload.
  * Fix "FTBFS: SWIG version >= 1.3.31 is required. You have 2.0.4."
applying patch from ubuntu (Closes: #631820)
  * Apply fix for newer libgearman-dev (changes includes)
  * Fix "python-gearman.libgearman and python-gearman: error when trying
to install together" Cherry-picking relevant sections of the attached
patch in the bugrport (Closes: #620469)

 -- Tobias Frost   Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:03:30 +0100


  Regards,
   Tobias Frost


- -- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk9Rr90ACgkQvyUNygvkuQIoKwCfUaUKC4MutW19a7ISVoZUW2Jw
20UAn1eT+la+3MxA4xAE9eFqBOZKnhOH
=TENU
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 14:19, Sandro Tosi  wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 13:38, Tobias Frost  wrote:
>> Hallo Sandro,
>>
>> uploaded to d-m.
>> * undid wrap-and-sort
>> * Patches are attached to the relevant BTS entries.
>> * Filed the 3rd RC bug (FTBFS reg. libgearman)
>> * no other changes made to the package.
>
> Thanks a lot for you work!! I've uploaded to DELAYED/2 . Just a trick
> for the next NMU: to send diff to related bugs, there's a tool:
> nmudiff - it will help you a lot.

The package has just been accepted: thanks for your contribution to Debian!

Closing,
-- 
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi

--- End Message ---

Bug#662632: RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1

[Benoît Knecht]

Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Benoît Knecht  writes:
> > Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> 
> >> The package is native because I am both maintainer and upstream
> >> author. Does a watch file make sense for a native package?
> >
> > That's not what native means. See the third point of [3].
> 
> It says "should" and not "must" and a native package is just so much
> simpler to work with at the current state of the package. Current state
> is about 50 upstream releases to 3 debian changes only releases.
> That might change in the future and then the package can become
> non-native. But for now I feel native is the best way.

You're of course free to do as you want, but I maintain that it's a very
bad idea, and not doing something right because it's easier to do it
wrong will almost certainly turn out to be much more of a mess and a
burden than you'd have anticipated.

With the path you're choosing, you're essentially making sure that no
other distribution will ever package your software. They'd have to sort
through every new upstream release to see if anything changed besides
debian/; and when they fall behind on the upstream version simply
because only Debian-specific stuff has changed, their users will start
complaining and they'll have to explain the disparity.

And as mentioned in [4], NMUs will be much more complicated.

I think it important for any maintainer to clearly differentiate in
their mind upstream from Debian, even if they happen to be the same
person. Otherwise, you're artificially limiting your software to Debian,
which is at the opposite side of what free software should strive for.

Of course, I can't sponsor your package either way, so you can
completely ignore my advice if you wish. But if I was in the position of
sponsoring it, I wouldn't do it based on this point alone (and I kind of
hope prospective sponsors feel the same way).

I sincerely hope you'll do the right thing here.

[3] 
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#What_is_the_difference_between_a_native_Debian_package_and_a_non-native_package.3F
[4] 
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#What.27s_wrong_with_upstream_shipping_a_debian.2BAC8_directory.3F

Cheers,

-- 
Benoît Knecht



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120306142202.ga31...@marvin.lan

Bug#662632: RFS: libaio-ocaml/1.0~rc1

[Stéphane Glondu]

Le 06/03/2012 15:22, Benoît Knecht a écrit :
> I think it important for any maintainer to clearly differentiate in
> their mind upstream from Debian, even if they happen to be the same
> person. Otherwise, you're artificially limiting your software to Debian,
> which is at the opposite side of what free software should strive for.

I wholeheartedly agree with that.

Le 06/03/2012 10:36, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> Even with a single repository I need to roll out a new orig.tar.gz for
> every upstream change or have to commit upstream changes to
> debian/patches/* every time I build a source package and send it to
> build. The recent change that dpkg now needs "dpkg --commit" is
> partially to blame there.

You are free to use native packages for your own (intermediate,
unreleased) development versions. But the version ultimately uploaded to
Debian should not be native.

