Re: linuxworld expo 2003
At 07:20 PM 11/11/02 -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: On Sunday 10 November 2002 13:08, Samuel Desseaux wrote: > Hi! > excuse me, before all, if i am a bit out of the subject of the list. > > Who plan to take part at the next linuxworld expo in 2003 (in New-york or > San francisco)? I've never take part in it but next year, i'd like it very > much (like the free software meeting in france, it seems to be a good > opportunitie to learn and meet some developers). > > So, if someone has the experience of this event, write me!! > > thanks > > sam If it is held again in San Francisco (economy, tech market, etc) I usually take charge of the booth here. As the time comes closer we discuss somethings here and on a Bay Area mailing list. I'm in San Francisco, and this is the first I've heard about a Bay Area list. Could you tell me about it? Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Replacing a single file with Replaces:
In the policy manual, section 7.5.1 "Overwriting files in other packages" it says: "However, if the overwriting package declares that it Replaces the one containing the file being overwritten, then dpkg will replace the file from the old package with that from the new. The file will no longer be listed as `owned' by the old package. " I read that to mean that you can actually replace a single file from a package, in another package. But I can't get that to work. If I put "Replaces:" and the package name which I want to replace a file in, dpkg still aborts and says that the file exists in multiple packages. How to get this feature to work, to replace a single file in a package from within another package? -- Karolina -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linuxworld expo 2003
Le Mardi 12 Novembre 2002 04:20, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry a écrit : > On Sunday 10 November 2002 13:08, Samuel Desseaux wrote: > > Hi! > > excuse me, before all, if i am a bit out of the subject of the list. > > > > Who plan to take part at the next linuxworld expo in 2003 (in New-york or > > San francisco)? I've never take part in it but next year, i'd like it > > very much (like the free software meeting in france, it seems to be a > > good opportunitie to learn and meet some developers). > > > > So, if someone has the experience of this event, write me!! > > > > thanks > > > > sam > > If it is held again in San Francisco (economy, tech market, etc) *yes (according to the website of this event) I usually > take charge of the booth here. As the time comes closer we discuss > somethings here and on a Bay Area mailing list. * euh... what do you want to say? I hope to come at San Francisco (big travel -11 hours by plane) because it must very interessant and, after the free software meeting in Bordeaux (cf http://lsm.abul.org), it must be a good opportunity to meet developers. sam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Replacing a single file with Replaces:
can you post a copy of your debian/control file? a. On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 09:10:41AM +0100, Karolina Lindqvist wrote: > In the policy manual, section 7.5.1 "Overwriting files in other packages" it > says: > "However, if the overwriting package declares that it Replaces the one > containing the file being overwritten, then dpkg will replace the file from > the old package with that from the new. The file will no longer be listed as > `owned' by the old package. " > > I read that to mean that you can actually replace a single file from a > package, in another package. But I can't get that to work. If I put > "Replaces:" and the package name which I want to replace a file in, dpkg > still aborts and says that the file exists in multiple packages. > > How to get this feature to work, to replace a single file in a package from > within another package? > > > -- Andrea Mennucc "E' un mondo difficile. Che vita intensa!" (Tonino Carotone) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Full albüm mp3 cymo
Mp3sa yine bir ilki gerçekleþtiriyor: Klip arþivi! Full albüm ve single parçalar mp3 halinde! Arayýpta bulamadýðýnýz bütün parçalar için birde sitemize bakýn: http://www.mp3sa.com Full Turkçe Album Full Yabancý Album A-Z Yerli Mp3 A-Z Yabancý Mp3 En Iyý 20 Yerli Výdeo Klýp Yabancý Výdeo Klýp Yerli ve Yab. Arsýv Hepsine birden ulaþabileceðiz tek bir adres var http://www.mp3sa.com èPÔ ¨¥¶^n&§éí¢»+z«²Ùb²Û y¸àÂ+ajËç-¡û§²æìr¸y:è¹¹^ íiËeËfjË^®X¬¶Ç^n&§¢¸
Re: Replacing a single file with Replaces:
tisdagen den 12 november 2002 11.09 skrev Andrea Mennucc: > can you post a copy of your debian/control file? I have to come back with this and construct an example. -- Karolina -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What does dpkg-source mean with this?
