Re: network connection problem IBM X40
Derek Broughton wrote: > Duncan Kolba wrote: > > >>ever since i installed debian i always have to issue "ifdown eth0" if i >>wanna use wifi or "ifdown eth1" for ethernet. >> >>i have tracked down the problem to the routing table which sets eth0 and >>eth1 as default. > > > Sorry, that makes no sense to me... > >>route del dev eth0 >>solves the problem - though the settings asre gone after a system reboot. >> >>so what's the "debian way" of permanently setting routes? >> > > ifplugd. It'll bring up whichever interface is _really_ available, with the > default route set. Here's an article on setting up the network to work automatically with wireless/ethernet. It worked for me on a T43. YMMV, of course. :-) http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/312 Regards, ST -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
apt-getable 2.6 kernel snapshots [Fwd: snapshots archive]
Hello,
This may be useful for people who would like to try out if the latest
kernel helps to overcome kernel/driver related problems on laptops.
Regards,
ST
Original Message
Subject: snapshots archive
Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:50:06 -0600 (CST)
Resent-From: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:49:58 +0100
From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Hi folks
Some of you already recognized the topic in #debian-kernel, which refers
to
| deb http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel {sid,trunk} main
This archive includes daily snapshots of the sid and trunk branches of
linux-2.6. Currently it builds s390, powerpc and i386 binaries.
If someone is willing to spend some (or better, much) cpu power to build
other arches, he may ask for upload permissions or w-b access.
Also you may request snapshots of other parts of the debian-kernel
packages.
Bastian
--
You! What PLANET is this!
-- McCoy, "The City on the Edge of Forever", stardate 3134.0
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: ati fglrx and xorg 7.0.0
Ivan Glushkov wrote: > Hi all, > > I tried to install ati driver after upgrading my Debian/etch to xorg > 7.0.0. There are three ways to do that as fas I know: [snipped] Flavio posted on the fglrx list that a new 8.24 version compatible with X.org 7.0 is available for testing. http://www.stanchina.net/~flavio/debian-official/fglrx-driver.html A number of people have reported positive results. Regards, ST -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: using another WM alongside gnome
Dan Davison wrote: > Hi, > > I've just installed Debian Sarge on a new laptop. During the install > process, I chose to have a desktop environment. However I would really > like to have the choice to quit out of gnome (or never enter it) and use > a different window manager, when I want. I have the .xsession file from > my old debian system that sets up an X session with the ion window > manager, and I would like to be able to choose between using gnome and > using ion. > > Could someone advise me how to do this? The machine boots directly into > gnome using gdm, and I have not worked out how to have any control over > this. > > Thanks a lot, > > Dan > > Hello Dan, Use apt-get to remove gdm, re-boot and you'll, hopefully :-), be shown the command line login. After logging in, run "startx". Use "update-alternatives" to choose the priority of your WM. You can also try the "wmanager" package that lets you choose your WM on X starting. Hope this helps, ST -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Loss of hardware acceleration after fglrx upgrade to 8.28.8-0.1 in sid on a Thinkpad T43
