RFS: libsmf
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsmf".
* Package name: libsmf
Version : 1.3-1
Upstream Author : Edward Tomasz Napierała
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/libsmf/
* License : BSD-licensed
Programming Lang: C
Description : LibSMF is a BSD-licensed C library for
handling SMF ("*.mid") files.
Section : libs
It transparently handles conversions between time and pulses, tempo
map handling etc.
..
This package is required by Denemo.
It builds these binary packages:
libsmf0- LibSMF is a BSD-licensed C library for handling
SMF ("*.mid") files
libsmf0-dev - Development files for the smf library
libsmf0-utils - Utilities to support the smf library
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libsmf
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian
unstable main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libsmf/libsmf_1.3-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Josue Abarca
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: RFS: libsmf
A review: The first 3 symbols in the symbols file look like they might be internal symbols that should not be exported, is that the case? http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility The SONAME should not be added to the -dev or utils packages. I'd recommend naming the utils package smf-utils Why does the -dev package depend on libc-dev? I find it interesting that upstream uses readline (GPL) rather than editline (BSD). -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/h2ie13a36b31004050314j73e21a3bvd120808a599cd...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: gatling
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gatling". * Package name: gatling Version : 0.11-1 Upstream Author : Felix von Leitner * URL : http://www.fefe.de/gatling/ * License : GPLv2 Section : net It builds this binary package: gatling- a high performance web server The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 568039 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gatling - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gatling/gatling_0.11-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Vedran Furač -- http://vedranf.net | a8e7a7783ca0d460fee090cc584adc12 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/hpceut$l2...@dough.gmane.org
RSF: logkeys
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "logkeys". I would also note that I'm familiar with this process as, for some years now, I already maintain a couple of packages in debian and hopefully I haven't made any errors when packaging this one. * Package name: logkeys Version : 0.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Kernc * URL : http://code.google.com/p/logkeys/ * License : GPLv3 Section : admin It builds this binary package: logkeys- a keylogger for GNU/Linux systems The upload would fix these bugs: 567414 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/logkeys - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/logkeys/logkeys_0.1.0-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Vedran -- http://vedranf.net | a8e7a7783ca0d460fee090cc584adc12 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/hpcf4o$l2...@dough.gmane.org
Re: RFS: antennavis (updated package)
Hi, the error has been resolved by adding mandir=$(CURDIR)/debian/antennavis/usr/share/man to make install line in debian/rules as you commented. Package has been uploaded again to debian.mentors.net. Thanks in advance, Chris. On 4/4/2010 19:52, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 02:04:10PM +0200, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: > >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/antennavis/antennavis_0.3.1-1.dsc >> >> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. >> > FTBFS on my machine with the following error: > > install -m 0644 antennavis.1 /usr/share/man/man1 > install: cannot create regular file /usr/share/man/man1/antennavis.1': > Permission denied > make[1]: *** [install] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory /home/stas/src/antennavis-0.3.1' > make: *** [install] Error 2 > > Adding mandir=$(CURDIR)/debian/antennavis/usr/share/man to make > install line in debian/rules solves this. > > -- Nanakos Chrysostomos GnuPG:6583 B3EB B874 F454 4D5D 2B23 873D EA30 9D13 807F http://www.include.gr nana...@wired-net.gr http://www.debian.orgDebian GNU/Linux, software should be Free -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4bb9c0c3.7060...@wired-net.gr
RFS: clamz
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clamz". * Package name: clamz Version : 0.2-3 Upstream Author : Benjamin Moody * URL : http://code.google.com/p/clamz/ * License : GPLv3 Section : utils It builds these binary packages: clamz - A command-line program to download MP3's from Amazon The package appears to be lintian clean. My motivation for maintaining this package is: It's a great tool to use if you enjoy music from Amazon. Additionally, I have permission to take over the original work by Stefan Schmidt. His bug (545717) and mine (574569) have been merged. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/clamz - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/clamz/clamz_0.2-3.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Chris Silva P.S. Again, sorry for first posting (lack of coffee). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100405062306.4f823...@makeworld.com
