Re: proposta ordine
On Tue, 27 Nov 2018, Dave Horsfall wrote: > When is this list to adopt some simple anti-spam measures? I have offered > my help many times (having many years of experience), and have been ignored > each time by the alleged moderator(s). > > Does Debian really promote spam, or are they simply ignorant? Or perhaps > they are too ashamed to ask for help? you mean https://salsa.debian.org/debian-listmasters/spamassassin_config/commit/5c59e47ba8d9f6c8540fb90b3c0cdd73205fb693 ? And the moderators (that don't exist) have nothing to do with anti spam measures on lists.debian.org. You can send patches and/or pull-requests at any time to our anti spam methods. Alex - Debian Listmaster P.S. it is always hard to create a rule before a mail arrived. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: richiesta ordine (fwd)
On Mon, 03 Dec 2018, Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 12:07 -0800, Tao, Tchie wrote: > > Perhaps someday he might learn to express his frustrations in some > > sort of constructive fashion rather than insulting folks and throwing > > a childish tantrum? > > And perhaps someday the spammers will learn to respect others... but I'm > not holding my breath. > > How long should Dave wait out the problem before insulting folks? 1 > month, 2 months, 6 months, 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, 25 years? At > what point should constructive feedback yield to insults, and at what > point should insults yield to violence? > > If your answer to that last question is "never", then I suggest you > study some history. ;-) I never got any patch of you for our anti spam measures, neither do I got something from Dave. Alex - Debian Listmaster signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: richiesta ordine (fwd)
On Mon, 03 Dec 2018, Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 21:38 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > I never got any patch of you for our anti spam measures, neither do I > > got something from Dave. > > > > Alex - Debian Listmaster > > Patch? I think you've identified the problem. > > A start would be to tighten or remove any out-of-the box changes made to > spamassassin. Let's be clear, your current setup only set a score of 2 > for an email that: > > 1) contained a shortened URL > 2) was From: a freemail address > 3) fails SPF for outlook.it > 4) contains blacklisted received headers (ZEN, PBL, Barraacuda) > 5) promotes Instagram to a technical laptop discussion list. > > That email should have scored at least a 5 or 6 in stock Spamassassin > rules. We can give it a try, just for this list. But tbh, you have really no idea how much spam we catch. > > Further, email headers show you have Amavis with a threshold score of > 5.3 and Spamassasin with a threshold of 4.0. Which one will "win"? > > But really, you would be better served by just enabling some RBL checks > in Spamassassin and getting rid of Amavis. Getting rid of amavis wouldn't change anything. We would still call SA. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: richiesta ordine (fwd)
On Mon, 03 Dec 2018, Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 22:05 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Mon, 03 Dec 2018, Jim Popovitch wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 21:38 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > > I never got any patch of you for our anti spam measures, neither > > > > do I > > > > got something from Dave. > > > > > > > > Alex - Debian Listmaster > > > > > > Patch? I think you've identified the problem. > > > > > > A start would be to tighten or remove any out-of-the box changes > > > made to > > > spamassassin. Let's be clear, your current setup only set a score of > > > 2 > > > for an email that: > > > > > > 1) contained a shortened URL > > > 2) was From: a freemail address > > > 3) fails SPF for outlook.it > > > 4) contains blacklisted received headers (ZEN, PBL, Barraacuda) > > > 5) promotes Instagram to a technical laptop discussion list. > > > > > > That email should have scored at least a 5 or 6 in stock > > > Spamassassin > > > rules. > > > > We can give it a try, just for this list. But tbh, you have really no > > idea how much spam we catch. > > That's good, and Thank you for that. > > > > > > > Further, email headers show you have Amavis with a threshold score > > > of 5.3 and Spamassasin with a threshold of 4.0. Which one will > > > "win"? > > > > > > But really, you would be better served by just enabling some RBL > > > checks in Spamassassin and getting rid of Amavis. > > > > Getting rid of amavis wouldn't change anything. > > We would still call SA. > > Why involve Amavis then? If it's not being used, then it's just another > potential point of failure in the mail process. it is used for several things, like a viruscanner, language specific spamassassin sets and some other things. Removing it wouldn't get you better SA results. Alex signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [spam subject elided] (fwd)