When I run this, I get the following error messages. What does it mean? Which file(s) are already existing? $ dpkg-source -b noteedit-2.0.16 noteedit_2.0.16.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: building noteedit using existing noteedit_2.0.16.orig.tar.gz tar: noteedit-2.0.16/doc/noteedit/afterCombine.png: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/doc/noteedit/afterCombine.png: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/water1.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/water2.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/whiskey1.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/whiskey2.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/whiskey3.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/whiskey4.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/whiskey5.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/water1.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/water2.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/whiskey1.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/whiskey2.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/whiskey3.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/whiskey4.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/whiskey5.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/noteedit.desktop: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/resources/breve.ppm: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/resources/breve.xbm: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/resources/breve_grey.ppm: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/resources/breve_red.ppm: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/INSTALL: Cannot open: File exists tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors dpkg-source: failure: tar -xkf - gave error exit status 2 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Different libc versions accross architectures.
Looking at the buildd logs of my ulog-acctd package today (http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=ulog-acctd), I noticed that the build process had failed on some architectures (s390, arm, m68k) because ipt_ULOG.h which got introduced into libc6-dev at some point (I haven't found out when, yet) was missing there. What should I do? I was thinking about putting ipt_ULOG.h into the source package. Since ipt_ULOG.h is distributed with the kernel sources (it is part of netfilter), that should work on these architectures. Or should I just wait? Will the current situation keep my package from going into testing as long as no newer version of libc6[-dev] for those architectures is available? Thanks, -Hilko Bengen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linuxworld expo 2003
Ross Boylan wrote: > >If it is held again in San Francisco (economy, tech market, etc) I usually > >take charge of the booth here. As the time comes closer we discuss > >somethings here and on a Bay Area mailing list. > > I'm in San Francisco, and this is the first I've heard about a Bay Area > list. Could you tell me about it? The one Sean is referring to is hosted at http://bad.debian.net/ There are of course oodles of other, non-Debian-specific bay area lists.. -- see shy jo msg07833/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: What does dpkg-source mean with this?
Karolina Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > When I run this, I get the following error messages. What does it mean? > Which file(s) are already existing? It looks like open() is being called with O_CREAT | O_EXCL and so creation will fail if the file is already present. It looks like all the files are pre-existing. Try running dpkg-source -b from another directory or renaming the noteedit-2.0.16 directory? > $ dpkg-source -b noteedit-2.0.16 noteedit_2.0.16.orig.tar.gz > dpkg-source: building noteedit using existing noteedit_2.0.16.orig.tar.gz > tar: noteedit-2.0.16/doc/noteedit/afterCombine.png: Cannot open: File exists [...] > tar: noteedit-2.0.16/INSTALL: Cannot open: File exists > tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors > dpkg-source: failure: tar -xkf - gave error exit status 2 -- Roger Leigh "Liberty and Livelihood" - Support the Countryside Alliance Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/ GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 available on public keyservers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Replacing a single file with Replaces:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 09:10:41AM +0100, Karolina Lindqvist wrote: > In the policy manual, section 7.5.1 "Overwriting files in other packages" it > says: > "However, if the overwriting package declares that it Replaces the one > containing the file being overwritten, then dpkg will replace the file from > the old package with that from the new. The file will no longer be listed as > `owned' by the old package. " > > I read that to mean that you can actually replace a single file from a > package, in another package. But I can't get that to work. If I put > "Replaces:" and the package name which I want to replace a file in, dpkg > still aborts and says that the file exists in multiple packages. Try using Conflicts: instead of (or in addition to) Replaces: > How to get this feature to work, to replace a single file in a package from > within another package? Also, take a look at dpkg-divert. (Be careful not to misuse/abuse this though) -- Duncan Findlay -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linuxworld expo 2003
On Tuesday 12 November 2002 00:10, Ross Boylan wrote: > > I'm in San Francisco, and this is the first I've heard about a Bay Area > list. Could you tell me about it? > Thanks. [EMAIL PROTECTED] go to http://bad.debian.net for details. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What does dpkg-source mean with this?
