[outreachy] Very good work (Was: r22429 - trunk/packages/rostlab/reprof/trunk/debian)
Hi Tanya, thanks for your very thorough work on all packages you are touching. I'm really happy that you are doing all the work (even the not so interesting one) on the packages you are touching. That's really helpful. Please remember my suggestion to apply for Debian Maintainer. Kind regards Andreas. PS: Feel free to quote me in your outreachy blog. On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 11:23:30PM +, Tatiana Malygina wrote: > Author: latticetower-guest > Date: 2016-07-07 23:23:29 + (Thu, 07 Jul 2016) > New Revision: 22429 > > Modified: >trunk/packages/rostlab/reprof/trunk/debian/changelog >trunk/packages/rostlab/reprof/trunk/debian/copyright > Log: > debian/copyright: fixed syntax to fit DEP5 > > Modified: trunk/packages/rostlab/reprof/trunk/debian/changelog > === > --- trunk/packages/rostlab/reprof/trunk/debian/changelog 2016-07-07 > 23:07:37 UTC (rev 22428) > +++ trunk/packages/rostlab/reprof/trunk/debian/changelog 2016-07-07 > 23:23:29 UTC (rev 22429) > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ >* cme fix dpkg-control >* add hardening >* add debian/README.test, debian/docs > + * debian/copyright: fixed syntax to fit DEP5 > >[ Andreas Tille ] >* Fix clean target to build twice in a row > > Modified: trunk/packages/rostlab/reprof/trunk/debian/copyright > === > --- trunk/packages/rostlab/reprof/trunk/debian/copyright 2016-07-07 > 23:07:37 UTC (rev 22428) > +++ trunk/packages/rostlab/reprof/trunk/debian/copyright 2016-07-07 > 23:23:29 UTC (rev 22429) > @@ -1,42 +1,34 @@ > -This work was packaged for Debian by: > +Format: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/ > +Upstream-Name: reprof > +Upstream-Contact: hoenigsch...@rostlab.org > +Source: ftp://rostlab.org/reprof/ > > -Peter Hoenigschmid on Fri, 16 Dec 2011 > 16:44:22 +0100 > +Files: * > +Copyright: > + Copyright (C) 2011 Peter Hoenigschmid , > + Technical University of Munich, Germany > + Copyright (C) 2011 Burkhard Rost , > + Technical University of Munich, Germany > +License: GPL-3 > > ... -- http://fam-tille.de
Re: Orthanc 1.1.0
Hi, I have just pushed an important fix for FTBFS issue #829608: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-med/orthanc.git/commit/?id=8d9cbc2f8b4c8d6395ad59cee45ba92adf39b447 Please could someone upload it? TIA! Sébastien- On 06/27/2016 11:16 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: Uploaded, thanks for your work on this, Andreas. On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 04:59:22PM +0200, Sebastien Jodogne wrote: Dear all, I have just packaged the newest upstream version of Orthanc (1.1.0): http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-med/orthanc.git/ Could someone check the package and upload it if everything is OK? Thanks in advance!
Re: [Outreachy] predictprotein and other RostLab packages
Hi Andreas,
Your solution for reprof works, I've added README.test and for now it's
ready (current testsuite checks only perl portion of code, I'll probably
later add other test).
I've made tests for profphd-utils, it's ready for upload. For now I took 2
example files from profphd package - to test profphd-utils independently
from profphd. If you think it's better to take them directly from profphd
package installation (and mention profphd in 'Depends:' section in
debian/tests/control), I can fix this.
I also tried to make tests for profnet. This package generates 8 packages
(and profphd-net), with commands which can be run in similar manner. But
there are no enough example files. I found correct example file for these
tests in profphd source package, but it works for 5 of 8 packages. Other 3
packages (profnet-bval, profnet-md, profnet-norsnet) with the same input
files raise Segmentation fault.
The main difference between sources of these executables can be found in
upstream's patch files mainly in space character (like in these two lines
from upstream's bval.patch file):
- CALL RDPAR_ERR('NUMIN ',VARIN)
+ CALL RDPAR_ERR('NUMIN',VARIN)
For now I couldn't find correct set of example files which works with
profnet-bval, profnet-md or profnet-norsnet.
For other 5 packages (profnet-chop, profnet-con, profnet-isis,
profnet-prof, profnet-snapfun) I wrote testsuite which passes.
The main problem is profnet is utility package and packages it generates
are not made to be used by itself, without packages they are supposed to be
used with.
I think it's better to return later to this package and search example
files which works correctly in related packages (for now I couldn't find
any which doesn't produce segfault). How do you think?
2016-07-05 20:49 GMT+03:00 Andreas Tille :
> Hi Tanya,
>
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 07:30:28PM +0300, merlettaia wrote:
> > debuild -us -uc -b
>
> Hint: I'm using debuild which is a more intelligent wrapper around this.
>
> > - for the first time, all goes fine.
> > When I run the same command again, I've got error message. Full error log
> > is in attached file.
>
> Ahhh, broken clean target and ugly hacks. I fixed the clean target and
> worked around those ugly hacks. May be you re-check my commit and
> confirm if it works for you now.
>
> Hope this helps
>
>Andreas.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
--
Best wishes,
Tanya.
Sponsoring request [RC]: sofa-framework
Dear all, I've fixed compilation of sofa framework [1] with gcc-6: Changes: * d/p/gcc-6: Add patch to fix compilation with gcc-6, Closes: #811747 * cme fix dpkg-control * d/copyright: DEP5 - remove duplicate entries * d/rules: hardening += all * d/rules: enable parallel builds * d/p/hardening: Add hardening flags and debug information * d/control: secure VCS browser url Also, I was not able to reproduce #814975 [2], so after this package is uploaded I'd close #814975 manually. Best, Gert [1] svn://anonscm.debian.org/debian-med/trunk/packages/sofa- framework/trunk/ [2] https://bugs.debian.org/814975