How you manage your git (or whatever) repository is not relevant in
chosing whether a package is native or not. Sure, I expect a certain
layout for repositories under d-o-m umbrella, but I guess I wouldn't
mind as long as it is obvious how to build the package from the git
repository (maybe README.source if a plain git-buildpackage doesn't work?).

> It says "should" and not "must" and a native package is just so much
> simpler to work with at the current state of the package. Current state
> is about 50 upstream releases to 3 debian changes only releases.
> That might change in the future and then the package can become
> non-native. But for now I feel native is the best way.

Then maybe libaio-ocaml is not mature enough to enter Debian...


Cheers,

-- 
Stéphane



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f562a2b.2020...@debian.org

Bug#662812: RFS: lugaru/0~20110520.1+hge4354+dfsg-2

[Martin Erik Werner]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal


Dear mentors, and pkg-gamers,

I am looking for a sponsor for my updated package "lugaru" which
(amongst other things) fixes an "important" bug: #662424

* Package names   : lugaru
  Version : 0~20110520.1+hge4354+dfsg-2
  Upstream Authors: Wolfire Games 
  : Neal Gompa 
  : Alexander Monakov 
  : Côme BERNIGAUD 
  : sf17k
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/lugaru/
  : http://www.wolfire.com/lugaru
* License : GPL-2+, CC-BY-SA, "freeware"
  Section : contrib/games

It builds these binary packages:
lugaru - third-person action game

Changes: 
 lugaru (0~20110520.1+hge4354+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Rework launcher script to start windowed and with no mouse grabbing per
 default.
   * Update manual page:
 - Information regarding fullscreen and input grabbing,
 - document -h|-help|--help commandline
   * Change Arand -> Martin, same person, now with real name
   * Fix naming of 128x128 icon so it is used properly
   * Standards-Version 3.9.3
 - Update DEP-5 Format: link
   * Add unversioned library depend alternatives
 - libglu1-mesa-dev | libglu-dev
 - libglew1.5-dev | libglew-dev
 - libsdl1.2-dev | libsdl-dev
 - zlib1g-dev | libz-dev
   * Rename and refresh patches
 - Add DEP-3 tag to dont-install-data.patch
   * Build-Depends on libpng-dev, change from libpng12-dev (Closes: 662424)

The packages are lintian clean apart from:
I: lugaru: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/games/lugaru/lugaru ment meant
 - lintitan somehow misinterprets a mangled string in the binary
P: lugaru: no-upstream-changelog
 - Can't do much I'm afraid, point releases is what I'd hope for first...

The packages can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- dget 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/l/lugaru/lugaru_0~20110520.1+hge4354+dfsg-2.dsc

The git VCS for lugaru is up for inspection at:
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-games/lugaru.git
- "debian_source" is the branch corresponding to the "lugaru" package,
see README.source for more info (this VCS layout is a bit of a failed
experiment).

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

--
Martin Erik Werner



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#662026: RFS: shotdetect/1.0.86-1 [ITP]

[Giulio Paci]

Hi Benoît,
thank you for your comment. I updated the package, adding the missing
libxslt1-dev dependency and fixing a couple of other minor issues.

Cheers,
Giulio.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f563e58.5060...@gmail.com

Bug#662832: RFS: pdfcube/0.0.4-2 - PDF document viewer with 3D effects

[Andreas Moog]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pdfcube"

* Package name: pdfcube
  Version : 0.0.4-2
  Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
* License : [fill in]
  Section : text

It builds those binary packages:

 pdfcube- PDF document viewer with 3D effects
 pdfcube-dbg - PDF document viewer with 3D effects - debug symbols

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/pdfcube

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

 dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pdfcube/pdfcube_0.0.4-2.dsc

