Re: plasma 5.5 in experimental

2016-02-17 Thread Sami Erjomaa
Hi,

I don't think it's completely because of builder issue. If it is an issue
in builders wouldn't all the packages in experimental be built with 5.6.0?
Some of the packages in experimental are built with 5.5.1 and some are
built with 5.6.0.

examples:
built with qt 5.5.1: bluez-qt, karchive
built with qt 5.6.0: kwidgetsaddons, kcodecs, kconfig

I can't see directly from the build dependencies what would make the
builders choose 5.6.0 for some and 5.5.1 for some.

karchive
Build-Depends: cmake (>= 2.8.12),
   debhelper (>= 9),
   extra-cmake-modules (>= 5.19.0~),
   libbz2-dev,
   liblzma-dev,
   pkg-kde-tools (>= 0.15.16~),
   qtbase5-dev (>= 5.4),
   zlib1g-dev


kconfig
Build-Depends: cmake (>= 2.8.12),
   debhelper (>= 9),
   extra-cmake-modules (>= 5.19.0~),
   pkg-kde-tools (>= 0.15.15ubuntu1~),
   qtbase5-dev (>= 5.4),
   qttools5-dev (>= 5.4),
   qttools5-dev-tools (>= 5.4)


Re: plasma 5.5 in experimental

2016-02-17 Thread Marc Haber
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 07:18:12PM +0200, Sami Erjomaa wrote:
> the Plasma 5.5 and KF 5.18/19 isn't complete or possible to install from
> experimental since some of the packages are built with qt 5.5.1 from
> unstable and some are built with qt 5.6.0 beta from experimental making it
> impossible for the build system to build all the packages or install when
> they depend on different qt versions.

Yes, that seems to be the issue when trying a full upgrade. With
today's unstable, I don't even get a panel any more. I think I'll wait
a while. Too bad, I have been holding my breath for plasma 5.5 for
quite some time now.

Greetings
Marc

-- 
-
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany|  lose things."Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Nordisch by Nature |  How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421



Splash Crash

2016-02-17 Thread Tim Rühsen
Hi,

since several weeks I have the KDE splash window with ~80% progress staying on 
the desktop. I can work as normal, the desktop behaves as it should do.

Though it seems just a cosmetic annoyance, I would like to find the reason and 
fix it (makes me a bit nervous).

I am on SID amd64 with Intel gfx.

Does anyone know which process is responsible for the splash screen ?
Or maybe anyone already solved a similar issue ?

Best Regards

Tim


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.