insighttoolki4, (was gccxml is uploaded)
Hello Gianfranco, I tried to compile it over the weekend. I was working in a cowbuilder i386 environment and the gccxml errors in are back. I confirmed that the gccxml version used was really the latest one. But all is not lost, earlier I was wondering why gets included at all, and I've added a patch to ITK that simply inhibits the inclusion of this header if __SSE2__ is not defined. (Upstream report: [1]). It seems to compile now (did it on my laptop where it takes >12h, so it's not finished yet.) There still seems to be some work going on regarding the fixes for the failing tests, which means later this week I will check back with the guys from Kitware to see what are the actual commits I'll have to cherry-pick, and then we will hopefully get this package uploaded -- right before 4.6 is released ;) > don't know if you already know this tool, but it is awesome for its simplicity Thanks, yes I knew it already. Thanks to NeuroDebian I discovered cowbuilder which is a wrapper around pbuilder and now I usually use this one. Best, Gert PS: I put the debian-med list in, because I think it's best when the team is aware of what's going on with the package. [1] https://issues.itk.org/jira/browse/ITK-3299 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: insighttoolki4, (was gccxml is uploaded)
Il Lunedì 21 Luglio 2014 12:01, Gert Wollny ha scritto: > > >Hello Gianfranco, > Hi Gert! >I tried to compile it over the weekend. I was working in a cowbuilder >i386 environment and the gccxml errors in are back. >I confirmed that the gccxml version used was really the latest one. > the SSE2 was fixed when I did the build, this is somewhat tricky :( having a non reproducible issue is really annoying from my side! I'm thinking about a pbuilder-dist "issue", but I honestly don't know why the build succeeded, and I cannot prove it... >But all is not lost, earlier I was wondering why gets >included at all, and I've added a patch to ITK that simply inhibits the >inclusion of this header if __SSE2__ is not defined. (Upstream report: >[1]). It seems to compile now (did it on my laptop where it takes >12h, >so it's not finished yet.) yes, the patch seems really nice, however I'm still worried about this non-reproducibleness, (also for tests, we can spurious test failures, and this is annoying!) > >There still seems to be some work going on regarding the fixes for the >failing tests, which means later this week I will check back with the >guys from Kitware to see what are the actual commits I'll have to >cherry-pick, and then we will hopefully get this package uploaded -- >right before 4.6 is released ;) Wonderful to hear! We are on your hands then ;) It is nice when the maintainers are so active and proficient! > >> don't know if you already know this tool, but it is awesome for its >> simplicity >Thanks, yes I knew it already. Thanks to NeuroDebian I discovered >cowbuilder which is a wrapper around pbuilder and now I usually use this >one. I would say "I'll try it" but after pbuilder-dist I don't need anything else :p thanks for working on this issue! BTW the ubuntu sync has been accepted, and the package has been automatically rebuilt (it was lacking of the gccxml dependency) it builded without any issue https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/insighttoolkit4 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/insighttoolkit4/4.5.2-3 maybe the log can help you a little bit ;) cheers, Gianfranco > >Best, >Gert > >PS: I put the debian-med list in, because I think it's best when the >team is aware of what's going on with the package. > Yes, nice idea! > > >[1] https://issues.itk.org/jira/browse/ITK-3299 > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1405937815.36093.yahoomail...@web171806.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
Re: Package of r-cran-beeswarm
Hi, I renamed the source package, the git repository [1] and finished the package. Best regards, Dylan [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-med/r-cran-beeswarm.git 2014-07-17 3:16 GMT+02:00 Charles Plessy : > Le Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 08:16:24PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:34:22PM +0200, Dylan wrote: > > > > > > I saw that Charles Plessy began a package for r-cran-beeswarm[1,2] but > > > without time to finish it[3]. So, I would like to finish it, do you > agree? > > > > I'd say go for updating the package and meanwhile Charles has enough > > time to stop you from working (which is not expected). > > Hi Dylan, > > you are very welcome to go ahead. > > Please not that since the time I made the draft package, I think that we > (re)started to use the same name for source and binary R packages. That > is, > unless somebody tells it is wrong, please use r-cran-beeswarm as a source > package name instead of just beeswarm, and do not hesitate to rename the > Git > repository. > > Have a nice day, > > Charles > > -- > Charles Plessy > Debian Med packaging team, > http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med > Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: > https://lists.debian.org/20140717011619.gk21...@falafel.plessy.net > >
Re: insighttoolki4, (was gccxml is uploaded)
Thanks to everyone who has worked together on this! Also, a big thanks to Steve Robbins, who maintains the Debian Sid ITK dashboard submissions. > There still seems to be some work going on regarding the fixes for the > failing tests, which means later this week I will check back with the > guys from Kitware to see what are the actual commits I'll have to > cherry-pick, and then we will hopefully get this package uploaded -- > right before 4.6 is released ;) Bumping to v4.6.0 is a good option -- freshly tagged. :-) Otherwise, the hashes are: 9c54724 BUG: Remove division in inner loop for otsu threshold calculator defdd99 BUG: Use tolerant float compare when choosing better otsu threshold b3ca416 BUG: Increased OtsuThreshold computation precision 76c4580 BUG: Increase itkVoronoiPartitioningImageFilterTest1 for 32-bit builds. Thanks, Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CALzTN-TTmq208Tdwrz8hD=kpvysdhrmx1erh5xjhr2pwhw_...@mail.gmail.com