tisdagen den 12 november 2002 21.28 skrev Roger Leigh: > It looks like all the files are pre-existing. Try running dpkg-source > -b from another directory or renaming the noteedit-2.0.16 directory? That might be the problem, so please bear me with some questions so that I get this very clear to me: When you take a tar file from somewhere and make a debian package of it, should it be unchanged from upstream or can it be modified? For example, should (in this case) noteedit_2.0.16.orig.tar.gz extract to noteedit, noteedit-2.0.16 or noteedit-2.0.16.orig? Does it matter? Can the source tar file be called noteedit-2.0.16.tar or should it be renamed to noteedit_2.0.16.orig.tar If there is an old debian directory in the upstreams tar file, for some old debian version. Should that be removed? If there are bin-files or *.o files or similar in the upstreams tar file. Should they be removed? In KDE applications, normally a "make -f Makefile.cvs" (or similar) is done before the upstreams tar file is packed. But often that is done with another version of automake than debian is using. Often an old automake1.4 or something. If some changes are needed to the *.am files, that will create problems due to automake incompatibilites. If no changes to the *.am files is needed, it might work even with incompatible versions, since automake is never called, but it might create trouble if something is changed. One solution is to make a "make -f Makefile.cvs" before building it on debian, but then the diffs with all the Makefile.in files etc. will become huge. Can that be done before packing the *.orig.tar file, to avoid rebuilding problems and making the diffs small? Many questions, but it is things that I have been wondering about. -- Karolina -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What to do with wrong files from upstreams
tisdagen den 12 november 2002 21.28 skrev Roger Leigh: > It looks like all the files are pre-existing. Try running dpkg-source > -b from another directory or renaming the noteedit-2.0.16 directory? ... And then yet another question. When I get the following error message: In file included from knat_toolbar.cpp:18: knat.moc:17: #error "This file was generated using the moc from 3.0.5. It" knat.moc:18: #error "cannot be used with the include files from this version of Qt." knat.moc:19: #error "(The moc has changed too much.)" Oobviously I need to rebuild the *.moc files that comes from upstreams that are not deleted by "make distclean". Sometimes that goes automatically by the Makefile if the moc file is removed. How should I handle this gracefully? Delete the *.moc files from the *.orig.tar file, delete them in the debian/rules files, delete them in the "clean" rule or something else? -- Karolina -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ndbm.h and libc ...
Hello, ... I have a package who can build ndbm support. Prior to libc6 2.3.1, /usr/include/db1/ndbm.h was included with libc6-dev, and the package builded correctly. Since then this file is no more included, but libgdbmg1-dev contains a /usr/include/gdbm-ndbm.h. Is this file equivalent to the previous one ? Using it requires patching all over the source to change the ndbm.h includes into gdbm-ndbm.h ones. Is using /usr/include/gdbm-ndbm.h the right solution, or does a copy of /usr/include/db1/ndbm.h still be included in a non obvious place ? Friendly, Sven Luther
Re: linuxworld expo 2003
At 07:20 PM 11/11/02 -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: On Sunday 10 November 2002 13:08, Samuel Desseaux wrote: > Hi! > excuse me, before all, if i am a bit out of the subject of the list. > > Who plan to take part at the next linuxworld expo in 2003 (in New-york or > San francisco)? I've never take part in it but next year, i'd like it very > much (like the free software meeting in france, it seems to be a good > opportunitie to learn and meet some developers). > > So, if someone has the experience of this event, write me!! > > thanks > > sam If it is held again in San Francisco (economy, tech market, etc) I usually take charge of the booth here. As the time comes closer we discuss somethings here and on a Bay Area mailing list. I'm in San Francisco, and this is the first I've heard about a Bay Area list. Could you tell me about it? Thanks.
