Netwave WLAN card

2001-05-03 Thread Jeff Coppock
Anyone,

I just acquired a BayStack 660 Wireless PC Card which uses the netwave_cs 
module (according to my docs).  I've got the card to load properly as far as I 
can tell:

syslog snip:
May  2 11:12:46 localhost cardmgr[212]: socket 1: Netwave AirSurfer Pro 
Wireless LAN
May  2 11:12:46 localhost cardmgr[212]: executing: 'modprobe netwave_cs'
May  2 11:12:46 localhost kernel: cs: IO port probe 0x0100-0x04ff: excluding 
0x378-0x37f 0x4d0-0x4d7
May  2 11:12:46 localhost kernel: cs: IO port probe 0x0380-0x04cf: clean.
May  2 11:12:46 localhost kernel: cs: IO port probe 0x04d8-0x04ff: clean.
May  2 11:12:46 localhost kernel: cs: IO port probe 0x0800-0x08ff: excluding 
0x800-0x84f
May  2 11:12:46 localhost kernel: cs: IO port probe 0x0a00-0x0aff: clean.
May  2 11:12:46 localhost kernel: cs: IO port probe 0x0c00-0x0cff: excluding 
0xcf8-0xcff
May  2 11:12:46 localhost kernel: eth0: Netwave: port 0x300, irq 3, mem 
d008e000 id , hw_addr FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF
May  2 11:12:46 localhost kernel: Netwave_reset: revision  ff7f
May  2 11:12:46 localhost cardmgr[212]: executing: './network start eth0'

What I'm struggling with now is when I try to configure eth0 via dhcp, my 
system locks and I have to power-cycle.

Does anyone have any experience here and/or can help me out?

TIA,
jc



2.2.19 won't run on toshiba sat 470CDT

2001-05-03 Thread Othmar Pasteka
hi,

i just wanted to upgrade the kernel but all i get with the .19
kernel with noting special in it, not even apm stuff, i get a
"interrupt handler killed" msg during boot time. i can't exactly
determine when t his happens whether it's during mounting / or
during rcS.d is run ...
any hints/suggenstions?

tahnks a lot
Othmar



apm with kernel 2.4.3

2001-05-03 Thread Sylvester Keil

hi! i use a sony vaio notebook (sr1k) with debian potatoand upgraded the
kernel to version 2.4.3 with the effect that i cannot get apm to work.

in the past i have used 2.4.2 however (to my shame) i don't remember what
my apm configuration looked like exactly. anyway, i was able to read
battery status and the computer would shut down and reboot automatically,
apart from that suspend worked fine.

with the 2.4.3 kernel however, i've already tried all kinds of
configurations but the computer never shut down automatically and the
/etc/init.d/apmd causes a crash.

any ideas?

thanks!

amael







Re: 2.2.19 won't run on toshiba sat 470CDT

2001-05-03 Thread Othmar Pasteka
hi,

update: when cardmgr is started the kernel kills the interrupt
handler ... but still no clue why :(.

so long
Othmar

On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:03:34AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> i just wanted to upgrade the kernel but all i get with the .19
> kernel with noting special in it, not even apm stuff, i get a
> "interrupt handler killed" msg during boot time. i can't exactly
> determine when t his happens whether it's during mounting / or
> during rcS.d is run ...
> any hints/suggenstions?



Re: apm with kernel 2.4.3

2001-05-03 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Sylvester Keil wrote:

> hi! i use a sony vaio notebook (sr1k) with debian potatoand upgraded the
> kernel to version 2.4.3 with the effect that i cannot get apm to work.
> 
> in the past i have used 2.4.2 however (to my shame) i don't remember what
> my apm configuration looked like exactly. anyway, i was able to read
> battery status and the computer would shut down and reboot automatically,
> apart from that suspend worked fine.
> 
> with the 2.4.3 kernel however, i've already tried all kinds of
> configurations but the computer never shut down automatically and the
> /etc/init.d/apmd causes a crash.
I'm not really sure if it helps but my apm-problems were solved after
loading the apm modul explicitely using modprobe (if apm compiled as
module).

Kind regards

Andreas.