Changes since the last upload:

pdfcube (0.0.4-2) unstable; urgency=low

* debian/source/format: Use 3.0 (quilt) source format
* debian/rules: Use DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND instead of LDFLAGS to ensure
  that all hardening flags are passed correctly. (Closes: #662235)
  Thanks Simon Ruderich 
* debian/patches/array_bounds.patch: The top_color array is defined as
  containing 4 elements, yet the fifth element was accessed.
  (Closes: #662240)
  Thanks Simon Ruderich 
* debian/control, d/rules, d/pdfcube.install, d/pdfcube.manpages:
  - add pdfcube-dbg package

  Regards,
   Andreas Moog



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#662832: RFS: pdfcube/0.0.4-2 - PDF document viewer with 3D effects

[Andreas Moog]

On 06.03.2012 18:52, Andreas Moog wrote:

Urghs, sorry for the template cruft in the original mail.

These are the package details:

* Package name: pdfcube
  Version : 0.0.4-2
  Upstream Author : Mirko Maischberger 
* URL : http://code.100allora.it/pdfcube
* License : GPL-2+
  Section : text

Cheers,
  Andreas



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: Re: Merge two RFSs for different versions of pdfcube

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> block 651724 with 662832
Bug #651724 {Done: Andreas Moog } [wnpp] ITA: pdfcube -- PDF 
document viewer with 3D effects
Was blocked by: 660665
Added blocking bug(s) of 651724: 662832
> merge 660665 662832
Bug#660665: RFS: pdfcube/0.0.4-1 [ITA] -- PDF document viewer with 3D effects
Bug#662832: RFS: pdfcube/0.0.4-2 - PDF document viewer with 3D effects
Merged 660665 662832.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
660665: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660665
662832: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662832
651724: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651724
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133106092626247.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: Raise severity of RFS that fixes RC bug to 'important'

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 662744 important
Bug #662744 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ibus-unikey/0.6.1-1 [RC]
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'

> retitle 662744 RFS: ibus-unikey/0.6.1-1 [RC] -- Vietnamese Input Method 
> Engine for IBus using Unikey Engine
Bug #662744 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ibus-unikey/0.6.1-1 [RC]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: ibus-unikey/0.6.1-1 [RC] -- Vietnamese Input Method 
Engine for IBus using Unikey Engine' from 'RFS: ibus-unikey/0.6.1-1 [RC]'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
662744: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662744
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133106108127800.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed (with 1 errors): Undo: Merge two RFSs for different versions of pdfcube

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> unmerge 660665 662832
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> unblock 651724 by 662832
Bug #651724 {Done: Andreas Moog } [wnpp] ITA: pdfcube -- PDF 
document viewer with 3D effects
Was blocked by: 660665 662832
Removed blocking bug(s) of 651724: 660665 and 662832
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
651724: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651724
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133106163630175.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: Re: Undo: Merge two RFSs for different versions of pdfcube

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> unmerge 662832
Bug#662832: RFS: pdfcube/0.0.4-2 - PDF document viewer with 3D effects
Bug#660665: RFS: pdfcube/0.0.4-1 [ITA] -- PDF document viewer with 3D effects
Disconnected #662832 from all other report(s).

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
660665: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660665
662832: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662832
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13310623862120.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#660665: marked as done (RFS: pdfcube/0.0.4-1 [ITA] -- PDF document viewer with 3D effects)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 6 Mar 2012 20:45:14 +0100
with message-id <20120306194513.gf13...@marvin.lan>
and subject line Re: Bug#660665: RFS: pdfcube/0.0.4-1 -- PDF document viewer 
with 3D effects
has caused the Debian Bug report #660665,
regarding RFS: pdfcube/0.0.4-1 [ITA] -- PDF document viewer with 3D effects
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
660665: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660665
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pdfcube".

