Re: Status of Plasma 6?
On Sun Nov 3, 2024 at 8:54 PM CET, Shmerl wrote: > Now that Qt 6.7.2 transition succeeded, kf6 frameworks libs are in > unstable/testing and most > apps are updated in experimental too, is there anything specifically > blocking uploading latest Plasma to unstable? There's an old adagio: "We release when ready" If you feel you really need to have them now, you already know where to get them. Otherwise just let the maintainers do their thing in the order and the speed they've choosen, without bugging them about it. If you want to help with the packaging stuff, there have been earlier messages indication how to do that. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Little regression in kmail 24.08?
Hi, it seems that kmail from experimental has a tiny regression: Both "sign all messages" and "encrypt all messages" preference has no effect here. A quick glance at bugs.kde.org shows nothing, therefore it might be something debian specific. Regards (& thanks for all that awesome work!) Dietz signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Status of Plasma 6?
Le 5 novembre 2024 15:30:58 GMT+01:00, Shmerl a écrit : >Obviously it's always "when it's ready", I was asking what in particular is >remaining, >if anyone knows. … which I personally perceive as a close proxy for "when it's done", and I (personally again) don't post timelines. >If you are willing to spend time to post a response, at least try to answer >the question, >instead of posting basically "stop bugging maintainers". > >And if you don't know the answer, why even respond? It makes it more >productive and saves >everyone's time. And if you find it annoying, why even… ### stack overflow, too many recursions ### We've passed the point of what's acceptable for an on-list discussion, let's go do something else. Happy hacking, -- Aurélien