Re: apm with kernel 2.4.3

2001-05-03 Thread Calum Mackay
> hi! i use a sony vaio notebook (sr1k) with debian potatoand upgraded the
> kernel to version 2.4.3 with the effect that i cannot get apm to work.
> 
> in the past i have used 2.4.2 however (to my shame) i don't remember what
> my apm configuration looked like exactly. anyway, i was able to read
> battery status and the computer would shut down and reboot automatically,
> apart from that suspend worked fine.
> 
> with the 2.4.3 kernel however, i've already tried all kinds of
> configurations but the computer never shut down automatically and the
> /etc/init.d/apmd causes a crash.

Just in case it might help, I have APM working perfectly on my Dell
7500, with 2.4.3 & 2.4.4, with the following kernel configuration:

CONFIG_APM=y
# CONFIG_APM_IGNORE_USER_SUSPEND is not set
CONFIG_APM_DO_ENABLE=y
CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE=y
CONFIG_APM_DISPLAY_BLANK=y
CONFIG_APM_RTC_IS_GMT=y
# CONFIG_APM_ALLOW_INTS is not set
# CONFIG_APM_REAL_MODE_POWER_OFF is not set

and with apmd 3.0final-1.

best regards,
Calum.



Re: 2.2.19 won't run on toshiba sat 470CDT

2001-05-03 Thread Drew Parsons
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 11:18:46AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> hi,
> 
> update: when cardmgr is started the kernel kills the interrupt
> handler ... but still no clue why :(.
> 

I got no idea why you're getting that problem, but if cardmgr is causing it,
you could switch cardmgr during boot and then try experimenting with it
manually after you've booted up.

Or even better, just to be sure, uninstall pcmcia-cs altogether and reboot.
Then reinstall after booting (make sure you have a copy of the deb file for
pcmcia-cs and pcmcia-modules!).

Drew

-- 
PGP public key available at http://dparsons.webjump.com/drewskey.txt
Fingerprint: A110 EAE1 D7D2 8076 5FE0  EC0A B6CE 7041 6412 4E4A



Teles PCMCIA ISDN problem

2001-05-03 Thread Gabor Zoltan Csejtey
HI,

Anyone using Teles PCMCIA ISDN card???


I managed to install the hisax module using slightly different io address:
modprobe hisax type=8 io=0x301 irq=11 protocol=2

but the card doesn't work yet.

After starting the isdnutils and trying the to dial I get a local
hangup after 8 seconds. It doesn't matter if the cable is connected to
the ISDN adaptor or not.

I can ramove the crad without an effect to the hisax module using
cardctl eject. I suspect the teles_cs module from the pcmcia package
cause the problem.

Gabor



Re: 2.2.19 won't run on toshiba sat 470CDT

2001-05-03 Thread Eric Richardson
Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> 
> hi,
> 
> update: when cardmgr is started the kernel kills the interrupt
> handler ... but still no clue why :(.
> 
> so long
> Othmar
> 
> On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:03:34AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> > i just wanted to upgrade the kernel but all i get with the .19
> > kernel with noting special in it, not even apm stuff, i get a
> > "interrupt handler killed" msg during boot time. i can't exactly
> > determine when t his happens whether it's during mounting / or
> > during rcS.d is run ...
> > any hints/suggenstions?

I don't have a Toshiba but I'm curious how you got the pcmcia-modules
for 2.2.19? I upgraded to 2.2.19 kernel and no pcmcia modules came with
the kernel. I filed a bug report and a few days later after I saw the
2.2.19 modules I did an apt-get install pcmcia-modules-2.2.19 and got
version 3.1.22-0.2potatok4 and the apt system also replace my kernel
with a matching one. This one works.

Hope this helps,
Eric



Re: 2.2.19 won't run on toshiba sat 470CDT

2001-05-03 Thread Othmar Pasteka
hi,

On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:39:50AM -0700, Eric Richardson wrote:
> I don't have a Toshiba but I'm curious how you got the pcmcia-modules
> for 2.2.19? I upgraded to 2.2.19 kernel and no pcmcia modules came with
> the kernel. I filed a bug report and a few days later after I saw the
> 2.2.19 modules I did an apt-get install pcmcia-modules-2.2.19 and got
> version 3.1.22-0.2potatok4 and the apt system also replace my kernel
> with a matching one. This one works.

apt-get source pcmcia-cs and follow the README in debian/, i.e.
do a debian/rules binary-modules ... it needs the linux source in
/usr/src/linux and it also has to be configured ...

so long
othmar



Re: Inspiron 3500 networking woes....