 * Package name: pdfcube
   Version : 0.0.4-1
   Upstream Author : mirko.maischberger (at) gmail (dot) com
 * URL : http://code.100allora.it/pdfcube
 * License : GPL-2.0+
   Section : text

It builds those binary packages:

pdfcube- PDF document viewer with 3D effects

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

  http://mentors.debian.net/package/pdfcube

Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pdfcube/pdfcube_0.0.4-1.dsc

As a third option, you can access the git packaging at alioth:

git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/pdfcube.git

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards,

Andreas Moog



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Andreas Moog wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pdfcube".
> 
>  * Package name: pdfcube
>Version : 0.0.4-1
>Upstream Author : mirko.maischberger (at) gmail (dot) com
>  * URL : http://code.100allora.it/pdfcube
>  * License : GPL-2.0+
>Section : text
> 
> It builds those binary packages:
> 
> pdfcube- PDF document viewer with 3D effects

Closing, uploaded by Alexander Wirt.

-- 
Benoît Knecht

--- End Message ---

Processed (with 1 errors): Merge redundant ITP and RFS bugs for libre-jigsaw

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> block 660435 with 661857
Bug #660435 [wnpp] ITP: libre-jigsaw-pics -- Libre Jigsaw pictures
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 660435: 661857
> merge 660433 660435
Bug#660433: ITP: libre-jigsaw -- A jigsaw puzzle game
Bug#660435: ITP: libre-jigsaw-pics -- Libre Jigsaw pictures
Merged 660433 660435.

> retitle 662754 RFS: libre-jigsaw/2012.03.04-1 [ITP] -- jigsaw puzzle
Bug #662754 [sponsorship-requests] Subject: RFS: libre-jigsaw/2012.03.04-1 [ITP]
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: libre-jigsaw/2012.03.04-1 [ITP] -- jigsaw puzzle' 
from 'Subject: RFS: libre-jigsaw/2012.03.04-1 [ITP]'
> merge 661857 662754
Bug#661857: RFS: libre-jigsaw/2012.02.25-1 [ITP] -- jigsaw puzzle game
Bug#662754: RFS: libre-jigsaw/2012.03.04-1 [ITP] -- jigsaw puzzle
Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
Values for `blocks' don't match:
 #661857 has `660433 660435';
 #662754 has `'

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
662754: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662754
660435: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660435
660433: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660433
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133106972512219.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#662026: RFS: shotdetect/1.0.86-1 [ITP]

[Benoît Knecht]

Giulio Paci wrote:
>   thank you for your comment. I updated the package, adding the missing
> libxslt1-dev dependency and fixing a couple of other minor issues.

A few things to look into:

  - Your man page is quite thin. Please expand it using full words
instead of abbreviations (img, thumb, etc.) and full sentences. Try
explaining what each option does.

For instance, '-o' takes a path as an argument; to what, a directory
or a file? What happens if both and XML file and a thumbnail are to
be generated?

Likewise, the description of '-s' doesn't help me at all. What is
the range of the threshold? Is it a float or an integer? What does
it represent?

For '-w', what is a waveform?

You also need to escape the space between 'January,' and '2012'.

  - debian/patches/compilation_fixes.patch contains a lot of whitespace
fixes, most of them in comments; please remove those to make it
easier to understand.

  - Why are you putting your package in contrib/misc? As far as I can
see, it doesn't depend on a non-free package, so the video section
seems more appropriate.

  - ltmain.sh is GPL-2+, and the FSF is its copyright holder; this
should be reflected in debian/copyright. Use

  licensecheck -r --copyright .

to make sure you're not missing anything else.

  - I don't think you should install AUTHORS; it contains a single name,
and that information is in debian/copyright already.

The NEWS file seems pretty useless as well.

The README file is just plain confusing.

Cheers,

-- 
Benoît Knecht



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120306222505.gh13...@marvin.lan

Bug#662754: RFS: libre-jigsaw/2012.03.04-1 [ITP]

[Benoît Knecht]

block 660433 with 662754
block 660435 with 662754
merge 661857 662754
thanks

Hi Jon,

Jon Hulka wrote:
> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libre-jigsaw"
> 
> Package name: libre-jigsaw
> Version : 2012.03.04-1
> Upstream Author : Jonathan Hulka 
> URL : https://github.com/jon-hulka/libre-jig
> License : GPL-2 and CC BY-SA 3.0
> Section : games
> 
> It builds those binary packages:
> 
> libre-jigsaw - jigsaw puzzle
> libre-jigsaw-pics - jigsaw puzzle (pictures)

Please only close #660433 in the changelog, both ITP bugs are now merged
and will be closed together. In general, if a bug needs to be closed
because it was opened by mistake, just close it manually; there's no
need to clutter the changelog with such entries.