RFS: clamz
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clamz". * Package name: clamz Version : 0.2-3 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] * License : [fill in] Section : utils It builds these binary packages: clamz - A command-line program to download MP3's from Amazon The package appears to be lintian clean. My motivation for maintaining this package is: It's a great tool to use if you enjoy music from Amazon. Additionally, I have permission to take over the original work by Stefan Schmidt. His bug (545717) and mine (574569) have been merged. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/clamz - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/clamz/clamz_0.2-3.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Chris Silva -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100405061155.1f839...@makeworld.com
RFS: gdevilspie
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gdevilspie". * Package name: gdevilspie Version : 0.31-2 Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream] * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site] * License : [fill in] Section : gnome It builds these binary packages: gdevilspie - A user friendly interface for devilspie The package appears to be lintian clean. My motivation for maintaining this package is: Allowing a graphical interface to the already existing package devilspie. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gdevilspie - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gdevilspie/gdevilspie_0.31-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Chris Silva -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100405061331.7230a...@makeworld.com
RFS: gdevilspie
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gdevilspie". * Package name: gdevilspie Version : 0.31-2 Upstream Author : Islam Amer * URL : http://code.google.com/p/gdevilspie/ * License : GPLv2 Section : gnome It builds these binary packages: gdevilspie - A user friendly interface for devilspie The package appears to be lintian clean. My motivation for maintaining this package is: Allowing a graphical interface to the already existing package devilspie.. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gdevilspie - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gdevilspie/gdevilspie_0.31-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Chris Silva P.S. Sorry about the first post (lack of coffee). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100405061940.0eaa3...@makeworld.com
Re: flow of things rules/debhelper
Hi, On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 02:37:41AM +0200, jmroth+...@iip.lu wrote: > Hello there, > > today, I have a question regarding the maintainers guide, which says: You must be reading one from squeeze or subversion one which is enen newer. > "fakeroot debian/rules binary" runs "fakeroot dh binary" which in turn > runs "fakeroot dh binary-arch" and "fakeroot dh binary-indep"... > > It does indeed work that way, but hadn't it better be: > > "debian/rules binary" -> "dh binary" -> "debian/rules binary-arch" -> > "dh binary-arch" ... I do not get your point. Are you suggesting dropping fakeroot? (Why? Without fakeroot, command can not be run.) Are you suggesting to call "debian/rules binary-arch" (This is too pedantic and I am not sure it actually do this.) Situation is: debian/rules binary | +---> "dh binary" | +---+--> dh binary-arch | +--> dh binary-indep If there is a good way to express following in English: "fakeroot debian/rules binary" runs "fakeroot dh binary" which in turn runs ( "fakeroot dh binary-arch" and "fakeroot dh binary-indep" ) By reading folowing text should have made it clear: The commands listed below are run twice, once with the "-a" option (in binary-arch) and once with the "-i" option (in binary-indep): > I'm asking because in the first case, the binary-indep target in > debian/rules is never called (even for my "Architecture: all" > package). Your way of punctuation understaning makes this. But that was not my or Rapael's intent. I added ";" to make them clearer. Wait for 4 hours or so. "fakeroot debian/rules binary" runs "fakeroot dh binary"; which in turn runs "fakeroot dh binary-arch" and "fakeroot dh binary-indep". > Or maybe I'm just misunderstanding something and this target > is deprecated and/or should simply not be used at all? I do not understand. What is deprecated. > While we're at it, I got a second question: is it normal that building > a package using .orig.tar.bz2s in Lenny is not supported? AFAIS > building a source format 3.0 (quilt) package works flawlessly except > for this. As described in the Chapter 1, this is updated to squeeze. Please install backported packages. (I added footnote.) Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100405124813.ga19...@osamu.debian.net
Re: flow of things rules/debhelper
Hi,
I'll try to make myself clearer:
the question is: why is e.g. debian/rules binary-indep never called on
a binary independent package, assume a PHP app.
