RFS: burn 0.4.3.ds1-2
Howdy mentors, I am seeking a sponsor for my adopted package, ‘burn’. Package name: burn Version : 0.4.3.ds1-2 Upstream Author : Gaetano Paolone URL : http://www.bigpaul.org/burn/ License : GPL-2+ Section : otherosfs It builds these binary packages: Package: burn Description: command-line tool for writing optical media ‘burn’ is a command-line tool to create audio CDs from MP3, Ogg Vorbis, or WAV files, to backup data files, to create CDs from ISO-9660 images, and to copy CDs on-the-fly. It performs any of its functions in a single command, without requiring preparatory filesystem creation, etc. . The program can compute if there is necessary free space for temporary files (images and audio files), warn if size is bigger than CD capacity, and manage multisession CDs. The upload would fix these bugs: #451712, #517793 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/burn/ - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/burn/burn_0.4.3.ds1-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. -- \ “Today, I was — no, that wasn't me.” —Steven Wright | `\ | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Using a pbuilder hook to test install/remove process
Hi, On Donnerstag, 2. April 2009, Ben Finney wrote: > Yes. My question is, though, is it a good idea to run the one within > the other? As I understand it, ‘piuparts’ does its work inside a > chroot; is it advisable for that to happen while already inside > ‘pbuilder’s existing chroot? not really, but piuparts has an option to reuse a pbuilder chroot. (and piuparts in svn can also read .changes files.) regards, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Looking for hwinfo uploader, bug fixed (was: Bug#495866: hwinfo: library packages are needlessly not co-installable)
Hello Mentors Somebody can help me to upload the new revision to close a bug? Thanks in advanced Regards! -- Forwarded message -- From: William Vera Date: Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:20 PM Subject: Re: Bug#495866: hwinfo: library packages are needlessly not co-installable To: debian-mentors Hi Guillem My apologies, for some estrange reason this topic was in spam label (I already fixed this) On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 23:18:24 -0600, William Vera wrote: >> Ok, you can see a new revision at mentors: >> >> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hwinfo/hwinfo_15.3-2.dsc > > Sure, just checked, I think you need a bit more changes: > > * remove the Provides in libhd15. > * rename debian/libhd15-dev.install to debian/libhd-dev.install. > * rename debian/libhd15-doc.doc-base to debian/libhd-doc.doc-base. > * add libhd15-doc to Provides in libhd-doc. > * add libhd15-dev to Provides in libhd-dev. > * fix references of libhd14-doc inside the doc-base file. > * fix the reference to libhd13-dev in libhd-doc long description. > * install files for libhd-doc under /usr/share/libhd-doc/ instead of > /usr/share/libhd15-doc > > Maybe I missed other stuff. Please check the generated packages, some > were empty. I already fixed all those points, you can see it at mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hwinfo/ Thanks in advance Regards! > > regards, > guillem > -- William Vera PGP Key: 1024D/F5CC22A4 Fingerprint: 3E73 FA1F 5C57 6005 0439 4D75 1FD2 BF96 F5CC 22A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
warning messages
Hello mentors,
I have some warning messages during build a package.
Can somebody please look at them if they are serious?
###
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol dlsym used by
debian/libslv2-9/usr/lib/libslv2.so.9.1.1 found in none of the libraries.
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol dlopen used by
debian/libslv2-9/usr/lib/libslv2.so.9.1.1 found in none of the libraries.
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol dlclose used by
debian/libslv2-9/usr/lib/libslv2.so.9.1.1 found in none of the libraries.
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol dlerror used by
debian/libslv2-9/usr/lib/libslv2.so.9.1.1 found in none of the libraries.
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on librasqal.so.1 could be avoided if
"debian/libslv2-9/usr/lib/libslv2.so.9.1.1" were not uselessly linked against
it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on librasqal.so.1 could be avoided if
"debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_simple_jack_host debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_inspect
debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_list debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_jack_host" were not
uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on librdf.so.0 could be avoided if
"debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_simple_jack_host debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_inspect
debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_list debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_jack_host" were not
uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libraptor.so.1 could be avoided if
"debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_simple_jack_host debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_inspect
debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_list debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_jack_host" were not
uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on librt.so.1 could be avoided if
"debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_simple_jack_host debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_jack_host"
were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libpthread.so.0 could be avoided if
"debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_simple_jack_host debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_jack_host"
were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
dh_gencontrol
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown substitution variable ${shlibs:Depends}
#
regards
mira
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
RFS: bindfs (updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.8.3-1 of my package "bindfs". It builds these binary packages: bindfs - mirrors or overlays a local directory with altered permissions The package is "lintian -ivI" clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bindfs - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/b/bindfs/bindfs_1.8.3-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com C++/Perl developer, Debian Maintainer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: warning messages
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 19:51 +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Hello mentors,
>
> I have some warning messages during build a package.
> Can somebody please look at them if they are serious?
>
> ###
>
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol dlsym used by
> debian/libslv2-9/usr/lib/libslv2.so.9.1.1 found in none of the libraries.