Hello, After upgrading from version 8.24.8 to 8.28.8-0.1 in sid on a Thinkpad T43, I observed this strange behaviour. Kernel is 2.6.17-2-686. $ glxgears -printfps 1127 frames in 5.0 seconds = 225.244 FPS 1120 frames in 5.0 seconds = 223.986 FPS 1112 frames in 5.0 seconds = 222.386 FPS 1133 frames in 5.0 seconds = 226.586 FPS 1132 frames in 5.0 seconds = 226.386 FPS 1118 frames in 5.0 seconds = 223.586 FPS 1070 frames in 5.0 seconds = 213.906 FPS 15255 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3050.958 FPS 28449 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5689.754 FPS 26781 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5352.986 FPS 1050 frames in 5.0 seconds = 209.989 FPS 1080 frames in 5.0 seconds = 215.987 FPS 19741 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3948.142 FPS 27631 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5526.118 FPS 27298 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5459.505 FPS 27656 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5531.150 FPS 24765 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4952.919 FPS 28035 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5606.998 FPS 27900 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5579.997 FPS 27913 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5582.503 FPS 27679 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5535.743 FPS 28375 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5674.939 FPS 28409 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5681.744 FPS 28356 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5671.131 FPS 28563 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5712.597 FPS 27857 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5571.102 FPS 28735 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5727.678 FPS 29099 frames in 5.1 seconds = 5744.930 FPS 27424 frames in 5.1 seconds = 5389.797 FPS 1046 frames in 5.0 seconds = 209.094 FPS 998 frames in 5.0 seconds = 199.588 FPS 1061 frames in 5.0 seconds = 212.187 FPS 1121 frames in 5.0 seconds = 224.186 FPS No hardware acceleration, most of the time and then fps shoots up to a high value which appears to be incorrect. Grateful for any pointer. Regards, ST -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Loss of hardware acceleration after fglrx upgrade to 8.28.8-0.1 in sid on a Thinkpad T43
Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote: > For diagnosis purpose try the following > > LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxgears -info -printfps > > assuming a bash-shell; and > > aticonfig --list-powerstates > > Is the "atieventsd" daemon running? > > Is the fglrx kernel module loaded? (/sbin/lsmod) > > Are you using a kind of speedstep? > (cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor) > > Which libGL is used on your system? (ls -lF /usr/lib/libGL*) > > Regards, > Jörg-Volker. > > > I've in fact reverted back to 8.24. And at this moment, I don't have the T43 with me. I'll report back later when it's back. Thanks very much for all the help, ST -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Loss of hardware acceleration after fglrx upgrade to 8.28.8-0.1 in sid on a Thinkpad T43
Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote: > For diagnosis purpose try the following First of thanks very for the help. I tried it again; same result, ie, no hardware acceleration. > > LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxgears -info -printfps libGL: XF86DRIGetClientDriverName: 8.28.8 fglrx (screen 0) libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so libGL: XF86DRIGetClientDriverName: 8.28.8 fglrx (screen 0) drmOpenByBusid: busid is PCI:1:0:0 drmOpenDevice: minor is 0 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 drmOpenDevice: open result is 4, (OK) drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns 4 drmOpenByBusid: drmGetBusid reports PCI:1:0:0 Can't open configuration file /etc/drirc: No such file or directory. Can't open configuration file /home/uts/.drirc: No such file or directory. GL_RENDERER = MOBILITY RADEON X300 Generic GL_VERSION= 2.0.6011 (8.28.8) GL_VENDOR = ATI Technologies Inc. GL_EXTENSIONS = GL_ARB_multitexture GL_EXT_texture_env_add GL_EXT_compiled_vertex_array GL_S3_s3tc