(semi-)automatic unclaim of packages with more than 2 weeks of inactivity (and missing DLAs on www.do)
hi, today there were four packages unclaimed for LTS: - condor (Roberto C. Sánchez) - mercurial (Roberto C. Sánchez) - squid3 (Markus Koschany) - wpa (Abhijith PA) and none for ELTS. Thorsten Alteholz probably claimed too many packages: - curl - libapache2-mod-auth-openidc - luajit - python2.7 - salt There are three DLAs which have been reserved but not yet been published on www.debian.org: - DLA 2290-1 (reserved by Thorsten Alteholz) - DLA 2289-1 (reserved by Thorsten Alteholz) - DLA 2286-1 (reserved by Markus Koschany) -- cheers, Holger --- holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Suggestions for handling of condor update
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 07:45:33PM -0500, Tim Theisen wrote: > Hello Roberto, > > I have just returned from a two week canoe camping trip (no electricity, > no internet). I saw this bug report just as I left town. I will be able > to review your work next week. > > I will have bit to catch up on Monday. I will take a look at this after > I catch up. > > Thank you for putting in the time to address this issue. You will hear > from me again next week. > > I should be able to review that the changes are correct and test on the > various distributions. > Hi Tim, I somehow missed your reply. I hope you have been able to catch up on your backlog. If I can do anything to help you with reviewing the changes, please let me know. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez
Re: Reclaiming packages with no status update
Hi, On 23/07/2020 10:18, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 20/07/2020 12:04, Holger Levsen wrote: >> today there were two packages unclaimed for LTS: >> and four for ELTS: > I often notice that after each round of these unclaims, people tend to reclaim > their packages without adding a note on the progress or status. Could I ask > that > when you reclaim a package you add a note mentioning where things stand? +1 and preferably with more detail than "WIP" or "ongoing". When a security update requires more than 2 weeks of work/delay, there's probably a blocker that is best made explicit :) Cheers! Sylvain
re: kernel updates
To whom it may concern: Does LTS support update kernel and debian 9 for security issues, along with packages. First time using LTS support. Regards Rob