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol dlopen used by
> debian/libslv2-9/usr/lib/libslv2.so.9.1.1 found in none of the libraries.
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol dlclose used by
> debian/libslv2-9/usr/lib/libslv2.so.9.1.1 found in none of the libraries.
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol dlerror used by
> debian/libslv2-9/usr/lib/libslv2.so.9.1.1 found in none of the libraries.
^^ Not sure about these.
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on librasqal.so.1 could be avoided if
> "debian/libslv2-9/usr/lib/libslv2.so.9.1.1" were not uselessly linked against
> it (they use none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on librasqal.so.1 could be avoided if
> "debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_simple_jack_host debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_inspect
> debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_list debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_jack_host" were not
> uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on librdf.so.0 could be avoided if
> "debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_simple_jack_host debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_inspect
> debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_list debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_jack_host" were not
> uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libraptor.so.1 could be avoided if
> "debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_simple_jack_host debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_inspect
> debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_list debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_jack_host" were not
> uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on librt.so.1 could be avoided if
> "debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_simple_jack_host debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_jack_host"
> were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libpthread.so.0 could be avoided if
> "debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_simple_jack_host debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_jack_host"
> were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
^^ Refer to the thread about -Wl,--as-needed in debian-mentors.
> dh_gencontrol
> dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown substitution variable ${shlibs:Depends}
^^ Can be safely ignored. Basically means that the said libraries do not
have any shared lib dependencies.
--
Chow Loong Jin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: warning messages
> Od: Chow Loong Jin > On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 19:51 +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > I have some warning messages during build a package. > > Can somebody please look at them if they are serious? > > > > ### > > > > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol dlsym used by > debian/libslv2-9/usr/lib/libslv2.so.9.1.1 found in none of the libraries. > > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol dlopen used by > debian/libslv2-9/usr/lib/libslv2.so.9.1.1 found in none of the libraries. > > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol dlclose used by > debian/libslv2-9/usr/lib/libslv2.so.9.1.1 found in none of the libraries. > > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol dlerror used by > debian/libslv2-9/usr/lib/libslv2.so.9.1.1 found in none of the libraries. > ^^ Not sure about these. > > > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on librasqal.so.1 could be avoided if > "debian/libslv2-9/usr/lib/libslv2.so.9.1.1" were not uselessly linked against > it > (they use none of its symbols). > > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on librasqal.so.1 could be avoided if > "debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_simple_jack_host debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_inspect > debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_list debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_jack_host" were not > uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). > > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on librdf.so.0 could be avoided if > "debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_simple_jack_host debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_inspect > debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_list debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_jack_host" were not > uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). > > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libraptor.so.1 could be avoided if > "debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_simple_jack_host debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_inspect > debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_list debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_jack_host" were not > uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). > > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on librt.so.1 could be avoided if > "debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_simple_jack_host debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_jack_host" > were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). > > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libpthread.so.0 could be avoided if > "debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_simple_jack_host debian/slv2/usr/bin/lv2_jack_host" > were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). > ^^ Refer to the thread about -Wl,--as-needed in debian-mentors. I can't find this thread .. can you send a link please regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: libapache2-mod-auth-cas
Hi Luk, On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 07:43 +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > Michele Baldessari wrote: > > So I removed the postinst change and changed dh_fixperms appropriately > > in trunk. Thanks for noticing and let me know if you'd like me to upload > > a 1.0.8-2 to mentors. > > Please do and ping me for upload, TIA. I've uploaded to mentors an updated package: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-auth-cas/libapache2-mod-auth-cas_1.0.8-3.dsc Notable changes: * Removed the statoverride call in postinst, and used dh_fixperms -X to have /var/cache/apache2/mod_auth_cas owned by www-data:www:data (750) (Suggestion by Luk Claes) * Updates to 3.8.1 policy (no changes required) * Link to -lssl & -lcrypto (missing symbol errors won't happen again) * Lintian overrides for non-standard-dir-perm : it's the path where CAS session cookies are stored and it should not be readable by everyone The resulting pbuilt package is successfully running on my production servers and it is lintian clean (modulo one override for the CAS cookie path permissions). Thanks for your upload or comments and regards, Michele signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: New upstream release