Cheers,

-- 
Benoît Knecht



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120306223646.ga27...@marvin.lan

Processed: Re: Bug#662754: RFS: libre-jigsaw/2012.03.04-1 [ITP]

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> block 660433 with 662754
Bug #660433 [wnpp] ITP: libre-jigsaw -- A jigsaw puzzle game
Bug #660435 [wnpp] ITP: libre-jigsaw-pics -- Libre Jigsaw pictures
Was blocked by: 661857
Added blocking bug(s) of 660433: 662754
Was blocked by: 661857
Added blocking bug(s) of 660435: 662754
> block 660435 with 662754
Bug #660435 [wnpp] ITP: libre-jigsaw-pics -- Libre Jigsaw pictures
Bug #660433 [wnpp] ITP: libre-jigsaw -- A jigsaw puzzle game
Was blocked by: 662754 661857
Ignoring request to alter blocking bugs of bug #660435 to the same blocks 
previously set
Was blocked by: 662754 661857
Ignoring request to alter blocking bugs of bug #660433 to the same blocks 
previously set
> merge 661857 662754
Bug#661857: RFS: libre-jigsaw/2012.02.25-1 [ITP] -- jigsaw puzzle game
Bug#662754: RFS: libre-jigsaw/2012.03.04-1 [ITP] -- jigsaw puzzle
Merged 661857 662754.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
660435: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660435
662754: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662754
661857: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661857
660433: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660433
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13310734461278.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

sponsorship-requests mails should not go to debian-mentors

[Samuel Bronson]

It's getting to the point where I think it would be best if we do one
of two things:

 1. Split out sponsorship-requests bug mail to a new mailing list.

 2. Stop sending it anywhere, and let people subscribe through the PTS
if they care.

How about you?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/cajyzjmd5dzthos4fysn0gsh7wzvp_2z0uftot8cakdmcg7a...@mail.gmail.com

Re: sponsorship-requests mails should not go to debian-mentors

[Gergely Nagy]

Samuel Bronson  writes:

> It's getting to the point where I think it would be best if we do one
> of two things:
>
>  1. Split out sponsorship-requests bug mail to a new mailing list.
>
>  2. Stop sending it anywhere, and let people subscribe through the PTS
> if they care.
>
> How about you?

I'd go with option two (but 1 is also acceptable), but the noise ration
on -mentors is getting in the way indeed.

-- 
|8]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87r4x5ibke@luthien.mhp

Re: sponsorship-requests mails should not go to debian-mentors

[Paul Tagliamonte]

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Samuel Bronson  wrote:
> It's getting to the point where I think it would be best if we do one
> of two things:
>
>  1. Split out sponsorship-requests bug mail to a new mailing list.
>
>  2. Stop sending it anywhere, and let people subscribe through the PTS
> if they care.
>
> How about you?

I hate to +1 without much content, but IMHO the "right" thing to do
would be to split off people trying to give or receive help and
automated mail regarding requests for sponsorship.

The percent of RFS mail / mail is much higher then !(spam-mail) / mail.

In the end, this needs to go to the listmasters and get a change on
the BTS side as well. Perhaps we should start that flame war again.

>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: 
> http://lists.debian.org/cajyzjmd5dzthos4fysn0gsh7wzvp_2z0uftot8cakdmcg7a...@mail.gmail.com
>

-T

-- 
All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors.