Replacing a single file with Replaces:
In the policy manual, section 7.5.1 "Overwriting files in other packages" it says: "However, if the overwriting package declares that it Replaces the one containing the file being overwritten, then dpkg will replace the file from the old package with that from the new. The file will no longer be listed as `owned' by the old package. " I read that to mean that you can actually replace a single file from a package, in another package. But I can't get that to work. If I put "Replaces:" and the package name which I want to replace a file in, dpkg still aborts and says that the file exists in multiple packages. How to get this feature to work, to replace a single file in a package from within another package? -- Karolina
Re: linuxworld expo 2003
Le Mardi 12 Novembre 2002 04:20, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry a écrit : > On Sunday 10 November 2002 13:08, Samuel Desseaux wrote: > > Hi! > > excuse me, before all, if i am a bit out of the subject of the list. > > > > Who plan to take part at the next linuxworld expo in 2003 (in New-york or > > San francisco)? I've never take part in it but next year, i'd like it > > very much (like the free software meeting in france, it seems to be a > > good opportunitie to learn and meet some developers). > > > > So, if someone has the experience of this event, write me!! > > > > thanks > > > > sam > > If it is held again in San Francisco (economy, tech market, etc) *yes (according to the website of this event) I usually > take charge of the booth here. As the time comes closer we discuss > somethings here and on a Bay Area mailing list. * euh... what do you want to say? I hope to come at San Francisco (big travel -11 hours by plane) because it must very interessant and, after the free software meeting in Bordeaux (cf http://lsm.abul.org), it must be a good opportunity to meet developers. sam
Re: Replacing a single file with Replaces:
can you post a copy of your debian/control file? a. On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 09:10:41AM +0100, Karolina Lindqvist wrote: > In the policy manual, section 7.5.1 "Overwriting files in other packages" it > says: > "However, if the overwriting package declares that it Replaces the one > containing the file being overwritten, then dpkg will replace the file from > the old package with that from the new. The file will no longer be listed as > `owned' by the old package. " > > I read that to mean that you can actually replace a single file from a > package, in another package. But I can't get that to work. If I put > "Replaces:" and the package name which I want to replace a file in, dpkg > still aborts and says that the file exists in multiple packages. > > How to get this feature to work, to replace a single file in a package from > within another package? > > > -- Andrea Mennucc "E' un mondo difficile. Che vita intensa!" (Tonino Carotone)
Full albüm mp3 cymo
Mp3sa yine bir ilki gerçekleþtiriyor: Klip arþivi! Full albüm ve single parçalar mp3 halinde! Arayýpta bulamadýðýnýz bütün parçalar için birde sitemize bakýn: http://www.mp3sa.com Full Turkçe Album Full Yabancý Album A-Z Yerli Mp3 A-Z Yabancý Mp3 En Iyý 20 Yerli Výdeo Klýp Yabancý Výdeo Klýp Yerli ve Yab. Arsýv Hepsine birden ulaþabileceðiz tek bir adres var http://www.mp3sa.com
Re: Replacing a single file with Replaces:
tisdagen den 12 november 2002 11.09 skrev Andrea Mennucc: > can you post a copy of your debian/control file? I have to come back with this and construct an example. -- Karolina
What does dpkg-source mean with this?