2001-05-03 Thread Alexander Clouter
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Diarmuid Drew wrote:
>
> [snipped]
>
> network. I have struggled over the past 2 years to get a stable network
> connection on my home network. Under 2.4.2 everything is rock solid but
> 2.4.3 and 2.4.4 are broken. The common error I get is "transmit timeout".
>
> any suggestions ?
>
ermif everything is rock solid under 2.4.2 then why don't you keep to
it?  Or have I missed something fundemental.  Currently you are saying
that the latest and greatest kernel release is not working for you,
however a slightly younger kernel version is fine.

another thing you need to mention is whether you are using the kernel
support for pcmcia or whether you are just using the pcmcia package?  I
would highly recommend the package version of pcmcia rather than the
kernel version, also use version 3.1.24 (3.1.25 has an interesting feature
which need you to mount /var *without* the 'nodev' option in your fstab
file).

Alex



Re: apm with kernel 2.4.3

2001-05-03 Thread Sebastien Kalt
Hello,

Le Thu, May 03, 2001 at 11:29:20AM +0100, Calum Mackay a écrit:
> CONFIG_APM=y
> # CONFIG_APM_IGNORE_USER_SUSPEND is not set
> CONFIG_APM_DO_ENABLE=y
> CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE=y
I had to disable CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE last time I compiled a 2.4.0
kernel: it caused 'kapmd' to use 30% of CPU when idled ! Not really what
expected.
May be this was fixed in later 2.4 kernels, I didn't checked.

I'm using potato (apmd 3.0final-1) on an IBM Thinkpad 390 (233mmx).

Sebastien



Re: 2.2.19 won't run on toshiba sat 470CDT

2001-05-03 Thread Eric Richardson
Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> 
> hi,
> 
> On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:39:50AM -0700, Eric Richardson wrote:
> > I don't have a Toshiba but I'm curious how you got the pcmcia-modules
> > for 2.2.19? I upgraded to 2.2.19 kernel and no pcmcia modules came with
> > the kernel. I filed a bug report and a few days later after I saw the
> > 2.2.19 modules I did an apt-get install pcmcia-modules-2.2.19 and got
> > version 3.1.22-0.2potatok4 and the apt system also replace my kernel
> > with a matching one. This one works.
> 
> apt-get source pcmcia-cs and follow the README in debian/, i.e.
> do a debian/rules binary-modules ... it needs the linux source in
> /usr/src/linux and it also has to be configured ...

I did compile the pcmcia-modules but I don't compile my own kernel yet
so I couldn't try it out. I don't think you mentioned that you were
compiling you own stuff. I thought you were using stock 2.2r3.
Eric



Re: Inspiron 3500 networking woes....

2001-05-03 Thread Alan Shutko
Alexander Clouter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> ermif everything is rock solid under 2.4.2 then why don't you keep to
> it?  

Iirc, there are some somewhat serious filesystem corruption bugs in
2.4.2.

-- 
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
The world is coming to an end!  Repent and return those library books!



Re: apm with kernel 2.4.3

2001-05-03 Thread Alan Shutko
Sebastien Kalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I had to disable CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE last time I compiled a 2.4.0
> kernel: it caused 'kapmd' to use 30% of CPU when idled ! 

Yes, that's as designed.  Really, that's working, kapmd isn't making
your CPU run active, it _is_ terribly confusing and those in charge
don't care

-- 
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
Flattery will get you everywhere.



Re: Inspiron 3500 networking woes....

2001-05-03 Thread Vivek Dasmohapatra
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Alan Shutko wrote:

> Iirc, there are some somewhat serious filesystem corruption bugs in
> 2.4.2.

Yeah - ext2 could pretty much be guaranteed to need a fsck after a reboot
on my SMP box under 2.4.2. 2.4.3-ac5 seems Ok though.

