Re: Rage Mobility DRI problem
Hi, on a related note, does gatos modules and dri.sf.net modules complete each other or are they in conflict with each other? I'm a bit confused about these things. I believe I have the same chip. lspci says: ATI Technologies Inc Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x (rev 64) Cheers. On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 14:35:51 +0200 Benjamin Fritzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > looks to me like yu don't have the linux sources on your machine. > get the linux sources an make a .config file according to your kernel. > > if that doesn't help or you already have the sources check if they are > /usr/src/linux. > > if that doesn't help then i don't know. > > greets benny > > > On Sunday 06 October 2002 14:30, Philipp Haller wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > My Rage Mobility (in my IBM A22e) belongs to the mach64 chipset family, so > > I went to http://dri.sf.net/snapshots/bleeding-edge/ and downloaded the > > last snapshot for mach64. But when I launch ./install.sh I get the > > following error when trying to compile the DRM kernel modules: > > > > The script will now compile the DRM kernel modules for your machine. > > > > Press ENTER to continue or CTRL-C to exit. > > > > > > Compiling... > > ERROR: Kernel modules did not compile > > > > The DRI drivers can not be installed without the latest kernel modules. > > Installation will be aborted. See the dri.log file for information on > > what went wrong. > > > > tpa22e:/home/phil/dripkg# cat dri.log > > cc -O2 -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align > > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE > > -fomit-frame-pointer -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -I0 -c mach64_drv.c -o mach64_drv.o In > > file included from drmP.h:43, > > from mach64_drv.c:32: > > /usr/include/linux/module.h:21: linux/modversions.h: No such file or > > directory make: *** [mach64_drv.o] Error 1 > > > > I run a stock Debian 3.0 woody installation with kernel-2.4.18-bf2.4. I > > installed kernel-headers-2.4.18-bf2.4 and kernel-source-2.4.18 but the file > > linux/modversions.h is still missing. Can anybody help? > > > > Thanks, > >phil > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Adam Huuva Hjortvägen 15 - S-95336 Haparanda - Sweden - Lappland Phone: +46 (0)922-12880-E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Rage Mobility DRI problem
Hi, on a related note, does gatos modules and dri.sf.net modules complete each other or are they in conflict with each other? I'm a bit confused about these things. I believe I have the same chip. lspci says: ATI Technologies Inc Rage Mobility P/M AGP 2x (rev 64) Cheers. On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 14:35:51 +0200 Benjamin Fritzsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > looks to me like yu don't have the linux sources on your machine. > get the linux sources an make a .config file according to your kernel. > > if that doesn't help or you already have the sources check if they are > /usr/src/linux. > > if that doesn't help then i don't know. > > greets benny > > > On Sunday 06 October 2002 14:30, Philipp Haller wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > My Rage Mobility (in my IBM A22e) belongs to the mach64 chipset family, so > > I went to http://dri.sf.net/snapshots/bleeding-edge/ and downloaded the > > last snapshot for mach64. But when I launch ./install.sh I get the > > following error when trying to compile the DRM kernel modules: > > > > The script will now compile the DRM kernel modules for your machine. > > > > Press ENTER to continue or CTRL-C to exit. > > > > > > Compiling... > > ERROR: Kernel modules did not compile > > > > The DRI drivers can not be installed without the latest kernel modules. > > Installation will be aborted. See the dri.log file for information on > > what went wrong. > > > > tpa22e:/home/phil/dripkg# cat dri.log > > cc -O2 -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align > > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE > > -fomit-frame-pointer -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -I0 -c mach64_drv.c -o mach64_drv.o In > > file included from drmP.h:43, > > from mach64_drv.c:32: > > /usr/include/linux/module.h:21: linux/modversions.h: No such file or > > directory make: *** [mach64_drv.o] Error 1 > > > > I run a stock Debian 3.0 woody installation with kernel-2.4.18-bf2.4. I > > installed kernel-headers-2.4.18-bf2.4 and kernel-source-2.4.18 but the file > > linux/modversions.h is still missing. Can anybody help? > > > > Thanks, > >phil > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Adam Huuva Hjortvägen 15 - S-95336 Haparanda - Sweden - Lappland Phone: +46 (0)922-12880-E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian Users...
Tom Ballard wrote: On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 01:49:55PM -0600, Alex Malinovich wrote: On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 12:10, Dutch wrote: Just sorta takin an informal poll here... Debian users, -how many of you are running Gnome? -how many are running WindowMaker (me) -If not WM,then which windowmanager doyou use/prefer? (I have and am used to WindowMaker. Was thinking of playing with Gnome for a bit.) Gnome using metacity for a wm I run fluxbox, Me too. Without yer extras below. I'm not particularly fond of it, it's just something I kinda got stuck with. It mainly doesn't suck enough to make me want to try something else. My history of wm:s is something like: fvwm, kde at some point, i'm sure gnome was there at it's early stages, I guess I tried enlightenment as well, ion briefly, ratpoison for actually quite a while, then now I've been using flux for some two years or so. With flux I've got this row of 11 various and essential wmapps. And a bbpager. I'd guess fvwm is still the one that I've used the longest. Cheers, -- Adam Huuva V:a Esplanaden 11 - 953 37 Eurocity - Sweden, Finland Phone: +46-922-10599 - E-mail: aatami at home dot se -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian Users...
Tom Ballard wrote: On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 01:49:55PM -0600, Alex Malinovich wrote: On Tue, 2003-11-18 at 12:10, Dutch wrote: Just sorta takin an informal poll here... Debian users, -how many of you are running Gnome? -how many are running WindowMaker (me) -If not WM,then which windowmanager doyou use/prefer? (I have and am used to WindowMaker. Was thinking of playing with Gnome for a bit.) Gnome using metacity for a wm I run fluxbox, Me too. Without yer extras below. I'm not particularly fond of it, it's just something I kinda got stuck with. It mainly doesn't suck enough to make me want to try something else. My history of wm:s is something like: fvwm, kde at some point, i'm sure gnome was there at it's early stages, I guess I tried enlightenment as well, ion briefly, ratpoison for actually quite a while, then now I've been using flux for some two years or so. With flux I've got this row of 11 various and essential wmapps. And a bbpager. I'd guess fvwm is still the one that I've used the longest. Cheers, -- Adam Huuva V:a Esplanaden 11 - 953 37 Eurocity - Sweden, Finland Phone: +46-922-10599 - E-mail: aatami at home dot se