When using
%:
dh $@
it is clear that if dh doesn't call it, then nobody will, however the
policy manual says:
binary may be (and commonly is) a target with no commands which simply
depends on binary-arch and binary-indep.
So, if I have an architecture independent package it would be logical
to put my commands into binary-indep; why else would it be there.
But it is not called. When I look at my build log, this is more or
less what happens:
debian/rules build
dh build
[...]
fakeroot debian/rules binary
[...]
dpkg-deb: building package...
No sign of debian/binary-arch and/or debian/binary-indep here.
Probably because I did not write down a specific rule
binary: binary-arch binary-indep
dh $@
in debian/rules.
Looking at
/usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.{tiny,indep}
their behaviors are simply different, as dh from rules.tiny does not
follow the Makefile dependencies as seen in rules.indep.
JM
On 4/5/2010 2:48 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Are you suggesting to call "debian/rules binary-arch"
> (This is too pedantic and I am not sure it actually do this.)
>
> Situation is:
>
> debian/rules binary
>|
>+---> "dh binary"
>|
>+---+--> dh binary-arch
>|
>+--> dh binary-indep
>
> If there is a good way to express following in English:
>
> "fakeroot debian/rules binary" runs "fakeroot dh binary" which in turn
> runs ( "fakeroot dh binary-arch" and "fakeroot dh binary-indep" )
>
> By reading folowing text should have made it clear:
>
> The commands listed below are run twice, once with the "-a" option (in
> binary-arch) and once with the "-i" option (in binary-indep):
>
>> I'm asking because in the first case, the binary-indep target in
>> debian/rules is never called (even for my "Architecture: all"
>> package).
>
> Your way of punctuation understaning makes this. But that was not my or
> Rapael's intent. I added ";" to make them clearer. Wait for 4 hours or so.
>
> "fakeroot debian/rules binary" runs "fakeroot dh binary"; which in turn
> runs "fakeroot dh binary-arch" and "fakeroot dh binary-indep".
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4bb9e096.8050...@iip.lu
Re: flow of things rules/debhelper
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 09:48:13PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 02:37:41AM +0200, jmroth+...@iip.lu wrote: > > Hello there, > > > > today, I have a question regarding the maintainers guide, which says: > > You must be reading one from squeeze or subversion one which is enen > newer. > > > "fakeroot debian/rules binary" runs "fakeroot dh binary" which in turn > > runs "fakeroot dh binary-arch" and "fakeroot dh binary-indep"... > > > > It does indeed work that way, but hadn't it better be: > > > > "debian/rules binary" -> "dh binary" -> "debian/rules binary-arch" -> > > "dh binary-arch" ... > > I do not get your point. > Are you suggesting dropping fakeroot? > (Why? Without fakeroot, command can not be run.) > Are you suggesting to call "debian/rules binary-arch" > (This is too pedantic and I am not sure it actually do this.) > > Situation is: > > debian/rules binary >| >+---> "dh binary" >| >+---+--> dh binary-arch >| >+--> dh binary-indep > > If there is a good way to express following in English: > > "fakeroot debian/rules binary" runs "fakeroot dh binary" which in turn > runs ( "fakeroot dh binary-arch" and "fakeroot dh binary-indep" ) > > By reading folowing text should have made it clear: > > The commands listed below are run twice, once with the "-a" option (in > binary-arch) and once with the "-i" option (in binary-indep): Actually, it doesn't. dh binary just runs whatever sequence is necessary for the binary target, starting from where it ended last, running without even -i or -a. dh binary-arch will do the same, but with the -a argument. dh binary-indep will do the same, but with the -i argument. Example: - if you first ran dh build, then dh binary will run dh_auto_install, dh_install, (...), dh_installcatalogs, (...), dh_strip, (...), dh_installdeb, (...) - if you ran nothing, then dh binary will run dh_auto_configure, dh_auto_build, dh_auto_test, dh_auto_install, etc. - if you ran dh install, then dh binary-arch will run dh_strip -a, (...), dh_installdeb -a, (...) Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100405133050.ga4...@glandium.org
Re: flow of things rules/debhelper