-- 
I am worthless. I struggle with the simple things. It seems so easy for 
everyone else. One armed blind people climb mountains and teenagers get
Ph.D's. I have trouble getting out of bed.
  -TMCM



Re: apm with kernel 2.4.3

2001-05-03 Thread Calum Mackay
> I had to disable CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE last time I compiled a 2.4.0
> kernel: it caused 'kapmd' to use 30% of CPU when idled ! Not really what
> expected.
> May be this was fixed in later 2.4 kernels, I didn't checked.

Yep, as Alan noted, that's normal; it's just the kernel's idle loop. My
kapm-idled is running at 90% cpu on an otherwise idle system. I think
it was explicitly renamed to from kapmd to kapmd-idled to help avoid
this confusion :)

This is also covered in the linux-kernel mailing list FAQ at:

http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[question 14.1]

cheers,
C.



2.2.19 won't run on toshiba sat 470CDT

2001-05-03 Thread Othmar Pasteka

hi,

i just wanted to upgrade the kernel but all i get with the .19
kernel with noting special in it, not even apm stuff, i get a
"interrupt handler killed" msg during boot time. i can't exactly
determine when t his happens whether it's during mounting / or
during rcS.d is run ...
any hints/suggenstions?

tahnks a lot
Othmar


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




apm with kernel 2.4.3

2001-05-03 Thread Sylvester Keil


hi! i use a sony vaio notebook (sr1k) with debian potatoand upgraded the
kernel to version 2.4.3 with the effect that i cannot get apm to work.

in the past i have used 2.4.2 however (to my shame) i don't remember what
my apm configuration looked like exactly. anyway, i was able to read
battery status and the computer would shut down and reboot automatically,
apart from that suspend worked fine.

with the 2.4.3 kernel however, i've already tried all kinds of
configurations but the computer never shut down automatically and the
/etc/init.d/apmd causes a crash.

any ideas?

thanks!

amael






--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: 2.2.19 won't run on toshiba sat 470CDT

2001-05-03 Thread Othmar Pasteka

hi,

update: when cardmgr is started the kernel kills the interrupt
handler ... but still no clue why :(.

so long
Othmar

On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:03:34AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> i just wanted to upgrade the kernel but all i get with the .19
> kernel with noting special in it, not even apm stuff, i get a
> "interrupt handler killed" msg during boot time. i can't exactly
> determine when t his happens whether it's during mounting / or
> during rcS.d is run ...
> any hints/suggenstions?


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: apm with kernel 2.4.3

2001-05-03 Thread Andreas Tille

On Thu, 3 May 2001, Sylvester Keil wrote:

> hi! i use a sony vaio notebook (sr1k) with debian potatoand upgraded the
> kernel to version 2.4.3 with the effect that i cannot get apm to work.
> 
> in the past i have used 2.4.2 however (to my shame) i don't remember what
> my apm configuration looked like exactly. anyway, i was able to read
> battery status and the computer would shut down and reboot automatically,
> apart from that suspend worked fine.
> 
> with the 2.4.3 kernel however, i've already tried all kinds of
> configurations but the computer never shut down automatically and the
> /etc/init.d/apmd causes a crash.
I'm not really sure if it helps but my apm-problems were solved after
loading the apm modul explicitely using modprobe (if apm compiled as
module).

Kind regards

Andreas.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: apm with kernel 2.4.3

2001-05-03 Thread Calum Mackay

> hi! i use a sony vaio notebook (sr1k) with debian potatoand upgraded the
> kernel to version 2.4.3 with the effect that i cannot get apm to work.
> 
> in the past i have used 2.4.2 however (to my shame) i don't remember what
> my apm configuration looked like exactly. anyway, i was able to read
> battery status and the computer would shut down and reboot automatically,
> apart from that suspend worked fine.
> 
> with the 2.4.3 kernel however, i've already tried all kinds of
> configurations but the computer never shut down automatically and the
> /etc/init.d/apmd causes a crash.

