Re: Status of BioCocoa (Was: trunk/packages/biococoa)
BioCocoa is ready for upload! The bits of code under question were re-released under the Lucent Public License 1.02 which should pass Debian guidelines. Sorry it took so long! cheers Scott On Apr 23, 2010, at 1:11 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 01:40:43PM -0700, Scott Christley wrote: >> Yes, we have received word recently that the few pieces of code under >> discussion are to be released under the new Plan 9 (Lucent) license, which >> should alleviate the licensing issues for that code. We are waiting for the >> author to release new files with the license attached. >> >> Is there a date set for the freeze? > > Not yet, but there is no way what comes first: The freeze or the new > release of BioCocoa. If you ask me I would attach the "word your > received recently" to the debian/copyright file and upload the package. > As you know we are changing binary package names and thus manual > intervention from ftpmaster is involved etc. So I would think it > is a good idea to get the packages out soon. > > Kind regards and thanks for working on this > > Andreas. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100423061106.ga14...@an3as.eu > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/f244be3c-d79e-41bf-b765-76026be9d...@mac.com
Bug#596733: unblock: ncbi-tools6/6.1.20100808-1 (as -2)
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Greetings!
ncbi-tools6 recently had its first upstream release in a year, issued
a few days before your latest announcement. (As the version number
indicates, the sources themselves are somewhat older; however, the
public release thereof didn't occur until August 27.) Here's the
changelog block:
ncbi-tools6 (6.1.20100808-1) experimental; urgency=low
* New upstream release; the upgrade to BLAST 2.2.24 (from 2.2.21) should
address a formatdb regression. (LP: #586219.)
* Uploading to experimental because squeeze is frozen.
* debian/rules
- Clean up compilation settings; in particular, use dpkg-buildflags rather
than relying on dpkg-buildpackage to have set CFLAGS appropriately.
- (clean): restore expected empty directories if necessary,
for compatibility with VCSes (notably git) that don't track them.
- (install-indep-stamp): adapt to new ncbilogo.ico contents.
- (VIB): add asndisc, as upstream takes care to publish binaries thereof.
* debian/ncbi-tools6.install: likewise add asndisc.
* (debian/).gitignore: Ignore content generated during build.
* debian/lib{ncbi6,vibrant6a}.symbols: update for latest release.
* make/makenet.unx: don't link asndisc against extraneous libraries.
* doc/man/*.1: update for latest release.
* doc/man/asndisc.1: throw together a man page for asndisc.
* doc/man/cleanasn.1: fix SEE ALSO formatting.
* debian/control:
- bump dpkg-dev build-dep to >= 1.15.7 for dpkg-buildflags.
- Standards-Version: 3.9.1 (already compliant).
- note switch to git-mediated Debian-Med team maintenance.
-- Aaron M. Ucko Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:43:17 -0400
In particular, please note that this upload fixes a nasty regression
reported in Launchpad:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ncbi-tools6/+bug/586219
There's no corresponding Debian bug report at present, but I can
formally issue one if you'd like. ;-)
At any rate, I uploaded my packages of the new release to experimental
out of respect for the freeze, but would greatly appreciate it if you
could please authorize a reupload to unstable with the intent of
making it into squeeze. I concede that the diff
http://git.debian.org/?p=debian-med/ncbi-tools6.git;a=commitdiff;hp=3a98718;h=c4b77b0
is on the large side; however, the impact on reverse dependencies
should be negligible, as most of the changed interfaces are only used
internally. (Also, leaving out changes to spacing and fully generated
files helps a fair bit; the result is still larger than I care to
attach :-/, but I've posted a copy at
http://people.debian.org/~ucko/ncbi-tools6_6.1.20100808-1.full-diff
that you're welcome to review as you see fit.)
Per reportbug, I'm including the relevant unblock directive for your
convenience:
unblock ncbi-tools6/6.1.20100808-2
Thanks in advance for considering this request; please let me know if
you have any questions or concerns.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20100913183621.28829.67353.report...@tux64.internal.ucko.debian.net
Re: Status of BioCocoa (Was: trunk/packages/biococoa)
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:10:04PM -0500, Scott Christley wrote: > BioCocoa is ready for upload! The bits of code under question were > re-released under the Lucent Public License 1.02 which should pass Debian > guidelines. That's good news. > Sorry it took so long! Well, we failed to reach the freeze date. However, I guess the world will not stop spinning around of this and we should probably build the package without hecticness. Scott, you once worked on this package. Would you volunteer to prepare final packages for upload. I'm currently a bit distracted by other tasks (GNUmed packaging, some Blends infrastraucture things, etc.) For sure other volunteers are welcome as well. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100913210045.ga24...@an3as.eu
Re: Bug#595613: Moving all EMBOSS libraries to /usr/lib/emboss/lib ?
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 14:17:29 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > In our Debian packages, I propose to move the EMBOSS libraries from /usr/lib, > for instance in /usr/lib/emboss/lib, and to merge the packages libajax6, > libajax6-dev, libnucleus6, libnucleus6-dev, into the emboss-lib package. This > will also prevent package renaming or confusion when versions 7 and higher of > EMBOSS will be released. > > Together with a change of section, it will also make the EMBOSS libraries > private from a Debian point of view, and solve our problem with emboss-lib > that > currently does not respect the Policy with the eplplot library (a fork of the > plplot library that should not be used outside EMBOSS). > If the libraries are used outside of their own source package (which is the case here for embassy-*, AIUI), then they are not private, and need to be versioned correctly so those other packages can link against them and get proper dependencies. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Status of BioCocoa (Was: trunk/packages/biococoa)
On Sep 13, 2010, at 4:00 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Scott, you once worked on this package. Would you volunteer to prepare > final packages for upload. I'm currently a bit distracted by other > tasks (GNUmed packaging, some Blends infrastraucture things, etc.) For > sure other volunteers are welcome as well. Sure. I'm not sure what's involved in upload though. I've checked in changes to the debian-med repository and verified the package builds. If you can point me to a document about other tasks, I will be happy to do them. Scott -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/6e4248c6-04aa-4fc2-bf97-de915d5ae...@mac.com