GL_ARB_depth_texture GL_ARB_fragment_program GL_ARB_fragment_program_shadow GL_ARB_fragment_shader GL_ARB_multisample GL_ARB_occlusion_query GL_ARB_point_parameters GL_ARB_point_sprite GL_ARB_shader_objects GL_ARB_shading_language_100 GL_ARB_shadow GL_ARB_shadow_ambient GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp GL_ARB_texture_compression GL_ARB_texture_cube_map GL_ARB_texture_env_add GL_ARB_texture_env_combine GL_ARB_texture_env_crossbar GL_ARB_texture_env_dot3 GL_ARB_texture_float GL_ARB_texture_mirrored_repeat GL_ARB_texture_rectangle GL_ARB_transpose_matrix GL_ARB_vertex_blend GL_ARB_vertex_buffer_object GL_ARB_vertex_program GL_ARB_vertex_shader GL_ARB_window_pos GL_ARB_draw_buffers GL_ATI_draw_buffers GL_ATI_element_array GL_ATI_envmap_bumpmap GL_ATI_fragment_shader GL_ATI_map_object_buffer GL_ATI_separate_stencil GL_ATI_texture_env_combine3 GL_ATI_texture_float GL_ATI_texture_mirror_once GL_ATI_vertex_array_object GL_ATI_vertex_attrib_array_object GL_ATI_vertex_streams GL_ATIX_texture_env_combine3 GL_ATIX_texture_env_route GL_ATIX_vertex_shader_output_point_size GL_EXT_abgr GL_EXT_bgra GL_EXT_blend_color GL_EXT_blend_func_separate GL_EXT_blend_minmax GL_EXT_blend_subtract GL_EXT_clip_volume_hint GL_EXT_draw_range_elements GL_EXT_fog_coord GL_EXT_framebuffer_object GL_EXT_multi_draw_arrays GL_EXT_packed_pixels GL_EXT_point_parameters GL_EXT_rescale_normal GL_EXT_secondary_color GL_EXT_separate_specular_color GL_EXT_shadow_funcs GL_EXT_stencil_wrap GL_EXT_texgen_reflection GL_EXT_texture3D GL_EXT_texture_compression_s3tc GL_EXT_texture_cube_map GL_EXT_texture_edge_clamp GL_EXT_texture_env_combine GL_EXT_texture_env_dot3 GL_EXT_texture_filter_anisotropic GL_EXT_texture_lod_bias GL_EXT_texture_mirror_clamp GL_EXT_texture_object GL_EXT_texture_rectangle GL_EXT_vertex_array GL_EXT_vertex_shader GL_HP_occlusion_test GL_NV_blend_square GL_NV_occlusion_query GL_NV_texgen_reflection GL_SGI_color_matrix GL_SGIS_generate_mipmap GL_SGIS_texture_border_clamp GL_SGIS_texture_edge_clamp GL_SGIS_texture_lod GL_SUN_multi_draw_arrays 1071 frames in 5.0 seconds = 214.110 FPS 1102 frames in 5.0 seconds = 219.492 FPS 1120 frames in 5.0 seconds = 223.824 FPS 1127 frames in 5.0 seconds = 225.386 FPS 1133 frames in 5.0 seconds = 226.586 FPS 1132 frames in 5.0 seconds = 226.386 FPS 1130 frames in 5.0 seconds = 225.986 FPS 1135 frames in 5.0 seconds = 226.985 FPS > > assuming a bash-shell; and > > aticonfig --list-powerstates core/mem [flags] - 1: 105/122 MHz [low voltage] 2: 209/182 MHz [low voltage] * 3: 297/230 MHz [default state] > > Is the "atieventsd" daemon running? "ps aux |grep atieventsd" returned nothing. > > Is the fglrx kernel module loaded? (/sbin/lsmod) "lsmod |grep fglrx" returned fglrx 396524 8 agpgart29864 2 fglrx,intel_agp > > Are you using a kind of speedstep? > (cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor) performance I think CPU is running at full speed. > > Which libGL is used on your system? (ls -lF /usr/lib/libGL*) lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 2006-08-20 01:03 /usr/lib/libGL.so -> libGL.so.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2006-09-17 16:16 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.1.2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 642476 2006-09-01 01:29 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 681050 2006-08-18 02:38 /usr/lib/libGLU.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 11 2006-08-20 01:03 /usr/lib/libGLU.so -> libGLU.so.1lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2006-08-20 01:03 /usr/lib/libGLU.so.1 -> libGLU.so.1.3.060402 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 499216 2006-08-18 02:38 /usr/lib/libGLU.so.1.3.060402 > > Regards, > Jörg-Volker. > Other info: $ uname -a Linux t43 2.6.17-2-686 #1 SMP Wed Sep 13 16:34:10 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux $ fglrxinfo display: :0.0 screen: 0 OpenGL vendor string: ATI Technologies Inc. OpenGL renderer string: MOBILITY RADEON X300 Generic OpenGL version string: 2.0.6011 (8.28.8) $ fgl_glxgears Using GLX_SGIX_pbuffer 1157 frames in 5.0 seconds = 231.400 FPS 1905 frames in 5.0