Hi Mike, On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 03:30:50PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > The commands listed below are run twice, once with the "-a" option (in > > binary-arch) and once with the "-i" option (in binary-indep): > > Actually, it doesn't. dh binary just runs whatever sequence is necessary > for the binary target, starting from where it ended last, running > without even -i or -a. > dh binary-arch will do the same, but with the -a argument. > dh binary-indep will do the same, but with the -i argument. ... That was what I think too. It was updated by raphael to current form: $ svn diff --old maint-guide.en.s...@r7185 --new maint-guide.en.s...@r7186 Index: maint-guide.en.sgml === --- maint-guide.en.sgml (revision 7185) +++ maint-guide.en.sgml (revision 7186) ... - "fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch" runs "fakeroot dh binary-arch" - which in turn runs the following. + "fakeroot debian/rules binary" runs "fakeroot dh binary" + which in turn runs "fakeroot dh binary-arch" and "fakeroot dh + binary-indep". The commands listed below are run twice, once with + the "-a" option (in binary-arch) and once with the "-i" option (in + binary-indep): dh_testroot dh_prep @@ -1485,11 +1489,6 @@ dh_md5sums dh_builddeb - "fakeroot debian/rules binary" runs "fakeroot dh binary" which in turn - runs the same as "fakeroot dh binary-arch". - "fakeroot debian/rules binary-indep" runs "fakeroot dh binary-indep" - which in turn runs the the same as "fakeroot dh binary-arch" except each - dh_* command is run with -i option appended. His thought was to present a simpler story to the novice, I guess. Should i revert this? Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100405145724.gb20...@osamu.debian.net
Re: flow of things rules/debhelper
Hi, Thanks. I am rethinking few things. On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 03:07:34PM +0200, jmroth+...@iip.lu wrote: > Hi, > > I'll try to make myself clearer: > > the question is: why is e.g. debian/rules binary-indep never called on > a binary independent package, assume a PHP app. Aside from the issues discussed with Mike ... reality is once "debian/rules binary" is run, there is no need to run "debian/rules binary-indep" nor "debian/rules binary-arch". All the piecees of actions have been done. Normal package build process only calls binary as I understand. > it is clear that if dh doesn't call it, then nobody will, however the > policy manual says: ... policy discussion is not my teritory. > So, if I have an architecture independent package it would be logical > to put my commands into binary-indep; why else would it be there. > > But it is not called. When I look at my build log, this is more or > less what happens: Good point. This log and document have to match. > debian/rules build > dh build > [...] > fakeroot debian/rules binary > [...] > dpkg-deb: building package... > > No sign of debian/binary-arch and/or debian/binary-indep here. > Probably because I did not write down a specific rule This prompts me to revert back to my original text with minor updates. dpkg-buildpackage is what I am following ... not Policy. This dh.tiny is somewhat cheating to normal make file things. But this is pretty regular and easy to understand. Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100405155717.ga21...@osamu.debian.net
Re: flow of things rules/debhelper
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 12:57:17AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks. I am rethinking few things. > > On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 03:07:34PM +0200, jmroth+...@iip.lu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'll try to make myself clearer: > > > > the question is: why is e.g. debian/rules binary-indep never called on > > a binary independent package, assume a PHP app. > > Aside from the issues discussed with Mike ... > > reality is once "debian/rules binary" is run, there is no need to run > "debian/rules binary-indep" nor "debian/rules binary-arch". All the > piecees of actions have been done. > > Normal package build process only calls binary as I understand. On buildds binary-arch is called if it exists. Otherwise, binary is used. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100405161749.ga25...@glandium.org
Re: migration to testing