#define sizeof(x) rand()
:wq


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAO6P2QSOzn9NEHqVg3nUBmgRsNQzKznGV=xrpmxy8qvkcmx...@mail.gmail.com

Re: sponsorship-requests mails should not go to debian-mentors

[Dmitry Smirnov]

We already tried to discuss the issue in 

  Bug#658498: "sponsorship-requests and debian-mentors mailing list"

but I have a feeling our argument hasn't been heard.

Regards,
Dmitry.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201203071127.48981.only...@member.fsf.org

Re: sponsorship-requests mails should not go to debian-mentors

[Don Armstrong]

On Tue, 06 Mar 2012, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> I hate to +1 without much content, but IMHO the "right" thing to do
> would be to split off people trying to give or receive help and
> automated mail regarding requests for sponsorship.

Anyone who doesn't want to receive mail from the BTS should be
trivially able to filter it out.[1]

If you don't want to receive control and closed acks, discard
X-Debian-PR-Message: (transcript|closed). The following procmail
recipe will do it for you:

:0:
* ^X-Debian-PR-Message: (transcript|closed)
* ^List-Id: 
/dev/null

and the sieve is pretty similar.


Don Armstrong (with owner@bdo and listmaster@ldo hats on)

1: If you can't, either your MUA is severely limited, or you haven't
read its documentation, and you aren't interested in learning procmail
or sieve.
-- 
There is no more concentrated form of evil
than apathy.

http://www.donarmstrong.com  http://rzlab.ucr.edu


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120307015031.gy3...@rzlab.ucr.edu

Bug#662754: RFS: libre-jigsaw/2012.03.04-1 [ITP]

[Jon Hulka]

Benoît Knecht wrote:
> block 660433 with 662754
> block 660435 with 662754
> merge 661857 662754
> thanks

Thanks for cleaning up my mess.

> Please only close #660433 in the changelog, both ITP bugs are now merged
> and will be closed together. In general, if a bug needs to be closed
> because it was opened by mistake, just close it manually; there's no
> need to clutter the changelog with such entries.

I've modified the package at mentors.debian.net to only close #660433

Thanks,

 - Jon



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CALkGRC8pVYavce7=huk0c9hyxbn3amkk1-tcwrl6+zutaep...@mail.gmail.com

Re: sponsorship-requests mails should not go to debian-mentors

[Ben Finney]

Don Armstrong  writes:

> Anyone who doesn't want to receive mail from the BTS should be
> trivially able to filter it out.[1]
[…]

> 1: If you can't, either your MUA is severely limited, or you haven't
> read its documentation, and you aren't interested in learning procmail
> or sieve.

Or we're not reading these messages via an MUA, and hence don't control
which messages appear here.

+1 on sending automated messages to a different forum to which people can
optionally subscribe, separate from the human discussion in this forum.

-- 
 \   “The cost of education is trivial compared to the cost of |
  `\ ignorance.” —Thomas Jefferson |
_o__)  |
Ben Finney


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87aa3tm5l3@benfinney.id.au

Bug#662899: RFS: dsniff/2.4b1+debian-22

[William Vera]

Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dsniff"

* Package name: dsniff
  Version : 2.4b1+debian-22
  Upstream Author : Dug Song 
* URL : http://www.monkey.org/~dugsong/dsniff/
* License : BSD
  Section : net

It builds those binary packages:

  dsniff - Various tools to sniff network traffic for cleartext insecurities

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:

http://mentors.debian.net/package/dsniff


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x 
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dsniff/dsniff_2.4b1+debian-22.dsc

More information about hello can be obtained from http://www.example.com.

Changes since the last upload:

 Acknowledge NMU.
  + Thanks Hilko Bengen
 Bump standards to 3.9.3.


Regards,
 William Vera

-- 
William Vera | bi...@billy.mx
Systems Engineer / Consultant IT / Sysadmin
PGP Key: 1024D/F5CC22A4
3E73 FA1F 5C57 6005 0439  4D75 1FD2 BF96 F5CC 22A4



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/CAPQrxN+tq=5nf18+p4RCF-VA7DNHw71naqYDP=o=xbgkyqt...@mail.gmail.com