Re: Loss of hardware acceleration after fglrx upgrade to 8.28.8-0.1 in sid on a Thinkpad T43
André Wendt wrote: > LUK ShunTim schrieb: >>> Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote: >>>> For diagnosis purpose try the following >>> First of thanks very for the help. I tried it again; same result, ie, no >>> hardware acceleration. >>> >>>> LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxgears -info -printfps >>> libGL: XF86DRIGetClientDriverName: 8.28.8 fglrx (screen 0) >>> libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/fglrx_dri.so >>> libGL: XF86DRIGetClientDriverName: 8.28.8 fglrx (screen 0) >>> drmOpenByBusid: busid is PCI:1:0:0 >>> drmOpenDevice: minor is 0 >>> drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 >>> drmOpenDevice: open result is 4, (OK) >>> drmOpenByBusid: drmOpenMinor returns 4 >>> drmOpenByBusid: drmGetBusid reports PCI:1:0:0 >>> Can't open configuration file /etc/drirc: No such file or directory. >>> Can't open configuration file /home/uts/.drirc: No such file or directory. >>> GL_RENDERER = MOBILITY RADEON X300 Generic >>> GL_VERSION= 2.0.6011 (8.28.8) >>> GL_VENDOR = ATI Technologies Inc. >>> GL_EXTENSIONS = GL_ARB_multitexture GL_EXT_texture_env_add >>> GL_EXT_compiled_vertex_array GL_S3_s3tc GL_ARB_depth_texture >>> GL_ARB_fragment_program GL_ARB_fragment_program_shadow >>> GL_ARB_fragment_shader >>> GL_ARB_multisample GL_ARB_occlusion_query GL_ARB_point_parameters >>> GL_ARB_point_sprite GL_ARB_shader_objects GL_ARB_shading_language_100 >>> GL_ARB_shadow GL_ARB_shadow_ambient GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp >>> GL_ARB_texture_compression GL_ARB_texture_cube_map GL_ARB_texture_env_add >>> GL_ARB_texture_env_combine GL_ARB_texture_env_crossbar >>> GL_ARB_texture_env_dot3 >>> GL_ARB_texture_float GL_ARB_texture_mirrored_repeat GL_ARB_texture_rectangle >>> GL_ARB_transpose_matrix GL_ARB_vertex_blend GL_ARB_vertex_buffer_object >>> GL_ARB_vertex_program GL_ARB_vertex_shader GL_ARB_window_pos >>> GL_ARB_draw_buffers >>> GL_ATI_draw_buffers GL_ATI_element_array GL_ATI_envmap_bumpmap >>> GL_ATI_fragment_shader GL_ATI_map_object_buffer GL_ATI_separate_stencil >>> GL_ATI_texture_env_combine3 GL_ATI_texture_float GL_ATI_texture_mirror_once >>> GL_ATI_vertex_array_object GL_ATI_vertex_attrib_array_object >>> GL_ATI_vertex_streams GL_ATIX_texture_env_combine3 GL_ATIX_texture_env_route >>> GL_ATIX_vertex_shader_output_point_size GL_EXT_abgr GL_EXT_bgra >>> GL_EXT_blend_color GL_EXT_blend_func_separate GL_EXT_blend_minmax >>> GL_EXT_blend_subtract GL_EXT_clip_volume_hint GL_EXT_draw_range_elements >>> GL_EXT_fog_coord GL_EXT_framebuffer_object GL_EXT_multi_draw_arrays >>> GL_EXT_packed_pixels GL_EXT_point_parameters GL_EXT_rescale_normal >>> GL_EXT_secondary_color GL_EXT_separate_specular_color GL_EXT_shadow_funcs >>> GL_EXT_stencil_wrap GL_EXT_texgen_reflection GL_EXT_texture3D >>> GL_EXT_texture_compression_s3tc GL_EXT_texture_cube_map >>> GL_EXT_texture_edge_clamp GL_EXT_texture_env_combine GL_EXT_texture_env_dot3 >>> GL_EXT_texture_filter_anisotropic GL_EXT_texture_lod_bias >>> GL_EXT_texture_mirror_clamp GL_EXT_texture_object GL_EXT_texture_rectangle >>> GL_EXT_vertex_array GL_EXT_vertex_shader GL_HP_occlusion_test >>> GL_NV_blend_square >>> GL_NV_occlusion_query GL_NV_texgen_reflection GL_SGI_color_matrix >>> GL_SGIS_generate_mipmap GL_SGIS_texture_border_clamp >>> GL_SGIS_texture_edge_clamp >>> GL_SGIS_texture_lod GL_SUN_multi_draw_arrays >>> 1071 frames in 5.0 seconds = 214.110 FPS >>> 1102 frames in 5.0 seconds = 219.492 FPS >>> 1120 frames in 5.0 seconds = 223.824 FPS >>> 1127 frames in 5.0 seconds = 225.386 FPS >>> 1133 frames in 5.0 seconds = 226.586 FPS >>> 1132 frames in 5.0 seconds = 226.386 FPS >>> 1130 frames in 5.0 seconds = 225.986 FPS >>> 1135 frames in 5.0 seconds = 226.985 FPS >>> >>>> assuming a bash-shell; and >>>> >>>> aticonfig --list-powerstates >>> core/mem [flags] >>> - >>> 1: 105/122 MHz [low voltage] >>> 2: 209/182 MHz [low voltage] >>> * 3: 297/230 MHz [default state] >>> >>>> Is the "atieventsd" daemon running? >>> "ps aux |grep atieventsd" returned nothing. >>> >>>> Is the fglrx kernel module loaded? (/sbin/lsmod) >>> "lsmod |grep fglrx" returned >>> >>> fglrx 396524 8 >>> agpgart29864 2 fglrx,intel_agp >>> >&g