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:38:56PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:05:37PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:16:58PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: > > > One of my packages, fuse-convmvfs (uploaded by a sponsor), cannot > > > migrate to testing. The migration is blocked by kfreebsd: > > > > > > * fuse-convmvfs/kfreebsd-amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: fuse-utils > > > * fuse-convmvfs/kfreebsd-i386 unsatisfiable Depends: fuse-utils > > > > > > What is the recommended way of solving this? > > > > fuse-utils is not build on kfreebsd-(amd64|i386) since it's > > Linux-specific, see #528537: [snip] > Anyways, on kfreebsd, fusemount is provided by another package (fusebsd, > iirc), which means that except if the freebsd kernel allows the mount > syscall for users, all packages currently depending on fuse-utils should > now depend on fuse-utils | fusebsd. I could not find this fusebsd package in Debian :( However, a related project indeed exists [1]. As the original poster of that question on debian-mentors, I would like to ask anyone who has access to a Debian/kFreeBSD installation to test if fuse-convmvfs from sid works there (provided that fuse4bsd is installed). My package builds on that architecture just fine, but unfortunately I cannot test myself if it works there. > This just sounds plain wrong, and IMHO, libfuse itself should do the > depend, though arguably, some libfuse rdepends don't need them. Well, if that would be possible I would simply prefer to add a dependence to my package and forget about it for a while. [1] http://fuse4bsd.creo.hu/ -- Stanislav -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100405210552.ga6...@kaiba.homelan
Re: RFS: libsmf
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 06:14:25PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > A review: Thanks for your review, > > The first 3 symbols in the symbols file look like they might be > internal symbols that should not be exported, is that the case? > > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility It seems tha the whole file src/smf_private.h shoul not export symbols, so I will make a patch to add #pragma GCC visibility push(hidden) ... #pragma GCC visibility pop and check it with upstreamer (maybe he prefers another approach). > > The SONAME should not be added to the -dev or utils packages. I'd > recommend naming the utils package smf-utils > Ok, I will change the names. > Why does the -dev package depend on libc-dev? > >From the "Debian Library Packaging guide" (a non official document) http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html#id291957 "The -DEV package would usually declare Depends: relationship on all -DEV packages for libraries that the library package directly depends upon, with the specific SONAME version that the library package is linked against. This includes libc-dev. [5] The dependency is required to make things such as statically linked libraries to work, and C header file inclusions. ... [5] A package should depend on libc-dev, without versioned depends, or generate ... Not all architectures have libc-dev as libc6-dev." I saw that packages like libgpm-dev does this. Is this wrong (or deprecated)? > I find it interesting that upstream uses readline (GPL) rather than > editline (BSD). Thanks for your help. -- Josué M. Abarca S. Vos mereces Software Libre. PGP key 4096R/70D8FB2A 2009-06-17 fingerprint = B3ED 4984 F65A 9AE0 6511 DAF4 756B EB4B 70D8 FB2A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100405210255.gd2...@zumi.usac.edu.gt
RFS: duply (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.5.2.2-1 of my package "duply". It builds these binary packages: duply - easy to use frontend to the duplicity backup system The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/duply - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/duply/duply_1.5.2.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. And I would be most grateful if a kind sponsor would set the DM-Upload-Allowed (DMUA) bit. Kind regards Joachim Wiedorn signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: migration to testing
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 01:05:52AM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: > As the original poster of that question on debian-mentors, I would > like to ask anyone who has access to a Debian/kFreeBSD installation to > test if fuse-convmvfs from sid works there (provided that fuse4bsd is > installed). My package builds on that architecture just fine, but > unfortunately I cannot test myself if it works there. Just install it yourself in virtualbox (slow, always works) or kvm (requires hardware support). I just lost several hours today trying, so here's a list of pitfalls: * You need to change the virtual network card. VirtualBox's default, "PCnet-FAST III (Am79C973)", is recognized by kfreebsd but doesn't see the network. "PCnet-PCI II (Am79C970A)" works fine. * You need a particular d-i build: http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-i386/20100221-11:20/monolithic/ (I assume -amd64 works too). Current d-i dailies are broken (the partitioner fails, even with a pre-partitioned disk, not letting you assign mount points). Don't use the sysinstall images either (they install but filesystem operations randomly fail). Rumours that d-i builds 20100306 or 20100223 are ok are untrue as well (won't even boot past the splash screen). -- 1KB // Microsoft corollary to Hanlon's razor: // Never attribute to stupidity what can be // adequately explained by malice. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100405230539.ga32...@angband.pl
