bash completion script licensing

2009-01-02 Thread Mike Hommey
Hi,

While working on packaging zfs-fuse, I thought about adding a bash
completion script for the zfs and zpool commands. Anyways, such a script
already exists[1], but its license is CDDL, which is not GPL compatible.

Most files in /etc/bash_completion.d on my system don't have a license
boilerplate header, but the few that do are under the GPL, and bash
itself is GPL.

As the GPL and CDDL are incompatible, as GPL code has some strange
interactions with other code (library linkage, etc.), and as I'm not
sure how sourced bash scripts are supposed to be considered in this
context, I wonder if having such a CDDL bash script would be
problematic license-wise.

Mike

1. http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/scripts/sunScripts/zfs_completion.bash.txt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org



Re: bash completion script licensing

2009-01-02 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Fri Jan 02 19:50, Mike Hommey wrote:
> As the GPL and CDDL are incompatible, as GPL code has some strange
> interactions with other code (library linkage, etc.), and as I'm not
> sure how sourced bash scripts are supposed to be considered in this
> context, I wonder if having such a CDDL bash script would be
> problematic license-wise.

There would be no problem with a CDDL bash script per-se, any more than
there would be with a CDDL jpeg or a GPL word document. I suppose you
could argue that since it is modifying the behaviour of one of bash's
built-in functions it counts under the (already dubious) GPL linkage
clause, but I think it would be a stretch. 

Matt

-- 
Matthew Johnson


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: GPL photographies, eg for backround

2009-01-02 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 31 décembre 2008 à 09:15 -0800, Ken Arromdee a écrit :
> > Indeed, but we are not talking of a program but of pictures here.
> 
> The same applies if you don't provide the source code for the picture.

No. If you’re the copyright owner, you get to decide what is the
preferred form of modification.

-- 
 .''`.
: :' :  We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `'   We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
  `-our own. Resistance is futile.


signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message	numériquement signée