When I run this, I get the following error messages. What does it mean? Which file(s) are already existing? $ dpkg-source -b noteedit-2.0.16 noteedit_2.0.16.orig.tar.gz dpkg-source: building noteedit using existing noteedit_2.0.16.orig.tar.gz tar: noteedit-2.0.16/doc/noteedit/afterCombine.png: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/doc/noteedit/afterCombine.png: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/water1.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/water2.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/whiskey1.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/whiskey2.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/whiskey3.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/whiskey4.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/whiskey5.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/water1.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/water2.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/whiskey1.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/whiskey2.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/whiskey3.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/whiskey4.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/lyrics/whiskey5.txt: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/noteedit.desktop: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/resources/breve.ppm: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/resources/breve.xbm: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/resources/breve_grey.ppm: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/noteedit/resources/breve_red.ppm: Cannot open: File exists tar: noteedit-2.0.16/INSTALL: Cannot open: File exists tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors dpkg-source: failure: tar -xkf - gave error exit status 2
Different libc versions accross architectures.
Looking at the buildd logs of my ulog-acctd package today (http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=ulog-acctd), I noticed that the build process had failed on some architectures (s390, arm, m68k) because ipt_ULOG.h which got introduced into libc6-dev at some point (I haven't found out when, yet) was missing there. What should I do? I was thinking about putting ipt_ULOG.h into the source package. Since ipt_ULOG.h is distributed with the kernel sources (it is part of netfilter), that should work on these architectures. Or should I just wait? Will the current situation keep my package from going into testing as long as no newer version of libc6[-dev] for those architectures is available? Thanks, -Hilko Bengen
Re: linuxworld expo 2003
Ross Boylan wrote: > >If it is held again in San Francisco (economy, tech market, etc) I usually > >take charge of the booth here. As the time comes closer we discuss > >somethings here and on a Bay Area mailing list. > > I'm in San Francisco, and this is the first I've heard about a Bay Area > list. Could you tell me about it? The one Sean is referring to is hosted at http://bad.debian.net/ There are of course oodles of other, non-Debian-specific bay area lists.. -- see shy jo pgpz1tO5Nnq2S.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: What does dpkg-source mean with this?
Karolina Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > When I run this, I get the following error messages. What does it mean? > Which file(s) are already existing? It looks like open() is being called with O_CREAT | O_EXCL and so creation will fail if the file is already present. It looks like all the files are pre-existing. Try running dpkg-source -b from another directory or renaming the noteedit-2.0.16 directory? > $ dpkg-source -b noteedit-2.0.16 noteedit_2.0.16.orig.tar.gz > dpkg-source: building noteedit using existing noteedit_2.0.16.orig.tar.gz > tar: noteedit-2.0.16/doc/noteedit/afterCombine.png: Cannot open: File exists [...] > tar: noteedit-2.0.16/INSTALL: Cannot open: File exists > tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors > dpkg-source: failure: tar -xkf - gave error exit status 2 -- Roger Leigh "Liberty and Livelihood" - Support the Countryside Alliance Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/ GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 available on public keyservers
Re: Replacing a single file with Replaces:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 09:10:41AM +0100, Karolina Lindqvist wrote: > In the policy manual, section 7.5.1 "Overwriting files in other packages" it > says: > "However, if the overwriting package declares that it Replaces the one > containing the file being overwritten, then dpkg will replace the file from > the old package with that from the new. The file will no longer be listed as > `owned' by the old package. " > > I read that to mean that you can actually replace a single file from a > package, in another package. But I can't get that to work. If I put > "Replaces:" and the package name which I want to replace a file in, dpkg > still aborts and says that the file exists in multiple packages. Try using Conflicts: instead of (or in addition to) Replaces: > How to get this feature to work, to replace a single file in a package from > within another package? Also, take a look at dpkg-divert. (Be careful not to misuse/abuse this though) -- Duncan Findlay
Re: linuxworld expo 2003
On Tuesday 12 November 2002 00:10, Ross Boylan wrote: > > I'm in San Francisco, and this is the first I've heard about a Bay Area > list. Could you tell me about it? > Thanks. [EMAIL PROTECTED] go to http://bad.debian.net for details.