Re: flow of things rules/debhelper
Le Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 06:17:49PM +0200, Mike Hommey a écrit : > > On buildds binary-arch is called if it exists. Otherwise, binary is > used. That is very kind of them, as Policy § 4.9 specifies anyway that “Both the binary-arch and binary-indep targets must exist”. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100406002324.ga11...@kunpuu.plessy.org
Re: RFS: libsmf
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:02 AM, Josue Abarca wrote: >> Why does the -dev package depend on libc-dev? ... > Is this wrong (or deprecated)? No, I was just trying to clarify it, since I wasn't aware of that suggestion. -- bye, pabs http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/u2ne13a36b31004051829z58259452k29d668bfd2214...@mail.gmail.com
RFS: gkrellexec
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gkrellexec". Package name: gkrellexec Version : 1.0.2-1 Upstream Author : Leandro Penz URL : http://github.com/lpenz/gkrellexec License : GPL 2 Section : utils It builds these binary packages: gkrellexec - gkrellm plugin that displays the return status of arbitrary shell commands The package appears to be lintian clean. My motivation for maintaining this package is: [fill in]. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gkrellexec - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gkrellexec/gkrellexec_1.0.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Leandro Penz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/r2xf95d20b21004051908j9bfb39e5q867d911f3adc0...@mail.gmail.com
Re: RSF: logkeys
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Vedran Furač wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "logkeys". I would also note that I'm familiar with this process as, for some years now, I already maintain a couple of packages in debian and hopefully I haven't made any errors when packaging this one. I suggest the debian-forensics team might provide a sponsor, and if not, I'd be happy to. Currently swamped, but talk to me in 14 days. -- Asheesh. -- "... an experienced, industrious, ambitious, and often quite often picturesque liar." -- Mark Twain
RFS: evilvte (updated package)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.6-1 of my package "evilvte". (Programming language: C) It builds the binary package: evilvte The package is lintian clean. Note: bug #576624 is vte's bug, not evilvte's. evilvte (0.4.6-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release - avoid an severe VTE bug in version 0.24.0, please see #576624 * Switch to 3.0 (quilt) source format - remove README.source * debian/rules, debian/config.h, debian/evilvte.xpm, debian/install: - remove quilt related targets - configure against debian/config.h (new upstream feature) - honor DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS here - install debian/evilvte.xpm for menu system * debian/control: - drop Build-Depends: quilt - bump Standards-Version to 3.8.4 * Drop all patches (no longer needed) * Update debian/copyright to DEP 5, revsion 135 Description: lightweight terminal emulator based on VTE evilvte is a terminal emulator based on Virtual Terminal Emulator(VTE) library. It supports almost everything VTE provides. It also supports tabs, tabbar autohide, and switch encoding at runtime. Configuration is via editing source code and recompilation. . This build provides all runtime changeable options in the right-click menu. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/evilvte/evilvte_0.4.6-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. :-) Kind regards Wen-Yen Chuang PS: When you test the binary, if your X11 background has no pixbuf data, "Toggle background" via right-click menu may cause evilvte crash. It is vte's bug in version 0.24.0. Please see #576624. - -- My GPG key is signed by Debian Developer Masayuki Hatta. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAku6zigACgkQdEpXpumNYVlfGQCeMakYG6i2fzHeTaDL964tFYFV OHwAn3FArRhlKmHjTLr9Z1Br5Sg+mcD3 =hPOs -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4bbace28.7040...@calno.com
Re: RSF: logkeys
vedran.fu...@gmail.com wrote: > Upstream Author : Kernc The mail address seems ... wrong. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/lddm.1004060814.1...@thorondor.akallabeth.de