> > Od: Jaromír Mikeš > > > $ sudo pbuilder build clxclient_3.6.1-1.dsc than > > > > dpkg-source: warning: extracting unsigned source package > > (clxclient_3.6.1-1.dsc) > > dpkg-source: extracting clxclient in clxclient-3.6.1 > > dpkg-source: error: unrecognized file for a v2.0 source package: > > clxclient_3.6.1-1.diff.gz > > pbuilder: Failed extracting the source > > -> Aborting with an error > > This is solved .. I found this: > http://forums.opensuse.org/programming-scripting/opensuse-build-service-obs/402528-su-line-0-cd-usr-src-packages-build-no-such-file-di.html > > Repacked source.tar.bz2 to source.tar.bz ... and it works > > Now I have only this warning message for "$ sudo pbuilder build > clxclient_3.6.1-1.dsc" > and for "$ sudo dpkg-buildpackage -S" too > > dpkg-genchanges: warning: missing Section for source files > No Section: in debian/control? Best, Michael pgpWuUNzRfyeV.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: how to support 32- & 64-bit versions of libraries
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 05:39:33PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > "Steve M. Robbins" writes: > > I've run into a roadblock, however, in that the header gmp.h is > > generated by configure. It has some parameters (size of a limb) that > > depend on whether compiled for 32 or 64 bits. So on amd64, for > > example, I have two incompatible gmp.h files. Matthias provided a > > gmp.h wrapper from Redhat that selects between architecture variants > > based on preprocessor symbols, e.g. > > > > #if defined(__i386__) > > #include "gmp-i386.h" > > #elif defined(__ia64__) > > #include "gmp-ia64.h" > > ... > > > > However, in the case at hand it is the same architecture. One > > variant is compiled with -m32 and the other with -m64. Is there a > > symbol that can distinguish the two so that I can use the Redhat > > trick? Other solutions? > > -m32 defines __i386__ while -m64 defined __x86_64__ and so on for each > architecture. So just use the architecture defines. The Redhat trick > already does the job. Hey, that's great! My next question is: how can I discover the suffix programmatically? Is there something like "dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_GNU_CPU" or "gcc -dumpmachine" that will spit out the right suffix when given -m32 or -m64, etc? Thanks, -Steve signature.asc Description: Digital signature
RFS: hexer (adopted & updated package)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.4c-3 of my package "hexer". This is an adoption - ITA #520635. The changelog entry describing my update to the Debian packaging of hexer is included a bit further down. There's just one binary package: hexer - An interactive binary editor with a Vi-like interface The package has been tested with lintian and pbuilder. The upload would fix these bugs: 437160, 520635 The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hexer/hexer_0.1.4c-3.dsc Some may have noticed that it is my custom to 1. fix all compiler warnings in a package build, and 2. use the hardening wrapper. For this particular case, I've chosen not to do that straight away with the adoption; I'll probably adopt the upstream package itself in the next day or two and bring that 13-year-old code up to snuff. The problem is, the patch that fixes just -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes was more than 120 KBytes long :) IMHO, it'll better that I do this as a new upstream release :) Just for reference, here's my adoption changelog entry: hexer (0.1.4c-3) unstable; urgency=low * New maintainer. Closes: #520635 * Use quilt for patch management. * Drop the README patch; with all due respect to Peter Mathiasson, in my humble opinion this information is addressed to developers, not end-users, and thus belongs right here, in the Debian changelog instead. * Add a watch file. * Fix up the manual page a bit: - use .\" instead of ./" for comments - properly use hyphens instead of minus-signs * Flesh out the long description with a list of hexer features. * Unbreak the "comment" and "argument" words in the help text to avoid spellcheck warnings from lintian. * Override the "no upstream changelog" and "no homepage field" lintian warnings. * Add the Vcs-Svn and Vcs-Browser fields. * Bump the debhelper compatibility version to 7: - add misc:Depends to the binary package - minimize the rules file * Bump Standards-Version to 3.8.1: - replace Apps with Applications in the menu section - honor the "nostrip" build option; Closes: #437160 - override the compiler program and flags so the "noopt" build option is also honored - add the README.source file mentioning the use of quilt * Convert the copyright file to the machine-parseable format and add my copyright notice on the Debian packaging. * Build with -Werror if "werror" is specified in DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS. * Fix some compiler warnings. * Quote the "needs" and "section" menu file fields and install it. -- Peter Pentchev Fri, 03 Apr 2009 05:31:17 +0300 I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.netr...@space.bgr...@freebsd.org PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 If the meanings of 'true' and 'false' were switched, then this sentence wouldn't be false. pgpWEpVS6k5AX.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: RFS: hexer (adopted & updated package)
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Peter Pentchev wrote: > - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hexer/hexer_0.1.4c-3.dsc I'm unable to sponsor at the moment, but I took a look at the diff.gz. Please remove the lintian overrides, you should only override lintian complaints when the lintian test is wrong and it isn't possible to fix the test for your case, not when you just want to ignore it or the test has a bug. In this case there isn't an upstream homepage or changelog yet, which are both valid complaints that you intend to fix by taking over upstream. The rest of the diff.gz looks fine, I suggest someone else do a deeper review and upload this package. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: RFS: hexer (adopted & updated package)
Hi Dne Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:50:09 +0300 Peter Pentchev napsal(a): > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.4c-3 > of my package "hexer". This is an adoption - ITA #520635. > The changelog entry describing my update to the Debian packaging of > hexer is included a bit further down. > > There's just one binary package: > hexer - An interactive binary editor with a Vi-like interface Have you checked how does it compare to bvi? > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hexer/hexer_0.1.4c-3.dsc Besides two overrides, which were already brought to attention, I don't see anything problematic in there. -- Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com signature.asc Description: PGP signature