Re: Loss of hardware acceleration after fglrx upgrade to 8.28.8-0.1 in sid on a Thinkpad T43
Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote: > André Wendt wrote: >> I have a T41p and am just curious: How can you tell that HW acceleration >> is not enabled? Also, you might want to try >> >> grep fglrx /var/log/Xorg.0.log >> >> and look for any warnings (WW) or errors (EE) at the beginning of lines. >> Although most of the things that don't work in 8.28 in fact didn't >> work in 8.24 either, like HW accel and Composite extension...) >> > Also > grep rendering /var/log/Xorg.0.log > grep -3 fglrx_drv /var/log/Xorg.0.log > grep -3 fglrxdrm /var/log/Xorg.0.log > > At the moment I also have no concrete idea what may be wrong. > Thanks to all the people who sent me the ideas. I can revert back to 8.24 and kernel 2.6.16 when I need hardware acceleration. When I have more time, I'll try to look at it again. May as well be a kernel relate-related issue. Regards, ST -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Nautilus 2.14.3 CD burning error
Preston Boyington wrote: > I am currently unable to write data files to a CD using the "CD/DVD > Creator Folder" that is started by Nautilus / GNOME when a blank CD is > inserted into the drive. > > I am using GNOME 2.14, Debian "Testing" (with a little "Unstable" > thrown in). I can burn with K3B, but would like this to work also. > K2B only seems to work when I am root, so I would like to fix that > (want user to be able to burn disks). > > Here is the error message I get using the pop up window: > > Error writing to disc > There was an error writing to the disc > > Is there a group I should be in or some configuration that is not set > so "users" can create CDs? On my debian/unstable, the group is called cdrom. I guess it should be the same for testing. > > Thanks all, > Preston > > Regards, ST -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Loss of hardware acceleration after fglrx upgrade to 8.28.8-0.1 in sid on a Thinkpad T43
Micha wrote: > ST, > What do you think these values should be ? > > Here's the data for a T2400 Pentium M Dual Core 1.8GHz, > ATI X1300 (64MB), Debian Sid/experimental with xorg 7.1.1, fglrx-source > 8.28.8, > kernel 2.6.18 custom. > > ~ mi: fgl_glxgears -info > > Using GLX_SGIX_pbuffer > GL_RENDERER = ATI Mobility Radeon X1300 Generic > GL_VERSION= 2.0.6011 (8.28.8) > GL_VENDOR = ATI Technologies Inc. > GL_EXTENSIONS = GL_ARB_multitexture GL_EXT_texture_env_add > GL_EXT_compiled_vertex_array GL_S3_s3tc GL_ARB_depth_texture > GL_ARB_fragment_program GL_ARB_fragment_program_shadow GL_ARB_fragment_shader > GL_ARB_multisample GL_ARB_occlusion_query GL_ARB_point_parameters > GL_ARB_point_sprite GL_ARB_shader_objects GL_ARB_shading_language_100 > GL_ARB_shadow GL_ARB_shadow_ambient GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp > GL_ARB_texture_compression GL_ARB_texture_cube_map GL_ARB_texture_env_add > GL_ARB_texture_env_combine GL_ARB_texture_env_crossbar > GL_ARB_texture_env_dot3 GL_ARB_texture_float GL_ARB_texture_mirrored_repeat > GL_ARB_texture_rectangle GL_ARB_transpose_matrix GL_ARB_vertex_blend > GL_ARB_vertex_buffer_object GL_ARB_vertex_program GL_ARB_vertex_shader > GL_ARB_window_pos GL_ARB_draw_buffers GL_ATI_draw_buffers > GL_ATI_element_array GL_ATI_envmap_bumpmap GL_ATI_fragment_shader > GL_ATI_map_object_buffer GL_ATI_separate_stencil GL_ATI_shader_texture_lod > GL_ATI_texture_compression_3dc