Re: kscope licences
MJ Ray a écrit : Fathi Boudra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Upstream author find a solution : The next version of KScope, due shortly, uses 'dot' from the command-line=20 instead of dynamically linking with graphviz. This should solve all licensi= ng problems. That seems a good solution. Thanks for working on this problem. Hello, Can you explain me why, by using this command line, you makes the license ok, and what the difference? Isn't strange, if you can't use a part of code under a license , to find an an other way to use it? The goal is to not extend the license to the other part of the program, isn't it? An other question, what are the different way to use a dynamical link, and what sort of bypass, or alternative can be found to avoid certain license's effects? Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache license 1.1 for non-Apache software
Hi, I want to package Forwards (see my ITP [1]), a non-Apache software under Apache License 1.1 [2]). I read debian-legal archives to have information about Apache License version 1.1. Situation seems confuse on the first thread [3]. This thread [4] explains there is no problem for Apache software under Apache License. Note that I am intent to call my Debian package 'sork-forwards-h3' and with very few patches for upstream version. Note also there are already packages with this license in "main" : sork-passwd-h3, ingo1, jython, et cetera. Could you confirm me that my package will be DFSG-compliant ? [1] : http://bugs.debian.org/362652 [2] : http://cvs.horde.org/co.php?r=1.1.2.2&f=forwards%2FLICENSE&p=1 [3] : http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2000/06/msg00103.html [4] : http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/08/msg00205.html Regards, -- Gregory Colpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG:1024D/C1027A0E Evolix - Informatique et Logiciels Libres http://www.evolix.fr/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