Just in case it might help, I have APM working perfectly on my Dell
7500, with 2.4.3 & 2.4.4, with the following kernel configuration:

CONFIG_APM=y
# CONFIG_APM_IGNORE_USER_SUSPEND is not set
CONFIG_APM_DO_ENABLE=y
CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE=y
CONFIG_APM_DISPLAY_BLANK=y
CONFIG_APM_RTC_IS_GMT=y
# CONFIG_APM_ALLOW_INTS is not set
# CONFIG_APM_REAL_MODE_POWER_OFF is not set

and with apmd 3.0final-1.

best regards,
Calum.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: 2.2.19 won't run on toshiba sat 470CDT

2001-05-03 Thread Drew Parsons

On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 11:18:46AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> hi,
> 
> update: when cardmgr is started the kernel kills the interrupt
> handler ... but still no clue why :(.
> 

I got no idea why you're getting that problem, but if cardmgr is causing it,
you could switch cardmgr during boot and then try experimenting with it
manually after you've booted up.

Or even better, just to be sure, uninstall pcmcia-cs altogether and reboot.
Then reinstall after booting (make sure you have a copy of the deb file for
pcmcia-cs and pcmcia-modules!).

Drew

-- 
PGP public key available at http://dparsons.webjump.com/drewskey.txt
Fingerprint: A110 EAE1 D7D2 8076 5FE0  EC0A B6CE 7041 6412 4E4A


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Teles PCMCIA ISDN problem

2001-05-03 Thread Gabor Zoltan Csejtey

HI,

Anyone using Teles PCMCIA ISDN card???


I managed to install the hisax module using slightly different io address:
modprobe hisax type=8 io=0x301 irq=11 protocol=2

but the card doesn't work yet.

After starting the isdnutils and trying the to dial I get a local
hangup after 8 seconds. It doesn't matter if the cable is connected to
the ISDN adaptor or not.

I can ramove the crad without an effect to the hisax module using
cardctl eject. I suspect the teles_cs module from the pcmcia package
cause the problem.

Gabor


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: 2.2.19 won't run on toshiba sat 470CDT

2001-05-03 Thread Eric Richardson

Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> 
> hi,
> 
> update: when cardmgr is started the kernel kills the interrupt
> handler ... but still no clue why :(.
> 
> so long
> Othmar
> 
> On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:03:34AM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> > i just wanted to upgrade the kernel but all i get with the .19
> > kernel with noting special in it, not even apm stuff, i get a
> > "interrupt handler killed" msg during boot time. i can't exactly
> > determine when t his happens whether it's during mounting / or
> > during rcS.d is run ...
> > any hints/suggenstions?

I don't have a Toshiba but I'm curious how you got the pcmcia-modules
for 2.2.19? I upgraded to 2.2.19 kernel and no pcmcia modules came with
the kernel. I filed a bug report and a few days later after I saw the
2.2.19 modules I did an apt-get install pcmcia-modules-2.2.19 and got
version 3.1.22-0.2potatok4 and the apt system also replace my kernel
with a matching one. This one works.

Hope this helps,
Eric


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: 2.2.19 won't run on toshiba sat 470CDT

2001-05-03 Thread Othmar Pasteka

hi,

On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:39:50AM -0700, Eric Richardson wrote:
> I don't have a Toshiba but I'm curious how you got the pcmcia-modules
> for 2.2.19? I upgraded to 2.2.19 kernel and no pcmcia modules came with
> the kernel. I filed a bug report and a few days later after I saw the
> 2.2.19 modules I did an apt-get install pcmcia-modules-2.2.19 and got
> version 3.1.22-0.2potatok4 and the apt system also replace my kernel
> with a matching one. This one works.

apt-get source pcmcia-cs and follow the README in debian/, i.e.
do a debian/rules binary-modules ... it needs the linux source in
/usr/src/linux and it also has to be configured ...

so long
othmar


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Inspiron 3500 networking woes....

2001-05-03 Thread Alexander Clouter

On Wed, 2 May 2001, Diarmuid Drew wrote:
>
> [snipped]
>
> network. I have struggled over the past 2 years to get a stable network
> connection on my home network. Under 2.4.2 everything is rock solid but
> 2.4.3 and 2.4.4 are broken. The common error I get is "transmit timeout".
>
> any suggestions ?
>
ermif everything is rock solid under 2.4.2 then why don't you keep to
it?  Or have I missed something fundemental.  Currently you are saying
that the latest and greatest kernel release is not working for you,
however a slightly younger kernel version is fine.

another thing you need to mention is whether you are using the kernel
support for pcmcia or whether you are just using the pcmcia package?  I
would highly recommend the package version of pcmcia rather than the
kernel version, also use version 3.1.24 (3.1.25 has an interesting feature
which need you to mount /var *without* the 'nodev' option in your fstab
file).