GL_ATI_texture_ env! > _combine3 GL_ATI_texture_float GL_ATI_texture_mirror_once > GL_ATI_vertex_array_object GL_ATI_vertex_attrib_array_object > GL_ATI_vertex_streams GL_ATIX_texture_env_combine3 GL_ATIX_texture_env_route > GL_ATIX_vertex_shader_output_point_size GL_EXT_abgr GL_EXT_bgra > GL_EXT_blend_color GL_EXT_blend_func_separate GL_EXT_blend_minmax > GL_EXT_blend_subtract GL_EXT_clip_volume_hint GL_EXT_draw_range_elements > GL_EXT_fog_coord GL_EXT_framebuffer_object GL_EXT_multi_draw_arrays > GL_EXT_packed_pixels GL_EXT_point_parameters GL_EXT_rescale_normal > GL_EXT_secondary_color GL_EXT_separate_specular_color GL_EXT_shadow_funcs > GL_EXT_stencil_wrap GL_EXT_texgen_reflection GL_EXT_texture3D > GL_EXT_texture_compression_s3tc GL_EXT_texture_cube_map > GL_EXT_texture_edge_clamp GL_EXT_texture_env_combine GL_EXT_texture_env_dot3 > GL_EXT_texture_filter_anisotropic GL_EXT_texture_lod_bias > GL_EXT_texture_mirror_clamp GL_EXT_texture_object GL_EXT_texture_rectangle > GL_EXT_vertex_array GL_EXT_vertex_shader GL_HP_occlu sio! > n_test GL_NV_blend_square GL_NV_occlusion_query GL_NV_texgen_reflection > GL_SGI_color_matrix GL_SGIS_generate_mipmap GL_SGIS_texture_border_clamp > GL_SGIS_texture_edge_clamp GL_SGIS_texture_lod GL_SUN_multi_draw_arrays > 1354 frames in 5.0 seconds = 270.800 FPS > 1532 frames in 5.0 seconds = 306.400 FPS > 1534 frames in 5.0 seconds = 306.800 FPS > 1537 frames in 5.0 seconds = 307.400 FPS > 1526 frames in 5.0 seconds = 305.200 FPS > 1537 frames in 5.0 seconds = 307.400 FPS > 1530 frames in 5.0 seconds = 306.000 FPS > 1535 frames in 5.0 seconds = 307.000 FPS > > ~ mi: aticonfig --list-powerstates > > core/mem [flags] > - > 1: 128/135 MHz [low voltage] > 2: 324/135 MHz > * 3: 392/324 MHz [default state] > > ~ mi: ps aux | grep atiev > root 3143 0.0 0.0 2768 532 ?Ss 21:20 0:00 > /usr/sbin/atieventsd > > ~ mi: lsmod | grep fglrx > fglrx 395756 8 > agpgart26060 1 fglrx > > ~ mi: cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor > userspace > > ~ mi: ls -lF /usr/lib/libGL* > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 2006-10-05 20:30 /usr/lib/libGLEW.so.1.3 -> > libGLEW.so.1.3.4 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 216K 2006-04-26 12:56 /usr/lib/libGLEW.so.1.3.4 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2006-09-27 02:36 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 -> > libGL.so.1.2 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 628K 2006-09-26 07:36 /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2006-09-27 02:35 /usr/lib/libGLU.so.1 -> > libGLU.so.1.3.060501 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 492K 2006-09-25 20:09 /usr/lib/libGLU.so.1.3.060501 > > > > Hello Micha, Subsequently I filed a bug report to debian bugs and learnt something new. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=390361 In a nutshell, 1. hardware acceleration *is* enabled. 2. glxgears is not really an appropriate tool for checking this. Regards, ST -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IBM Thinkpad 770 - Mouse "goes crazy" in X
Iohan wrote: > > I've looked at the Linux Laptops HOWTOs and various webpages but I haven't > found a solution. > > My X 3.3.6 runs fine, but the mouse just jumps around uncontrollably. I've > tried just the built-in trackpoint, and I've tried plugging in a regular MS > Intellimouse in the PS/2 port. Same problem. Presumably you have a Savage/IX /MX video card (My T20 has this one), did you use this patched version of X-server instead of the one from the original debian distribution? http://www.probo.com/timr/savagemx.html It should work. > > I've tried modifying the XF86Config with different protocols - "PS/2", > "Microsoft", and "Intellimouse". > I've tried modifying the device in XF86Config - "/dev/psaux", "/dev/mouse", > "/dev/gpmdata" > I've tried with and without "Emulate3Buttons" Setting the device to /dev/psaux works fine for my T20. And maybe you know this already, /dev/mouse is normally a symbolic link. > > The mouse works fine in text mode. But when I start X, it is uncontrollable. > In this connection, I'd like to ask for some information. After I upgraded to woody, I lost my gpm. Apparently /dev/gpmctl gone missing and I was not able to get in back. I was told that it may be a pipe but creating it manually doesn't work. Anyone has any such experience or the answer? Regards, ST --