On Mon, 03 Dec 2018, Marvin Renich wrote: > * Jim Popovitch [181203 15:21]: > > How long should Dave wait out the problem before insulting folks? 1 > > month, 2 months, 6 months, 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, 25 years? > > The correct answer is "much longer than 25 years". He should at least wait until he gets its facts right. Afair/afaik there never was any offer to help or constructive help we received from him. Alex
Re: Writing Cd's with TOSHIBA SD-R21021715
Am Fre, 2003-04-25 um 05.27 schrieb ben: > Hi All! > > I am trying to enable cd-writing with my Asus L3800 Laptop which has a > toshiba SD-R21021715 combo DVD-CDR/RW > I am running Debian Woody with the 2.4.20 Kernel from Kernel.org. > The kernel has been patched with acpi & Asus tweak (which is working really > well!!) > Currently I have enabled sccsi emulation & disabled ide cdrom in the kernel. > The system boots fine and I can read cd's without any problems.. > Unfortunately I can't burn em! I have the same laptop. With recent versions (testing) of cdrecord its possible to write cds withous SCSI Emulation. This works fine for me. You have just to use dev=ATAPI:0,0,0 as device option. This works also with xcdroast. formorer -- Alexander "formorer" Wirt KeyID: BC7D020A EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 28651245 WWW: http://www.formorer.de Encrypted and Signed Email preferred.
Re: ide CD Bruner
Am Son, 2003-07-06 um 14.58 schrieb mi: > Does anybody know if cdrecord recently supports ide burning ? > > I look for a *bootable* CD rw that is supported by linux ide burning ... any > model hints ? Every modern cdrecorder manufactured in the last years should work without any problems. Mostly not being able to boot is a bios problem. > I've exchanged the original cd with a teac W 24E CD rw, and now the lap > doesn't boot no more from cd. Is this a well-known effect ? It's an Dell > Inspiron 5000 manufactured around 1999/2000, BIOS A08. Recent versions of cdrecord are able to use the ATAPI method to burn cdroms. This method is aside of the classic ide-scsi method nd is that what some people would call "native" burning. I do not know if the woody version has already this method, but the sid and sarge version does. If you want to use it try: cdrecord -scanbus dev=ATAPI: then you should see something like this: scsibus0: 0,0,0 0) 'TOSHIBA ' 'DVD-ROM SD-R2312' '1708' Removable CD-ROM Then you are lucky and are able to use the ATAPI transport method: cdrecord -speed XX dev=ATAPI:0,0,0 -eject -v .iso But be carefull, this method is marked a beta. But I use it for several months without any problems. formorer -- Alexander "formorer" Wirt KeyID: BC7D020A EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 28651245 WWW: http://www.formorer.de Encrypted and Signed Email preferred. signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Re: ide CD Bruner
Am Son, 2003-07-06 um 14.58 schrieb mi: > Does anybody know if cdrecord recently supports ide burning ? > > I look for a *bootable* CD rw that is supported by linux ide burning ... any > model hints ? Every modern cdrecorder manufactured in the last years should work without any problems. Mostly not being able to boot is a bios problem. > I've exchanged the original cd with a teac W 24E CD rw, and now the lap > doesn't boot no more from cd. Is this a well-known effect ? It's an Dell > Inspiron 5000 manufactured around 1999/2000, BIOS A08. Recent versions of cdrecord are able to use the ATAPI method to burn cdroms. This method is aside of the classic ide-scsi method nd is that what some people would call "native" burning. I do not know if the woody version has already this method, but the sid and sarge version does. If you want to use it try: cdrecord -scanbus dev=ATAPI: then you should see something like this: scsibus0: 0,0,0 0) 'TOSHIBA ' 'DVD-ROM SD-R2312' '1708' Removable CD-ROM Then you are lucky and are able to use the ATAPI transport method: cdrecord -speed XX dev=ATAPI:0,0,0 -eject -v .iso But be carefull, this method is marked a beta. But I use it for several months without any problems. formorer -- Alexander "formorer" Wirt KeyID: BC7D020A EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 28651245 WWW: http://www.formorer.de Encrypted and Signed Email preferred. signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