Alex


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: apm with kernel 2.4.3

2001-05-03 Thread Sebastien Kalt

Hello,

Le Thu, May 03, 2001 at 11:29:20AM +0100, Calum Mackay a écrit:
> CONFIG_APM=y
> # CONFIG_APM_IGNORE_USER_SUSPEND is not set
> CONFIG_APM_DO_ENABLE=y
> CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE=y
I had to disable CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE last time I compiled a 2.4.0
kernel: it caused 'kapmd' to use 30% of CPU when idled ! Not really what
expected.
May be this was fixed in later 2.4 kernels, I didn't checked.

I'm using potato (apmd 3.0final-1) on an IBM Thinkpad 390 (233mmx).

Sebastien


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: 2.2.19 won't run on toshiba sat 470CDT

2001-05-03 Thread Eric Richardson

Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> 
> hi,
> 
> On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:39:50AM -0700, Eric Richardson wrote:
> > I don't have a Toshiba but I'm curious how you got the pcmcia-modules
> > for 2.2.19? I upgraded to 2.2.19 kernel and no pcmcia modules came with
> > the kernel. I filed a bug report and a few days later after I saw the
> > 2.2.19 modules I did an apt-get install pcmcia-modules-2.2.19 and got
> > version 3.1.22-0.2potatok4 and the apt system also replace my kernel
> > with a matching one. This one works.
> 
> apt-get source pcmcia-cs and follow the README in debian/, i.e.
> do a debian/rules binary-modules ... it needs the linux source in
> /usr/src/linux and it also has to be configured ...

I did compile the pcmcia-modules but I don't compile my own kernel yet
so I couldn't try it out. I don't think you mentioned that you were
compiling you own stuff. I thought you were using stock 2.2r3.
Eric


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Inspiron 3500 networking woes....

2001-05-03 Thread Alan Shutko

Alexander Clouter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> ermif everything is rock solid under 2.4.2 then why don't you keep to
> it?  

Iirc, there are some somewhat serious filesystem corruption bugs in
2.4.2.

-- 
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
The world is coming to an end!  Repent and return those library books!


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: apm with kernel 2.4.3

2001-05-03 Thread Alan Shutko

Sebastien Kalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I had to disable CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE last time I compiled a 2.4.0
> kernel: it caused 'kapmd' to use 30% of CPU when idled ! 

Yes, that's as designed.  Really, that's working, kapmd isn't making
your CPU run active, it _is_ terribly confusing and those in charge
don't care

-- 
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
Flattery will get you everywhere.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Inspiron 3500 networking woes....

2001-05-03 Thread Vivek Dasmohapatra

On Thu, 3 May 2001, Alan Shutko wrote:

> Iirc, there are some somewhat serious filesystem corruption bugs in
> 2.4.2.

Yeah - ext2 could pretty much be guaranteed to need a fsck after a reboot
on my SMP box under 2.4.2. 2.4.3-ac5 seems Ok though.

-- 
I am worthless. I struggle with the simple things. It seems so easy for 
everyone else. One armed blind people climb mountains and teenagers get
Ph.D's. I have trouble getting out of bed.
  -TMCM


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: apm with kernel 2.4.3

2001-05-03 Thread Calum Mackay

> I had to disable CONFIG_APM_CPU_IDLE last time I compiled a 2.4.0
> kernel: it caused 'kapmd' to use 30% of CPU when idled ! Not really what
> expected.
> May be this was fixed in later 2.4 kernels, I didn't checked.

Yep, as Alan noted, that's normal; it's just the kernel's idle loop. My
kapm-idled is running at 90% cpu on an otherwise idle system. I think
it was explicitly renamed to from kapmd to kapmd-idled to help avoid
this confusion :)

This is also covered in the linux-kernel mailing list FAQ at:

http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[question 14.1]

cheers,
C.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]