KMail with Akonadi and Nepomuk has lots of potential
Hello! A minute ago: I am editing a journal entry in Kontact while KMail meant it might have been a good idea to move 6200 mails of debian-user-german to an archival mbox - blocking my typing for about a minute completely. And right while I was typing the previous sentence it continued this game with 13100 mails from debian-devel-changes blocking my input for several minutes. This issue is there since introduction of this function. Its also there with slow mail filters, fortunately crm114 is really fast, and other operation which take a long time like for example searches. KMail is completely blocked or almost completely blocked during these. KMail with Akonadi and Nepomuk has the potential to handle such longer operation in background. There might have been other ways to achieve it, but this way, other applications may access mail data as well without blocking each other and there is a clean separation between mail storage and mail presentation / handling. It all depends on how bug free / stable / fast the implementation will be, but I really want to give it a chance. I am mail power user with *insane* amounts of mail and folders and I want an infrastructure which handles it. Zimbra which uses MySQL and a Lucene search index does so quite well for me work related mail, why shouldn't KMail 2 with Akonadi and Nepomuk be able to achieve that too? There might come the day where I will throw swear words at KMail 2, Akonadi and PIM as I did already with KAdressBook and Akonadi, but when in the end it I get that infrastructure I want then it might still just worth it. Hopefully there will be a comfortable enough way to test out KMail 2 once its ready for user testing. Ciao, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
KOffice 2.2.0 available for general consumption
KOffice 2.2.0 is available for amd64 & i386 from the semi-official repository at: http://qt-kde.debian.net/ These packages will arrive to the official archive soon, but since I need to get some time to update the copyright file and they include new debs (kformula shape and kexi), they need to go thru NEW queue and it might take a couple of weeks. It is still to be decided if KOffice 2.2.0 will make it into Squeeze, I am currently inclined to do so. However, it is not yet fully decided and I would love some well argumented feedback. Take into consideration some apps are more mature than others. Some notes and advise: - You have the instructions in how to use those repositories in the mentioned page, please follow them. - The packages are for KDE 4.4.3 - If you do not understand very well how to install packages from no official repositories and you do not want to break your system, do not use them. Reporting bugs -- These packages are not in the Debian archive so please *don't* report bugs against them in the Debian Bug Tracking System. If you see any packaging problem, please report it in this mailing list. If you find a bug, miss a feature or have a wishlist, please file a report in the KDE bugzilla: https://bugs.kde.org/ Include all the information you can about your system (Debian experimental, KOffice 2.2.0) and all the details you are able to give. If you just have a problem and you don't know exactly what it is, send an email to this list. In the case of crashes, install the package koffice-dbg to get a backtrace. Read more at: http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/Debugging/How_to_create_useful_crash_reportss Ana -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100526141400.ga4...@pryan.ekaia.org
Re: KOffice 2.2.0 available for general consumption
Am Mittwoch 26 Mai 2010 schrieb Ana Guerrero: > KOffice 2.2.0 is available for amd64 & i386 from the semi-official > repository at: http://qt-kde.debian.net/ Great stuff. Saw it already. And now I can have Krita back. I would love to see this going into Squeeze (not yet a well argumented case, but still an opinion). Thanks. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
do you now about a guide for nopemuk use??
helo i have 4.4.3 and i try use nopemuk in konqueror but is fail. I'm use development/tutorials/metadata/nepomuk/tipsandtrics. I' cant find a document for nepomuk newbies in the nopemuk web. Do you now where i cant find a manual for de use nepomuk? thanks BasaBuru -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201005262135.00199.basab...@basatu.org