Undefined symbols in pcmcia modules in potato
Dear all, I installed pcmcia-modules-2.2.17_3.1.20-2k1 and there was a number of "undefined symbols" messages when the pcmcia modules are inserted. The problems seems to be a kernel incompatibility. The package page at debian says that it's for kernel 2.2.17 package version1:2.2.17-1 but the kernel image is kernel-image-2.2.17 2.2.17pre6-1. Has anyone encounter this before? Will there be a compatible kernel image soon or maybe I got it wrong somewhere? Regards, ST --
Re: experience with GERICOM
Rene Mayrhofer wrote: > [snipped] > I own a Gericom Phantom and am very happy with it (I am writing this > mail on it). Nearly every piece of hardware in it (USB, IRDA, Lucent > WinModem, Network card, DVD drive, ...) runs under Debian (unstable) > with kernel 2.4.1. If I could just get it to connect to the Internet via Does the winmodem work out of the box with this unstable installation? In particular, what version of ppp is it using? [snipped] Regards, ST --
Re: IBM Thinkpad 770 - Mouse "goes crazy" in X
Iohan wrote: > > I've looked at the Linux Laptops HOWTOs and various webpages but I haven't > found a solution. > > My X 3.3.6 runs fine, but the mouse just jumps around uncontrollably. I've > tried just the built-in trackpoint, and I've tried plugging in a regular MS > Intellimouse in the PS/2 port. Same problem. Presumably you have a Savage/IX /MX video card (My T20 has this one), did you use this patched version of X-server instead of the one from the original debian distribution? http://www.probo.com/timr/savagemx.html It should work. > > I've tried modifying the XF86Config with different protocols - "PS/2", > "Microsoft", and "Intellimouse". > I've tried modifying the device in XF86Config - "/dev/psaux", "/dev/mouse", > "/dev/gpmdata" > I've tried with and without "Emulate3Buttons" Setting the device to /dev/psaux works fine for my T20. And maybe you know this already, /dev/mouse is normally a symbolic link. > > The mouse works fine in text mode. But when I start X, it is uncontrollable. > In this connection, I'd like to ask for some information. After I upgraded to woody, I lost my gpm. Apparently /dev/gpmctl gone missing and I was not able to get in back. I was told that it may be a pipe but creating it manually doesn't work. Anyone has any such experience or the answer? Regards, ST -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Undefined symbols in pcmcia modules in potato
Dear all, I installed pcmcia-modules-2.2.17_3.1.20-2k1 and there was a number of "undefined symbols" messages when the pcmcia modules are inserted. The problems seems to be a kernel incompatibility. The package page at debian says that it's for kernel 2.2.17 package version1:2.2.17-1 but the kernel image is kernel-image-2.2.17 2.2.17pre6-1. Has anyone encounter this before? Will there be a compatible kernel image soon or maybe I got it wrong somewhere? Regards, ST -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: experience with GERICOM
Rene Mayrhofer wrote: > [snipped] > I own a Gericom Phantom and am very happy with it (I am writing this > mail on it). Nearly every piece of hardware in it (USB, IRDA, Lucent > WinModem, Network card, DVD drive, ...) runs under Debian (unstable) > with kernel 2.4.1. If I could just get it to connect to the Internet via Does the winmodem work out of the box with this unstable installation? In particular, what version of ppp is it using? [snipped] Regards, ST -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
