Re: New package of GWAMA

2014-11-23 Thread Dylan
Hi Thorsten,
Thank you for your comments. Now, uscan excludes the folder.
For the file commandLine.cpp, I will send an email to upstream developers
to clarify the license.


Best regards,
Dylan


Re: Please help: failed build of plastimatch 1.5.16+dfsg-2 for several architectures

2014-11-23 Thread Martin Steghöfer

Hi Gregory!


Gregory Sharp wrote:

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 01:36:40PM +0100, Martin Steghöfer wrote:

  Problem seems resolved to be resolved: https://bugs.debian.org/768769#47

Thanks.  Please make sure that also the bug-closing magic will be done properly
to ensure that plastimatch will not be auto-rejected at some point in time

Is there anything that needs to be done for plastimatch itself?

It got a new bug report due to the build failure: https://bugs.debian.org/769975
Therefore it is ok I should just close it?


The original FTBFS issue #768769 seems to be solved (at least judging 
from local tests) and therefore can stay closed.


The new FTBFS issue #769975, however, isn't yet fixed and IMHO should 
therefore stay open for now (even if it's not plastimatch's "fault"). 
Judging from the message [1], I thought that the necessary binNMU for 
ITK3 was already requested, but I can't find any reference about it in 
[2]. So someone should request the binNMU for ITK3 (like described in 
[3]), mentioning bug #769975 (so it becomes clear what broke and the 
issue can be closed automatically after rebuild) as well as the analysis 
of the problem posted in [4].


As you were asking, if something needs to be done, maybe you volunteer 
to do it? I don't have much time right now myself (and no experience 
with binNMUs either), sorry.


Cheers,
Martin


[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768769#47
[2] 
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=release.debian.org#_4_14_4

[3] https://release.debian.org/wanna-build.txt
[4] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768769#42


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/5471a78a.8060...@steghoefer.eu



Re: Please help: failed build of plastimatch 1.5.16+dfsg-2 for several architectures

2014-11-23 Thread Gregory Sharp
Hello Martin,

On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 10:23:22 +0100
Martin Steghöfer  wrote:
> Gregory Sharp wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 01:36:40PM +0100, Martin Steghöfer wrote:
> >>>   Problem seems resolved to be resolved:
> >>> https://bugs.debian.org/768769#47
> >> Thanks.  Please make sure that also the bug-closing magic will be done
> >> properly to ensure that plastimatch will not be auto-rejected at some
> >> point in time
> > Is there anything that needs to be done for plastimatch itself?
> >
> > It got a new bug report due to the build failure:
> > https://bugs.debian.org/769975 Therefore it is ok I should just close it?
> 
> The original FTBFS issue #768769 seems to be solved (at least judging 
> from local tests) and therefore can stay closed.
> 
> The new FTBFS issue #769975, however, isn't yet fixed and IMHO should 
> therefore stay open for now (even if it's not plastimatch's "fault"). 
> Judging from the message [1], I thought that the necessary binNMU for 
> ITK3 was already requested, but I can't find any reference about it in 
> [2]. So someone should request the binNMU for ITK3 (like described in 
> [3]), mentioning bug #769975 (so it becomes clear what broke and the 
> issue can be closed automatically after rebuild) as well as the analysis 
> of the problem posted in [4].
> 
> As you were asking, if something needs to be done, maybe you volunteer 
> to do it? I don't have much time right now myself (and no experience 
> with binNMUs either), sorry.

This is very helpful.  Exactly the advice I was seeking!
Slowly the process is starting to make sense.

I have requested the binNMU for insighttoolkit.
(Strangely I didn't get a return email from reportbug. 
Maybe it is in the queue.  Or maybe I made a mistake.
We'll see...)

Once the binNMU is successful, it seems a "give-back" 
on plastimatch is needed.

Thank you,
Greg

> 
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768769#47
> [2] 
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?package=release.debian.org#_4_14_4
> [3] https://release.debian.org/wanna-build.txt
> [4] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768769#42
> 
> 


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141123165306.7ea12...@sherbert.partners.org